Many Brits Would Vote to Leave the E.U., But They'll Need a Tory Victory
On Wednesday, British Prime Minister David Cameron offered the British people a referendum on the U.K.'s membership of the European Union by 2017 at the latest if the Conservatives win the next General Election.
New polling suggests that the British would choose to quit the E.U. From AFP:
In the first major survey since Cameron pledged on Wednesday to hold a public vote on Britain's troubled EU membership by the end of 2017, 40 percent said they would vote to leave and 37 percent to stay, the Times newspaper said.
Stripping out the 23 percent who were undecided and taking into account how likely people said they were to vote, the survey conducted by Populus for the Times said the figures translated into a 53-47 vote in favour of quitting.
Polling from Yougov published today shows that Labour are ahead of the Conservatives by 10 points. What is also of note is that the Eurosceptic United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) is only one point behind the Liberal Democrats, who are some of the U.K.'s strongest Euorphiles.
Given the current situation the 40 percent of the British public who would vote to leave the E.U. will only get to do so if Conservatives win the next election, which is far from a certainty.
Although more would vote to leave than to stay in the E.U. it is important to remember that David Cameron believes that the U.K. should remain part of the E.U., be it in a "renegotiated relationship." In fact, it is also the opinion of the Obama administration that the U.K. should stay within the E.U.
A lot can change before 2015, and it will be interesting to see how many voters are tempted to vote for the Conservatives at the next General Election because of the promise of a referendum. However, given the history of British politicians making promises on referendums some British voters will probably be understandably skeptical.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So the EU council will counter by saying they can't leave, right?
Dirtym teabaggin' Brits!
It's all to free the slaves, the EU will say when it sends an invasion force to Britain.
France will finish what William the Conquerer started and annex the British Isles as part of the spoils of war following the Treaty of London 2020.
From a politician's standpoint, a promise which takes effect so far in the future is treated like no promise at all. They'll always be able to say circumstances have changed.
Not only will they not keep the promise, they will work themselves up into a lather of indignation at anyone who reminds them of the promise.
But, sure, go ahead and try to kick that football, Brits.
Why 2017? Why not 2013? Or 2017013?
Anybody who falls for this deserves the Charlie Brown treatment from Lucy. Cameron is a lying arrogant asshole. He might just destroy the Tories, which is kind of awesome.
Nah. All Tory politicians are Romney-esque, flip-floping quasi-progressives. They'll demonize him, but he's nothing especially damaging to the party.
There is a dude that clearly knows what week it is!
http://www.Anon-ids.tk
I hope the Brits aren't so dense that they don't realize they can more reliably get the same thing with a UKIP win.