Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: Banks Repay Federal Loans With Federal Money, IRS Illegally Spies on Email, Soda Bans Lead To Drinking More Soda

J.D. Tuccille | 4.11.2013 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • Big Gulp
    Russell Bernice

    Small banks that received TARP loans from the feds repaid the money with money from another federal program meant to boost lending to small businesses, says a government watchdog. Yes, it's like Ouroboros, but stupider.

  • The 2013 Sheinberg Scholar-in-Residence at NYU Law School is Kathy Boudin, a convicted murderer dating back to a 1981 Brinks armored car robbery staged by the Weather Underground. This interesting bit of personal history does not appear on her official university biography.
  • Despite a court order to the contrary, the IRS has apparently been spying on emails without obtaining warrants first.
  • The House Intelligence Committee approved CISPA, a controversial cybersecurity bill that will give the government broad(er) access to personal data.
  • When you answer the door in New Jersey, don't do so wth a joint dangling from your lips. The state's Supreme Court says that's an invitation for the cops to come in and break out the handcuffs.
  • A Texas veterinarian is suing state regulators on First Amendment grounds after he was punished for offering free veterinary advice over the Internet.
  • Researchers say that oh-so trendy soda bans will likely lead to more sugar consumption as vendors logically offer bundles of smaller drinks as an end run around the law.

Have a news tip for us? Send it to: 24_7@reason.com.

Follow Reason 24/7 on Twitter: @reason247

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: ACLU: IRS Spying on E-Mails Without Warrant, Despite 2010 Court Ruling

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (436)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. mnarayan   12 years ago

    Troll Free Thursday Topic of the Day: Could FIFA do a worse job of adding new rules and "points of emphasis" for referees?

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      You people talked about hockey on Monday. Enough already.

      1. The DerpRider   12 years ago

        I missed it. May we rehash?

      2. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

        we were talking hockey? and I missed it?

        1. mnarayan   12 years ago

          Would it have been more clear if he said something like "all the touchdowns the pitcher scored in the hockey game"?

        2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

          Red Wings 20 year playoff streak in jeopardy. Discuss.

          1. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

            hmm. they have a game in hand. I think they just make it.

          2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

            They only have 4 home games left. It's going to be down to the wire with Phoenix of all teams going for that 8th spot. They'll lose in the first round anyway. I'd actually like for them to miss and get a shot at one of the 3 wunderkind centers coming in the draft this year.

            1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

              My love of the Red Wings has dwindled since the retirement of Yzerman.

              1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

                My hatred of the Red Wings has not dwindled since they were "Red Army North".

            2. Elspeth Flashman   12 years ago

              How often does an 8th seed win?

          3. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

            I am hoping they make it in as the #8 so the Blackhawks can utterly dismantle them in the first round.

        3. The DerpRider   12 years ago

          Okay. Fun beer league fact. I travel a lot for work and the easiest play to find drop-in in the entire country? Raleigh, NC. I found three rinks within 10 minutes of my hotel and was able to play every night. New York and Boston charge $25 to skate - ridiculous. And no place in the northeast has enough ice time at night. Only cops and firefighters can play two hours at noon.

          1. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

            what's it cost you to play? we pay as a team and it works about to about $450 a skater. about 15 on the roster. goalies play free. fuckers.

          2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

            Well, I'd normally say that, but I took a stick in the face - broke my orbital, sinus, nose, and skull !?! A paramedic was there and hopped the boards to stop the bleeding. We got to the locker room and he said he had his pack so he could stitch me up. He pulled the towel away, took a look, and said hell no, we're going to the ER.

            1. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

              you don't wear a cage?

              1. The DerpRider   12 years ago

                I do now. Started at 5 years old (full gear til 17), never took a bad stick or puck until I was 35. That sucked. Being stupid is stupid.

            2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

              So, I wear a full mask now. Wife says if I'm not getting paid to play, I can't go Ron Duguay.

    2. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

      Soccer is the greatest troll in the history of mankind.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Agreed. It make me want to hurl things and decry the whole "sport".

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          You're just pissed because you're a M?laga fan, aren't you? 😉

          1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

            I went to a couple Kaiserslautern games in 1997.

            Other than that, I couldn't name more than a handful of teams that play that miserable game.

            You want fun with a ball on grass, go watch rugby union, Aussie Rules or the NFL.

            1. mr simple   12 years ago

              So you prefer your sport to not require a lot of skill or acumen to play, unlike the beautiful game.

              (I keed, I keed)

              1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

                So, Mr. s is kidding - come into this scrum, please...

            2. Teaching Student   12 years ago

              Heck, even better, go to a High School Rivalry Football Game. I officiated a couple this year, nothing is better than that.

            3. Raston Bot   12 years ago

              K-town! WOOT

              1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

                Hertha BSC came to town and the 1FCK fans treated it like the Mongols had come riding over the hill to loot and rape and burn. They had groups of cops, 10 men at a time, with large dogs and for reals "assault rifles". I sat in the section next to them (separated by a chain link fence for God's sake!?) and they spent the whole game shirtless, screaming profanities and flipping the bird at the cameras in the stadium (1/2 cops, 1/2 TV sports program ones).

                The Beautiful Game indeed.

      2. Zeb   12 years ago

        So, everyone is into soccer just to annoy you? Interesting theory.

        1. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

          No, the creators of soccer were sockpuppets pretending it was a real, worthwhile game. And a billion people fell for it.

          1. Zeb   12 years ago

            Your ideas intrigue me. Who do you suppose was the puppet master in all this?

            1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

              Pele?

              1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

                The Beer industry

            2. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

              Jews.

            3. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

              Greifers gotta grief.

      3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        When they write the history of the downfall of America, they will point to the time period where children stopped playing football and baseball and started playing the gayest sport known to man...SOCCER!

        That is all.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          In baseball, every kid gets their turn to be a goat or a hero, to know the pain of personal failure when striking out, and the glory of personal accomplishment when hitting a home run.

          In soccer, you just kick the ball to the next kid, and once every hour or so, someone randomly scores a goal.

          1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

            Don't forget falling down and grabbing your shin every so often. I heard faking injuries builds character or some shit.

    3. The DerpRider   12 years ago

      I understand they are implementing a new rule that a moderate breeze of at least 10mph is required before writhing on the ground in pain for 20 minutes.

      1. Counterfly   12 years ago

        Well, I guess my little statement backfired just a touch!

  2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Small banks that received TARP loans from the feds repayed the money with money from another federal program meant to boost lending to small businesses...

    In related news, shit stinks.

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      Not mine!

      1. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

        The Liberia is covering it up.

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          Zing!

          1. Counterfly   12 years ago

            Actually that's pretty much true. Especially in Monrovia.

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      Too Small To Fail, biotches!

  3. Counterfly   12 years ago

    Watching Nikki, Kristen and IFH with the machine, it was suddenly so clear. The commentariat would never stop. It would never leave them. It would never hurt them, never shout at them, or get drunk and hit them, or say it was too busy to spend time with them. It would always be there. And it would die to protect them. Of all the would-be lovers who came and went over the years, this thing, this machine was the only one that measured up. In an insane world, it was the sanest choice.

    It's Troll Free Thursday, so get out there and make a difference!

    And just a reminder, TFT is like a full day thing, not just for the morning links, you apes.

    1. Restoras   12 years ago

      Researchers say that oh-so trendy soda bans will likely lead to more sugar consumption as vendors logically offer bundles of smaller drinks as an end run around the law.

      The more you tighten your grip Bloomberg, the more soda you will encourage to be drunk...

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        So that means Cuomo is there to hold Bloomberg's leash? Or is it the reverse?

        1. Restoras   12 years ago

          Not sure. I do think Cuomo looks more like the Emperor and Bloomberg looks more like Vader. He certainly does look like someone cut his legs off.

          1. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

            maybe he had to much soda and has diabetes and is going to lose the leg

          2. JW   12 years ago

            If anyone in NY is the Emperor, it's Rainbow Bitch Titties.

      2. a better weapon   12 years ago

        My prediction is that decades from now after many years of Bloomberg being out of office (or dead), apathy towards this law will have grown into systemic non-enforcement and become ancient lore. The 16 oz soda ban will become a local bar trivia question about "laws you won't believe are actually on the books!"

        It'll be like the law that says a slice of cheese has to be served with apple pie in Wisconsin.

        1. Rhywun   12 years ago

          Except the ban was struck down. It's not on the books. Common sense prevails for the moment.

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            I'm assuming that'll be very short lived in NY.

    2. Cavpitalist   12 years ago

      It's Troll Free Thursday, so get out there and make a difference!

      Fuck off, slaver.

  4. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    Researchers say that oh-so trendy soda bans will likely lead to more sugar consumption as vendors logically offer bundles of smaller drinks as an end run around the law.

    A banner's job is never done.

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      Ban Hard II: Ban Harder.

      Wasn't Ban Harder the original bass player for Soundgarden? Or am I thinking of Pogo?

      1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

        Slurpee ki-yay

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          *shakes head, silently thinks "here we go again"*

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            Here we go again on our own?

            1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

              Well, it is the only road I've ever known.

              1. Counterfly   12 years ago

                Carry a laser down the road that you must follow.

