Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: Bolton Suggests Clinton Faked Concussion, Samuel L. Jackson Wades Into Gun Debate, French President Pushes For Banking Reform, Gun Control Task Group Announced, Obama is Time's Person of the Year

Matthew Feeney | 12.19.2012 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • John Bolton has suggested that Hillary Clinton might have caught a "diplomatic illness" that prevented her from testifying on the Benghazi fiasco. The State Department maintains that Clinton fainted and hit her head. 
  • Samuel L. Jackson doesn't think gun control is the right way to address mass shootings.
  • Several networks are projecting that Park Gyeun-hye will win South Korea's presidential election. She will be South Korea's first female president.  
  • Obama has announced the creation of a gun control task force. The announcement came shortly before the president was declared Time's "Person of the Year."
  • French President Francois Hollande has proposed splitting banks' trading and lending operations. 
  • A bill backed by Netflix that will make it easier to share film-viewing habits was passed by the House.

Follow Reason on Twitter and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

The updated Reason app for Apple and Android now includes Reason 24/7!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Palestinian President Pressing UN to Help Get Palestinian Refugees in Syria to West Bank, Gaza

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (403)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    The announcement came shortly before the president was declared Time's "Person of the Year."

    Justice Roberts got shafted, by the way.

    1. generic Brand   13 years ago

      the president was declared Time's "Person of the Year."

      Paging Barfman.

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        Did he do anything at all this year besides campaign and kill people in the Middle East?

        1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

          Golf.

        2. Gene   13 years ago

          Lowered his handicap.

      2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

        Meh. Hitler and Stalin were also Time Men of the Year.

        1. generic Brand   13 years ago

          Yeah, well, "YOU" were Time Person of the Year as well, so there!

          1. Way Of The Crane   13 years ago

            Yeah, well, "YOU" were Time Person of the Year as well, so there!

            One of my proudest moments highlighted on my curriculum vitae.

            1. fried wylie   13 years ago

              Same here, but for some reason employers are less than impressed when I show them my cover, what gives?

        2. CE   13 years ago

          You're not supposed to tell us who else was Person of the Year. You're supposed to phrase it as a question....

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   13 years ago

      Obama edged out Malala Yousufzai, a Pakistani girl shot in the head by the Taliban for advocating girls' education, for the honor, Stengel said.

      Sorry little girl, but he is the fucking President.

      1. RBS   13 years ago

        I think that little girl should have won.

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          Oh come on, Obama is clearly better. He doesn't let the Taliban shoot him in the head, he shoots them in the head. Obviously his plan is smarter than this little girl's.

        2. Certified Public Asskicker   13 years ago

          You dogmatic racist (new phrase, inspired by Tony)

          1. Randian   13 years ago

            Really? Where did he say that? I want to read it.

            1. Certified Public Asskicker   13 years ago

              He didn't. I was just inspired by his overuse of the word dogma.

    3. CE   13 years ago

      Shouldn't Romney have been Person of the Year?

  2. generic Brand   13 years ago

    Samuel L. Jackson doesn't think gun control is the right way to address mass shootings.

    Motherfucking gun control on these motherfucking planes.

    1. Tim   13 years ago

      That's the bravest thing a major star could do. Hat's off.

      1. generic Brand   13 years ago

        "I grew up in the South with guns everywhere and we never shot anyone. This [shooting] is about people who aren't taught the value of life."

        That's the case to be made.

        I said that Mrs. Lanza didn't even recognize how troubled her son was. If some people can't take the role of motherhood seriously, we should just ban mothers!

    2. Brett L   13 years ago

      "... at the advice of his lawyers, who worry that liability could blow back."

    3. mr lizard   13 years ago

      You didn't tell me he had a muthafuckin hand cannon!

    4. PS   13 years ago

      Adam Carolla was pointing out that Sam Jackson was staying in the suite next to him in Winnipeg, because he's shooting a movie there. And why are they shooting in freezing ass Winnipeg instead of Hollywood? Huge tax breaks, tax subsidies, and less powerful unions, you know all those things Jackson, as a leftie water-carrying socialist detests. Well except for the tax subsidies, the film industry ought to be subsidies because it is such an amazing art form, like cowboy poetry.

