DOT Bounces California-Las Vegas High-Speed Rail Plan Out of Casino Bank
Federal loan for high-stakes gamble on train tourism will not be considered

I have some good news for those attending Freedom Fest in Las Vegas this weekend to celebrate. It appears the absurd plan to build a high-speed train from the middle of the California desert to Las Vegas will not be getting a federal loan. Which may mean the whole plan is dead.
XpressWest (once known as DesertXpress) proposed building a high-speed train from Los Angeles to Las Vegas to bring in the tourists. Except it didn't start in Los Angeles. It started near Victorville, requiring train users to travel a third of the way to their destination through other means, and it was the part with the worst traffic, no less. For this they wanted a $5.5 billion loan from the Federal Railroad Administration to pay for much of this proposed $7 billion project.
The plan made some truly absurd claims, not unusual for these high-speed rail projects. They argued the ridership would be enough to divert 25 percent of the traffic off of the highway leading between the California desert and Los Angeles Las Vegas.
The Reason Foundation (the nonprofit that publishes this site and Reason magazine) produced a study eviscerating any claims that this project could ever possibly work. Subsequently Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) sent a letter to the Department of Transportation, partly drawing from the Foundation's report, to ask them not to approve the loan.
Yesterday, Ryan and Sessions released a letter to the comptroller general of the Government Accountability Office stating the DOT's review of XpressWest's loan application has been indefinitely suspended. They didn't get a copy of the DOT's actual letter essentially killing the loan, but they were told that "significant uncertainties surround the project." (Read the Ryan/Sessions letter here (pdf))
A call to the firm handling media for XpressWest has not yet been returned.
Technically, this doesn't mean the project is fully dead. They could make changes to it and try again. They could get private investment for … well, no, that probably won't happen.
Anyway, that's a $5.5 billion boondoggle that won't be happening for the time being. Enjoy the news and enjoy Reason Day at Freedom Fest tomorrow, if you're out there.
(UPDATE) Here's a statement from the train company provided to KSNV in Las Vegas:
Catherine Levy, the director of public affairs for XpressWest, provided this statement: "While the loan process for XpressWest has been suspended, it is our understanding the project is still being reviewed. We believe high-speed rail in the western United States is both feasible and desired. We await further information and direction from the Administration.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, I'm with the Libertarians on this. It is a good thing.
But as a man who has driven Ford Passenger Van Type R (Type Rs are the fastest in the world) on about a dozen LA -- Vegas bachelor parties, I am sad that their won't be a drunk bullet train to replace our drunk bus.
XpressWest (once known as DesertXpress)
Well, they may have been too stupid to realize starting in Victorville made this a huge mistake, but they were at least smart enough to realize how bad their original name was.
When XpressWest fails, they'll rename it YpressWest.
I don't know what they're going to do once ZpressWest fails.
Nah, they won't really get into trouble till they get to DpressWest
AApressWest of course
Subsequently Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Mich.)
??
It never said that. I deny everything.
Alt-text absolves all sins.
Even Original Political Sin?
The least you could have done is give me a hat-tip.
You probably back-date your posts, too. :-p
Politics, being what it is... is it possible that Jerry Brown knew that this would never get its federal loan, so he signed this shit into being knowing it was a dead letter, satisfying his progressive trains-run-on-time base without actually causing any real damage?
If so, well played sir, well played.
I think you're giving Moonbeam way too much credit.
Hold on, buster... let's not start with that H&R stuff... I'm merely asking questions... I'm not ascribing any super mental powers to Moombeam at all. Why do H&R commenters hate questions?
What if HIGW is real?
Hugh Akston| 7.12.13 @ 4:14PM |#
"I think you're giving Moonbeam way too much credit."
Absolutely.
That sleazy liar had hopes this would pay off another union election-cycle Dem contribution.
I don't believe Jerry Brown actually had any involvement in this one. The project actually started before he returned to office and was being pushed from Nevada.
I'm too lazy to google it, Scott, but didn't Jerry Brown give the project the final go-ahead when he had a chance to kill it? I know the project didn't start with him, but wasn't he responsible for the golden seal of approval at the state level?
No that was a different train- the one going from LA - SF. With the greenlighted part starting in bum-fuck-egypt and going to no-fucking-place.
Yep, I got ya. You're right. It's a different train that will be high speed and run on time.
Yeah, that one's his baby. His pyramid.
His Waterloo. His Titanic. His O'leary's cow.
If he did, I'm not seeing it anywhere (it's not even listed on XpressWest's timeline). Certainly there were approvals on the state level, but given the autonomous agencies we have out there, I don't think it necessarily needed to involve him.
He no doubt supports it. But I don't think he needed to actually extend so much as a finger. It was being dragged along by local governments and the Las Vegas side.
Shit, am I thinking of this:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/18/.....speed-rail
Now that the abortion debate is finally over, let's all take a moment to relax and look at some hungover owls:
http://hungoverowls.tumblr.com/
That was a hoot.
"significant uncertainties surround the project."
No they don't; it's a guaranteed failure.
Guaranteed success for union train crews, the only folks that really count.
They argued the ridership would be enough to divert 25 percent of the traffic off of the highway leading between the California desert and Los Angeles.
Is that supposed to say Las Vegas, or did they really try to claim it would reduce traffic on the one leg of the trip the train didn't make?
It's highspeed rail, so it's *MAGIC*. But, then again this is Reason, typo's are also likely, so ymmv.
Ergh. I blame ... um ... the IRS.
Music for going to Vegas!
Now the libertarians going to Freedomfest will have to hop a freight train.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/201.....-memories/
"They could get private investment for ... well, no, that probably won't happen."
Maybe yes, maybe no. Have you seen this?
http://www.dailytech.com/Elon+.....e31956.htm