              2. Jerryskids   12 years ago

                So you know what it means to walk along the lonely street of dreams?

              3. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

                Are you like a drifter, born to walk alone?

    2. some guy   12 years ago

      Once all the things are banned the only thing left to ban will be the act of banning. And after this final act we will have finally reached Libertopia.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        A banning Ouroboros?

        Oh and kudos to J.D. for a wonderful use of "Ouroboros"

    3. NeonCat   12 years ago

      The new one-drop rule will be that you have to consume soft drinks with an eye-dropper, one drop at a time. Straws will be contraband, available only with a doctor's prescription (for people with their jaws wired shut).

  5. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    When you answer the door in New Jersey, don't do so wth a joint dangling from your lips. The state's Supreme Court says that's an invitation for the cops to come in and break out the handcuffs.

    That's just criminal stupidity.

    1. Tim   12 years ago

      Stupidity is not a crime! Gimme my gubmint check!

    2. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

      Someone stole his wits.

    3. Counterfly   12 years ago

      If you do it with a bong dangling from your lips, it means you have really sticky lips.

    4. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      I thought simply living in New Jersey was an invitation for cops to come in and break out the handcuffs.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Agreed.

        "Officer, can you describe to us the reason for your arrest"

        "Yes, the subject was a resident of the State of New Jersey"

        "Nothing further, your honor"

        "Very well, I am finding that there was probable cause for the search and arrest. Counsel, please see the clerk for our next hearing date".

        1. NeonCat   12 years ago

          "He was plotting to pump his own gas!"

          1. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

            Not being able to pump your own gas offends me disproportionately so for some reason, even though I've never actually been subject to that nonsense.

            1. Counterfly   12 years ago

              It's because you hate people having jobs.

              1. T   12 years ago

                It's because you hate people having jobs.

                This covers about 95% of my politics.

    5. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

      That was my thought.

      While I don't think it should be any different than me answering the door with a beer in my hand, it IS still illegal. Don't be surprised when you get arrested while doing something illegal in front of cops.

      1. a better weapon   12 years ago

        Unless of course you're looking to film a pornstar banging herself in the back of their squad car while they're on duty, then in that case they're happy to assist you and offer to join in.

        1. Loki   12 years ago

          According to interim general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation Amir Sedadi, the two officers are currently on administrative leave pending completion of the investigation.

          They got to bang a pornstar AND they get a paid vacation out of the deal?

        2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          I hope they were wearing condoms! Wouldn't want them to get hassled by whoever enforces Measure B.

          1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

            Other cops?

    6. generic Brand   12 years ago

      But don't they have Medijuana in Jersey? So possessing MJ in and of itself should not constitute probable cause, since the person could be a card holder.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The 2013 Sheinberg Scholar-in-Residence at NYU Law School is Kathy Boudin, a convicted murderer dating back to a 1981 Brinks armored car robbery staged by the Weather Underground.

    A member of the Weather Underground found in academia? Say it ain't so!

    1. Tim   12 years ago

      Wonder how she feels about the Second Ammendment.

    2. Virginian   12 years ago

      It's not like she killed anyone important. Sometimes nobles kill peasants for sport, that's why they're nobles.

    3. Counterfly   12 years ago

      And she's not even in the Meteorology department.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        *basilisk type stare*

        Not you too.

    4. generic Brand   12 years ago

      Meh, I find it hard to get too upset over this. Our criminal justice system is supposed to make the convict serve the time and then rejoin society. If you don't like the fact that they are out and about, change the law so they are locked up longer. The information is freely available, so anyone can see the criminal record, but I don't think that it has to be publicly announced anytime that person wants to do something.

      I abhor the sex offender's database for exactly those reasons.

      1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        I abhor the sex offender's database for exactly those reasons.

        Get over it gB, you will never get that job teaching Pre-K database or no database.

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        As far as the government is concerned, sure. However, no way I'm hiring someone with a murder conviction. Yeah, I know, I'm prejudiced against murderers.

        1. Rasilio   12 years ago

          What if they murdered Nancy Pelosi? Would you hire them then?

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            I'm generally anti-murderer/employee.

          2. Agammamon   12 years ago

            No, but I might give them a hundred dollars.

      3. Virginian   12 years ago

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brinks_robbery_(1981)

        Fuck her. She's a cold blooded murderer and thief. She should have been shot in the back of the head after the guilty verdict was handed down.

  7. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Sex Pistol Johnny Rotten attacks hate mobs celebrating Baroness Thatcher's death as 'loathsome' and calls for respect

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....spect.html

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      I prefer to think of him as Public Image Ltd's Johnny Rotten.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Would John fuck Johnny Rotten?

      1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

        Doubt it.

        I bet he'd go for Liza.

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....rance.html

        1. Counterfly   12 years ago

          Wow, I honestly thought she was dead.

          1. Rich   12 years ago

            Dead or Canadian?

          2. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

            She is.

    3. wareagle   12 years ago

      when Johnny Rotten is the voice of civility and reason....

      1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

        No shit.

        1. Rhywun   12 years ago

          I love how they had to toss in speculation that he's a Nazi - doesn't that just go hand-in-hand with respecting a dead Margaret Thatcher.

      2. Restoras   12 years ago

        I hate to say it but it appears The Thatcher Era was a speed bump in the decline of Britain into complete insanity. It is reverting to trend and has now completely picked up where it left off in the late 70's. Will be interesting, and sad, to watch.

        1. WTF   12 years ago

          Yes, well, the USA is only a couple of decades, at best, behind them.

        2. Zeb   12 years ago

          You think they'll go back to outright nationalization of industries, or do it more subtly this time?

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            That's one possibility. Personally, what I think will happen there (and here, frankly) is outright nationalization with the excuse of stabilizing the broader macroeconomic environment once the whole thing starts to collapse. Temporarily, of course...

        3. Loki   12 years ago

          I hate to say it but it appears The Thatcher Reagan Era was a speed bump in the decline of Britain America into complete insanity. It is reverting to trend and has now completely picked up where it left off in the late 70's. Will be interesting, and sad, to watch.

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            That too.

      3. MJGreen   12 years ago

        Johnny Rotten's not a dummy. And didn't he give props to Ron Paul when they were both on the Tonight Show?

    4. lap83   12 years ago

      It gives me hope when a liberal actually lives up to the "compassionate" label. Sadly it doesn't happen too often.

  8. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Daredevil dies as he hurls himself off a 120ft bridge in stunt... and asks his friends to film the whole thing

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....m-him.html
    And the Darwin Award goes to...

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      How much money are those Darwin Awards worth anyway? I mean a Nobel's a cool million, but I probably won't win one of those. I mean another one of those.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        If Obama can win one, why not you or I?

        1. generic Brand   12 years ago

          We don't have the ability to peacefully bomb enough people.

          1. Bobarian   12 years ago

            Now, there's a real oportunity coming up to peacefully start a war with NK and peacefully turn the peninsula into a glowing parking lot, so if you play your cards right?

    2. Capt Ace Rimmer   12 years ago

      Near impossible to get a Darwin Award if you live in China considering blanket prohibition on reproducing

    3. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Parkour craze involves fans performing acrobatics in urban settings; Became hit after appearing in action films like James Bond

      Here we go again, blaming the movies. Do these fucks ever go on Youtube? This shit has been going on for years and years without the help of hollywood.

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        A French sport developed out of hoodlums running away from the police.

        BEST. SPORT. EVER.

        1. Agammamon   12 years ago

          Yeah, either you get to see french cops humilated when the hoddlums get away or you get to see french hoodlums humiliated when they faceplant and are carted off to jail.

          either way the french are humiliated - win/win.

      2. Agammamon   12 years ago

        That quote has to be one of the stupidest things I've seen written in a while (I make an effort not to read Krugman's articles).

        parkour was popular for like, a decade before JB or appearing in action films - it shows up in those films *because* its so popular not the other way around.

  9. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    2013 predicted to be an above-average hurricane season with 18 tropical storms and nine hurricanes

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....canes.html
    Of course it is. If it's above-average, that's proof of Global Warming. And if it's not, then that's also proof of Global Warming.

    1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      We have no clue what an "above average" hurricane season is. Until the last 30 years or so, we missed at least a third, and maybe more than a half, of all hurricanes and tropical storms because we had no clue they existed unless they hit land or a ship ran into it (and survived). It's only now that we have satellites blanketing the entirety of the Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico that we see these storms.

      Sometime between the 12th and 14th centuries, a Category 5 hurricane hit the coast of New Jersey. In 1635, the "Great Colonial Hurricane" hit Long Island as a Category 4, and then Boston/Plymouth, MA as a Category 3. Imagine the global warming hysteria if either of those hit nowadays. Sandy was a pretty tame storm in the big scheme of things.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Sandy wasn't just tame, it wasn't even a named storm when it landed, hence the "Superstorm" BS appellation.

        It wasn't a strong storm, but, my God man, where it hit! Manhattan was hurt!!1!1!

        1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

          There have been multiple studies on to what would happen if storm the size of the Long Island Express hurricane of 1938 came up the Hudson into lower Manhattan. It's never happened, but it's come close to happening (1815). JFK airport and pretty much everything in lower Manhattan (up to 20th I think?) would be under 20 feet of water.

