Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Covered at Reason 24/7: White House May Reverse Decision on Suspended Tours

Ed Krayewski | 3.13.2013 11:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

tour the news
Reason 24/7

Remember the sequester? It's in effect but the effects so far have been far from the dire scenarios predicted by President Obama and his administration. The largest outcry so far has been over the suspension of the White House's self-guided tours (estimated savings: about $74,000 a week). The president may now apparently reverse his decision.

From Fox News:

In the face of a public outcry, President Obama opened the door in an interview broadcast Wednesday to resuming White House tours -- after they were suspended in a decision purportedly meant to save the Secret Service money while it deals with sequester cuts. 

The decision, announced earlier this month, was decried by Republican lawmakers as over-the-top and unnecessary. School groups and others who had planned to visit the White House got disappointing news when the tours ceased this past Saturday -- a group of sixth graders in Iowa even took to Facebook to vent their frustrations in a widely viewed web video. 

The federal government spends more than $100,000 a second on average.

Follow these stories and more at Reason 24/7 and don't forget you can e-mail stories to us at 24_7@reason.com and tweet us at @reason247.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: European Parliament Not Happy With EU Deal to Cut Budget by 3.3 Percent

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

PoliticsWhite HouseSequestration
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (24)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    $74k? Holy fuck. They spend more than that to go out for cheeseburgers.

    What a fucking clown show.

    1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      $74,000. American dollars.

      Just to compare:

      http://washingtonexaminer.com/.....le/2510864

      the rail service lost $84.5 million alone on its food and beverage services in 2011.

      That's some pretty rarified air (and not in a good way) you breath when you're incompetent enough to LOSE money on running a snack bar.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        And with a captive audience too.

      2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

        Have you ever been to an Amtrak snack bar?

        No, I'm still amazed, because captive audience + outrageous prices mean you should be making money even on terrible, terrible food. I guess they are paying the guy who microwaves your cheeseburger a living wage though or something.

        1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          Not only have I never been at an Amway snack bar, I have never been in an Amway coach, nor have I gazed directly at an Amway transport going by lest it taint my vision. There is a monocle ap for that, you know.

  2. John   12 years ago

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....ml?hpid=z1

    Looks like that whole Washington Monument strategy isn't working out so well.

    1. Paul.   12 years ago

      That article is pretty depressing. If you read it carefully, majorities of Americans both disapprove of the budget cuts growth dampening, and would like congress and the president to hold hands, stare longingly into eachother's eyes, and restore the cuts debt throttle to 'full speed ahead'.

    2. Paul.   12 years ago

      Americans largely support the administration's stand on new measures to curb gun violence, but on basic trust on the issue, the president and Republicans in Congress fare about evenly.

      Please don't post any more WaPo polls, John. I'm depressed enough as it is.

  3. R C Dean   12 years ago

    I would say that Youtube of the kids whining about "the White House is our house" embarrassed them, but I don't think they are capable of embarrassment.

    1. alan_s   12 years ago

      I'm sure they're all being raised to have zero self respect. I'm eternally greatful to my parents that I didn't spend my childhood in public schools.

    2. Question of Auban   12 years ago

      I love it when socialists claim that government property is "ours". I reply "so, can I sell my part of it?"

  4. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

    It appears these self-referential "Covered at Reason 24/7" posts will be a daily occurrence, yes?

    1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      It looks like they're making an effort to being the 24/7 feed more into the stuff we, you know, actually read.

      1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

        *bring

  5. wareagle   12 years ago

    how does anyone NOT burst out laughing, or cying, every time that fucker speaks. Good lord; how the dogwashers keep polishing this turd is beyond mystifying.

  6. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    It appears these self-referential "Covered at Reason 24/7" posts will be a daily occurrence, yes?

    You have only yourself to blame, for not fully embracing 24/7 of your own free will.

  7. c3po   12 years ago

    Did no one point out to him the obvious, that canceling WH tours would blow up in his face? Or did they try to tell him, and he ignored them?

    1. Tim   12 years ago

      Taking the kids hostage usually works. Like when the local school board loses a vote on a tax increase and they immediately announce that they will have to remove all the seats from all the busses.

    2. Paul.   12 years ago

      Look, guys, Obama had to cut something, and he sure wasn't going to cut $250,000,000 in aid to Springtime for Arabs Central Egypt.

    3. Randian   12 years ago

      It's pure and simple petulance combined with an obsequious media.

  8. Question of Auban   12 years ago

    A family friend said the Blue Angels were also suspending flights. So ? all manner of government propaganda has been halted. I hope this goes on longer!

  9. Killazontherun   12 years ago

    So the White House tours come out of the Secret Service hooker stash, who knew?

  10. CampingInYourPark   12 years ago

    "White House: Tours are 'labor intensive operations,' will remain closed"

    "'These are labor intensive operations that require thousands of man hours by the Secret Service,' Carney said, 'and the decision was made that given the unhappy set of choices sequester presented to the Secret Service, that this was the best option.'"

    http://dailycaller.com/2013/03.....z2NRTTGwBB

  11. Brandon   12 years ago

    Why not just charge for them? How many people per week do they get for that 74k?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!