Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Covered at Reason 24/7: Sen. Rand Paul Filibuster Successfully Delays CIA Vote

Come back tomorrow, Sen. Reid

Scott Shackford | 3.6.2013 6:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul has been on the Senate Floor for about six hours now filibustering the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director in order to object to the lack of transparency from the Obama Administration. He is demanding information about the use of drones for extrajudicial executions of terrorism suspects and more clarity about whether the Department of Justice believes it's legal to kill non-combatants on American soil without the benefit of a trial.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) attempted to bring about the end of the filibuster and failed. Paul is still talking and the vote won't happen until tomorrow, at least.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's plan to push the chamber toward a final vote on John Brennan's nomination to head the Central Intelligence Agency was blocked, at least temporarily, by a filibuster.

Mr. Reid, a Nevada Democrat, moved to end debate on the nomination earlier in the day, but Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.) stalled the chamber as he expressed anger with the Obama administration after Attorney General Eric Holder said in a letter Tuesday that the U.S. has authority to carry out drone strikes on American soil.

The filibuster caught Senate leaders by surprise. Mr. Reid had thought he could reach an agreement with Senate Republicans to vote on Mr. Brennan on Wednesday, early enough to allow lawmakers to adjourn before a winter storm was poised to hit. But Mr. Paul took to the Senate floor shortly before noon, promising to speak "for as long as I can hold up."

We started live-tweeting Paul's Filibuster at the Reason 24/7 Twitter feed here. We'll try to keep it up as it goes on. At least we get to sit down.

Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7.

If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: ACLU Working to Assess Growth in Police Militarization

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

PoliticsRand PaulCivil LibertiesPolicySenateCentral Intelligence AgencyExecutive PowerDronesWar on Terror
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (62)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jordan   12 years ago

    Okay, my previous question has been answered. He's now eating a candy bar. Dude came prepared.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      I like the pauses while he chews.

      1. CampingInYourPark   12 years ago

        ummm...ok

  2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Still going...can nothing stop the Randerizer?

    1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      He's a Randroid! Someone get a Voight-Kampff test stat!

  3. Bam!   12 years ago

    Been standing now for 7 hours. You think he's gellin'?

    1. Nuked   12 years ago

      Gellin' like Magellan

      1. Jordan   12 years ago

        Gellin' like a felon. Which he probably soon will be in our brave new world.

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          "He's not gellin'. He's chillaxin'. If you can't speak the language, go back to Mexico. Where you were born, and are from."

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Soon, he's already committed two felonies today. The third is yet to come.

  4. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

    Awesome. The fact that Harry Reid has been pwned makes this all worthwhile.

    1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      You should have seen his angry droopy face as he huffed offstage.

      1. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

        I'm just going to imagine Jimbo's gaping urethra wearing teeny little glasses, is that okay?

        1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          I'm impressed Hugh, you've managed to make the mental image I have of Jimbo's urethra worse.

          1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

            He's managed to make the image of Jim's urethra and sadface Harry Reid worse all at once.

            But...it's pretty accurate.

            1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

              So nobody has a screencap of Harry Reid's pouty face?

              1. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

                It was something like this.

                1. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

                  His wife must be used to that face.

    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

      This is indeed a fine day for that very reason. Also, I got an emergency government grant of internet pixels so I can post again.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        That may make it a fine day for you, but not for the rest of us.

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          I try and cause as much pain and suffering as I can.

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            Episiarch: nega-utilitarian

  5. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    I enjoy how I'm writing an essay on the Bill of Rights and its protections against police abuse while listening to Rand about civil liberties.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      You should filibuster your next class.

    2. kibby   12 years ago

      I've been doing my Accounting homework. Much less fitting, but it's still pretty inspiring listening to him.

  6. DEATFBIRSECIA   12 years ago

    I've been listening at work for about two hours now, and I like what I'm hearing. He's basically laying out many of the Constitutional transgressions of this and the former administration, and doing so quite eloquently (in between bites of Snickers that is).

  7. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

    He just said Djibouti

  8. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    And in other news, the Mars Company wants Rand Paul to be their next spokesman since I think he's eating a Snickers bar.

