Fed Warns That ObamaCare Will Negatively Impact Hiring

A new report from the Federal Reserve suggests that ObamaCare may be negatively impacting employment. CNBC's John Carney reports on the Fed's latest Beige Book, a summary of anecdotal information on the economy collected by each of the district-level Federal Reserve Banks:
The Beige Book, which paints a picture of the economy by drawing on the contacts maintained by regional Fed banks with their local business communities, was prepared this time around by the Kansas City Federal Reserve. It's not usually considered to have any partisan tilt, although obviously the views it reports are those of the business sector (rather than, say, the labor unions).
"Employers in several Districts cited the unknown effects of the Affordable Care Act as reasons for planned layoffs and reluctance to hire more staff," the report says.
The Richmond Fed reports that employers in its area continued to point to the Affordable Care Act as "reasons for planned layoffs and reluctance to hire more staff."
The Dallas Fed contacts "noted concern that client companies are hiring the absolute minimum to get by due to uncertainty about the Affordable Care Act."
It's not just hiring that is being hurt by Obamacare, according to the Beige Book. Sales are also.
"Many District contacts commented on the expired payroll tax holiday and the Affordable Care Act as having restrained sales growth," the report says.
Carney says he finds a little bit of good news in the San Francisco branch's report that health providers expect increased demand for services as the major provisions of ObamaCare begin to kick in. I'm less confident that adding a new layer of health-industry friendly subsidies to our already distorted health services sector is something to cheer.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"I'm less confident that adding a new layer of health-industry friendly subsidies to our already distorted health services sector is something to chher."
chher? Is that something Dr. Hurrhurr would do?
I never understood why the Beige book reports could be so accurate and their policy so entirely disconnected. Its like the Fed Governors don't actually read it because they're too busy toadying to the Executive branch.
I was told all the unemployment was the fault of the sequestration. Who am I to believe, the Fed or the feds?
I was told all the unemployment was the fault of the sequestration. Who am I to believe, the Fed or the feds?
my best friend's step-aunt makes $87 every hour on the computer. She has been laid off for 9 months but last month her check was $12850 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this web site and go to home tab....
http://googlejobs.co.uk.qr.net/ka8z
Fucking server squirrels, how do they work?
"A new report from the Federal Reserve suggests that ObamaCare may be negatively impacting employment."
In related news, a report from the U.S. Geological Survey announced the discovery of the New World.