Apple

US Trade Representative Vetoes Ban on Apple iPhone, iPad Patent

Overruled judge's ruling that Apple violated Samsung's patents

|

A ban on sales of older models of Apple's iPad and iPhone in the US has been overturned by the Obama administration.

In June, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled that Apple infringed a patent of rival Samsung.

President Barack Obama's trade representative has now vetoed that decision because of its "effect on competitive conditions in the US economy".

Advertisement

NEXT: Peter Capaldi Cast as 12th Doctor in "Doctor Who" Franchise

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Anyone who knows a bit about this able to say if/how shady this move was by Obama?

    1. It’s complicated.

      There’s a lot of debate over whether owners of so-called standard essential patents (SEPs) should be able to get an import ban or injunction against infringers.

      The Obama admin seems to be on the side against being able to seek injunctions (a proposed [accepted? — can’t remember] FTC settlement with Google stipulated that they not do so with Motorola’s patents]). This could just be a manifestation of that policy.

      It could also be protectionism using that as an excuse. It’s hard to say.

      Whether or not it’s shady is complicated by the fact that the ITC is court-like but not part of the judiciary. So it’s not like the Obama admin is trying to overrule a court decision.

      Also, IIRC the last time an admin has stepped in to overrule the ITC on an import ban was in the late ’80s. So the fact that this is rare makes it seem a bit shady.

      1. ToW,
        Under the rule of following the money (power for politicos), who is benefiting?

        1. Apple and Microsoft

          1. So it might be lobbying pressure, but any benefit to Obama is indirect?
            I guess it’s possible that some decision by Obama might not be totally corrupt.

            1. TBH I doubt Obama was involved in the decision if he was even notified of it at all.

    2. my friend’s mother-in-law makes $82 hourly on the laptop. She has been out of a job for five months but last month her payment was $20185 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Here’s the site to read more WEP6.COM

  2. before I looked at the receipt 4 $4372, I have faith …that…my brother woz trully erning money parttime from there pretty old laptop.. there aunt has done this for only about 14 months and at present paid the morgage on there apartment and bought themselves a Mercedes. we looked here… http://www.cnn13.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.