Court Blocks Atlanta Mayor's Attempt To Replace Street Vendors With Corporate Monopoly

Atlanta's city council, like many others across the country, has responded to the city's abundance of popular and successful small businesses by intervening and making work more difficult for the owners. In this case, the businesses were street vendors and the city revoked their permits in an effort to instate a corporate monopoly. However, this week the Fulton County Superior Court definitively struck down the council's decision.
The saga started in 2009, when then-Mayor Shirley Franklin signed an exclusive 20-year contract handing all public street-vending rights over to General Growth Properties, a multi-billion-dollar company based in Chicago. The contract required all existing and new street vendors to rent out one of the company's uniform green kiosks if they wanted to continue selling their wares.
Aside from the inflexibility of location, the kiosks are far more expensive than what most vendors pay for their tables or tents, costing up to $20,000 per year. Larry Miller, president of the Atlanta Vendors Association, who has been selling Braves gear for 25 years said, "For me to have a kiosk instead of my regular setup would destroy my business." The benefits of the arrangement? According to Mayor Reed, the kiosks are there to prevent Atlanta from "being turned into a swap meet." Basically, they're easier for local government to control and some people think they look nicer.
Several vendors sued the city for granting a monopoly on public land to a private firm and infringing on their ability to make a living. In December 2012, Judge LaGrua of the Fulton County Superior Court ruled in their favor, striking down the mayor's contract with GGP – and the law behind it – as invalid.
However, according to the Institute for Justice, the public interest law firm representing the vendors:
Rather than accept the court's ruling, Mayor Reed illegally shut down all street vending citywide, throwing dozens of vendors out of work right before the Braves' opening day and the NCAA Final Four.
…
On July 2, 2013, the Fulton County Superior Court [made] clear that its December 2012 order had reinstated the pre-existing vending law that vendors had worked under for years. The ruling came just one day after vendors and civil-rights activists engaged in a widely publicized protest on the steps of city hall. But Mayor Reed disregarded that decision as well.
Apparently frustrated with Mayor Reed's repeated defiance, Judge LaGrua ruled again this week that Atlanta must return the permits to vendors. The city has announced plans to appeal this decision.
Watch the Institute for Justice's video about the case below:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We should have a national holiday called, "Free Market Day." On that day, all government regulations like this are suspended.
Go peddle your ideas over in the designated free speech zone, sir.
That, too. Maybe just "Freedom Day," where we all dress funny and celebrate freedoms we used to have.
"My fellow Earthicans, we enjoy so much freedom, it's almost sickening. We're free to chose which hand our sex-monitoring chip is implanted in. And if we don't want to pay our taxes, why, we're free to spend a week with the Pain Monster."
Fucked you are, yes, hmmmmm.
Do What You Feel Day.
Like the freedom to own slaves?
/leftist
I don't remember where I first saw this, by Howard Nemerov.
Because I am drunk, this Independence Night,
I watch the fireworks from far away,
from a high hill, across the moony green
Of lakes and other hills to the town harbor,
Where stately illuminations are flung aloft,
One light shattering in a hundred lights
Minute by minute. The reason I am crying,
Aside from only being country drunk,
That is, may be that I have just remembered
The sparklers, rockets, roman candles and
so on, we used to be allowed to buy
When I was a boy, and set off by ourselves
At some peril to life and property.
Our freedom to abuse our freedom thus
Has since, I understand, been remedied
By legislation. Now the authorities
Arrange a perfectly safe public display
To be watched at a distance; and now also
The contribution of all the taxpayers
Together makes a more spectacular
Result than any could achieve alone
(A few pale pinwheels, or a firecracker
Fused at the dog's tail). It is, indeed, splendid:
Showers of roses in the sky, fountains
Of emeralds, and those profusely scattered zircons
Falling and falling, flowering as they fall
And followed distantly by a noise of thunder.
My eyes are half-afloat in happy tears.
God bless our Nation on a night like this,
And bless the careful and secure officials
Who celebrate our independence now.
Geez man! While we're at it, why don't we have a 'get-away-with-murder-day' as well?
Wow, good Poe's law entry.
You mean "everyone's a cop" day?
Fido says: BARK! BARK! BARK! BARK!
*hides under couch, whimpering*
According to Mayor Reed, the kiosks are there to prevent Atlanta from "being turned into a swap meet."
Atlanta would be so nice if not for all the people.
Actually, the people aren't so bad, but maybe a day without the cars? Driving through that city is like a religious experience, in that I feel closer to God and death.
You do feel like you're in a race.
Yes. Trips through Atlanta are like living the NASCAR dream. Except that I don't like NASCAR.