      1. Red Rocks Rockin   13 years ago

        I remember reading some article quoting Ari Emanuel (Rahm's brother and Hollywood agent) talking about how beneficial tax breaks were to the film industry. This is at the same time he's giving money to shitlibs pushing for high taxes on individuals and corporations outside the entertainment sphere.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    A bill backed by Netflix that will make it easier to share film-viewing habits was passed by the House.

    Ugh. Netflix is going to share with the world what it already thinks: that I'm either a woman or a gay?

    1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      We all think that already.

      1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

        Even the world's worst ephebophile wouldn't sit through Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants as many times as FOE has.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

          LOVE ACTUALLY WAS A FINE FILM WITH SUBTLE PERFORMANCES FROM ALL THOSE BRITISH PEOPLE WHO WERE IN IT.

          1. nicole   13 years ago

            Fist, I will watch Love Actually with you over, and over, and over again, forever, because Colin Firth. I know you understand.

            1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

              You know his part seemed really shoe-horned in there.

              1. nicole   13 years ago

                Sort of. But it's not like that matters.

              2. KMA Too   13 years ago

                That's what sh-

                Fuck it. Never mind.

            2. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

              my wife and I watch that annually. and the Firth story line is my favorite. but not b/c of Firth.

              1. Randian   13 years ago

                I think the Portuguese chick is hot.

                1. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

                  damn skippy

          2. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

            That's such a fake chick-flick. There's way too much nudity and Bill Nighy to be a chick-flick.

            1. Tim   13 years ago

              Take it up a notch and watch The ENglish Patient. Amateurs.

              1. wareagle   13 years ago

                English Patient is in the ideal in-flight film, particularly if you normally have trouble sleeping on planes.

                1. robc   13 years ago

                  When I moved back to the US, I was welcomed with in-flight movies of Mannequin 2* and King Ralph. It almost made me renounce my citizenship.

                  *it might have been the first. Im not going on imdb and looking up the release dates, I just dont care.

              2. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

                So I get to watch Willem Dafoe chew the scenery AND get credit for watching a chick flick?! Count me in!!!

                1. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

                  I am forced to admit I like "Love Actually", and yes the Portuguese chick is hot. But the "English Patient" was the last time I suffered through a movie to get laid...I will never pay that price again. I will go to east Colfax if I have to and pay 19.95 for the tuesday special.

    2. generic Brand   13 years ago

      "We are pleased the house has moved to modernize the VPPA, giving consumers more freedom to share with friends when they want," the streaming company said in a statement. "We look forward to swift action in the Senate."

      The bill is similar to a proposal approved last month by the Senate Judiciary Committee, minus language inserted by Sen. Patrick Leahy requiring police to obtain search warrants before accessing files stored in the cloud, including e-mail.

      It has the magic words "share with friends", which for some reason everybody feels is just THE COOLEST THING TO DO?!

      1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

        Share with Officer Friendly! He's everyone's friend, except for criminals.

        And you're not a criminal are you?!

      2. Ted S.   13 years ago

        It has the magic words "share with friends",

        Once again, this is why I don't do the Facebook thing.

        1. generic Brand   13 years ago

          I use Facebook, I just am smart enough to not click "Like" on pages outside of Facebook.

          1. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

            Doesn't matter, if you have a facebook account, the "like/unlike" controls register your visit when the page is loaded, even if you don't click them.

          2. Ted S.   13 years ago

            I hate those links anyhow, since they always seem to be terrible memory hogs.

        2. RBS   13 years ago

          Because you don't have any friends to share with?

        3. Zeb   13 years ago

          I don't get it either. I bought a saw the other day on Amazon and it asked me if I wanted to "share" my new purchase. Why the fuck would I want to do that?

          1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

            You bought a saw?!? If only I'd have known. Now I have to return your damn Xmas present and get you a new one.

