UN Report Shows Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan Down, But It's Not All Good News

According to a report from the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan the number of civilians killed in Afghanistan has dropped for the first time since 2007. However, the report also includes figures that should worry Afghan and American policy-makers.
Although the total number of civilian deaths is down, violence against women in Afghanistan is increasing. From Reuters:
But despite the good news, the United Nations said there had been a 20 percent increase in the number of Afghan women and girls killed or injured in 2012, with more than 300 women and girls killed and more than 560 injured.
"The sad reality is that they were killed and injured while going about their daily work, their daily business" said U.N. human rights director in Afghanistan, Georgette Gagnon.
The report also says that violence committed by "Anti-Government Elements" is increasing:
Anti-Government Elements increasingly targeted civilians throughout the country and carried out attacks without regard for human life. UNAMA documented 6,131 civilian casualties (2,179 civilian deaths and 3,952 injuries) by Anti-Government Elements in 2012, an increase of nine percent compared to 2011. 81 percent of the total civilian casualties in 2012 were attributed to Anti-Government Elements.
The number of civilians killed by drone strikes has also increased. From the AP:
The U.N. mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said 506 weapons were released by drones in 2012, compared with 294 the previous year. Five incidents resulted in casualties with 16 civilians killed and three wounded, up from just one incident in 2011.
In his most recent State of the Union address the president reaffirmed his commitment to ending the American military mission in Afghanistan by the end of the year. Over a decade after the American-led intervention it is looking like American troops will be leaving an Afghanistan where violence against women, insurgent violence, and civilian deaths remain tragically familiar.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How good could her aim possibly be with a baby hanging out of her gash?
Sorry wrong thread
What sage meant to say is how can Afghani women be expected to escape from violence with a babies hanging out of their gashes?
Although the total number of civilian deaths is down, violence against women in Afghanistan is increasing.
They should reclassify them as men. Problem solved.
For some reason that line from The Fifth Element "Are you classified as human?" comes to mind.
Violence against females is unchanged.
They just need an Afghan version of VAWA to be passed by the Wolesi Jirga, that will solve everything!
/Jezzie
The article seems misleading. Couldn't this could actually be a side-effect of a rather positive development. How about, women and girls feel a lot more free to go around town on their own business than they ever were under the Taliban? The increased mortality could just be a proportional symptom of attacks on civilians of all genders?
For example:
The sad reality is that they were killed and injured while going about their daily work, their daily business"
or
Anti-Government Elements increasingly targeted civilians throughout the country and carried out attacks without regard for human life.
Not one of those quotes makes it sound that there was a statistically significant increase in women specifically being targeted.