Democrats Say Immigrants Grow the Economy, Republicans are Skeptical
According to the latest Reason-Rupe poll, a majority of Democrats (51 percent) say immigrants help grow the US economy, whereas a majority of Republicans (53 percent) say immigrants harm the economy; Independents are evenly divided. Republicans are also more likely to say immigrants take jobs from native-born Americans (67 percent), 56 percent of Independents agree, compared to 42 percent of Democrats.
Not surprisingly, far more Democrats favor legal residency and path to citizenship (66 percent) for unauthorized immigrants than Republicans (41 percent). Independents side with Democrats in favor or residency and a citizenship pathway (55 percent).
Interestingly, Democrats and Republicans are equally supportive of maintaining the status quo for high-skilled and low-skilled visa annually distributed. In fact, neither Democrats nor Republicans reach a majority in favor of raising visa caps for high-skilled or low-skilled workers. This is surprising because Democrats support reform for unauthorized immigrants, but are less willing to support more open immigration policy for future immigrants who seek to enter the country legally.
Republicans who believe immigrants strengthen the economy are actually slightly more willing than like-minded Democrats to raise the cap on high-skilled visas (66 percent to 55 percent). Roughly half of both groups favor raising the cap for low-skilled visas.
Americans Who Agree On Immigration's Benefits Support Reform
After controlling for perceptions of immigration's economic impact, partisanship's influence on policy preferences diminishes substantially. If partisans assume immigrants strengthen the economy, strong majorities of both Republicans and Democrats support legal residency and a path to citizenship for unauthorized workers. In contrast, equal numbers (and pluralities) of Republicans and Democrats favor deportation if they say immigrants harm the economy.
Read the full report here: Reason-Rupe Feb 2013 Full Immigration Findings
Nationwide telephone poll conducted February 21-25 2013 interviewed 1002 adults on both mobile (502) and landline (500) phones, with a margin of error +/- 3.8%. Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full poll results found here. Full methodology can be found here. A full analysis of the poll's immigration results can be found here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am generally reluctant to jump on board with anything Democrats claim helps the U.S. economy. I'm guessing this polling more reflects partisan parroting of claims.
My gut response was the same. Stopped clock, I guess.
Baltimore is proof that they don't.
Why did reason-Rupe push poll in favor of "a path to citizenship " by not separating legal residency as has been proposed?
Of course, to a Democrat, every additional person on food stamps "grows the economy."
(Not that every immigrant is on welfare, but an awful lot of them are.)
To nativists, labor is apparently the only resource that actually decreases wealth the more you have of it.
Maybe some of the nativists think that the additional costs associated with the additional labor outweigh the benefit of that labor.
And that an excess of unskilled labor lowers wages for the poorest people.
"We need voters, not workers!"
Can't have open unrestricted immigration AND a cradle to grave welfare state.
It's gonna be a disaster.
Some would say that the fact loosening immigration makes the welfare state unsustainable is a point in its favor, not a point against it.
Yup, they grow the drug trade with the Mexican Cartels making in roads.