Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Brickbat: Man's Best Friend

Charles Oliver | 7.26.2013 7:20 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
L'Hotel fer Dogs

The Statham, Georgia, city council has barred residents from owning more than three dogs. Anyone who wishes to own more will be treated as a kennel and subject to all the regulations and inspections that kennels must comply with.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: GOP Legislators Split on Obamacare Tactics

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

PolicyCultureNanny StateRegulationOccupational Licensing
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (21)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    He's been criticised for backdating his posts. He's been criticised for SF'ing his links. He's been criticised for not having a surname. But by God, Charles Oliver makes an effort with his alt-text.

    1. mnarayan   12 years ago

      He's also been criticized for not having alt-text many a time.

    2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Charles Oliver makes an effort with his alt-text.

      Everything else is optional.

      Though I hope he isn't suggesting that the officer was subject to the high capacity magazine ban, because let's be honest, he had an exemption for that.

      1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

        No, some of the dogs would get to cover before he could reload enough times for the average cop accuracy to have hit them.

        1. Scarecrow Repair   12 years ago

          Don't they have full auto M4s in their squad cars?

          1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

            He's a motorcycle cop. No squad car.

            1. Bryan C   12 years ago

              The obvious answer is to equip cycle cops with fragmentation grenades for urban animal control.

  2. Live Free or Diet   12 years ago

    What, no comments about "going to the dogs?"

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    If you have more than three pet dogs and can't afford the onerous fees of running a kennel, Stratham Police does off a wrong door, no-knock raid for free.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      If you have more than three pet dogs and can't afford the onerous fees of running a kennel, Stratham Police does offer a wrong door, no-knock raid for free.

      (There really was no need for the Freudian slip, was there?)

  4. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

    "We had one person who ran a hobby kennel, and he was raising the dogs to fight," [the mayor] said.

    Right, because that one person is everybody. Collective guilt FTL.

    Aside: I used to live in a city that had what was nicknamed the "crazy-cat-lady ordinance," which forbade anyone to have more than four cats.

    1. Jon Lester   12 years ago

      Having more than four pretty much defines "crazy cat lady." I wouldn't want one for a neighbor, but I don't think I could support such an ordinance, either.

      Someone in my dating history recently doubled her dog count from three to six. For all her other faults, she does take reasonably good care of them.

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        I used to have a neighbor that not only had multiple cats but also left food outside for all the neighborhood strays. My dog used to hate those things.

  5. Jon Lester   12 years ago

    Statham is in my general area. I really wouldn't put it past their police to simply shoot excess dogs, now that they have a pretext.

  6. Floridian   12 years ago

    In Georgia? Really? What about all the hunters who use dogs. How did this ever pass?

  7. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

    Wait...

    Dogs have litters. If your unspayed bitch gives birth, you're running a kennel?

    1. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

      Depending on the state and the circumstances, you may have to pay a higher licensing fee for an un-neutered animal or even obtain a breeder's permit.

      1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

        License? for a mutt?

        That's inane.

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      War on bitches.

      1. Robert   12 years ago

        You forgot the comma.

  8. Rich   12 years ago

    He said the ordinance bans those hobby kennels and has "bite" to be able to punish violators.

    What a "wag"!

  9. Tonio   12 years ago

    This sort of limit is fairly common in cities and towns. Not defending it, but not high on my list of priorities for things to get outraged about.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Texans Gain the Right To Try Individualized Medical Treatments

J.D. Tuccille | 6.6.2025 7:00 AM

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!