Gambling

More Americans Than Ever Are Free to Gamble

For decades, Nevada was the only state where gambling was allowed.

|

JohnSeb / photo on flickr

America is a much freer place than it was a few decades ago, and one way you can tell is that changes once considered unthinkable now occur almost unnoticed. A case in point came when New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie signed a bill to legalize online gambling.

Atlantic City casinos, which now offer various games on site, will now be able to provide them to patrons at home or wherever else they have access to a computer. New Jerseyans will be able to play the slots without getting off the couch.

Doesn't sound like such a big deal, does it? But 40 years ago, there was only one way to take part in casino gambling: Get in your car or board an airplane and go to Las Vegas. For decades, Nevada was the only state where it was allowed.

Why? Because gambling was regarded as disreputable, the seamy habit of criminals, hustlers and lowlifes. Many people thought entering a casino was the first step on the road to self-destruction. So governments generally made gambling illegal.

To anyone who grew up since then, all this may sound bizarre. The casino-goer you know may be your strait-laced grandmother. Today, 38 states feature casino gambling establishments, including those on Indian reservations.

Nearly 60 million people—1 in 4 adults—visited these places in 2011, according to the American Gaming Association (AGA). The industry now accounts for almost 1 percent of the national economy.

Legal gambling is all around us, and it's only going to become more ubiquitous. New Jersey is the third state to allow online betting, after Nevada and Delaware, and others are sure to follow.

The Obama administration spurred progress in 2011, when the Justice Department abandoned its position that federal law essentially prohibits online gambling. State lotteries, of which there are 43, may now sell tickets beyond their borders.

Legal restrictions can only do so much, regardless. In the digital age, policing online gambling is only slightly easier than curbing online pornography. In the debate over legalization, says Chapman University law professor Tom W. Bell, "always looming in the background is instant access to overseas casinos."

For the gambler determined to circumvent the law to wager from the comfort of home, he told me, "there's some hassle, but you can do it—and not get caught." A survey commissioned by the AGA found that 4 percent of respondents already take part in online gambling.

That black-market competition is one reason the casino industry, which once opposed Internet betting, has gotten behind it. Better to provide it themselves, even if it means many players will stay away from casinos, than to let unregulated foreign operators corner the business.

The industry's support for change is a mixed blessing, as the New Jersey measure illustrates. Gamblers would have to establish accounts with casinos, and industry officials "expect the state to require gamblers to have to appear in person at a casino to open their accounts and verify their age, identity and other personal information," reports The Associated Press. A rule of this kind would serve to get patrons in the door, where they may be induced to buy food, drink and tickets to a show.

The new law also requires participants to be physically in New Jersey to place bets, at least for now. What lies ahead is far from being a wide-open, consumer-driven business. Still, it's a far better deal for customers than being denied a legal avenue to Internet betting.

Drastic change hasn't happened overnight, and it won't start now. But we have seen a steady, gradual process of opening up freedom in this particular realm—a process that is not about to end.

That's because as more and more Americans have encountered legal gambling, they have discarded the exaggerated fears that once blocked it. The vast majority of patrons, it turns out, don't become compulsive gamblers, don't blow the rent on blackjack and don't desert their families.

Bringing a casino into a community is not likely to set off a wave of crime or social decay. Neither is allowing it in the home.

Attitudes that took years to change are not about to turn around. At a casino or a racetrack, you can't be certain of winning any wager. But in the policy arena, the continued expansion of legal gambling is as close as you can get to a sure thing.

Advertisement

NEXT: Neutering the Sheepdogs

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. America is a much freer place than it was a few decades ago, and one way you can tell is that changes once considered unthinkable now occur almost unnoticed.

    ———————-

    That’s a great nugget of encouragement, but I won’t be exclaiming this sentiment until the state removes itself entirely from the healthcare, education, and energy industries.

    1. And no, I’m not a head-up-my-idealistic-ass type. I realize this is unlikely to ever happen.

  2. Gamboling, however, remains illegal. I blame the city-statists.

    1. “America is a much freer place than it was a few decades ago”
      We have confiscatory taxes, nationalized industries, 16 trillion dollars in debt, but at least we can now have our pot and poker!

      1. This is a case of the stopped clock. Even statists have things they don’t want to ban, because dude, pot is medicine

  3. Interesting… and hilarious, since prior to 2006 I was already free to play poker online (and did so often). I kind of felt “more free” back then, before GW Bush effectively made it illegal to use my own, actual money to play poker online.

    http://seattletimes.com/html/n…..ing14.html

  4. My son was able to play high level on-line poker for about 10 years until the Obama administration Shut It Down a couple years ago by going after the largest sites. Even today, my son has to leave the country to play high level on-line poker.

    These sites are still not available in the US because of the Obama Administration.

    The title and content of this article are simply wrong when they give credit to Obama. This is like trying to credit the Obama administration with legalizing marijuana.

  5. While this change does certainly mean that we have some more specific freedoms, I can’t say that I view this as a result of an “enlightening” of our elected representatives. They don’t care about providing us with civil liberties; they have no problem getting “all up in our bidness.”

    This is about money, as everything is.

    Think about it: when people are hard-up for cash, what do they do? They turn to semi-criminal behaviour and place risky bets (or “investments”) that they hope will solve their problems. This is what our government is doing, mostly on a small scale with state or local governments. But it will spread.

    After that doesn’t work, what’s the next step? Sell drugs and get into prostitution, of course. So we can look forward to legalization gradually phasing itself in over the next two decades.

    Again: not because any of our politicians care that we’re losing the war on drugs. They’ll just finally realize that we need the tax revenue.

  6. just as Edward said I’m in shock that anyone can make $9973 in a few weeks on the computer. did you read this page http://www.wow92.com

  7. But what will happen to the brick and mortar casinos if more and more people start gambling online? How will the casino workers reap the benefits of the upcoming minimum wage hike?

    More middle class jobs will be lost. Chris Christie and all of his republican thugs were bought off by the online gaming industry. For shame.

  8. The NV law has no provision for establishing accounts in-person and was specifically designed to allow other states to opt-in to its system. I was surprised it didn’t get more attention here at Reason.

  9. I find it hilarious that gambling is still the last taboo here in ‘murica, btw. Hookers and blow can barely muster a controversy, but legalize gambling? Jesus Christ, think of the childrunz! And the poor! And the stupid!

  10. til I saw the receipt four $6575, I be certain that…my… friends brother was like they say realey bringing home money in their spare time on their apple labtop.. there sisters roommate started doing this less than fifteen months and a short time ago paid for the morgage on there home and bought a top of the range Citro?n DS. I went here, http://www.wow92.com

  11. my friend’s step-mother makes $63/hr on the computer. She has been fired from work for six months but last month her payment was $15870 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this web site
    http://qr.net/ka6n

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.