Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Uber Van Attacked By French Taxi Drivers

Matthew Feeney | 1.13.2014 4:47 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Reason

Today, an Uber van in France was attacked by taxi drivers, who feel that the independent car service is threatening their jobs.

Taxi unions in France have criticized Uber for "unfair competition."

Kat Borlongan, co-founder of consulting firm Five by Five, who was in the van, tweeted about the attack:

Credit: Twitter

 From Reuters:

For two Uber customers in Paris, their ride was not at all what they expected. 

Major taxi unions in the French capital staged protests Monday against startup Uber and other independent car services for "unfair competition." The local taxi drivers feel that their jobs are threatened by new services such as Uber, French newspaper Le Monde reports.

But the protests turned violent when taxi drivers apparently attacked the Uber van that was transporting Kat Borlongan, co-founder of consulting firm Five by Five, and Eventbrite CTO Renaud Visage.

Read more from Reason.com on Uber here. 

Follow these stories and more at Reason 24/7 and don't forget you can e-mail stories to us at 24_7@reason.com and tweet us at @reason247.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Member of Libyan Cabinet Shot and Killed

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

PolicyEconomicsWorldUberFrance
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (60)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    In case you forgot why everyone hates the French.

    1. widget   11 years ago

      There's a fairly good chance, if you open the lighting panel for your home you'll see a Square-D or Schneider (that's a French name, curiously) logo on some of the components. When you examine one more closely you'll often see "Made in France" in tiny print, embossed on the part, rather than the usual "Made in China".

      1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        NEVER!

      2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

        Schneider (that's a French name, curiously)

        Only curious if you are curious yellow. Who can forget French gal and butter enthusiast Maria Schneider?

      3. seguin   11 years ago

        I give you the Schneider CA1

    2. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

      Seems more like a union thing this go-around. They are branching out from the racism of old where Samuel Gompers declared Chinese men as the root of white unemployment, or the later bigots who blamed newly freed blacks.

      No, these guys are equal opportunity idiots who cannot figure out that all you have to do to be successful at cab driving is not suck as bad as the union guys.

    3. Brandybuck   11 years ago

      Keeping it classy, Frenchie, keeping it classy!

      1. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

        Perhaps they were just confused French Underground cabbies, thinking they were targetting Taxi Uber Alles?

  2. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

    A nation of thundercunts.

    Be thankful for America.

  3. Greg83   11 years ago

    Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system!

  4. Episiarch   11 years ago

    unfair competition

    Translation: existing. I bet the rest of you don't even speak French.

    1. Pelosi's Rabbit   11 years ago

      Ah, thank you. I was wondering what the distinction was between "competition" and "unfair competition."

    2. Sigivald   11 years ago

      Better translation: not paying Union dues.

  5. EdWuncler   11 years ago

    And this is why the French will never ever be a beacon for economic liberty. I understand being worried about having to face competitors and possibly even losing your job. At the same time though, these guys (taxi cartels) created a system where there's no competition and promoted price fixing by regulating those who didn't receive special privileges from the government, completely out of business. Now that your government has somewhat allowed competition and relaxed the regulations, your asses are getting kicked and thus resorting to violence to keep your privileges and shield yourself from competition.

    America may have it's issues, but I would rather live here then in France.

    1. Greg83   11 years ago

      They would do it in America if they thought they could get away with it.

      Let's not forget the unions, especially the "teacher's" union, trying to use strong-arm tactics to bully the Wisconsin legislator when things didn't go their way.

      1. EdWuncler   11 years ago

        But the thing is though while the unions here in America would love to try this sort of shit, the difference is that Americans don't have much tolerance for violence. If the public sector unions in Wisconsin would have resorted to violence, the American public would quickly turn on them in a second.

        1. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

          The unions do resort to violence, periodically.

          The American public is loathe to support any strikes that inconvenience them directly.

          I think the California grocery strike of ten years ago failed like that. You want to strike against GM or some company I only deal with through a distributor, that's one thing. Make it hard for me to buy groceries or get around town, and you can all go to hell.

          1. EdWuncler   11 years ago

            Americans are pretty passive but when you fuck with their convenience, you have fucked up.

          2. playa manhattan   11 years ago

            Ken, which grocery store do you go to around here?

        2. R C Dean   11 years ago

          the difference is that Americans don't have much tolerance for violence.

