Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Talk Private Space Exploration with XCOR's Doug Jones: Livestream Today at 3pm ET/12 noon PT

Nick Gillespie | 5.16.2013 3:01 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

If you've ever dreamed of soaring to the stars, liftoff may be coming sooner than you think. Just ask XCOR's Chief Test Engineer Doug Jones, who has designed a commercial suborbital spaceship that can fly up to four times a day, six days a week - sort of like an airplane. And for the low, low price of $95,000, you too can have a ticket to ride. 

Come back to Reason's Hit & Run blog today at 3pm ET/12 noon PT for a livestream conversation with Jones and Reason's Brian Doherty.

If you've got a question to ask this real-life rocketman, send it to us on Facebook, leave it in the chat box below, or send it to #reasonlive on Twitter.

We'll be streaming via our channel on UStream if you'd rather watch there.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Conn. Seeks Federal Funds to Build New School in Newtown

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsWorldScience & TechnologyCultureEconomicsPolicyFederal Aviation AdministrationTransportation PolicySpace
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (53)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Uhura was raped in that episode.

    1. Drake   12 years ago

      She was wearing a miniskirt.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Well, now that that still shot from "The Gamesters of Triskelion" is no longer up there, you look like a fool.

  2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    Can I get a discount if it's a only a one way trip?

    *eyes Epi suspiciously*

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      You know, if I wanted to buy one of these one-way tickets for a "friend," would it be cheaper if they didn't worry about safety or the viability of the passenger? I mean, I'm not rich and can't afford such fancy things.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        They don't really need a seat. Can we just remove it and deduct the cost of the saved fuel?

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          Also, Pro Lib, should we find a way to sabotage this guy to help our space elevator investment, or should we just assume that we'll blow them out of the water by superior product?

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Why not both?

            1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              Also we should come up with a question to ask Jones. QUICK!

              1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                NOOOO, we missed it. I should have asked what he thought space-hat fashion would entail.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Purple hair, of course.

                  1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                    That doesn't sound very cunning.

                    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      Are you familiar with U.F.O.?

                    2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                      It is from 1970. You know I'm not.

                      Also, we aren't currently working on U.F.O.: TNG.

                    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      No, that's next year.

                      You don't have to watch it, but you should familiarize yourself with some images. It's really got a great look.

                      Along those lines, one of my favorite spaceships ever was Space: 1999's Eagle.

                    4. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                      Are you trying to tell me you lived in Britain in the 70's?

                    5. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      Believe it or not, some of those programs ran in the U.S. On one of the six stations we were permitted to watch during the Nixonian Hegemony.

                    6. Tonio   12 years ago

                      Space 1999 and UFO were from the same producers and possibly (IDK) in the same continuum. They used a lot of the same models.

                    7. robc   12 years ago

                      Im unfamiliar with UFO, but was a fan of Space 1999*.

                      *I was young and didnt know any better

                    8. robc   12 years ago

                      From wikipedia:

                      In one judicially infamous reference, United States Seventh Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook stated in Williams v. Boles, "Many things--beating with a rubber truncheon, water torture, electric shock, incessant noise, reruns of 'Space 1999'--may cause agony as they occur yet leave no enduring injury."

                    9. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      It looked cool, even if the stories were bizarre.

                    10. JW   12 years ago

                      Both were Gerry Anderson productions. Different continuum, though. Same with Thunderbirds.

        2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Wait, what if we used the "passenger" as fuel? You're our rocket guy, is that feasible? Fuel can be made from water by separating out the hydrogen, right?

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            That might be harder to sell to the passenger.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I, um, have a particular passenger in mind.

              1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                JJ Abrams?

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Yeah, um, him, too.

              2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                But getting him on a one way trip is easier if you tell him he's getting in the ship to go to space (and just neglect that he isn't coming back). Getting him into the engine will require a bit more force.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  You know, maybe a one-way trip isn't such a bad idea. I could see the "passenger" being set up to comment here, and we could read the "passenger's" comments as the "passenger" slowly died. For science.

                  1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                    Whoa, don't go jumping the gun here. We don't want to could our experiment by preconceived notions. We don't know what will happen to the passenger left in space. That's what we are testing.

                    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      We could revise Orion and see just what truly high acceleration does to living human flesh.

                    2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                      Has anyone actually proved that human beings can't withstand 100g acceleration?

            2. Brett L   12 years ago

              We're paying his fare.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                Good point. We don't believe in something for nothing, right? So slowly killing him is completely libertarian. Right?

                1. Brett L   12 years ago

                  slowly killing him is completely libertarian. Right?

                  As long as there's a chance he could survive, we're not knowingly killing him. Totally libertarian.

                  1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    Kind of like Schr?dinger's Episiarch. I mean, cat.

  3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    If any Hit & Run editors or systems guys or whatever are hanging around, commenter Irish would like you to edit this comment to include a reference to pizza. He says so in that thread. If you could do that, that would be great, thanks.

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      EDIT BUTTON!

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Well, in lieu of that, we can ask politely. They all hate Episiarch, anyway, so I don't see why they wouldn't do us this small favor. I've been commenting here since the telegraph days and you since you were born, so I think we've earned this tiny request. And who knows what we might do in return?

        1. Tim   12 years ago

          -.. --- ..- -.-. .... .

        2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          I had a bit of a crisis when I recently considered how much of my life I have been commenting here.

          I suppose we could agree to actually click on some of the ads or something.

        3. Episiarch   12 years ago

          Don't be a fool, ProL. Well, not more than normal. H&R does not edit posts. They remove them. Be careful what you wish for. Next thing you know, Irish's comments will no longer exist. Kind of like your mom's chastity.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Your powers are weak, old man.

            In the HBO reboot of Star Wars in twenty years, where the original film is season one of a series, Kenobi responds to this with, "At least my dick wasn't burned off, Annie. That's your name, right, Annie? That's a chick name, you know."

          2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            I do like the possibility of an existential crisis for you if they do, in fact, edit his comment.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              They should provide an edit button for everyone other than Epi.

              1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                This is something we can all get behind.

              2. Episiarch   12 years ago

                That would be fine. I don't need an edit button. Only amateurs like you need an edit button.

                Post it, I'll be in my three story trailer.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Quadruple-wide!

                2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                  Good enough. Splice in some reaction post of me and shove it on the net.

  4. Tim   12 years ago

    Where's the links?

  5. WomSom   12 years ago

    Dude makes a ll kinds of crazy sense man.

    http://www.Prox-Anon.tk

  6. WomSom   12 years ago

    Dude seesm to be talking a WHOLE lotta smack over there.

    http://www.Prox-Anon.tk

  7. TheZeitgeist   12 years ago

    Ah, Rotary Rocket - Hudson's last gasp as it were. I wish the interviewer would have asked Xcor guy what he thought of that vehicle, if he thought it really could work.

    I remember the Rotary Rocket machine, and how neat of a concept it seemed, but it's SSTO configuration with kerosene left ~5% empty mass fraction and I personally doubted whether they could make that weight. Obviously its a moot point now, but it would have been fun to hear some tech-side from somebody who worked on that vehicle.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!