Government employees

Bloomberg vs. the Bus Drivers

Public-sector union power has reached the point where even Mayor Bloomberg is concerned.

|

America is approaching the point where the government employee unions are so powerful that even the liberals think it's getting out of control.

It used to be that taking on public-sector unions was the job of conservative Republicans like President Reagan, who took on the federal air traffic controllers, or Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin, who passed a law curbing the ability of government employee unions in his state to bargain collectively.

But it's gotten to the point where even New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg—a mayor who favors tightened government restrictions on guns, tobacco, trans-fats, and large bottles of non-dietetic iced tea, and who endorsed President Obama's re-election—is drawing a line in the sand.

One sign came earlier this month, when Bloomberg likened the United Federation of Teachers, the union that represents the city's public school teachers, to the National Rifle Association. In post-Newtown New York City, that was not either intended as a compliment or taken as one. The mayor was upset that the union had been blocking an effort to evaluate teacher performance.

But the United Federation of Teachers-National Rifle Association comparison looks like a warmup compared to the mayor's upcoming showdown with Local 1181 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, which represents the drivers of the yellow school buses that deliver students to the city's schools. They are threatening a strike, which the city is warning may come as soon as this week.

The mayor's wire service reported "The cost of bus service has skyrocketed to $1.1 billion a year from $71 million in 1979." The mayor himself said Sunday that the cost works out to "an average of $6,900 per student; that's far more than any other school system in the country. Los Angeles, second only to New York in size, pays just $3,100 per student."

You can do the math yourself—at $6,900 a student, a bus carrying 30 students grosses $207,000 a year, which should be plenty to pay for a driver, a bus, gas, insurance, and some profits for the contractor. The drivers themselves aren't city employees, but work for contractors, so the issue in their threatened strike isn't so much the wages and benefits of the drivers but rather the city's plan to re-bid the contracts in a court-directed way that wouldn't protect the jobs, seniority, and benefits of the drivers if their company lost the contract. The mayor says "the new contracts will save taxpayers $95 million over five years; that's money we are putting back into classrooms, where it's needed most."

When he talks like that, he reminds me of Scott Walker, who tells audiences that he has children in the Wisconsin public schools and that he's not hostile to teachers, but that he just wants to make sure that the interests of the students and the taxpayers don't take a back seat to the interests of the union. Bloomberg is girding for a strike, issuing MetroCards for students to take the subway or city buses instead of schoolbuses, and offering to reimburse parents for taxis or for driving their own children at 55 cents a mile.

The issue with the school bus contractors is a caution that not all problems with government-provided services can be solved by replacing government employees with outside contractors. In recent years the school bus companies have been found to have contributed to air pollution by violating city and state laws limiting idling time, and they were involved, though not indicted, in a scandal in which seven city inspectors were convicted of accepting bribes from the bus companies. A 2009 New York Times article reported, "In court filings in a separate case, federal investigators have said they believe that organized crime retains influence in the New York City school bus market. But they did not specify how that influence is felt except for identifying Salvatore Battaglia, the former head of the school bus drivers' union, as an organized crime associate. In that case, Battaglia pleaded guilty to extortion and is serving a 57-month prison sentence."

It's hard to overstate the role of unions representing either direct government employees or government contractors in spreading the idea that rich people are to blame for all of America's problems, which can be solved (the story goes) only by raising taxes on the rich. The home page of the Amalgamated Transit Union features a particularly nasty union-sponsored YouTube video with the claim that rich people "love their money more than anything in the whole world."

When public-sector union power reaches the point at which even Mayor Bloomberg concludes that enough is enough, it's a hopeful sign. If he stands firm on this school-bus driver strike, people may remember him for it long after they've forgotten his campaign against supersized sodas.

NEXT: TSA Seeks Market Researchers, Commercial Data for Traveler Screening

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “Bloomberg vs. the Bus Drivers”

    That’s like Notre Dame vs Michigan. Can’t they both lose?

  2. The mayor’s wire service reported “The cost of bus service has skyrocketed to $1.1 billion a year from $71 million in 1979.”

    Wow–I wonder how much that’s tied into pensions, health insurance, cost of gas, etc. as opposed to just salaries. $71 million in 1979 is about $250 million today, so the actual cost is four times the inflation-adjusted cost.

  3. rich people “love their money more than anything in the whole world.”

    I wish this was even remotely true.

  4. thanks for these info. visit our web on Training Center Semarang.
    please comment to improvement.

    success for you all.

    TRAINING SEMARANG

  5. Sometimes you jsut gotta roll with it man!

    http://www.AnonGettin.tk

    1. Great!
      Can we always get the package deal and ignore them both?
      Or is this shithead in a new guise?

  6. Bloomberg wants to rule the world and he will let anyone know he is in control.

  7. What I don’t get, if the costs in New York are so high, is why putting it out for bid is expected to save so little. $95 million over five years isn’t chump change, but this is on a basis of $1.1 billion/year. So the projected savings are only 1.73%. That hardly sounds like major savings. Getting even to 150% of the per-student cost of LA would save far more than that. Something doesn’t add up.

    1. LemonMender| 1.15.13 @ 5:20AM |#
      “What I don’t get, if the costs in New York are so high, is why putting it out for bid is expected to save so little.”

      Just a guess on my part:
      In SF, the contracting rules require a bidder to pay ‘prevailing wage’ (union negotiated wage), and also provide various benies no truly competitive company would ever include.
      Maybe (especially under that sleaze Bloomberg) NYC is the same.

  8. Then which one is the winner?

  9. |If he stands firm on this school-bus driver strike, people may remember him for it long after they’ve forgotten his campaign against supersized sodas.|

    Bloomberg could cure AIDS tomorrow and next week he will still be the Soda Nazi.

  10. “America is approaching the point where the government employee unions are so powerful that even the liberals think it’s getting out of control.”

    Nice doggy! Now sit down, nice doggy! Really! Sit! Reallluyuihjag-j==k[,guuuh.

  11. 2013 Happy New Year,NFL,NBA,fashion kickoff for u

  12. BTW, Bloomberg will cave, just like that sleazy Emanuel. There is no upside for a politico in facing down the SEIU.
    I can think of one change that would make a difference: repeal withholding. I know that has no direct effect on local budgeting, but it would have a huge effect on how the taxpayers saw spending in general.

  13. $6,900 per student? Just give them each cab fare and it would be a win-win.

  14. Not that I want more of these booger-eating-weasels on my train in the morning, but seriously, why the hell does the city need to spend this kind of money on kiddie busses? I suppose that a lot of kids don’t go to the public school nearest to their seedy walk-up apartments, but surely the grand oompa loompa can insert some specially-marked kiddies only trains into the morning commute rotation or something.

  15. this month, when Bloomberg likened the United Federation of Teachers, the union that represents the city’s public school teachers, to the National Rifle Association.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.