          As an aside, Long Island/NYC used to get hit by hurricanes on a very regular basis (every 15 years or so). They were long overdue when Sandy hit.

          1. CE   12 years ago

            But, global warming?

        2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

          It was actually pretty bad in comparison to a FL hurricane in damage severity. Over 10% of the claims my company handled were over $100k in damage. Floods are a bitch. Is this was a wind event only, it would have been nothing. Average loss payment on a windstorm ~$5000, on this storm it was about $33k.

          1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

            It was actually pretty bad in comparison to a FL hurricane in damage severity. Over 10% of the claims my company handled were over $100k in damage. Floods are a bitch. Is this was a wind event only, it would have been nothing. Average loss payment on a windstorm ~$5000, on this storm it was about $33k.

            That has nothing to due with the severity of the storm, but with how fucking expensive everything is in the greater NYC area.

            1. KPres   12 years ago

              And the fact that everything in Florida is built to withstand hurricanes?

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                And the fact that everything in Florida is built to withstand hurricanes?

                Exactly. It's like when Californians were laughing our asses off at people freaking out about a 5.8 earthquake on the east coast. Many Californians didn't consider that CA construction is very focused on seismic fitness, which isn't an issue for east coast construction.

            2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

              Sorry, I meant severity as in claims payments. Insurance speaks a different language.

        3. The DerpRider   12 years ago

          The reason they made up the superstorm name was to force the insurance companies to not apply hurricane deductible.

          1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

            Most people in the Northeast don't have hurricane deductibles. Since we're not in hurricane zones, our insurance policies generally don't distinguish between hurricanes and normal storm damage.

            1. The DerpRider   12 years ago

              There is also a wind deductible, which is akin to hurricane. Every single state DOI or DFS affected sent out notices to insurers they could not apply anything other than the base deductible.

        4. WTF   12 years ago

          Actually, it was a strong storm:

          "Hurricane Sandy was the deadliest and most destructive tropical cyclone of the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season, as well as the second-costliest hurricane in United States history. Classified as the eighteenth named storm, tenth hurricane and second major hurricane of the year, Sandy was a Category 3 storm at its peak intensity when it made landfall in Cuba.[1] While it was a Category 2 storm off the coast of the Northeastern United States, the storm became the largest Atlantic hurricane on record (as measured by diameter, with winds spanning 1,100 miles (1,800 km)).

          1. generic Brand   12 years ago

            Actually, it was a strong storm:

            Nothing in your quote disproves that it wasn't a strong storm when it made landfall in the northeast, as was said above. Just because millions of people live at sea level where it struck does not make the storm itself stronger. That's like saying Katrina was a bad storm because of the damage it caused and how nobody knows how to build a damn levee system. While those things are true, Katrina was a bad storm because it was ACTUALLY a bad storm, with category 4 or 5 winds at time of landfall.

            1. WTF   12 years ago

              Katrina was Category 3 when it hit. And Sandy caused extensive damage with people in New Jersey 40 miles or more from the coast and hundreds of feet above sea level sustaining extensive damage and losses due to high winds. So it wasn't just "millions of people at sea level".

              I really don't get the desire to downplay such a destructive storm simply because it happened to hit the northeast.

              1. Bobarian   12 years ago

                "I really don't get the desire to downplay such a destructive storm simply because it happened to hit the northeast."

                Because it's the northeast? And putting parts of it under water is a good start?

                1. WTF   12 years ago

                  Because it's the northeast? And putting parts of it under water is a good start?

                  Then let me take this opportunity to wish the same on wherever it is that you live.

                  1. T   12 years ago

                    I live in Houston. Just wait a while, you'll get your wish.

                    1. WTF   12 years ago

                      I've got nothing against Houston. I actually kind of like Texas - my wife used to live there.

              2. Scarcity   12 years ago

                Saying that it wasn't a strong storm is completely independent of the amount of damage it caused. It's not downplaying anything; in fact it should serve to increase the warning about what could happed in the future. As in, "if a non-hurricane level storm can do that much damage, imagine if a storm 50% stronger hit!"

                The strength of a storm does not depend on how populous of an area it hits. The amount of property and human damage it does, does.

              3. Andrew S.   12 years ago

                Because it was a nothing storm. If that storm hits Miami, or if it hits Galveston/Houston, there's very little damage. The northeast gets hurricanes on a very regular basis, but nobody ever thought to actually build anything to withstand even a small hurricane.

              4. KPres   12 years ago

                I really don't get the desire to downplay such a destructive storm simply because it happened to hit the northeast.

                Uh, because that's exactly how they were regarding the Tornadoes that swept through the South a few years ago?

        5. Rhywun   12 years ago

          It wasn't a strong storm, but, my God man, where it hit! Manhattan was hurt!!1!1!

          Where it proceeded to cause billions of dollars in damage and made thousands homeless. Do you even know what the fuck you're talking about? Yes, it wasn't a major hurricane - if it was, we'd be talking about millions homeless simply due to the concentration of people.

          1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

            I rather imagine I know a whole bunch more about what I am talking about than you.

            I was referring (see the snark - hint:the extra ones and exclamation points) to the amount of attention and focus on how strong/powerful/"above average" the storm supposedly was - not its financial or personal impact. The unobservant, such as you, missed the fact we were discussing flawed hurricane predictions - number and strength of storms, etc - and measurement of the strength of a storm, not in wind speed or such, but in where it lands.

            1. Scarcity   12 years ago

              As an example, a hurricane season that consisted entirely of 15 Cat 1 storms that all made landfall precisely on top of a major metropolitan area would be a very WEAK season, despite the fact that the damages were in the thousands of lives and eleventy-trillions of dollars.

            2. Rhywun   12 years ago

              So you were being a pendant 🙂 Point taken.

    2. Capt Ace Rimmer   12 years ago

      Come to papa. Daddy needs some FEMA cash.

    3. mgd   12 years ago

      It may not end up being above average, but it should get a participation trophy regardless.

  10. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Gunman who held four firefighters hostage in Georgia is shot DEAD after SWAT team ends stand off with explosion

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-call.html
    Kidnap government employees and your death is a forgone conclusion.

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      Yeah, you should really restrict it to rape and murder. Kidnapping is too risky and unrewarding.

  11. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Dubai Police add ?300,000 Lamborghini to their fleet (because 0-60 in three seconds is just what they need for catching criminals)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....fleet.html

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      If you went from 0-60 you might have already crossed the entire UAE, yikes.

    2. KPres   12 years ago

      You clearly haven't seen The Last Stand.

    3. Agammamon   12 years ago

      How long before one of the cops wrecks it because he can't control the damn thing in first gear.

  12. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Bras Make Breasts "Saggier", 15-year French Study Reveals
    http://www.counselheal.com/art.....eveals.htm

    1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

      They had that on the DM but I couldn't get the page to open.

      1. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

        Just like a bra clasp.

        1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

          +2 boob

      2. Rich   12 years ago

        Nice.

    2. gaijin   12 years ago

      So Chuck Shumer wears a bra?

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        God knows he could use a Manziere.

        1. Counterfly   12 years ago

          It's called a Bro!

    3. a better weapon   12 years ago

      This is a study bought and paid for by the powerful pasties lobby.

      I watched enough natural geographic growing up to know this study is BS.

    4. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

      As any libertarian knows, providing artificial support for years tends to make things less resilient.

  13. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Vogue's new rules for models: Girls MUST eat, take breaks and work no longer than 10 hours a day

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem.....s-day.html
    Dang!

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      Should have done this a while ago. I mean with enough airbrushing, you can make Warty look like vintage Kate Moss.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        "I mean with enough airbrushing, you can make Warty look like vintage Kate Moss."

        That loud POP you heard was my brain imploding - thanks for that.

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          I think you'd have better luck turning the photo over and staring with the blank side and a stick figure.

      2. Elspeth Flashman   12 years ago

        +1 hollow laugh

    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

      " Girls MUST eat"

      but do they have to swallow and keep it down or can they spit/vomit it out before it gets digested?

  14. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Wild leopard savages 15 people - including 3 policemen - after wandering into Kathmandu suburb

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....mandu.html
    Here kitty kitty!

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Serves them right for baiting it.

    2. Zombie Jimbo   12 years ago

      Wild leopard wanders into Vogue photo shoot, savages 15 models, leaves hungry...

    3. Tim   12 years ago

      Worse than a Massachusetts Bear.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Andrew Sullivan mauls cops?

        1. Counterfly   12 years ago

          Paul Blart mauls cops?

          1. The DerpRider   12 years ago

            +1 Segway.

          2. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

            Just stop. Please.

          3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

            I see what you did there.

            Don't ever do it again.

    4. Restoras   12 years ago

      Can we finally have a serious discussion about the leopard problem?

      1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

        We need common sense solutions to the threat of leopard violence. I submit that we force all leopards to register their claws and teeth. The pads on their feet make them too silent and easy to conceal, for here on out, padded feet will be illegal. Also, no leopard needs more than 10 spots. But the ones who currently have more than ten spots will quickly use them up each time they attach, leaving less spots to be had.

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          "The pads on their feet make them too silent and easy to conceal, for here on out, padded feet will be illegal."

