Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

IRS Admits Targeting Tea Party Groups During 2012 Elections (Updated with Actual Letters)

Today's example of the dangers of massive bureaucracies

Scott Shackford | 5.10.2013 11:16 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | jesman / Foter.com / CC BY-NC-ND
(jesman / Foter.com / CC BY-NC-ND)
"Oh, boo yourself!"
Credit: jesman / Foter.com / CC BY-NC-ND

In early 2012 several conservative groups of the Tea Party persuasion reported they were getting strange letters from the IRS demanding more information than they believed typical for 501(c)4 non-profit political groups — sometimes hundreds of pages more. Fox News reported back then:

In letters sent from IRS offices in Cincinnati earlier this month, chapters including the Waco (Texas) Tea Party and the Ohio Liberty Council were asked to provide a list of donors, identify volunteers, financial support for and relationships with political candidates and parties, and even printed copies of their Facebook pages.

"Some of what they (the IRS) asked was reasonable, but there were some requests on there that were strange," Toby Marie Walker, president of the Waco Tea Party told FoxNews.com. "It makes you wonder if they do this to groups like ACORN or other left-leaning groups."

Were they really being targeted or were they just being paranoid about tiresome, exhaustive but actually common IRS bureaucratic meddling? Turns out they were being targeted, after all. Today, an IRS head admitted as much and apologized. Via the Associated Press:

Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS unit that oversees tax-exempt groups, said organizations that included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status were singled out for additional reviews.

Lerner said the practice, initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati, was wrong and she apologized while speaking at a conference in Washington.

I'm sure a stern memo was sent out to all involved.

(UPDATE: Click through to see some actual letters courtesy of the American Center for Law and Justice)

Letter from the IRS to Tea Party organizations

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: FAA Won't Tell Residents of MA Town What the Deal is With Low-Flying Aircraft

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

PoliticsPolicyTea PartyIRSElection 2012NonprofitsFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (92)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

    Agency responsible for taxes targets groups opposed to taxation!

    In other news Cop shoots dog.

    1. gordonshane1101   12 years ago

      before I saw the paycheck for $7727, I did not believe that...my... brothers friend woz like they say truley bringing in money in there spare time on their apple labtop.. there friends cousin started doing this less than 19 months and by now cleared the debts on their appartment and bourt Citro?n DS. go to... http://WWW.DAZ7.COM

    2. felicia22   12 years ago

      as Leslie replied I can't believe that a mom can earn $9902 in 1 month on the computer. did you see this webpage http://www.fox86.com

    3. markhit07   12 years ago

      Evan. I just agree... Patrick`s report is impressive... last tuesday I bought a great Volkswagen Golf GTI after I been earnin $8978 this-last/5 weeks an would you believe $10,000 last-munth. it's realy the easiest-job Ive ever done. I began this 3 months ago and immediately got me over $73 per-hr. I went to this website grand4.com
      (Go to site and open "Home" for details)

  2. John   12 years ago

    It is always low level workers. Funny that. As if some IRS drone would risk their job and commit a crime out of spite. It couldn't possibly have been higher up or political people responsible. Never.

    1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

      You and I are both familiar with bureaucrats. Anyone below a GS 15 would never initiate a process outside the scope of their duties. It had to have been higher-ups. Probably a political appointee in DC.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Totally. If some GS 12 manager came in and said they were going to do that, they would have been laughed out of the room. The actual bureaucracy is much more apolitical than people believe. In my experience no one talks about politics and people generally keep their political views to themselves. And they know pulling a stunt like this can get you fired. Like actually fired such that the merit service protection board isn't going to bail you out.

        This totally came from a political higher up.

        1. some guy   12 years ago

          I have to disagree. There are constant reminders about what constitutes a "constructive change" to a contract, what the "colors of money" mean, etc. because these little folk frequently do stuff they shouldn't. I'm sure some mid-level manager told some peon to double check every anti-tax non-profit, but I wouldn't be surprised if the peon decided on his own that "tea party" means "anti-tax".

          And making a mistake like this wouldn't get anyone fired, just reassigned.

      2. some guy   12 years ago

        I assume this is sarcasm? Half the people below GS-15 don't even know what their duties are.

        1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

          The point is, some 12 or 13 isn't going to stick his or her neck out for political reasons. They're also lazy as fuck and would never generate extra work for themselves. They do what they're told. Anyone with a hint of proactivity does not last in the Fed bureaucracy - it's too frustrating for them.

          1. some guy   12 years ago

            But they also aren't always the brightest pencils in the shed. Whoever did this may not have even realized it was a political move. It could go either way. I just have a personal rule about never ruling out incompetence.

