Senate Intelligence Committee Looking to Reform NSA Surveillance Practices
Even supporters, apparently
Federal lawmakers began debating Thursday not whether -- but how -- the government's disputed surveillance authority should be changed after a series of unauthorized disclosures by a former National Security Agency contractor raised serious questions about intelligence programs, including the collection of millions of Americans' phone records.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., opening a new round of public hearings on the matter, said that while she believed the programs are "lawful and effective'' she was nevertheless preparing a legislative proposal that would limit access to the NSA's massive phone record database and likely cut the time that the records could be stored, which now stands at five years.
"It is up to you to lay out the case and set the record straight,'' Feinstein said, referring to top intelligence officials who testified Thursday in defense of the government's operations.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The balls of Senator Feinstein to spend so much time defending and extolling the virtues of the NSA, et al, and then to tell them they have to, "lay out the case, and set the record straight."
How about limiting secret and surveillance activities to only what's allowed by the constitution?
Or would that be too be a hit to the unemployment stats?