          Maybe they could mandate attachment of those tap shoe metal bits?

          1. Counterfly   12 years ago

            But then how would people distinguish them from the leopard honor guard?

          2. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

            *checks historical records*

            Yes, tap shoes were around in the 1700s, so that technology will be allowed. However, velcro fasteners will not. They must be tied with string or leather straps.

            Now, on to the issue of those nasty concealed teeth. Any leopard found to be concealing their assault teeth without proper governmental permissions will be de-toothed and stripped of their right to grow new ones.

          3. Agammamon   12 years ago

            All leepards must wear a caller with a bell on it.

            And we need a new division within fish and wildlife to hande the tagging, belling, and tracking of these dangerous animals.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Is that anything like tight yoga pants?

        Oh, you said leopard problem, not leotard problem.

        1. Restoras   12 years ago

          There is no such thing as a 'cameltoe problem' anyway, at least as far as I am concerned.

          1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

            There is no such thing as a 'cameltoe problem' anyway, at least as far as I am concerned.

            I bet to differ...

            http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_JAbM.....el+toe.jpg

            1. Fate   12 years ago

              Moose knuckle, not cameltoe, example disallowed.

              1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                Incorrect. Moose Knuckle refers to men wearing tight pants.

                http://www.urbandictionary.com.....se-knuckle

                1. Loki   12 years ago

                  Incorrect. Moose Knuckle refers to men wearing tight pants

                  Apparently there's some disagreement on that. From your link:

                  3. Moose-Knuckle
                  Camel-toe's fatter, uglier, sister.
                  Guy 1: See that chick's camel-toe?

                  Guy 2: Camel-toe? Dude she was so fat she had a Moose-Knuckle!

                  4. moose-knuckle
                  An intensified camel-toe or kuder-cleavage.
                  Damn girl! Your kuder must be hungry 'cause you got moose-knuckle!

                  5. moose-knuckle
                  Large, Defined outline of the male/female package.
                  "Hey, you walkin, trim up that moose-knuckle!"

                  6. moose-knuckle
                  bearded clam
                  punani in full effect

                  7. moose-knuckle
                  see camel-toe

                  FYI, I think "kuder-cleavage" might the best euphamism for this I've seen in a long, long time. I'm going to have to start useing that one.

                  1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                    DAMMIT! That'll teach me to post a link after just skimming the content.

                    Kuder-Cleavage is new to me and I likes it!

            2. Restoras   12 years ago

              You bastard! My eyes!

            3. WTF   12 years ago

              Gah! I can't unsee that! You dick!

              1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                Hey, I didn't force either of you bastards to click on that link. I simply offered a counterpoint to Restoras's assertion that there is no such thing as a camel toe problem.

                THAT, most certainly is a problem. Hell, that may be an epidemic all by itself.

      3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        CLEARLY these beasts are being driven from their natural habitat by AGW.

        The science is settled. Why do you hate the kitties?

      4. Rasilio   12 years ago

        well coverage of it in the media has been rather spotty so more discussion could only help us sink out teeth into the issue

    5. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Time to ban assault kittens

  15. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The House Intelligence Committee approved CISPA, a controversial cybersecurity bill that will give the government broad(er) access to personal data.

    Those House Republicans, the last defense against Big Government.

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about.

      Except that I've been shovelspoofing seditious material from your Facebook account. Also I poisoned your fields in Farmville.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        I wondered what happened to my famed green thumb.

        1. NeonCat   12 years ago

          I thought some anti-GMOs hacked it off because they thought it was caused by Monsanto.

      2. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

        I wish I could salt the Farmville fields after burning them.

  16. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Interactive: How the Obama budget stacks up against Paul Ryan's
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....aul-ryans/

    The Republican plans would balance the budget over 10 years by cutting spending. Deficits remain under the Democratic plans, albeit lower than they would be under current policy.

    snip

    Government debt would continue to swell under the Obama and other Democratic proposals. It would level off under the House proposal and drop under the more conservative plan.

    charts in link.

    1. Jerryskids   12 years ago

      In other news, the American Conservative Union demonstrates why the conservatives are so much better than the liberals on reining in spending. If only those nasty Tea Party folks would recognize that some welfare spending is the good kind of welfare spending. The good kind of welfare spending being defined as the kind of welfare spending you personally can make a buck off of.

      FY, CS.

    2. Joe M   12 years ago

      Notice how they don't have charts showing the year-to-year spending amounts. That makes its easier to hide the huge increases in same.

  17. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Before Meeting Syrian Opposition, Kerry Says U.S. Is Considering More Support
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04.....html?_r=1&

    Mr. Kerry said that the Obama administration still favored a diplomatic solution in which President Bashar al-Assad would hand over power to a transitional government, but that additional pressure on the Syrian leader was needed.

    "The problem is you can't get there if President Assad is unwilling to decide that he should transfer that authority, and that's the current situation," Mr. Kerry said. "So we are left with no choice but to try to find ways to get him to think differently about what lies in the future."

    1. T   12 years ago

      I seem to recall putting the 82d in planes headed towards Haiti made Raoul Cedras reconsider his plans for the future. I certainly hope that's not what Kerry means.

  18. Rich   12 years ago

    Amazing DHS grace.

    You can even thank the Primary POC personally!

  19. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Obama's drone war kills 'others,' not just al Qaida leaders
    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/201.....thers.html

    "It has to be a threat that is serious and not speculative," President Barack Obama said in a Sept. 6, 2012, interview with CNN. "It has to be a situation in which we can't capture the individual before they move forward on some sort of operational plot against the United States."

    Copies of the top-secret U.S. intelligence reports reviewed by McClatchy, however, show that drone strikes in Pakistan over a four-year period didn't adhere to those standards.

    The intelligence reports list killings of alleged Afghan insurgents whose organization wasn't on the U.S. list of terrorist groups at the time of the 9/11 strikes; of suspected members of a Pakistani extremist group that didn't exist at the time of 9/11; and of unidentified individuals described as "other militants" and "foreign fighters."

  20. heller   12 years ago

    MAAAAATT DAAAAAAMON stars in class warfare commie bullshit sci-fi movie, Elysium. It's like the liberal version of Atlas Shrugged, except with production values!

    1. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

      Elysium: a giant monocle in space.

      1. Counterfly   12 years ago

        I hated it the first time, when it was called Avatar.

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          Which was the same anti-korperashun bullshit found in Alien(s).

          KORPERASHUNS want the end civilization because, profit.

    2. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

      Taking a glance at the plot summary online, it looks like yet another exploration of various people's inability to understand that healthcare, particularly in an industrial civilization, does not fall like manna from heaven but is a man-made value and thusly limited and impossible to obtain "by right" unless you're using a gun. Like Matt Damon is in that Youtube still.

      Last thing I saw Damon in was some "hunger awareness" ad where he talked about your "coworkers" possibly going hungry. Uh huh. Put that on the shelf next to the food desert and poor people are so fat pearlclutchery.

    3. generic Brand   12 years ago

      From the Wikipedia entry on the movie:

      The film will explore political themes such as "immigration, health care and class issues".

      Yep. Heller's story checks out.

    4. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

      Too damn bad. I liked District 9, it wasn't overly preachy. This looks like OWS in space.

    5. Loki   12 years ago

      MAAAAATT DAAAAAAMON stars in class warfare commie bullshit sci-fi movie, Elysium. It's like the liberal version of Atlas Shrugged, except with production values!

      You really don't need to go any further than "class warfare commie bullshit". And of course it has production values: it's class warfare commie bullshit, which means Hollywood is fully behind it.

  21. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

    Obama has performance review with his bosses today. Good luck Barry.
    http://mobile.bloomberg.com/ne.....-week.html

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      With Valerie and David by his side I'm sure he'll do just fine.

  22. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Thatcher Was Right: A Dependent Society Will Fail
    http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/.....aspx#page1

    The courage to confront the unions and their big government enablers, to stem Britain's decline into socialism, took guts ? the kind that's rare in the United States today. Our country is slip sliding towards mediocrity in much the same way Britain did in the 1970s.

    More and more of our policy decisions are driven not by what's best for the U.S. but rather what's best for politicians who chase after voting blocks like hounds on the scent and whose favors are often for sale to the highest bidder. The efficiency of markets has been sidelined for the inefficiencies of K Street loyalties and central planning.

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      hasn't more than one non-liberal Brit warned us that the US is where the UK used to be, and that doing the same things will not lead to a different result?

    2. Matrix   12 years ago

      I was talking about this with one of my coworkers on our way back from lunch. All these liberal assholes want to make our country like Europe with their 'free' healthcare and all the other BS. Why don't they move to Europe or all these other wonderful lands of socialism that they love so much? Why do they have to impose that shit on us? People have fled those countries to get away from that nonsense, and we are trying to erect that crap here. Those refugees lament the fact that we are turning into the places they fled. We are one of the last bastions of freedom in this world, and the statist bastards want to take it away from us. No more! They need to go to those countries they love so much and leave us the hell alone!

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        I went to business school with a woman who emmigrated from Russia. I have yet to meet anyone who despised Democrats, liberals, and socialism more vehemently.