            1. fried wylie   12 years ago

              The eternal question: malicious stupidity, or self-interested laziness.

              1. Almanian!   12 years ago

                And why is someone keeping pencils in the shed instead of a desk? GOVERNMENT - go figger....

          2. grey   12 years ago

            I'm already hearing news reports that multiple offices were doing the same reviews. So multiple offices acted independently targeting the same type of groups with no direction fro superiors?

            1. some guy   12 years ago

              Well, if that's the case then the Republicans have another cover-up to go after once Benghazi! blows over.

              1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

                B-b-but...that would be....POLITICAL!

                What difference does it make!

      3. Warty   12 years ago

        I'm so glad that I have no idea what GS 15 means.

        1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

          GS 15 is pretty much the highest level you can get to in the civil service. As opposed to political appointees, who aren't classified as "GS".

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            SES bitches.

          2. Duke   12 years ago

            What about GLG-20s? A movie said they're the best.

            1. Hopfiend   12 years ago

              That's quite a jump in base pay.

              thanks for the bruises, and you can keep the stool samples.

          3. Tulpa (LAOL-VA)   12 years ago

            Who would win in a fight, a GS-13 with a +12 axe or a CW-4 with an invisibility cloak?

            1. $park?   12 years ago

              Do you think that just this once you could take things seriously?

              1. fried wylie   12 years ago

                Wait, should I stop consulting the rulebooks?

            2. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

              Hey, Tulpa. Did you move to Virginia? Get a new job?

              1. Tulpa (LAOL-VA)   12 years ago

                Quit snooping around my personal lift.

                1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

                  Sorry. I remembered you were maybe moving to Sacramento, and just realized you changed your handle to (LAOL-VA). Hope all is well.

                  1. Tulpa (LAOL-VA)   12 years ago

                    Yes, I'm in VA now. With the new job.

                    I'm not used to people being friendly around here, apologies for my tone.

      4. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

        "Anyone below a GS 15"

        Does that stand for Government Stooge Level 15?

        1. fried wylie   12 years ago

          It does now.

          1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

            Glad I could be of use.

        2. Xenocles   12 years ago

          "General Schedule," but good guess.

          1. fried wylie   12 years ago

            Too late, already gone to print. Maybe in the next edition.

            1. Xenocles   12 years ago

              Hey, I liked it. Just figured you wanted the real answer too.

      5. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

        Anyone below a GS 15 would never initiate a process outside the scope of their duties.

        My dad was an 8 or 9 and did. Once. Of course, he was a nuclear reactor technician (insert Homer Simpson joke) and insisted that safety measures actually be followed. And this was BEFORE 3 Mile Island and the Dept. O'Energy.

        After 3 Mile Island, they never let some safety wise-ass like my old man anywhere near an actual reactor ever again.

      6. DarrenM   12 years ago

        It had to have been higher-ups.

        I disagree. It's easy to imagine politically ideological low IQ lower level employees singling out political groups they were told to hate.

    2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      It did have a Ken Lay feel to it.

  3. John   12 years ago

    And this is what story number 1000? that would have been a major legacy threatening scandal had it happened under a Republican Administration and the groups been left wing but is now a page 12 below the fold one day story.

  4. entropy   12 years ago

    Today, an IRS head admitted as much and apologized.

    Have you been singling out political groups for heightened scrutiny? Yes, and we're terribly sorry.

    Are you going to stop? No, and we're terribly sorry.

    I think sorry is bureaucratese for 'Suck it, bitch-ass proles'.

    1. some guy   12 years ago

      He's only sorry that he has to address the proles.

  5. Mike M.   12 years ago

    I'm sure of course that Block Yomomma had nothing to do with this whatsoever. What a fucking scumbag.

    1. fried wylie   12 years ago

      The IRS is executive branch still, right?

    2. NeonCat   12 years ago

      It wasn't him! It was one of his evil ministers!

  6. Emmerson Biggins   12 years ago

    I guess I'm feeling especially peasant-like today. I'm actually impressed that anybody who works for the IRS can admit that this happened and that it's wrong.

    1. grey   12 years ago

      Your standards on what to expect from the feds has been lowered, only natural. Imagine twenty more years of progressive victories and how low the bar will be.

  7. Bill Dalasio   12 years ago

    You know, just once, even if it doesn't stand, I'd like to see a judge declare that as a consequence of something like that, said organizations are exempt from IRS investigation for a period of twenty years. Some kind of actual consequence for malfeasance would be a nice change of pace.

