How Immigration Reform Will Harm U.S. Citizens

E-verify means new restrictions on both immigrants and citizens.


If immigration reform passes, life will get tougher for foreigners who want to come here illegally. Those trying to sneak in will face more agents, fences and drones. Those who slip through will find it harder to get work—thanks to a mandatory system to verify the legal status of all new hires.

But they'll have company in their misery. It may not have occurred to those who support stricter enforcement that the new system will affect anyone applying for a job. Under the proposed legislation, you will not be able to take employment without explicit federal authorization.

The online system, known as E-Verify, currently lets employers check that new employees are legally allowed to work in this country. Some states already mandate its use. But the immigration package now in the Senate would make it compulsory nationwide for every employer.

How would it work? When you get a new job, you'd have to provide your name, Social Security number and one or more documents to show that you are who you claim to be—such as a passport or a driver's license.

The employer would then enter the information, which goes into the E-Verify system to be compared against government records. If your documents appear to match, you would get permission to work. If not, you would get a "tentative non-confirmation" indicating that you don't qualify.

That may sound simple and painless for anyone who is here legally, and usually it is. But not always. In 2011, the federal Government Accountability Office reported that about one in every 400 submissions results in an erroneous disqualification.

Emily Tulli, an attorney with the National Immigration Law Center, estimates that in 2012, based on the apparent error rate, "160,000 workers had to contact a government agency to fix a database error or risk losing their jobs." Once every new employee has to go through E-Verify, the number will multiply.

The index of those deemed ineligible is the equivalent of the federal "no-fly" list, which has mistakenly barred infants and U.S. senators, as well as many people who were never told why they are excluded. But a "no-work" list is obviously far worse.

Most of us can manage to find food and shelter without ever getting on an airplane. Doing so without a job is not so easy. Those deprived of the opportunity to make a living would include a lot of native-born citizens as well as many people who were born elsewhere but have come here legally.

The victims can always challenge the decision, of course, but the burden is on them to prove their eligible status to some federal bureaucracy. It can take weeks or months to correct an error. In the meantime, the employer may decide the unfortunate applicant is too much trouble and hire someone else.

"A survey of immigrant workers in Arizona found that a third were fired immediately after receiving a tentative non-confirmation," says the ACLU, "and not one was notified by the employer that they had the right to appeal the E-Verify ruling—even though that notification is required." So even if the problem is fixed, the damage is done.

It would be bad enough if the immigration bill merely compelled universal use of E-Verify. But it creates another requirement that carries ominous potential. It mandates the use of a new means of verifying identity. Virtually everyone would have a photo in the federal archive, and it would be compared with the photo on the identification you provide, to confirm you didn't steal someone's identify.

Here, skeptics fear, there is more than meets the eye. They regard this provision as a big step toward a national ID card that would be essential for everyone. By requiring a government-approved photo ID to be used for verifying identity for purposes of employment anywhere in America, the measure may effectively create a national ID system—even as it disavows any such purpose.

Once it has become common for employment, its use could easily expand. Why not use it for voting? For gun purchases? For boarding an airplane? For access to unemployment insurance or other government programs? Social Security numbers originally were not supposed to be used for identification—yet today they are, all the time.

This new approach may or may not contribute to discouraging illegal immigration. But it's pretty certain that in the end, our sphere of privacy and autonomy will shrink, and government power will grow.

NEXT: New York Post Sued over Boston Marathon Coverage

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “a big step toward a national ID card”

    As in, a step across the finish line, yes.

    1. A national ID card would be completely under your control, wouldn’t have to be tied to any databases, and could be used for immediate employment verification without getting any government agency involved. This system is far, far worse.

  2. Okay, I am sold. Kill immigration reform now!

  3. Regardless of what you think about immigration, this bill is awful on civil liberties grounds. It needs to die.

  4. Did you really think they were going to do this right?

    1. Come on, you didn’t have faith in John McCain?

      1. Well I was a little skeptical, but when I heard Lindsey Graham was on board, I was reassured


        1. John McCain and Lindsey Graham working with a few right thinking Democrats. What could possibly go wrong?

          1. i still get to keep my Doctor, right?

  5. If you oppose the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill you are a MURICAN human rights violating xenophobic tea party rednecked nativist moron who is irrationally fearful that THAYL TAK UR JERBS so shut up.

  6. It’s not “reform” if it fucks almost everyone over like this. Quit calling it what it ain’t.

  7. Dem leadership prefers the status quo because immigrants from south of the border (so far) vote the Dems.

    Rep leadership prefers the status quo because their biggest donors want to keep the downward pressure of labor costs.

    But most of the people don’t like the status quo.

    So the Congressblobs want to act like they’re doing something without actually doing anything.

    1. Rep leadership prefers the status quo because their biggest donors want to keep the downward pressure of labor costs.

      You sure about that? Most of the (probably) illegal aliens I see work for the local redneck contractor. They might be republican, but I doubt they donate much money.

  8. “Social Security numbers will never , never be used for identification purposes and will never be used for anything but Social Security. ”

    /Congressman with fingers crossed behind his back

    I am sure a national ID card would never be abused, so sure in fact, that I recommend tarring and feathering any government employee or elected official who endorses this idea.

  9. I feel like any time both parties are working together on a bill it ends up being the equivalent of getting bent over a barrel and having every state in the union rammed up your ass without lubricant or even the common courtesy of a reacharound.

  10. The victims can always challenge the decision, of course, but the burden is on them to prove their eligible status to some federal bureaucracy. It can take weeks or months to correct an error.

    The false positives aren’t going to even know they need to do that, because what’s going to happen is that after the business runs their name and gets the “tentative non-confirmation”, they’re just going to trash the resume and move on to the next applicant. The unfortunate jobseeker is never going to find out that the reason no one is calling back for interviews is that e-Verify keeps rejecting them.

    1. Curse your nimble fingers, Stormy!

  11. “A survey of immigrant workers in Arizona found that a third were fired immediately after receiving a tentative non-confirmation,” says the ACLU, ”

    Well there’s no way that they were foreign nationals without work visas.

    There are no illegals in Arizona – it’s the only place in America where everyone’s a natural born citizenship. Heck, the only language people speak there is English.

  12. like this blog saved to bookmarks excited with your article

  13. good info its very nice to read keep on writing

  14. following this cool website keep functioning remarkable job thanks again much obliged

  15. truly amazing your style is unique compared to other people lovely just what i was searching for

  16. everyone loves this i’ve a link to my page some wonderful entropy

  17. i’ve read and find good information from your articles where can i find out more? hi admin i love your blog

  18. really great keep working splendid job your style is unique compared to other people

  19. i’ll reblogged this on special collections some great article regards for helping out

  20. i’ve read and find good information from your articles just what i was searching for valuable information

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.