        1. Matrix   12 years ago

          she already sounds more American than the socialists in this country

          1. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

            Haha, looks like we were thinking the same thing.

        2. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

          Some of my best friends are immigrants from former communist/socialist countries. Naturalized or not they're truer Americans than most of the native-born.

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            It's very difficult to appreciate true freedom if you haven't lived under the yoke of tyranny.

        3. Loki   12 years ago

          Most Russians I've met, especially the ones old enough to remember what life was actually like under communism, despise socialism more than anyone I've ever seen. Other than maybe Cubans. Funny that.

      2. a better weapon   12 years ago

        Its because they believe their loyalty to the cause will be paid back with the fruit of others when they get their way.

        They've lived in a (sort of) free society for long enough to know their own ambition and effort isn't enough to take care of themselves.

        1. Matrix   12 years ago

          Statism is a disease that is always hungry. It is NEVER satisfied. It always wants more power and more control. It abhors the thought that someone, somewhere might be living life of freedom. It cannot tolerate a free society. It must spread its infection everywhere until we are all consumed by it. But it will continue to feed until there is nothing left to feed upon, and it has either consumed itself into oblivion, or we have all perished.

      3. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

        Don't forget the bloody-minded egalitarianism angle, where equally distributed misery is the goal.

        1. AlexInCT   12 years ago

          Not for the elites though. After all, they earned it by the virtue they are doing all the "heavy lifting" to make sure everyone else is equally miserable...

      4. Jerryskids   12 years ago

        Change a few words there and you could be talking about the refugees from California fleeing into the neighboring states and immediately turning them into California.

        1. Matrix   12 years ago

          California has its good things. So people that leave there assume that by enacting some of the socialist crap that was in California, they can have the same thing too in the areas they fled too. Unfortunately, they will end up with the same BS they had in California and none of the benefits.

          And sometimes, depending on yourself is just too hard.

          1. Heedless   12 years ago

            Mere socialism will not, contrary to popular opinion, turn your landlocked mountain state into a sunny coastal paradise. Only a true revolution of the working class can accomplish such marvels.

            Forward, comrades!

      5. generic Brand   12 years ago

        They need to go to those countries they love so much and leave us the hell alone!

        I definitely agree with you wholeheartedly, but the mindset of most statists here in America is "if you love _____ so much, why don't you move there!" So they think the same thing, but rather than see that America used to be more free (in regards to drugs, manufacturing, business, you name it), they only see what it's been like in their lifetimes and assume we want to take them back into the dark ages.

        My girlfriend is a prime example of this, unfortunately. When I bring up how ridiculous the War on Drugs is and how countries like Portugal have completely decriminalized drugs, she throws up her hands and says "Why don't you move to Portugal then?"

  23. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    The House Intelligence Committee approved CISPA, a controversial cybersecurity bill that will give the government broad(er) access to personal data.

    This bill allows the government to call the IRS?

  24. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Give Monogamy a Chance
    Students, who in class recognize the ethical imperative not to use other people as means to an end, do so every night in their dorms.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/.....TopOpinion

    According to various academic studies, 65% to 75% of undergraduates report having participated in the hookup culture. But many are troubled by it. In a survey that Ms. Freitas gave to 1,010 students from Catholic and secular institutions, around 50% had reservations about whether casual sex is acceptable. Three quarters of the respondents objected to the notion, central to the hookup culture, that "sex is primarily the taking of pleasure from another person." And contrary to depictions in popular culture, men are just as troubled by casual sex as women are.

    So why do they do it? Social pressure plays a large role. But there is something else. College students may not be lusting after sex so much as they are chasing after relationships. In our wider culture, where more and more interactions are occurring via text messages, Facebook, Twitter and email rather than face-to-face or at the very least on the phone, students are yearning for meaningful connections. Hooking up offers an immediate substitute for the relationships and romance that young people admit they want, but without the constraints and sacrifices that authentic relationships require.

    1. Zeb   12 years ago

      "sex is primarily the taking of pleasure from another person."

      That's a weird thing to say. How do you take pleasure from another person?

      Is this another case of people who think that everything is zero-sum?

      1. wareagle   12 years ago

        if you're taking someone else's pleasure, aren't you doing it wrong? Last I checked, there was some giving of pleasure involved.

      2. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Strange it is. Should be "with" or "in" another person.

        1. Counterfly   12 years ago

          Or "in front of"..."while they laugh at you"...

          ..."and throw unspeakable things at you"...

      3. SugarFree   12 years ago

        It's the same antagonistic viewpoint as "rape culture" and Dworkin's nonsense. Sex is never between two individuals, but is rather a predator class attacking a victim class. There is never a give and take of pleasure, but only a taker and a one who is taken from in modal isolation from one another.

        1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          It's almost enough to make you think they've never had sex.

          1. a better weapon   12 years ago

            Well I guess if they're unimaginative in the sack and lay their like a board, its understandable why they would assume they're just a victim in the act.

            1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

              But it sounds like he doesn't think you should think you're the victim, but the victimizer. So whatever sex he's had has been good for him and bad for the other person.

            2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

              hey, you're talking about one of my exs there

        2. CE   12 years ago

          The ironic thing is that they assume the giver is always the taker.

      4. db   12 years ago

        Vatch...as she takes ze pleasure from ze serpent...

    2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      Three quarters of the respondents objected to the notion, central to the hookup culture, that "sex is primarily the taking of pleasure from another person."

      What hookup culture is that notion central to?

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        The one he's built in his head over years and years of being angry that no girl would give him the time of day.

        1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          And now no girl who has read that column ever will. Selfish fucker.

          1. Scarcity   12 years ago

            Selfish fucker

            Quite literally, apparently.

        2. Restoras   12 years ago

          I bet he thought when he became a professor that finally - finally! - attractive young coeds would be swooning at his feet in order to secure a good grade. Unfortunately the rampant grade inflation has eliminated that perk and you can't give a double-4.0.

          1. a better weapon   12 years ago

            or OR! its happening more than ever, hence the grade inflation, and he's now REALLY pissed about not getting any.

      2. BelowTheRim   12 years ago

        As someone who has only been out of college for 4-years, I would say that even though this bloke's whining is pretty pedantic, there can be a lot of social pressure to have a lot of one-nighters.

        That said, social pressure is present in almost every aspect of life and this guy needs to understand that applies to sex too even if it makes him upset.

        1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          there can be a lot of social pressure to have a lot of one-nighters.

          Oh, I'm not disputing that, but in my experience the people doing it think they're both having fun.

          1. Counterfly   12 years ago

            Yeah, but you're a harlot, so we can't trust anything you say.

        2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          there can be a lot of social pressure to have a lot of one-nighters.

          I didn't feel that at all. There were some people that did that a lot, but there was never any "Auric, what are you doing with that same girl still? Get out there and bang some randoms!"

          1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

            I got it from chick friends, for sure. I mean how do you think I ended up being a total whore? PEER PRESSUREZ

            1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              Men aren't your peers, nicole. It is the patriarchy, not "peer pressure".

              1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                No no, it was women who were saying this. It was "not normal" to be in a relationship when you were "supposed to be" out banging a different person every night.

                1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                  I'm aware that you think it was the women who who telling you this. They probably think they were the ones saying it too. But the pressure wasn't really from them. They were just tools of men.

    3. Spoonman.   12 years ago

      DERP

    4. Robert S   12 years ago

      RTFA - Read the Fucking Article

      Can we come up with an acronym for "Briefly Peruse the Article to Determine the Author's Gender Before Engaging in Ad Hominem Attacks Based on the Author's Gender"?

  25. Rich   12 years ago

    "There is a whole new sort of group of individuals now who ? I don't know what the numbers are ? that never hunt at all," Biden said. "But they own guns for one of two reasons, self-protection or they just like the feel of that AR-15 at the range."

    God love ya, Joe!

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      There is a whole new sort of group of individuals now who - I don't know what the numbers are - that never get abortions at all...

    2. Virginian   12 years ago

      Or they participate in IDPA or three gun or other practical shooting. But that's not a real sport, it's terrorist training or something.

      1. db   12 years ago

        You'd think DVC stands for "Deviant Vicious Criminal" the way these assholes demonize us.

    3. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      uh duh...

      I also like having a car with more power than I need. I also like owning more land than I could possibly use. And going to a restaurant that serves more food than I could possibly eat.

      Shooting is fun - even hitting targets with a little .22 rifle brings out the competitive spirit in me.

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        I had a Marlin semi-auto .22 when I was a kid. Plinking with that was just so much fun.

    4. db   12 years ago

      Yes?

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        My thoughts exactly. So he owns a gun just because he wants to. What's the problem?

    5. JW   12 years ago

      "But they own guns for one of two reasons, self-protection or they just like the feel of that AR-15 at the range."

      Practice makes perfect.

    6. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      Yeah, silly me for wanting to own guns even though I don't like hurting animals.