          2. wareagle   13 years ago

            call me crazy, but seems hitting the "share" button will only need to a flurry of new emails suggesting you buy this or that.

          3. Brett L   13 years ago

            OH, shit. Did I just share that Justin Bieber sex doll I bought as a joke gift for my housemate? This is gonna be an awkward facebook day.

            1. Randian   13 years ago

              The one called Just-in Beaver?

              1. Brett L   13 years ago

                Are we facebook friends?

            2. Bobarian   13 years ago

              For your "housemate"...

              uhh,... yeah.

        4. T   13 years ago

          Facebook is kind of pointless if you don't have friends.

          1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

            you know who else didn't have friends?

            me.

            *runs out of room*

            1. hamilton   13 years ago

              "Hey, we all need friends in here. I could be a friend to you."

              1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                While only a movie, the thought of that liberal fuck Tim Robbins getting repetitively anally raped brings a smile to my face.

                Does that make me a bad libertarian?

            2. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

              Joey Joe Jo Jim Bob Shabadou?

          2. Rasilio   13 years ago

            What are these friends you speak of and where may one acquire some?

            1. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

              Well, at the monocle store there were child laboring friends on discount.

      3. Rich   13 years ago

        You know what else you (well, some people) can "share with friends" ....

        1. wareagle   13 years ago

          artesan mayonnaise?

        2. SugarFree   13 years ago

          Anal gonorrhea?

          1. Rich   13 years ago

            Bingo.

      4. CE   13 years ago

        Why do they need a law to let people share their records with their friends? Couldn't they just make that an option, and let you opt in?

  4. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    'Welfare Spending Equates to $168 Per Day for Every Household in Poverty'
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/.....65160.html

    "Based on data from the Congressional Research Service, cumulative spending on means-tested federal welfare programs, if converted into cash, would equal $167.65 per day per household living below the poverty level," writes the minority side of the Senate Budget Committee. "By comparison, the median household income in 2011 of $50,054 equals $137.13 per day. Additionally, spending on federal welfare benefits, if converted into cash payments, equals enough to provide $30.60 per hour, 40 hours per week, to each household living below poverty. The median household hourly wage is $25.03. After accounting for federal taxes, the median hourly wage drops to between $21.50 and $23.45, depending on a household's deductions and filing status. State and local taxes further reduce the median household's hourly earnings. By contrast, welfare benefits are not taxed

    tldr version: welfare average income

    1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

      Who could possibly live on just over $61K a year.

    2. Gene   13 years ago

      Oh that's sustainable.

    3. generic Brand   13 years ago

      I need to start getting me some of that there welfare. And here I am working a job like AN IDIOT!

      1. Way Of The Crane   13 years ago

        I need to start getting me some of that there welfare. And here I am working a job like AN IDIOT!

        Just because the government is spending the equivalent of $168 per day for every household in poverty, it doesn't mean that you'd get anywhere near that much on welfare. It just means that the government is so inefficient that that kind of money does nothing to get people out of poverty. It also means that instead of funding monstrous bureaucracies, we'd save money if we just cut $50k checks annually to each family on welfare.

        1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

          Hell, I used to live on my own (i.e. no roommates) in DC (not the 'burbs) on $35k.

          1. Way Of The Crane   13 years ago

            Hell, I used to live on my own (i.e. no roommates) in DC (not the 'burbs) on $35k.

            I'm impressed.

            1. Ted S.   13 years ago

              She didn't say when she did this. Kirsten could be 90 years old and did this at the end of the 1940s.

              1. Randian   13 years ago

                I'm guessing she used artisanal chamberpots.

              2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

                HA! Late 1990's. The key is to live in one of those...what do you call them...."transitional" neighborhoods, and drink and eat at shitholes unless someone else is buying.

        2. robc   13 years ago

          Negative income tax.

          Convert the 30% efficiency to something probably about 90%.

        3. Red Rocks Rockin   13 years ago

          Just because the government is spending the equivalent of $168 per day for every household in poverty, it doesn't mean that you'd get anywhere near that much on welfare. It just means that the government is so inefficient that that kind of money does nothing to get people out of poverty.

