Stop and Frisk

Study Suggests 'Stop-and-Frisk' May Encourage Youth Crime

If you're going to be treated like a criminal anyway


Law enforcement reminders of the consequences of criminal behavior are supposed to curb illegal activity, but some of these intimidation strategies may be backfiring, especially among youth.

In the latest study of stop and frisk policies, in which law enforcement randomly stop individuals for questioning even if they aren't engaged in criminal activity, researchers found that those who were stopped were more likely than those who were not to engage in delinquent behavior later on.

The results, published in the journal Crime and Delinquency, are only the latest among a growing body of data suggesting that some juvenile justice tactics, including programs that rely on the "Scared Straight" harangues by prison inmates, boot camps and juvenile lockups could ultimately do more harm than good.

NEXT: UK Porn Filter May Censor More than Stated

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. So much unsaid. Proponents of stop and frisk will say this shows the popo are stopping the right people. The report claims they corrected for juveniles who had a prior delinquent record which is supposed to even it out, but how well did they do that? What they really need is a completely double blind test; pick several thousand teenagers, give them a tracking device, and have it trigger half the time when popo are near. Or something. Then 5 years later, correlate juvy record with number of stops.

    I wonder if you could even come up with a decent protocol, and that’s not to mention the police state mentality that condones stop and frisk in the first place.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.