Treason an Unlikely Charge Against Snowden, Say Legal Experts
Even if politicians throw the word around a lot
Edward Snowden has been called a "traitor" and accused of "treason" for his leaks of some of the nation's top secrets.
But is there a case for the T-words?
Treason is a crime so old that it's the only one specifically defined in the U.S. Constitution, but legal experts suggest it's a charge that Snowden will most likely never face. And "traitor" seems to fit better in the world of Benedict Arnold and dueling pistols than in today's sea of electronic surveillance and top secret security clearances.
Constitutionally, treason is defined as "whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere."
That's a tough sell in Snowden's case, legal experts say.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?