Big Government

What If Government Officials Broke the Laws We Hired Them to Enforce?

What if they prosecuted others for breaking the same laws they broke?


What if government officials have written laws that apply only to us and not to them? What if we gave them the power to protect our freedoms and our safety and they used that power to trick and trap some of us? What if government officials broke the laws we hired them to enforce? What if they prosecuted others for breaking the same laws they broke?

What if the government enacted a law making it a crime to provide material assistance to terrorist organizations? What if that law was intended to stop people from giving cash and weapons to organizations that bomb and maim and kill? What if the government looked at that law and claimed it applied to a dentist or a shopkeeper who sold services or goods to a terrorist organization, and not just to financiers and bomb makers?

What if an organization that killed also owned a hospital or a school and the law made it a crime to contribute to the hospital or the school? What if the Supreme Court ruled that the law is so broad that it covers backslapping, advocacy and free speech? What if the court ruled that the law makes it a crime to encourage any terrorist organization to do anything—fix teeth, educate children, save lives or kill people? What if the law makes it a crime to talk to any person known to be a terrorist? What if the law is so broad that it punishes ideas and the free expression of those ideas, even if no one is harmed thereby?

What if FBI agents pretended to be members of these terrorist organizations and set out to find people in America who were willing to join? What if the people they found really did want to join a real terrorist organization, but the organizations were located in the Middle East? What if the FBI offered plane tickets and cash to the people they found who said they were interested in joining these groups?

What if FBI agents actually encouraged these people to fly to the Middle East and take up arms in a violent civil war? What if the FBI arrested the people it found and encouraged just as they were about to leave the U.S. and then charged them with providing material assistance to terrorist organizations? What if the president boasted that in his mind these duped dopes were really terrorists and their arrests kept us all safer? What if no material assistance had in fact ever been supplied by those dopes to any terrorist organization?

What if the very members of Congress who voted for this law that prohibits providing material assistance to terrorists by deed or word went and visited people in the Middle East who were fighting a violent civil war? What if these members of Congress concluded that the warriors they visited were good because their adversaries were evil? What if, during a visit, one senator was actually photographed with two al-Qaida-affiliated leaders? What if that was confirmed on national television by the Bush administration ambassador to the United Nations? What if that senator was furious at the former ambassador and insisted that he had not met with al-Qaida? What if that senator encouraged whoever he met with to wage a war of terror on the government of the country they were trying to control? What if that senator insisted that the warriors with whom he met were good warriors because the government they were fighting was evil?

What if the government prosecuted the dopes whom the FBI duped just because it wanted to boast that it caught them? What if the FBI agents who tricked and trapped these dopes encouraged them to join terrorist groups? What if the FBI agents who tricked and trapped these dopes encouraged them to provide material assistance to terrorist-affiliated organizations in the Middle East? What if the senator that the former ambassador exposed offered to get the U.S. government to provide material assistance to terrorist-affiliated organizations? What if he did the same in Libya a few years ago and that brought anarchy to our former ally? What if our own ambassador to Libya was killed by a terrorist group because there was no effective government there to protect him?

What if it is a crime to backslap terror fighters and to encourage their terrorist-affiliated organizations to fight, except if the backslapper is an FBI agent or a senator? What if these terror-fought wars are simply not in the best interests of the American people? What if the backslappers love war because it makes the government stronger? What if the backslappers love war because it is easier to raise taxes, regulate behavior and acquire power for the government when wars are being fought? What if the backslappers are worried that the military might atrophy if it goes a long time without fighting?

What if offensive wars are illegal and morally wrong? What if killing is evil when not done in self-defense? What if those who kill not in self-defense are prosecuted and punished, except when they do so in large numbers and to the sounds of trumpets blaring? What do we do about a government that breaks the laws we have hired it to enforce?

