Eric Holder to Announce Phasing Out of Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Non-Violent Drug Offenders
Because prison overcrowding
Federal prosecutors will no longer seek long, "mandatory minimum" sentences for many low-level, nonviolent drug offenders, under a major shift in policy aimed at turning around decades of explosive growth in the federal prison population, Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. planned to announce Monday.
"Too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long, and for no good law enforcement reason," Holder planned to tell the American Bar Assn. meeting here, according to an advance text of his remarks. "While the aggressive enforcement of federal criminal statutes remains necessary, we cannot simply prosecute or incarcerate our way to becoming a safer nation."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is this something the attorney general has the authority to do though? While I agree with the action, it seems that these mandatory sentences were enacted by Congress and have been given validity by the Supreme Court. Wouldn't this be another example of the Holder DOJ circumventing the intent of Congress and the law?
I hate to bring this up, because I believe mandatory sentencing laws to be draconian and a violation of the spirit of equitable justice. But we are supposed to be a nation with rule of law, not rule by whim. Repeal of these awful laws really need to be done properly, in Congress. If we accept this deliberate discarding of the laws by the executive branch because we agree with it, it gives us little room to object later when it involves something we do not approve of.