NASCAR drivers have complained about driving in Atlanta.
On the track the other drivers are relatively competent.
Wait, surely you've driven in Miami?
I don't have to drive through or around Miami to get to other places.
It has surprising similarities to hell.
Wait, who doesn't like a swap meet? Why would turning the streets of a city into one be a bad thing?
So, street cleaners came through the neighborhood today. Managed to turn the streets from being relatively clean (some sand along the curb) into having a six-foot wide mud-streak running down each side.
Just another example of how government action makes things better.
All this reminds me of why my largest donations go to the IJ.
My company added them as an acceptable matching donation target when we went to this larger system that allows us to pick from most charities.
Tony is fine with this shit. Because democracy.
Tulpa is on record as fine with this shit because the streets are the city's private property.
But Mayor Reed disregarded that decision as well.
Please tell me how we live under rule of law and not rule of man (or woman in this case). Please, I need a good laugh.
We live under the rule of law. His law.
Because "The Will of the People" isn't in principle the same thing as "The Divine Right of Kings," and fuck you that's why.
Hizzoner the Mayor Kasim Reed is a man, and allegations of cronyism around contracts awarded to friends of his at Hartsfield-Jackson Intl Airport have never been proven. The new stadium for the Falcons which is being built largely so there will be more skyboxes for the well-heeled and their politician guests isn't a sign of corruption, either.
Shirley Franklin the former mayor is a woman. She always wore a big flower on her lapel. The mayor before her, Bill Campbell, shockingly was actually convicted of tax evasion.
Sounds like democracy: One man, one vote.
He's the man, and he's got the vote.
But Mayor Reed disregarded that decision as well.
Shouldn't there be a death penalty for this kind of shit?
Good news: weed is legal!
Bad news: you can only sell it from a shack you rent from the Mayor's brother in law.
I still think property owners should have overriding powers over any non-travel use of adjacent right of ways, or else use of public right-of ways should be restricted only to travel and access to property.
Several vendors sued the city for granting a monopoly on public land to a private firm and infringing on their ability to make a living.
But there is no enumerated right to earn a living, so such a right does not exist.
I remember hearing that that Ginsburg Nazgul, when some attorney mentioned "unenumerated rights," asked the guy to list them off for her. Apparently she doesn't know what enumerate or unenumerated means.
Jesus, are we fucked.
in C++ it is the unenum data type.
Freedom means asking permission and obeying orders.
Yes, sir! Thank you, sir! Right away, sir!
"Now that you have applied for and been given permission to have a business, here's how you're going to run it."
There is only one way for the judiciary to get their rightful place in the "checks and balances" equation back. They need to take petty tyrants like the mayor and city council members in Atlanta and have them locked up for contempt of court. Let them stew in a city jail for about 30 days and see if they don't come around and start respecting judgments.
Dueling "RESPECT MAH AUTHORITAHS!"
I like it.
Judges get special treatment from the police. If the get stopped while driving drunk they get a ride home. If they call 911 the cops come right away. The mayor and city counsel commands the police force, and judges know this. If they piss off the mayor too badly by, say, putting them in jail, then they lose their special treatment. That's why what you suggest will never happen.
I disagree. I think judges get special treatment from cops because judges give special treatment to cops, not because judges give special treatment to politicians.
So at what point does the court issue a contempt citation against the mayor?
When the judge decides it's worth being constantly harassed by police who will take their sweet time responding to an emergency.
In this case, since it's a county court, the arresting agency would be the Sheriff's office, not the city police. The mayor does not control the purse strings of the sheriff's dept.
Would the city cops try to block the sheriff?
We can hope. For the lulz.
Goddamn libertarians. All they care about is rich people and giant corporations.
I know it. Wanting to impose liberty onto people. Allowing people to act without asking permission. Not barking orders at people who know what they're doing. Allowing businesses with political connections to fail while allowing businesses without political connections to thrive. Allowing the rich to keep their ill-gotten gains. Not using coercion to feed starving children. Respecting the right to act collectively without being force. I mean, libertarians are fucking evil. That's all there is to it.
I noted in the interview that one man stated that they told him if he wanted to work, he would have to pay "them."
You know who else used to practice extortion like this?
Every government since income tax was invented?
Every government since income tax the protection racket was invented?
ftfy
Every government since income tax the protection racket government was invented.
Strip club owners?
Unions?
1. Businesses taken over in 2009.
2. Court makes decision in 2012.
3. Mayor continues to defy court in 2013.
I wonder how many of the businesses are left?
What a funny blog! I in fact enjoyed watching this funny video with my family unit as well as with my friends.
http://farrdesign.com/jerseys/?id=1552