          The growth of bureaucratic bloat is going to do more than anything else to kill welfare programs. Just look at the growth of administrative offices in academia, which has outstripped growth in professors for years. For probably half the tuition cost, most colleges could cut a lot of the bullshit programs they have in place for their third-tier trash clerks and still have enough left over to give their less-tenured instructors a raise.

    4. Jordan   13 years ago

      Yeah, ZeroHedge had a really depressing article about that:

      ...the single mom is better off earnings gross income of $29,000 with $57,327 in net income & benefits than to earn gross income of $69,000 with net income and benefits of $57,045.

  5. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

    A bill backed by Netflix that will make it easier to share film-viewing habits was passed by the House.

    I can't wait until the Fist of Etiquette 'Broken Arrow' clause goes into effect.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

      Broken Arrow was a fine film with subtle performances from BOTH Slater AND Travolta, and it woke the nation up to the dangers of unsecured, domestic nuclear arms.

      1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

        You're forgetting the most important part: HOWIE LONG'S FILM DEBUT.

        1. Ted S.   13 years ago

          I don't see Howie Long anywhere.

      2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        I kept thinking of Broken Bow instead.

  6. SIV   13 years ago

    The announcement came shortly before the president was declared Time's "Person of the Year."

    Do you know who else was declared Time's "Person of the Year"?

    1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

      Me?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

        First a mirror, then a chair. How many inanimate objects can they get away with calling a person?

        1. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

          It better not ever be a frackin' toaster.

          1. Dr. Frankenstein   13 years ago

            +1 plan

        2. generic Brand   13 years ago

          The announcement came shortly before CORPORASHUNS!!11! were declared Time's "Person of the Year".

          FTFY.

        3. Bobarian   13 years ago

          You're a towel!

    2. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

      The Computer (1982)

      1. CE   13 years ago

        There was only one computer back then?

  7. Zeb   13 years ago

    I wonder what proportion of Koreans are named either "Park" or "Kim"? Seems like an awful lot.

    1. tarran   13 years ago

      Those are the most common family names.

      It's important to remember that in Korean, the family name comes first, the individuals name second.

      1. Zeb   13 years ago

        I knew that much. But you'd think that for practical reasons they'd want to come up with some new ones. I think that "Nguyen" in Vietnam is even more prevalent.

        1. Red Rocks Rockin   13 years ago

          Come down to New Mexico and gaze in wonder at the proliferation of Lujans.

          1. BakedPenguin   13 years ago

            Patel.

        2. CE   13 years ago

          Yeah, the last mayoral election in Ho Chi Minh City was Nguyen vs. Nguyen. Either way it was a Nguyen-win situation.

    2. Bardas Phocas   13 years ago

      My dry cleaner is named Rhee. Those three names are about 90% of the Korean Collective.

      1. wareagle   13 years ago

        where does the Lee clan fit in?

        1. Ted S.   13 years ago

          Fucking transliteration. Rhee/Lee/Yee/Yi are all the same surname in Korean.

          1. Rich   13 years ago

            YACIST!!

          2. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

            Isn't Lee Chinese?

          3. robc   13 years ago

            A friend of mine's father spelled it E when he came to the country.

            He is the only person I know with a single letter last name. No computer system in the world gets it right. All of his credit cards have his middle initial as E.

            For example, lets same his name is John Doe E. His credit cards says "John E Doe".

            And its really worse than that, because his given name is a smushed together english/korean name, so they are splitting his first name around the E. JohnDoe E - John E Doe.

      2. T   13 years ago

        5 last names account for something like 95%+. There was a weird issue with marraige laws, because (IIRC) the Koreans didn't want no consanguinity, so you couldn't marry someone with the same last name. They modified that a few years back so they'll recognize such marraiges, but you have to leave the country to get married.

        Please don't ask me why I remember this.

        1. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

          That's a dumb way of accomplishing the goal, anyway. I have first cousins I don't share a family name with, and third cousins that I do share it with.

