Matt Welch Advocates Postal Privatization on The Kudlow Report
Last night I appeared on CNBC's The Kudlow Report to talk about why I think government should not be in the business of monopolizing (or guaranteeing the monopoly of) mail service:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I thought Lisa Kudlow was really good in Happy Endings.
Last night I appeared on CNBC's The Kudlow Report to talk about why I think government should not be in the business of monopolizing (or guaranteeing the monopoly of) mail service
Anarchy!!!
ROADZ!!!!!
SOMALIA!!!!11eleven!!!
Serial question (I'm just starting the video now-- only because I'm a closeted Welch Fan), but does FedEX, UPS etc. deliver to rural places like Rural Montana or the backwoods of Alaska?
There seems to be very few places that FedEX and UPS won't deliver to. I don't mean that they have door to door service, but neither does the post office. Nearly anywhere you go, you can find a store that will hold deliveries for you within 10-15 miles.
I don't see a lot of benefit in privitizing the post office. They'll be subsidised and regulated to the point that there is no appreciable difference.
I wouldn't be surprised if the argument for government needing a monopoly on mail delivery shifts to being a "national security" issue.
Just think of all the drugs, weapons exotic animals, and black market organs that would flow undetected without government officials being the ones to screen the mail.
What about rural Montana?
If I was a big mail courier company where having an office stationed there would be "unprofitable;" I would set up an affiliate contract with a local independent courier of that area to be a runner from the general courier storage hubs that would most likely spring up.
Got to love it when people are stuck in thinking only big business can replace the service provided by big government. Decentralized markets is the solution to that question above, but of course the central planners see it as too messy of a vision.