  26. Jordan   12 years ago

    Another outstanding article from Detlev Schlicter, this time taking on central bank idiocy, Japan, and the myth of the deflationary death spiral.
    It's official: Global economic policy now firmly in the hands of money cranks

    Those commentators who tell us that this 'crippling deflation' is hurting the economy because people postpone spending decisions in anticipation of lower prices, want us to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Watanabe don't buy a new popup toaster for ?3,930 this year because ? at a 0.6 percent p.a. deflation rate ? they can reasonably assume that it will only cost ?3,906 to buy the same toaster next year. And they won't even buy it next year at ?3,906 because the year after that it will only cost ?3,883. The Watanabes would thus be able to save ?47 over two years by not eating any toast (and it goes without saying that they may save considerably more by never eating toast!). This is a saving of ? wait for it! ? $0.47 or ?0.31 (at present exchange rates) for postponing the purchase of a standard consumption item for two years ? 730 mornings without toast!

    1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

      'crippling deflation'

      Oh for fuck sake. really? OH NOES! Our money is becoming more valuable... what ever shall we do?

      Ok, step 1: LOCK THIS SHIT DOWN!!
      Step 2: PRINT ALL THE MONEY!!!!
      Step 3: inflation.

      Whew. Couldn't have those savings accounts increase in value. We might have to start taxing the balances if people got too wealthy.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        The real danger of deflation for the establishment is that if money gets more valuable just sitting there, you don't need banks and they won't be able to keep track of how much you have.

    2. robc   12 years ago

      I disproved the deflationary death spiral concept years ago:

      Q: Have we ever failed to come out of a deflationary period?
      A: No.

      Concept disproved by counterexample. In fact all of them, as it never happens.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        How do you know that isn't what got the dinosaurs?

        How about that, hmm, smartguy?

      2. JW   12 years ago

        Consumer tech has been in a deflationary death spiral for years now.

        I still dream about the technology that was wiped out as a result. "Remember those pretentious dickweeds and their precious iPhones? I'd kill to have them back."

        1. CE   12 years ago

          I miss the good old Atari, Sega 16 and NEC TurboGrafx.

  27. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Has anyone ever believed the IRS is subject to Constitutional restraints?

    The IRS is what other government agencies want to be when they grow up.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      Well, the IRS is unconstitutional in and of itself, so no.

      1. Virginian   12 years ago

        Pretty sure the 16th amendment, combined with necessary and proper clause, makes it constitutional.

        1. robc   12 years ago

          Although the requirement to calculate your own taxes is a violation of the 13th Amendment.

          1. Virginian   12 years ago

            You are compensated. Not going to jail is compensation. Get with the program serf...er...I mean citizen.

            1. db   12 years ago

              Citizen don't serf!

              Ima make that a bumper sticker.

              1. gaijin   12 years ago

                Serfs Down!

          2. Emmerson Biggins   12 years ago

            and the 5th

    2. RBS   12 years ago

      "They're like the Mafia, they can take anything they want."

  28. Rich   12 years ago

    Goat's head delivered to Wrigley

    "And the Soup of the Day is ...."

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      They are doin' it wrong. They should have had the headless goat placed in Theo's bed. Cripes, its like these people have never seen The Godfather or something.

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        What does Cliff Huxtable's son have to do with the Cubs' curse?

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          Never. Do. That. Ever. Again.

  29. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    what happened to RC Dean? Vacation? Real work?

    1. Zeb   12 years ago

      Didn't he say he was moving? Maybe busy with that.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        Maybe he went to rescue Groovus Maximus?

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          Escape from Donetsk?

          1. NeonCat   12 years ago

            Now I'm picturing Dr. Groovus insisting on facing peril as RC drags him away.

  30. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

    "Small banks that received TARP loans from the feds repayed the money with money from another federal program meant to boost lending to small businesses, says a government watchdog."

    Just a small addition, it always bugs me when they say someone [repaid] TARP money--because it makes it sound like all's well that ends well...

    Fact is, when they say someone repaid TARP, they mean they gave the money back to the government--but that money didn't come from the government. It was raised through the sale of treasuries (most of them with a ten year maturity), which means the money is money ultimately comes out of the taxpayers' pockets.

    The government hasn't retired any ten year treasuries with the TARP money that's been supposedly "paid back". They respent every dime that was "paid back" and more--mostly on stimulus. The government hasn't given us a $700 billion tax break to pay back the taxpayers...

    In other words, not only has the principal on TARP not been "paid back" to the taxpayers who are paying for it--the principal hasn't even come out of the taxpayers' paychecks yet. We won't pay for it until sometime after those treasuries mature in 2018--unless the government actually slashes spending by $700 billion or so before then.

    Having spent the TARP money that was "paid back" is one of the reasons why Barack Obama is one of America's most horrible people.

    1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      Because that's what I was so upset about?

      It wasn't that I was being forced to bailout both Wall Street and the UAW with my future paychecks--oh no...

      I was just upset that the fucking government wasn't getting their money back?!

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

      Dude, most people can't figure their change at McDonald's. The idea that the populace is going to wake up and realize that the Feds are burning their money in a big pit in Arizona is a pipe dream.

      1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

        Well, it isn't gonna happen if nobody calls out the jokers every time they say someone paid TARP back.

        Where's my check? Did it get lost in the mail?

        They didn't pay me back!

        That muthafucka in the White House used my future income to bailout the fucking UAW...

        And I want every. freaking. penny. back now!

      2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

        One of the things that drives me crazy is when I go to a store and the total comes out to something like $1.86 and I give then $2.11 so I can get a quarter in change instead of my pocket filling up with pennies, and the cashier reacts like I just performed some amazing magic trick.

      3. Joshua   12 years ago

        Wouldn't we actually be better off if the Feds would just burn money in a big pit in AZ?

        1. BuSab Agent   12 years ago

          That's what I was thinking.

  31. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    "sex is primarily the taking of pleasure from another person."

    Wait, what?

    1. db   12 years ago

      This would explain my first girlfriend's technique.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        FEEL THE BURN!

        1. db   12 years ago

          Feel the *POP*, more like.

        2. Restoras   12 years ago

          No, the teeth...

          1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

            argh! flashback!

            1. Bobarian   12 years ago

              That's what safe-words are for...

              HAND-BANANA!

  32. db   12 years ago

    Oh, yeah, BTW I'll be at Knob Creek on Friday looking for all the deals on cheap ammo that will be sure to he had. I have a feeling the only thing worth buying there this spring will be a t-shirt.

    1. generic Brand   12 years ago

      Knob Creek the distillery?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

        Whiskey and ammo sounds like fun to me.

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          http://www.knobcreekrange.com/.....-gun-shoot

          I forgot that was this week-end. If you've got hundreds of dollars to burn, you can shoot M2 .50 Cal or maybe a mini-gun at old cars and refrigerators.

          And you're right db, There are probably few deals to be had.

          1. db   12 years ago

            I'm not even bothering to bring my MGs, as ammo is bound to be pricey.

  33. SugarFree   12 years ago

    Jezebellians encouraged to spend even more time being self-absorbed.

    1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      At least the comments are genuinely amusing.

      1. Virginian   12 years ago

        Is this peak crazy?

        1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          Oh, be nice. They're actually talking about something real. That gets points--I mean, the bar is low here.

          1. Virginian   12 years ago

            They're talking, as far as I can tell from mousing over the link, about studying their own poop.

            What the actual fuck?

            1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

              They're talking about what you can tell about your health/the health of your diet from your poop, yeah. Pretty basic but a far cry from rape culture.

            2. Zeb   12 years ago

              It's not a bad idea. I don't spend a lot of time examining poop, but I generally take a quick look.

              1. Counterfly   12 years ago

                I can usually tell without looking. Just sayin'. Although, the mechanics of most toilets make it where you have to go out of your way NOT to at least, as you say, take a quick look.

                Also I have one of those guys like in The Last Emporer that does it for me.

                1. Restoras   12 years ago

                  Does what? Takes your dump for you, or examines it for you?

                  1. Counterfly   12 years ago

                    I don't know what version of The Last Emporer you saw...

            3. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

              The most underrated thing in the world is a good dump.

              1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                And yet whenever I mention anal y'all all freak out.

                1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                  Who freaks out about anal? I still find it difficult to believe there are guys out there that don't like doing anal.

                  1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                    Me too but it's usually good for a few "eww, gross, that's a one-way street" comments, even in this cesspool.

                    1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      I always laughed at the "eww, icky stuff comes out of there" argument... Uhh, have you ever seen the stuff that comes out of a vagina??

                      I mean, KIDS come out of there. What could be more disgusting than that. 😉

                    2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                      Uhh, have you ever seen the stuff that comes out of a vagina??

                      For reals. Not to mention peeing with your dick! Eww!

                    3. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      It's ridiculous, the entire concept of sex of any type is a dirty, filthy endeavor.

                    4. Rasilio   12 years ago

                      I don't particularly like anal, not because it is gross but frankly because it doesn't feel as good and takes too much work.

                      I'd much rather just spend 45 minutes going down on her

                  2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                    Who freaks out about anal? I still find it difficult to believe there are guys out there that don't like doing anal.

                    What is hard to understand about buttholes being gross? If I wouldn't touch it with my mouth I'm not touching it with my penis either.

                    1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      Blood, urine, rotting uterine lining and several other nasty substances come out of the vagina. Do you have a problem with vaginas because of that? I'm guessing you don't, but you would like the vagina to be clean. Why can that not be the case for an anus?

