A Swedish court has ordered a homeless man, who wasn't identified by local media, to pay a $415 TV license fee. The man had originally filed for an exemption because his television broke. He later became homeless, but a court declared that despite having no TV and no home, the man must still pay the fee, which is used to fund public TV and radio broadcasts and is also charged to anyone who has a smart phone, computer or tablet.
After $67 billion and more than 20 years, the F-22 finally won a dogfight against an unarmed, nearly immobile opponent.
Now a judge has cleared him of wrongdoing and struck down the rule used to justify the arrest.
The last of the reelection campaign's defamation lawsuits against media outlets looks like it is headed for defeat, like all the others.
We may have finally discovered a limit to judicial immunity.
Why isn’t affirmative action in college admissions prohibited under the Civil Rights Act?