  8. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Stern memo from Lois Lerner to low-level IRS workers in Cincinnati:

    "This is to reprimand you for auditing all those Tea Party groups on your own initiative and without any encouragement from me or other Administration officials. This reprimand will be removed from your files unless you commit additional misconduct, if you know what I mean. Hint: Snitches get stitches.

    "Toodles,
    LL"

  9. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    I look forward to them enforcing Obamacare.

    1. 0x90   12 years ago

      that's rediculous, the irs has nothing todo with heath care

      1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        Not sure if serious.

        1. 0x90   12 years ago

          The problem is: I'm pretty sure you are. Parody really isn't possible anymore.

  10. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Of course, passing a law to increase the tax rate of those who are involved in electioneering does not in any way encourage corrupt, selective enforcement. No, sir!

  11. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    an IRS head admitted as much and apologized.

    "We're sorry. Sorry we got caught."

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      "And we'll be equally sorry and contrite when we do it again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again. And again."

  12. DJF   12 years ago

    As punishment these low level employees and their families will be sent to a month long training session supervised by high level employees in Hawaii.

    1. fried wylie   12 years ago

      Incidentals are not included, so really, it totally sucks, man.

  13. Brandon   12 years ago

    This doesn't seem like an admission so much as a tacit threat.

  14. Tony   12 years ago

    I find it hard to believe there's a single Tea Party-affiliated group that isn't deeply political and thus probably ineligible for tax exemption. The whole movement was a GOP rebranding effort, after all.

    I'm curious how far up the chain you guys want to take the blame? All the way up to the then-IRS commissioner? Come on, go ahead, say yes, so I can say you mean the Bush-appointed IRS commissioner?

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      Come on, go ahead, say yes, so I can say you mean the Bush-appointed IRS commissioner?

      Holy smokes, couldn't even wait to unload the GOTCHA!

      1. tarran   12 years ago

        This meme amongst progtards that only victims of an astroturf campaign would participate in a political movement against taxes and the lengths the progtards deny reality to promote it is really really funny.

        It only makes them look stupider and is unconvincing to all but the most credulous, yet they can't bring themselves to give legitimacy to their opponents and so they keep hitting themselves.

        1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          You know Tony isn't sincere in anything he writes, right? Those words above were specifically designed to get out of you the most ire that can be extracted. So, why bother to engage them?

          1. tarran   12 years ago

            Oh, he doesn't inspire ire in me. Just laughter.

          2. $park?   12 years ago

            Ire? For Tony? What a waste of time that would be.

            1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

              There is no denying his strategy works. He does it for attention and he gets attention. The most popular guy here by far. It is not even uncommon to see threads he hasn't even visited yet where someone wistfully posts 'here comes Tony to explain why this isn't a case of Team Blue hypocrisy in 3 . . 2 . .'

              He is the leader of the pack and y'all are swooning for his letterman jacket.

              1. dinkster   12 years ago

                Why would anyone respond to posts they agree with? Just to fill the void?

          3. fried wylie   12 years ago

            designed to get out of you the most ire that can be extracted

            Since harnessing the energy of founding-father-grave-rotation didn't pan out, the next green energy strategy is harnessing libertarian ire, a truly inexhaustible, sustainable resources available in significantly larger quantity.

            1. NeonCat   12 years ago

              How does libertarian ire compare to progressive-feminist dudgeon?

              1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

                Like a recurring ass pimple compares to a menstrual cycle.

              2. fried wylie   12 years ago

                How does libertarian ire compare to progressive-feminist dudgeon?

                Try harnessing that without massive Anti-patriarchy backlass.

                Nobody will complain about harnessing libertarian ire, aside from the libertarians, and they've proven easy enough to ignore. Their complaints about being harnessed just increases generator capacity.

                1. fried wylie   12 years ago

                  Backlass, Copyright 2012, Trademarked, and Patent Pending.

    2. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: Tony,

      I find it hard to believe there's a single Tea Party-affiliated group that isn't deeply political and thus probably ineligible for tax exemption.

      I wonder why would you even consider that someone or some group should be eligible for tax exemption at all if you believe (as you have stated many times before) that taxation is meant to pay for the wonderful bounty that is our civilization.

      Please, explain that to me. Your coherence of thought may still rekindle in me a trust in mankind.

      1. The Original Jason   12 years ago

        "Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society" in which "[t]hree generations of imbeciles are enough".

        1. entropy_factor   12 years ago

          ^ this. SOMEone went to law school 😉

    3. Fluffy   12 years ago

      501(c)4 groups are expressly allowed to engage in political activity, dopey.

      The entire reason to create a 501(c)4 is to engage in political activity.

