Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Matt Welch Advocates Postal Privatization on The Kudlow Report

Matt Welch | 7.16.2013 4:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Last night I appeared on CNBC's The Kudlow Report to talk about why I think government should not be in the business of monopolizing (or guaranteeing the monopoly of) mail service:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Petraeus Cuts College Teaching Salary to $1

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyEconomicsWorldPrivatizationPost Office
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (6)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Paul.   12 years ago

    I thought Lisa Kudlow was really good in Happy Endings.

  2. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

    Last night I appeared on CNBC's The Kudlow Report to talk about why I think government should not be in the business of monopolizing (or guaranteeing the monopoly of) mail service

    Anarchy!!!
    ROADZ!!!!!
    SOMALIA!!!!11eleven!!!

  3. Paul.   12 years ago

    Serial question (I'm just starting the video now-- only because I'm a closeted Welch Fan), but does FedEX, UPS etc. deliver to rural places like Rural Montana or the backwoods of Alaska?

    1. NewWorldDan   12 years ago

      There seems to be very few places that FedEX and UPS won't deliver to. I don't mean that they have door to door service, but neither does the post office. Nearly anywhere you go, you can find a store that will hold deliveries for you within 10-15 miles.

      I don't see a lot of benefit in privitizing the post office. They'll be subsidised and regulated to the point that there is no appreciable difference.

      1. The Great & Marvelous meh   12 years ago

        I wouldn't be surprised if the argument for government needing a monopoly on mail delivery shifts to being a "national security" issue.

        Just think of all the drugs, weapons exotic animals, and black market organs that would flow undetected without government officials being the ones to screen the mail.

  4. The Great & Marvelous meh   12 years ago

    What about rural Montana?

    If I was a big mail courier company where having an office stationed there would be "unprofitable;" I would set up an affiliate contract with a local independent courier of that area to be a runner from the general courier storage hubs that would most likely spring up.

    Got to love it when people are stuck in thinking only big business can replace the service provided by big government. Decentralized markets is the solution to that question above, but of course the central planners see it as too messy of a vision.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

An Indiana Mom Left Her Kids Home for an Hour. Her Husband's Ex-Wife Called Child Services.

Lenore Skenazy | 11.13.2025 5:10 PM

Los Angeles City Council Votes To Lower Rent Caps on 650,000 Rent-Stabilized Apartments

Christian Britschgi | 11.13.2025 4:55 PM

A New Lawsuit Says New York's Rent Law Is Forcing Landlords To Keep Apartments Empty

Christian Britschgi | 11.13.2025 4:05 PM

Trump Is Right: That BBC Documentary Misquoted Him

Robby Soave | 11.13.2025 3:15 PM

Democrats Are Beating Trump on Affordability. Will He Keep Pretending Otherwise?

Veronique de Rugy | 11.13.2025 2:20 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300