Shikha Dalmia on Republicans Becoming Big Labor's Willing Dupes on Immigration in Washington Examiner
President Obama is preparing to propose immigration reform. But before restrictionist Republicans get their knickers in a knot over whatever weak gruel the president offers, they should bear in mind that the status quo they are defending is wholly and solely the creation of Big Labor and is totally antithetical to their free market beliefs, notes Reason Foundation Senior Analyst Shikha Dalmia in her morning column in the Washington Examiner. She writes:
In a free market, employer needs, not federal bureaucrats, would determine which and how many immigrants enter the country. Uncle Sam's role would be restricted to conducting security and health checks.
That is not how our system works now.
Go here to read the whole thing.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In a free market, society wouldn't be picking up the tab for the cost of immigrants that exceed their benefit. If the employers want to pay the full cost of these employees, not just their salaries, then have at it. If employers want to impose some of their true labor costs on society, not so much.
Which is why welfare is the real problem, not immigration.
Absolutely. But that doesn't mean the latter shouldn't be relatively restrictive until the former is under control/eradicated.
Once immigrants sink or swim on their own, or rely on private help, throw open the gates for healthy, non-criminals.
Wait a minute, so happening to have the same position on an issue as another group makes you a willing dupe?
What does that say about gay marriage supporting libertarians and BO?