          I seem to recall lots of violence, by union members even, directed at Tea Party rallies and even around the WI union kerfuffle.

          And that's not even counting the violence and intimidation that unions routinely engage in. Any major strike will encompass lots of violence, threats of violence, and destruction of property.

          And practically nobody is ever charged. I would say that's pretty fucking tolerant of violence, myself.

          1. EdWuncler   11 years ago

            True. When you have an entity that is willing to use the American public as collateral for their quest for power and monopoly, they would have no problem resorting to violence means.

          2. playa manhattan   11 years ago

            Under California law, unions are specifically allowed to engaged in violence. I think there was an HandR post about it a few years ago.

        3. Pelosi's Rabbit   11 years ago

          I prefer to slowly turn on them in a second.

    2. Paul.   11 years ago

      France would rather you live here than France.

  6. EdWuncler   11 years ago

    And also, I love how the Progressive's bitch and moan about the French being much more civilized then us and how we should be more like them. These are the same people though who throws a bitchfit when their 3G or 4G phones aren't working and internet connection is slow. If you you lose your shit over that, you will probably go to the insane asylum when (insert trade labor union) goes on strike and Paris comes to a standstill.

    1. widget   11 years ago

      And also, I love how the [US?] Progressive's bitch and moan about the French being much more civilized then us and how we should be more like them.

      Without the antisemitism.

      1. R C Dean   11 years ago

        Since when do Progs object to anti-semitism?

    2. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

      "And also, I love how the Progressive's bitch and moan about the French being much more civilized then us and how we should be more like them."

      On this very subject, the president of France, Francois Hollande, just within the last day? A tabloid published that he was having an affair--and his First Lady only found out about it through the tabloids.

      She shit a tricolor Big Mac!

      Apparently, she had a nervous breakdown on the spot--to find out that her husband was cheating on her--and she had to be hospitalized.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01......html?_r=0

      The suggestion that French women don't care if you cheat on them is probably racist, OR if that sort of attitude predominates in France, then French society is misogynistic. ...yeah, we here in America are so "backwards", we sit up and take notice when somebody treats his significant other like shit.

      1. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

        Maybe she should have an affair with Obama - they could bond over how they only hear about things through the news.

        1. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

          +1

      2. Brett L   11 years ago

        She appears to be old enough to understand that if a man cheats on his steady with you, he'll cheat on you when you become his steady.

        1. neoteny   11 years ago

          This.

          He did not even marry her (or the previous one to her); I can't see how could she have any reasonable expectation of faithfulness.

          1. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

            He did not even marry her (or the previous one to her); I can't see how could she have any reasonable expectation of faithfulness.

            Because she has the delusion that she is somehow different than the others. It isn't that Hollande is bad, it's that he never had the right woman to tame him. She sees this as her failure, not his, and that's why she is so distraught.

          2. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

            "He did not even marry her (or the previous one to her); I can't see how could she have any reasonable expectation of faithfulness."

            What women are you dating, that they don't care about whether you cheat on 'em since you're not married?

            And after they've been in the public eye and humiliated like that?

            If you don't think it bugs women that you cheated on them--just because you're not married? Then you must be dating women from another planet.

            1. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

              Does it work this way with men, by the way?

              Are guys supposed to have no faith in any woman until she marries him--until then, she gets a free pass, but after she marries him, then she's supposed to start keeping her promises?

              You SERIOUSLY think women have no standing to be angry that you misled them and lied to them--so long as you don't marry them?!

              LOL

              1. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

                "He did not even marry her (or the previous one to her); I can't see how could she have any reasonable expectation of faithfulness."

                Do you ever make business agreements with people you're not married to?

                Do you expect them to honor their part of the bargain--if you're not married to them?

      3. Sevo   11 years ago

        Ken,
        That had nothing to do with his mistress. The whole thing is a result of Mickey Ds opening another franchise in Paris!

        1. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

          +1

  7. MJGreen   11 years ago

    I don't know if there is worse scum in the western world than French union members.

    OK, maybe rapists and serial killers. But it's close.

  8. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

    "Taxi unions in France have criticized Uber for "unfair competition."

    Something tells me that there isn't any form of competition that they would consider fair.