                    2. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      I also don't understand your "if I wouldn't touch it with my mouth I'm not touching it with my penis either" issue.

                      Why? you can't taste with your penis, so flavor isn't it. Your penis can't ingest things. Your penis serves a completely different function than your mouth. How does sticking one somewhere equate to the other?

                    3. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                      Got it. You like poop. That's weird, but fine; I don't really care. But it shouldn't be that hard to figure out why some people find it gross. I don't mind putting my mouth on a vagina, but I can still understand why someone might think it was gross and not want to do it.

                    4. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      No, I do not like poop. Just the same as I don't like urine, blood, uterine lining, etc... HENCE, why I put that little word in there... wait, which one was it... oh yeah CLEAN!

                      I just find it absurd that you're ok with a orifice that has multiple types of nasty substances come out of it, but the poop hole is too too icky. Clean it up, and it's a wonderful cavern of pleasure.

                      But, if you want to deny yourself that kind of pleasure for the sake of infantile aversions, so be it.

                    5. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                      "Clean" it up, and it's still an asshole.

                      But, if you want to deny yourself that kind of pleasure for the sake of infantile aversions, so be it.

                      And so are you.

                    6. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      So what is your actual aversion to assholes then if not the dirty part? If you clean it up, it's no longer dirty. It's just a warm, tight, fleshy hole that feels better than the other hole.

                      Look man, if you don't like buttsecks, fine. But at least be honest about why you don't like it. Claiming it's because icky stuff comes out of there is disingenuous at best. Icky stuff comes out of EVERY hole in the human body at some point. So are you celibate? I doubt it.

                      But please, don't try to claim it's because it's dirty even when it's not dirty. Don't claim I like poop because I like anal. And I won't call you infantile. Deal?

                    7. Jerryskids   12 years ago

                      Ok, let's not avoid the real issue here, guys. If you're into anal, chances are the real reason is so that you can avoid looking at that icky vagina and just pretend you're fucking somebody with a penis.

                    8. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      Yeah, I've heard that one before too... "You like anal? What are you, gay?" Uh, no... I like anal WITH WOMEN. I'll leave the gay butsecks to Jesse.

                    9. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                      But there is SO MUCH GAY BUTSECKS TO BE HAD. I am only one man.

                      Not that that will stop me from trying my best.

                    10. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                      Get that funky butt lovin!

                      I'm not saying everyone who doesn't like buttsecks is homophobic, but I've heard the "buttsecks is for fags" argument so so many times. I just shake my head anymore.

                      It's the same as the finger up the butt thing. Personally, not a fan of it. Doesn't mean that trying it made me gay, does it?

                2. Counterfly   12 years ago

                  Well, I mean, are you for it or again' it?

                  Actually, never mind, either answer will make me freak out.

                  1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                    Me? All for it.

                    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

                      So, uh, how's it going and stuff?

                    2. db   12 years ago

                      I have a friend who confided in me that his wife wants to try it but he's a little grossed out. I told him to make sure she cleans up beforehand and take it slowly and there's nothing but pleasure ahead. If she's into it and you're clean and careful, it is no different (apart from the way it feels) from vaginal sex.

    2. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

      http://www.theonion.com/articl.....yal,32007/

  34. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    what happened to RC Dean? Vacation? Real work?

    Overthrowing the Venezuelan government?

    I've got my fingers crossed.

    1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      He must be on vacation.

    2. db   12 years ago

      Do you think he'll grant us all citizenship for free?

    3. John Galt   12 years ago

      RC Dean is Venezuelan?

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        he will be once he starts his reign of libertarian terror.

        1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

          reign of libertarian terror.

          HA! I've seized your government! NOW PREPARE FOR THE HORRORS OF BEING LEFT ALONE!!! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    4. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      I think he's gone on a Taken style vengeance trip.

      "I will find you... and I will sue you."

  35. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

    Hollande rejoices! http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/he.....one-eaten/

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      My biggest problem with the whole damn situation is, why didn't they give him the "bigger and better-looking camel" in the first place?!

    2. John Galt   12 years ago

      So the farmer's farm was damaged by French tanks so the French president gives the farmer a camel with an extra mouth to feed to raise for the president and the farmer misunderstands and feeds the camel to his family?

      Sounds less like a misunderstanding and more like a justifiable F.U. from the farmer.

  36. John Galt   12 years ago

    With a little luck enough Big Gulps will help the young lady in the image to develop some breasts.

    1. BelowTheRim   12 years ago

      Can't have that, then the patriarchy would have converted another young girl to accepting the rape culture of desire that has ruined our young strong women.

  37. Matrix   12 years ago

    Despite a court order to the contrary, the IRS has apparently been spying on emails without obtaining warrants first.

    Warrants? We don't need to steenking warrants!

  38. Loki   12 years ago

    That chick in the picture is way too skinny to be drinking a Big Gulp. Only fatties with no self control who need the kind benevolent hand of their betters drink Big Gulps. Nanny Bloomie says so, so it must be true.

  39. Virginian   12 years ago

    Just did my taxes. Looks like I have a 500 dollar refund coming. So I'm either going to put it towards a new gaming rig or a new gun.

    1. Restoras   12 years ago

      New gun!

      1. Tim   12 years ago

        You can get a new gen XBOX or go on a 2 year waiting list, plus up to 3 rounds to load it with when it finally ships.

        1. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

          I vote learn how to build an AK from a receiver flat.

          1. db   12 years ago

            Or a shovel.

      2. Counterfly   12 years ago

        Gaming rig! (I assume you mean PC. Because if you meant console, then buy the gun, and use it on yourself!)

        1. Virginian   12 years ago

          Dude, glorious PC gaming master race.

          1. Counterfly   12 years ago

            Phew. Although honestly, I'm not looking forward to anything coming out anytime soon enough to upgrade right now.

            1. Virginian   12 years ago

              BF4 is coming out within the year. And I have played that franchise with the same group of guys for like...seven years? eight?

              It's a day one buy for me.

    2. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

      Oof, that's a tough choice.

      How old is your current gaming rig? If it's old enough, I'd say go with that. If it's adequate, buy a gun. You can never have too many guns.

      1. Virginian   12 years ago

        I really need a new one though. I have case, power supply, data drives. Would just need to buy new mobo, RAM, SSD, and CPU. Which I hope I can get for not much more then 500. Might need a new GFX card too.

        1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

          That's doable for under $500 if you're building it yourself and don't mind tech that's a few paces behind SOA. Where do you usually get your parts from?

          1. Virginian   12 years ago

            NewEgg usually. Although Amazon undercut them on the pricing of my processor three years ago.

            1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

              Awesome. I rarely buy all the components from once source. NewEgg is usually one of the major suppliers of parts for me, but I always check around for RAM and HDDs. MoBos and Video cards don't vary that much in price and processors are usually about the same too, but RAM and HDDs can be half the cost at another site.

              1. Virginian   12 years ago

                Yeah I'll be sure to shop around for RAM. I really want an SSD though, for mounting the OS and the games. What's a good size and price point?

                1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                  A good size? Whatever she tells you is...

                  I haven't purchased an SSD yet because of the price. It's down to less than a dollar a Gig, so prices have dropped significantly. I'd say go with one that's large enough to install your OS and a few of your favorite games on.

                  Given your limited budget for the computer, you can either go with a small SSD and then a larger HDD for storage, or you can get a few standard HDDs and stripe them together for faster access.

                  I went with a nice 1TB stripped raid system using standard drives. It's fat enough and didn't cost an arm and a leg.

        2. MJGreen   12 years ago

          I did a nice upgrade in late 2011 for $500. Mobo, 8 GB RAM, an SSD and i5-2500k. Naturally, the improved processors are available at the same price, and SSDs continue to drop.

          And I'm also getting $500 in rebates. But I should be getting it right as I go on vacation, so that's where it'll probably be spent.

    3. generic Brand   12 years ago

      Refund? What's that?

      Haha, seriously though, put your money towards whatever will give you more long term satisfaction. I don't own any guns (although I want to), but I get a lot of stress off my back by popping Fallout 3, Call of Duty, or FIFA 13 into my PS3 after work.

      Popping off some rounds at the shooting range can be pretty satisfying as well though.

  40. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Huh. The "economics reporter" on Bloomberg is talking about Bitcoin, right now. You'll never guess what he doesn't like about it.

    Hint: there is no provision for infinite expansion of the Bitcoin money supply by Top Men.

  41. WomSom   12 years ago

    Those dudes really do seem to know whats going on. Wow.

    http://www.AnonNow.tk

  42. Tim   12 years ago

    At the farm, it's a sure sign of spring now that the rooster is racing around the yard banging hens. They bend over to get a worm and the worm gets them, so to speak. Roosters are shameless little STEVE SMITHs.

  43. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I listened to a few minutes of Morning Joke today. They were having a serious conversation about gunz; with the Vice President, miscellaneous assorted nodders, and some cop dressed up like an admiral (What would really have made that outfit pop? One of those three-foot-diameter Russian General hats.).

    Content? None. Merely a rousing chorus of "wouldn't it be nice" hypotheticals and a lot of

    "You're awesome!"

    "No, YOU"RE awesome!"