NEXT: Brickbat: Oklahoma Stampede

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

    1. Obviously you’ve never listened to the blowing wind.

      1. or multiplied six by nine

        1. I don’t mind, I don’t mind.

          1. If you think Jimmy`s story is super,, a month back my cousins girlfriend brought in $7298 putting in 40 hours a month from home and the’re roomate’s mother-in-law`s neighbour has done this for 5 months and recieved a check for more than $7298 in there spare time at there pc. apply the information at this website…..
            (Go to site and open “Home” for details)

    2. The answers will be posted in tomorrow’s edition next to the jumble.

    3. If it’s a law The One doesn’t subscribe to, then you can’t have broken it as long as your actions were pure. And when you are working on behalf of The One your actions are always pure.

    4. I thought the answer to life, the universe and everything was 42?

  1. Is this a repeat of the same article posted a couple of months ago from the Judge? Or is this a new one that is just a wall of questions?

    1. He should have inserted questions like “Why do fools fall in love” to see if anybody was actually reading the article.

      1. Comments like these are why I can’t help falling in love with you, Ted.

          1. Surprisingly not produced by Frank Farian.

    2. I love the Judge, but I can’t stand reading any of the articles from his “What If?” ouevre.

  2. lol that dude jsut looks corrupt as the day is long.

    1. You’re slipping WomSom.

    2. I want to know if WomSom purposely makes those typos, or if he is just that awful at typing and proof-reading.

      1. It makes sens if you thikn about it, dude!

    3. lol that dude jsut looks corrupt as the day is long.

      WomSom must be whacking off to pictures of Obama playing golf again.

  3. “What do we do about a government that breaks the laws we have hired it to enforce?”

    What indeed.

    I have advocated before for term limits on every office and on office holders. All of the arguments presented against that sounded good but did not take one thing into account. There is a breed of human for whom the highest value is power. Power for the sake of power. Government is chock full of them. Making their time there limited would go a long way towards slowing the creeping cancer that is tyranny.

    1. Taking into account that there is a breed of human for whom ‘the highest value is power’, I don’t see how term limits help more than a minuscule amount. There’s no shortage of people willing to fill these posts for the reasons you mention.

      Creating the incentive for decent people to fill these posts is the real problem. Or from a more libertarian standpoint, eliminating the incentive for these power-hungry folks to pursue the office in the first place. Term-limits strike me as closing the barn door after the horse bolted.

      1. I see no reason why all of those strategies cannot be employed.

    2. I’ll get behind these term limits: two terms in office followed by two terms in prison.

      1. Two terms in prison seems awfully lenient. How about one half term in office, followed by conversion into soylent green so they can be used to nourish the next crop of politicians.

        1. That sounds like a lot of unnecessary money and effort. Can’t we just skip the conversion into soylent green step?

  4. Bush.
    That’s all; I’ll go back to looking at the dreamy picture of our prez.

  5. What do you mean what if? I thought thats the way it always was, laws are for the citizens not the political class

  6. This article is too unrealistic, our government would never do something like that.

  7. The answer is simple; when the people who represent the law break the law, then there is no law. All that is left is a struggle to survive. Time to lock and load.

  8. Reminds me of one of the last scenes from the movie “The Dictator” when he goes of talking about all the awesome things america could do if we were a dictatorship instead of a democracy (yes I know we’re technically a constitutional republic)

  9. Next they use their muscular forearms to hold down the hunted whilst they severe their spine (or suffocate by crushing the windpipe in case of big animals like gaur and water buffalo) using their long canines and strong jaws. Even still only a fraction of the hunts are a success for the Onitsuka tiger. Therefore it eats a lot during one sitting once it makes a kill (usually every four or five days). Next it hides the carcass and usually returns to it cheap onitsuka tiger shoes over the next couple of days to devour the scraps. Usual prey is deer, buffalo, gaur. However a hungry Onitsuka tiger will go for anything from young elephants, rhinos, crocodiles, leopards, bears and even humans. Whereas conflicts between Onitsuka tigers and elephants are rare, Onitsuka tigers have been known to charge and maul Indian bull elephants. A Onitsuka tiger can climb to the back of the elephant in a single leap and viciously attack the tourists atop – as is often chronicled by historians of the British India.

    1. Why wouldn’t you attack a British tourist?

  10. What if a bear shits in the woods?

  11. as Sandra answered I am startled that a person able to get paid $9702 in a few weeks on the internet. did you read this link Go to site and open Home for details

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.