  9. Almanian!   11 years ago

    In the end, the unions always resort to violence. ALWAYS. Management doesn't much do it any more - shamed out of it after Ford's Battle of the Overpass in which Walter Ruether and company were beaten bloody.

    Detroit newspaper strike a couple years ago? Nail stars in the driveway to puncture company truck tires (as well as those of innocent bystanders). Remember the truckers in the 70's SHOOTING AT "scabs"?

    In the end, the unions ALWAYS resort to violence. But they're the cool ones....fuck 'em.

    1. Almanian!   11 years ago

      Oh, PS, and Europe's unions are MUCH worse than those in the US for this. Fuck all of 'em.

      1. EdWuncler   11 years ago

        But yet the UAW cries whenever another plant moves to the South or Mexico. They actually expect management to put up with their shit and have a smile on their faces. This may be vindictive, but I somewhat get a smile on my face when I hear some company blowhard crying about outsourcing. If you and your union weren't dicks, they might want to stay.

    2. HazelMeade   11 years ago

      In the end, the unions ALWAYS resort to violence.

      Because they can't get what they want through voluntary cooperation.
      By definition.

      Whether it's through the long arm of the law, or through hurling bricks, any system that isn't based on voluntary cooperation is based on violence. Unions always resort to violence because there is no other way for them to get people to do what they want.

  10. Suthenboy   11 years ago

    The froggie unions are incredibly petulant and completely out of touch with reality.

    Didn't I see the other day where some union members were holding Goodyear execs hostage? Held hostage in the plant that Goodyear wanted to close because the workers would not work and repeatedly went on strike causing Goodyear to lose massive amounts of money yet the govt forced them to keep open.

    1. Paul.   11 years ago

      The froggie unions are incredibly petulant and completely out of touch with reality.

      Yes but do they get their way?

    2. EdWuncler   11 years ago

      They live in a delusional world.

      1. HazelMeade   11 years ago

        That's what happens when your worldview is never seriously criticized by anyone in the media establishment.

  11. Entropy Void   11 years ago

    Fuck those socialist, stinky, cheese-swilling surrender monkeys.

    That is all.

    1. JW   11 years ago

      France sounds like an excruciatingly stupid place to live, one that would have me in a bell tower after a few weeks.

      I get that its culture is something unique and should be experienced, but it seems to be populated exclusively by Veruca Salt's offspring.

  12. RishJoMo   11 years ago

    Dude makes a lot of sense man.

    http://www.Planet-Anon.tk

  13. neoteny   11 years ago

    OT: Texting Triggers Movie Theater Shooting by Retired Police Captain

    [...]

    Police said that Reeves asked Chad and Nichole Oulson several times to stop, and then Reeves left the theater. When Reeves returned, Chad Oulson asked Reeves if he reported his phone use to the theater managers, police said. That prompted an argument which ended when Reeves pulled out a gun and shot Oulson in the chest, police said.

    [...]

    Reeves was charged with second degree homicide.

    If he left to fetch his gun (admittedly a big if), then isn't that a sign of planning?

    1. dinkster   11 years ago

      I already read an article decrying gun ownership over this. No real attention being paid over the fact that he was a retired cop and can legally own fully automatic weapons.

  14. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

    In a country with CCW, this shit couldn't happen.

  15. pan fried wylie   11 years ago

    "...but the driver maneuvered us to safety, changed the tire on the freeway, and got us home safely."

    I'd like to see any of the union shits manage that.

  16. Jerryskids   11 years ago

    Today, an Uber van in France was attacked by taxi drivers, who feel that the independent car service is threatening their jobs.

    Please tell me that they attacked the van with wooden shoes.

  17. HazelMeade   11 years ago

    This really puts on full display what socialism is all about: using violence to force people to give you money.

    1. HazelMeade   11 years ago

      They should have just robbed the passengers. It would have been more honest.

  18. bostonaod   11 years ago

    I love that second tweet.

    A lot of the Uber drivers around here are former taxi drivers, they know that the closed market is bullshit.

  19. MoreFreedom   11 years ago

    Why didn't Kat or Renaud use their smart phones to videotape the perpetrators? That way, they'd be arrested, or will the French government show themselves to be bullied by the taxi drivers as well? It might have even stopped the attack. It's a good thing they did stop before someone was hurt, even though the owner of the vehicle was harmed by the damage done to the vehicle.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!