      With regard to how far up the chain to go, let's start with getting the low-level guys fired, and bring federal charges against them. They get leniency if they give up their superiors. And we'll see how far that process gets us.

    4. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

      The whole movement was a GOP rebranding effort

      Nope. The GOP wishes it could muster than kind of support, and they've done all they can to try to co-opt it, but the Tea Party still wants lower taxes and spending, including cutting back the Great Pentagon Pork Barrel.

      -jcr

      1. DarrenM   12 years ago

        The problem is that it's hard to know how much the GOP really wants lower taxation. It's more likely they are just panting after the power that comes with more money to spend. The rhetoric is just a path to that power.

  15. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I find it hard to believe there's a single Tea Party-affiliated group that isn't deeply political and thus probably ineligible for tax exemption.

    You're so cute.

    Dumb, but cute. Like a baby bunny.

    1. fried wylie   12 years ago

      Insulting baby bunnies. That's low.

  16. OldMexican   12 years ago

    Lerner said the practice, initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati, was wrong and she apologized while speaking at a conference in Washington.

    One can sense the utter frustration and sense of despair coming from the head of the IRS unit, who has to deal with the fact that his department is populated by such a bunch of loose cannons. I cannot feel anything but pity for the poor fellow.

    1. AuH20   12 years ago

      You're off the case Macbain!

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        Mendozaaaaaa!

  17. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

    initiated by low-level workers

    pics or gtfo

  18. Bill Dalasio   12 years ago

    In a stunning display of mendacity, "Lerner said the practice was initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati and was not motivated by political bias."

    So I guess they were just ticked off about New England's football team and didn't like little girls drinking caffeinated beverages.

  19. db   12 years ago

    "Lerner said the practice was initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati and was not motivated by political bias."

    Yeah, that's some pro-quality "taking full responsibility" right there. I think she just catapulted herself to the top of the list for a Cabinet seat.

  20. trshmnstr   12 years ago

    AHEM

    *clears throat obnoxiously*

    BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSHHHH

    1. entropy_factor   12 years ago

      ha!

  21. Ashlee76   12 years ago

    just as Phyllis explained I'm blown away that anyone can make $4315 in a few weeks on the . did you look at this site link go to this site home tab for more detail--- http://WWW.JOBS34.COM

  22. ThatSkepticGuy   12 years ago

    Pfft. Next you'll tell me the Tea Party never expressed any racist platform or intent, and that it was all a deliberate smear narative by certain state-puppeted media outlets and their Useful Idiot viewership to punish them for complaining about taxes and Big Government.

  23. Angelina09   12 years ago

    what Alexander answered I'm shocked that a mother can get paid $4989 in 4 weeks on the . have you read this webpage go to this site home tab for more detail--- http://WWW.JOBS34.COM

  24. Sevo   12 years ago

    OldMexican| 5.10.13 @ 12:24PM |#
    "One can sense the utter frustration and sense of despair coming from the head of the IRS unit, who has to deal with the fact that his department is populated by such a bunch of loose cannons. I cannot feel anything but pity for the poor fellow."

    You bet! In my dealings with low-level bureaucrats, they *always* show initiative and ambition! Pushing the envelope all the time! Taking chances!
    Pity the poor people who have to manage workers like that; why it must be like herding cats!

  25. WilliamGiannone   12 years ago

    uptil I looked at the check which was of $5984, I did not believe ...that...my cousin had been actualy bringing in money in there spare time online.. there sisters roommate started doing this for less than eighteen months and a short time ago paid for the loans on their villa and got a new Ford. we looked here, http://www.up444.com

  26. waltercollin   12 years ago

    before I saw the check which had said 4615, I didn't believe that my mother in law had been actualy bringing home money parttime on their computer.. there friends cousin has done this for under 21 months and at present repaid the mortgage on their appartment and purchased a new Lancia Straton. this is where I went, ............www.Mojo55.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Since Immigration Is an 'Invasion,' a Top Trump Adviser Says, the President Might Suspend Habeas Corpus

Jacob Sullum | 5.13.2025 5:50 PM

Spain's Grid Collapsed in 5 Seconds. The U.S. Could Be Next.

Marc Oestreich | 5.13.2025 4:35 PM

Trump Called Price Controls 'Communist.' Now He's Ordering Them for Prescription Drugs.

Joe Lancaster | 5.13.2025 4:15 PM

Miami Beach Homeless Arrests Spiked in February Under Anticamping Law

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.13.2025 3:19 PM

Airport Human-Trafficking Posters Are Overstating the Risks to Young People

Lenore Skenazy | 5.13.2025 1:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!