    1. CE   12 years ago

      They could use their "you're not you when you're hungry" campaign. Have Ron Paul ranting and raving about the Fed, take a bite of a Snickers, Rand Paul appears and saves Americans from summary execution.

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

      Need a filibuster? Grab a Snickers

  9. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

    CaitlinReagan 5:22pm via Web
    TWEEPLES: Tune in to CNN's @ErinBurnett at 7pm EST to watch @MikeRiggs discuss Obama's targeted killing policy & Rand Paul's filibuster.

    1. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      Riggs does tv appearances now?

    2. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      He better say murder drone.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        He'd better say he'd rather hear Rand Paul drone on all day then hear a drone flying over his backyard, wondering if he's on the kill list.

  10. Bam!   12 years ago

    Jerry Moran's back.

    1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      He got a brain!

  11. Scott S.   12 years ago

    He outlasted our Twitter account. We reached our Tweet limit. We'll start Tweeting again as soon as it lets us.

    1. Corning   12 years ago

      There are tweet limits???

      Why do you people use the fucking thing?!?!?

      1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

        Frequency limit, an antispam measure.

    2. RBS   12 years ago

      "We reached our Tweet limit. We'll start Tweeting again as soon as it lets us."

      Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        Soon Twitter will be putting them in camps for orderly disposal.

        1. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

          Some of us were kept alive... to work... reloading feeds. The aggregating units ran night and day. We were that close to running out of tweets forever.

          1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

            Ted Cruz just started to read a series of tweets in support of Paul, "since cell phones are not allowed on the Senate floor" lol.

          2. Episiarch   12 years ago

            But there was one man who taught us to fight, to storm the wire of the camps, to garble those 140 character motherfuckers into garbage. He turned it around. He brought us back from the brink. His name is Shackford. Scott Shackford. Your son, Nicole, your illegitimate son.

            1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

              Ugh, do I have to look all tough and sweaty all the time now? Good thing I'm already growing out my hair, I guess.

              1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                Uh, she only looks that way in Terminator 2. WHICH IS NOT THE MOVIE WE WERE QUOTING.

                I know I say this a lot, but it bears repeating: you really are the worst.

                1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                  You say that like she doesn't progress from Terminator to Terminator 2. IT'S INEVITABLE.

              2. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

                You have to be all whiny and vulnerable, but with huge 80s hair.

                1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                  I guess I could do that, but why do I think you would both be dicks about it?

                  1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                    Because we totally would?

                  2. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

                    Just think of me as Paul Winfield and Epi as Earl Boen.

                    1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                      While it is not the 1984 movie I personally would have chosen to be in, it could be worse.

                    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

                      Nicole's lifelong dream is to have had a guest role in Cannonball Run II.

                    3. Episiarch   12 years ago

                      In technical terminology: Nicole's a loon.

  12. Bam!   12 years ago

    Hearing scheduled on drones.

  13. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

    Reading tweets on the floor of the senate, oh my...

    1. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

      This is awesome, fuck yeah

      1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

        "I think the technical term for what the Twitterverse is doing right now is called 'blowing up.'"

        HAHAHA

    2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      This is amazing.

  14. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    I almost don't want Rand to risk running for president since if he runs and loses he'll have to forfeit his Senate seat under Kentucky law.

  15. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    The ACLU's senior legislative counsel endorses the filibuster:

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-G.....backs-Rand

  16. ZinxMinx   12 years ago

    So who knows how to do all that crazy stuff. Wow.

    http://www.NetAnon.da.bz

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Archives: Manny Klausner's Greatest Hits

Reason Staff | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: Rack Them Up

Charles Oliver | 5.20.2025 4:00 AM

At a Missouri Prison, Inmates Fear for Their Lives in Sweltering Cells

Emma Camp | 5.19.2025 5:00 PM

Not Even the Moody's Downgrade Can Make Republicans Take the National Debt Seriously

Eric Boehm | 5.19.2025 3:40 PM

Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Shouldn't End Scrutiny of the Cognitive Decline Cover-Up

Robby Soave | 5.19.2025 1:47 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!