Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

Glenn Reynolds: Don't Fear the Leaker

Nick Gillespie | 7.2.2013 1:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Writing in USA Today, Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, makes some great points regarding leaking and legitimacy:

As recently reported by the McClatchy Newspapers, the Obama administration views whistleblowing and leaks as a species of terrorism. According to McClatchy: "President Obama's unprecedented initiative, known as the Insider Threat Program, is sweeping in its reach. It has received scant public attention even though it extends beyond the U.S. national security bureaucracies to most federal departments and agencies nationwide, including the Peace Corps, the Social Security Administration and the Education and Agriculture departments. It emphasizes leaks of classified material, but catchall definitions of 'insider threat' give agencies latitude to pursue and penalize a range of other conduct. … Leaks to the media are equated with espionage."…

The freer people are to blow the whistle on wrongdoing, the more we can assume that when no whistle is blown, things aren't so bad. The more the government cracks down on whistleblowers, the more likely it is that they've got something to hide.

This system isn't perfect. Leakers can abuse their power for reasons of revenge, ego, or politics -- but then, so can congressional overseers, or attorneys general, or presidents. And the strong Democratic tilt to the career civil service means that Democratic presidents probably get less leaking than Republicans (and, when leaks happen, less coverage from the Democratic-leaning press).

Read the whole thing.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Tunisian Rapper, Jailed for Insulting Police, Now Released

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsPolicyCivil LibertiesWorldNSAIRSSurveillance
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (10)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. AlexInCT   13 years ago

    This most transparent administration ever sure has had a big boner when it comes to anyone that has leaked information that has harmed them politically. Those that have leaked secrets that have helped however, have gotten a pass. The whole incestous Hollywood & DNC lets make a movie about killing bin Laden before the election comes to mind.

  2. Tonio   13 years ago

    Really, Nick? That's a cheap pun of the sort the commentariat would use.

    1. UnCivilServant   13 years ago

      Catering to the audience I guess.

      1. db   13 years ago

        In his hurry to pen a headline, Nick became an agent of importune.

    2. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

      One might say...he's punning for you.

    3. Warty   13 years ago

      THE CURTAINS FLEW THEN HE APPEARED

      1. AlexInCT   13 years ago

        I knew you where that dude....

      2. db   13 years ago

        Q: How many people does the NSA spy on?

        A: Forty thousand men and women everyday.

        Nah, too low.

        1. entropy   13 years ago

          Helpless people on subway trains scream for god as he looks in on them.

  3. Aresen   13 years ago

    "Leakers can abuse their power for reasons of revenge, ego, or politics -- but then, so can congressional overseers, or attorneys general, or presidents."

    THIS.

    I will believe that their concerns about leaks are genuine when they start impeaching Congressmen, Cabinet Secretaries, Vice-Presidents and Presidents for leaks when the leaks are used to justify government policies.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Punisher

Liz Wolfe | 7.21.2026 9:30 AM

Is Court Packing Inevitable If Democrats Retake Congress and the White House?

Damon Root | 7.21.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: In-N-Out but Not Thru

Charles Oliver | 7.21.2026 4:00 AM

Research Suggests Trump and His Opponents Are Both Wrong About the Impact of Voter ID Requirements

Jacob Sullum | 7.20.2026 5:25 PM

South Carolina Law Prohibits Tattoo Parlors Near Churches. A New Lawsuit Calls That Unconstitutional.

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.20.2026 4:59 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason