Talk Private Space Exploration with XCOR's Doug Jones: Livestream Today at 3pm ET/12 noon PT
If you've ever dreamed of soaring to the stars, liftoff may be coming sooner than you think. Just ask XCOR's Chief Test Engineer Doug Jones, who has designed a commercial suborbital spaceship that can fly up to four times a day, six days a week - sort of like an airplane. And for the low, low price of $95,000, you too can have a ticket to ride.
Come back to Reason's Hit & Run blog today at 3pm ET/12 noon PT for a livestream conversation with Jones and Reason's Brian Doherty.
If you've got a question to ask this real-life rocketman, send it to us on Facebook, leave it in the chat box below, or send it to #reasonlive on Twitter.
We'll be streaming via our channel on UStream if you'd rather watch there.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Uhura was raped in that episode.
She was wearing a miniskirt.
Well, now that that still shot from "The Gamesters of Triskelion" is no longer up there, you look like a fool.
Can I get a discount if it's a only a one way trip?
*eyes Epi suspiciously*
You know, if I wanted to buy one of these one-way tickets for a "friend," would it be cheaper if they didn't worry about safety or the viability of the passenger? I mean, I'm not rich and can't afford such fancy things.
They don't really need a seat. Can we just remove it and deduct the cost of the saved fuel?
Also, Pro Lib, should we find a way to sabotage this guy to help our space elevator investment, or should we just assume that we'll blow them out of the water by superior product?
Why not both?
Also we should come up with a question to ask Jones. QUICK!
NOOOO, we missed it. I should have asked what he thought space-hat fashion would entail.
Purple hair, of course.
That doesn't sound very cunning.
Are you familiar with U.F.O.?
It is from 1970. You know I'm not.
Also, we aren't currently working on U.F.O.: TNG.
No, that's next year.
You don't have to watch it, but you should familiarize yourself with some images. It's really got a great look.
Along those lines, one of my favorite spaceships ever was Space: 1999's Eagle.
Are you trying to tell me you lived in Britain in the 70's?
Believe it or not, some of those programs ran in the U.S. On one of the six stations we were permitted to watch during the Nixonian Hegemony.
Space 1999 and UFO were from the same producers and possibly (IDK) in the same continuum. They used a lot of the same models.
Im unfamiliar with UFO, but was a fan of Space 1999*.
*I was young and didnt know any better
From wikipedia:
In one judicially infamous reference, United States Seventh Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook stated in Williams v. Boles, "Many things--beating with a rubber truncheon, water torture, electric shock, incessant noise, reruns of 'Space 1999'--may cause agony as they occur yet leave no enduring injury."
It looked cool, even if the stories were bizarre.
Both were Gerry Anderson productions. Different continuum, though. Same with Thunderbirds.
Wait, what if we used the "passenger" as fuel? You're our rocket guy, is that feasible? Fuel can be made from water by separating out the hydrogen, right?
That might be harder to sell to the passenger.
I, um, have a particular passenger in mind.
JJ Abrams?
Yeah, um, him, too.
But getting him on a one way trip is easier if you tell him he's getting in the ship to go to space (and just neglect that he isn't coming back). Getting him into the engine will require a bit more force.
You know, maybe a one-way trip isn't such a bad idea. I could see the "passenger" being set up to comment here, and we could read the "passenger's" comments as the "passenger" slowly died. For science.
Whoa, don't go jumping the gun here. We don't want to could our experiment by preconceived notions. We don't know what will happen to the passenger left in space. That's what we are testing.
We could revise Orion and see just what truly high acceleration does to living human flesh.
Has anyone actually proved that human beings can't withstand 100g acceleration?
We're paying his fare.
Good point. We don't believe in something for nothing, right? So slowly killing him is completely libertarian. Right?
slowly killing him is completely libertarian. Right?
As long as there's a chance he could survive, we're not knowingly killing him. Totally libertarian.
Kind of like Schr?dinger's Episiarch. I mean, cat.
If any Hit & Run editors or systems guys or whatever are hanging around, commenter Irish would like you to edit this comment to include a reference to pizza. He says so in that thread. If you could do that, that would be great, thanks.
EDIT BUTTON!
Well, in lieu of that, we can ask politely. They all hate Episiarch, anyway, so I don't see why they wouldn't do us this small favor. I've been commenting here since the telegraph days and you since you were born, so I think we've earned this tiny request. And who knows what we might do in return?
-.. --- ..- -.-. .... .
I had a bit of a crisis when I recently considered how much of my life I have been commenting here.
I suppose we could agree to actually click on some of the ads or something.
Don't be a fool, ProL. Well, not more than normal. H&R does not edit posts. They remove them. Be careful what you wish for. Next thing you know, Irish's comments will no longer exist. Kind of like your mom's chastity.
Your powers are weak, old man.
In the HBO reboot of Star Wars in twenty years, where the original film is season one of a series, Kenobi responds to this with, "At least my dick wasn't burned off, Annie. That's your name, right, Annie? That's a chick name, you know."
I do like the possibility of an existential crisis for you if they do, in fact, edit his comment.
They should provide an edit button for everyone other than Epi.
This is something we can all get behind.
That would be fine. I don't need an edit button. Only amateurs like you need an edit button.
Post it, I'll be in my three story trailer.
Quadruple-wide!
Good enough. Splice in some reaction post of me and shove it on the net.
Where's the links?
Dude makes a ll kinds of crazy sense man.
http://www.Prox-Anon.tk
Dude seesm to be talking a WHOLE lotta smack over there.
http://www.Prox-Anon.tk
Ah, Rotary Rocket - Hudson's last gasp as it were. I wish the interviewer would have asked Xcor guy what he thought of that vehicle, if he thought it really could work.
I remember the Rotary Rocket machine, and how neat of a concept it seemed, but it's SSTO configuration with kerosene left ~5% empty mass fraction and I personally doubted whether they could make that weight. Obviously its a moot point now, but it would have been fun to hear some tech-side from somebody who worked on that vehicle.