    Gag.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      What would really have made that outfit pop? One of those three-foot-diameter Russian General hats.

      He should go the North Korean route and invent so many medals that he has to start pinning them to his pants.

  44. Virginian   12 years ago

    http://deslide.clusterfake.net.....87,00.html

    50 fatty meals from the fifty states.

    1. Counterfly   12 years ago

      Florida, the home of Grunts 'n' Grits AND the conch fritter, gets freaking empanadas?

      Where's my smashing hammer?

      1. Counterfly   12 years ago

        And Hooters! Sheesh.

    2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      BACON! - Michigan

    3. Evan from Evansville   12 years ago

      Indiana's nod: Brain burger from my namesake.

      Shit isn't bad, frankly. But it's certainly a once-a-year type of thing.

    4. Elspeth Flashman   12 years ago

      I'm all for bacon wrapped meatloaf.

    5. mr simple   12 years ago

      Really? All Kentucky got was a KFC food item? They've never even been to the state, have they?

    6. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Ha, I knew NY would be the Garbage Plate. My cousin keeps trying to get me to go out for one anytime I visit family out there.

    7. Trespassers W   12 years ago

      That Eskimo ice cream looks sooo paleo.

  45. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

    http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_n.....again?lite

    http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_n.....stand?lite

    Steve Benen has been attacking Rand Paul for "brazenly lying" about always supporting the 1964 Civil Rights Act during his speech yesterday at Howard University.

    What Benen is apparently not understanding (or brazenly being dishonest about?) is that Paul never said he would have voted against the CRA. All he ever did was answer a hypothetical about his discomfort with 1/9th of the provisions of the CRA.

    1. BelowTheRim   12 years ago

      What Benen is apparently not understanding (or brazenly being dishonest about?)

      He's not understanding that any percieved chance to take a shot at Rand is a good career move for him.

      Pretty simple

      1. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

        It's a good thing that a legacy media outlet covered this, with its vast resources and fact-checkers and everything. Wouldn't want any of those sleazy irresponsible bloggers hogging all the action.

    2. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

      Interesting that all of this stems from a goofy, hypothetical, "Libertarians are Dangerous Ideologues!!!!" exchange between Maddow and Rand Paul on her show. It's almost as if the show's writers purposely concocted this storyline in case Rand decided to run for president.

      1. Elspeth Flashman   12 years ago

        You know who else was a dangerous ideologue?

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          Egon Krenz?

        2. Cheradenine Zakalwe   12 years ago

          MLK Jr.?

  46. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

    That our government would even consider enacting "sensible" and "reasonable" gun regulation is exactly why we have the Second Amendment.

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      why do you hate children?

      1. Rasilio   12 years ago

        Have you spent any time around the annoying little fucks?

    2. Jerryskids   12 years ago

      Nobody seriously believes 'Congress shall make no law' literally means 'Congress shall make no law', it obviously means 'Congress shall make no unreasonable law'.

      Well, nobody serious seriously believes that, anyway. There was that crackpot James Madison who explicitly said 'Congress shall make no law' means 'Congress shall make no law', but how the hell would he know what the author of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights meant by 'Congress shall make no law'?

  47. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Biden did mention, on Morning Joke, the President's awesome new brain mapping project. Apparently (given infinite funding and a generous dose of magic-wand-waving) we will soon be able to conclusively determine who's crazy and who isn't.

    I envision a process in which the "test subject" goes, or is delivered by cheerful and friendly Public Health technicians, to the government clinic to be scanned. He sits under a plexiglass globe much like the ones you see in a hair salon, only with a red and a green light on top. You can fill in the blanks from there.

    1. BelowTheRim   12 years ago

      I'm only 26, you guys scare the poop out of me every day.

      This could be my future, mostly because I hate artificial authority.

      I HOPE I DIE BEFORE I GET OLD!

      1. Raston Bot   12 years ago

        cryofreeze yourself until after the great collapse

        -j. cord

    2. Warty   12 years ago

      I've worked on some brain-mapping stuff. He's full of shit. This is just funneling some more cash to the NIH of NSF to give to professors, his core voters.

      1. Matrix   12 years ago

        but they'll claim it's science and use it to enact all sorts of crazy laws and regulations that will continue to siphon away our freedoms.

    3. JW   12 years ago

      "You brain scan is complete and the results have been analyzed. Please report immediately to disintegration booth #25."

  48. Warty   12 years ago

    Small banks that received TARP loans from the feds repaid the money with money from another federal program meant to boost lending to small businesses, says a government watchdog. Yes, it's like Ouroboros, but stupider.

    There's this amazingly stupid guy who has the same name as me, and thinks my email address is his email address. He likes to get payday loans, because he's stupid, and so every couple weeks I get an email from the payday loan people confirming the loan. Lately, because he's really stupid, he's started getting payday loans to pay off his payday loans. I should track him down and let him know he's so stupid that he's qualified for high office.

  49. Matrix   12 years ago

    Why is the media silent about the abortion murder trials?

  50. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Florida, the home of Grunts 'n' Grits

    Still talking about poop?

  51. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

    Dentata is real

    Beaver Bites Man To Death In Belarus Attack

  52. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

    "...Merchants of Death at Planned Parenthood..."

    /eyeroll

    1. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

      Sorry, this was in response to Matrix above.

  53. Matrix   12 years ago

    Another bad law based on a dead child
    Mother of a murdered teen pushes for laws mandating cell phone carriers release information to law enforcement.

    Yes, I'm a fucking monster because I don't support compelling cell phone carriers to give up information just because the police deem something an emergency.

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      "It would not have saved Kelsey's life," Missey Smith said of the law she is advocating, "But it would have saved us four days of agony not knowing where our child was."

      So, this law would have been just as effective in her case as the new background checks law would have been on Adam Lanza.

    2. bostonaod   12 years ago

      If you dig into the example they cite of one of the bill's success stories, they pinged the cell phone of a suspected kid-toucher

      link

  54. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    He's full of shit.

    You know that; I know that. Unfortunately, the mouth-breathing dolts who comprise the vast majority of the MSNBC target market will smile and nod, and say, "That would be awesome!" In the interim, we get three person review panels staffed by pinchfaced scolds who look like they were snatched right out of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.

  55. speedy loan   12 years ago

    First Bloomberg or ayone else who tries to decide what another person can have to eat or drink is wrong. Eash individual decides for themself. That is an individual right guaranteed by our Constituition. Next to say that people below the poverty line are more likely to be obese than tose who well above it is likely a true statement but not just because of sugary drinks. It's because of their total diet and lack of mobility. The foods they eat are not bnutritious but are the foods the money they have will purchase and the need to make their incomes stretch as far as they will go. Sometimes like the rubber band they break. People like Bloomberg have never been there and do not know what it is like. I noted though he did not allow control of the alcoholic drinks and they are worse for a person. So Why Not ? Contrary to opinions Bloomberg is not his brothers keeper. And most people would appreciate being left alone and allowed to decide for themselves regardless of consequences.

  56. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

    i haven't done drop in for years. been with the same team for about 10. 2 seasons a year. summer starts this weekend.

    winter has a 3-game series for the final. we lost game three 2-1. I clanged one of the crossbar on a shorthanded breakaway that would have tied it with about 5 to go.

  57. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

    true -- I laid out a fairfax county cop and man was he pissed. it was one of those things were we going to hit, so it was either lower the shoulder and skate through him or get run over. i took the roughing penalty. he had his head down.

  58. The DerpRider   12 years ago

    I play in a league in my town in Michigan. It works out to about $15/game for the season. 30 games + playoffs. I try to hit drop in to get on the ice a few more times a week. We just won our championship in a mens league with three girls on our team including our goalie (our top line did a lot of carrying...).

  59. The DerpRider   12 years ago

    Yep, I love that guys get into it when they're older, but they're called Pond Rockets for a reason. Flailing about with your stick or using it to balance yourself...

  60. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

    no .. i dont think so. maybe for the juniors

  61. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

    league rules -- full cage. i broke my collarbone 2 years ago playing.

    our bigger problem is slew foot. guys play it off like they don't know what they're doing.

  62. The DerpRider   12 years ago

    Our league has the weirdest rule. No modified cages or visors. After I was injured I had to add a cage, so I took my sons, pulled everything off of it, and just screwed it to my helmet so I didn't have to bother with straps and a chin cup. Referee made me remove it for the game. After that I cut a chin cup down to almost nothing and hot glued it to the cage so it looked normal. So odd.

  63. The DerpRider   12 years ago

    Best cheap hockey mod. Cutting broken blades from your one piece and turning it into the old style two piece. No more $150 sticks for me.

  64. Restoras   12 years ago

    Sticks are $150??? Jeezus, when I paid $30 for a stick I thought I was splurging on myself.

  65. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

    I buy the 3-packs that hockeymonkey has on clearance. held out forever in making the switch from wood. but i was breaking them on face-offs so much that it was costing more.

  66. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

    Yes.

  67. Elspeth Flashman   12 years ago

    seconded. At least, better than a Tebow thread, football thread, golf thread, etc.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 7.4.2025 4:00 AM

The Fourth of July Is a Celebration of Freedom—From Government

John Stossel | 7.4.2025 12:01 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!