    3. Evan from Evansville   13 years ago

      I live/teach in Korea right now: Kim/Park/Lee family names make up something like ~70% of all surnames.

      And the given names are just as repetitive. At my school we put letters after the names of repeats so we can distinguish what class they're in.

      We have at least 5 Kim So Young's that I am aware of. It's....not easy to negotiate.

      Hence why we love when kids readily adopt English names.

      1. Ted S.   13 years ago

        Any Kim So Olds?

        1. Evan from Evansville   13 years ago

          Not that I'd be interested in. But you know what they say.

          They stay So Young and I stay...so Steve Smithy.

          Fuck. I got NOTHING!

  8. aelhues   13 years ago

    Hillary caught a "diplomatic illness". That rocks.

    1. Rich   13 years ago

      "I am not going to get into the details beyond saying that she's on the mend," Nuland said,

      adding, "as is the Benghazi, um, tragedy."

    2. Robert S   13 years ago

      Mono?

  9. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    The State Department maintains that Clinton fainted and hit her head.

    Swooning like she did in that bin Laden raid situation room picture.

    1. generic Brand   13 years ago

      War rooms are no place for a woman. Unless said war room has a stove or unfolded laundry.

      1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

        What if I'm in the War Room and I need a beer?

        1. generic Brand   13 years ago

          Your War Room doesn't have the recliners with the built in coolers? Sounds like you need to call Tony Siragusa and get the Ultimate War Room Man Cave makeover.

        2. Ptah-Hotep   13 years ago

          What if I'm in the War Room and I need a beer?

          That's what kids are for.

          1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

            I don't let kids in the War Room at all. Not after that whole Uganda fiasco.

      2. kinnath   13 years ago

        No fighting in the war room!

        1. CE   13 years ago

          Or texting "May1" to the intended target of the hit.

    2. DJF   13 years ago

      Personally I am hoping for Hillary Clintons quick recovery. How will this country survive without her

      Expertise in cattle futures and real estate

      Her willingness to be bi-partisan as shown by her keeping Republican confidential FBI files in her private quarters in case she need to read them and recommend a Republican to a Democratic administration

      Her heath care plan that brought both Republicans and Democrats together in voting it down.

      Her multiple winning of the Tammy Wynette "stand by her man" award

      1. CE   13 years ago

        Her unmatched luck in disposing of political and personal enemies in various accidents, all to allow her moderate centrist husband to become president and allow the nation to prosper for 8 years.

    3. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      Do we all agree that the two options in regards to Benghazi are:

      1) There's a coverup.

      2) The administration is so dumb it's going out of its way to make it look like there is a coverup.

      1. Drake   13 years ago

        3) Hillary Clinton has become a falling-down-drunk old lady.

        1. Romulus Augustus   13 years ago

          She'll be a real hoot as President.

          1. fried wylie   13 years ago

            Hillary "Andrew Jackson" Clinton.

            1. CE   13 years ago

              Hey, Andrew Jackson paid off the national debt and shut down the Fed. Let's see Hillary do that.

      2. wareagle   13 years ago

        re: #2 - not so sure the administration is dumb so much as its hubris leads to the (often confirmed) belief that it can do anything and get away with it. Anyone pointing out the obvious will be blasted as racist, obstructionist, sour grapes loser, etc. The administration is simply following a strategy that has proven to work.

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          But in that case what would they be trying to get away with? Being wrong about the video being related?

          1. Drake   13 years ago

            1. The CIA holding AQ suspects in Benghazi.

            2. Weapons deals being managed at the site. (Maybe even an exchange of prisoners for missiles).

            3. The "response team too-far-away" bullshit.

            4. Why was Africom Commander relieved that day?

            Something very fishy was going in Benghazi. The Administration decided they would rather see the people there killed than expose what was happening to uncontrolled American forces.

            Nobody has heard a peep out of General Hamm or the American Benghazi survivors.

            http://reason.com/24-7/2012/12.....ot-providi

            1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

              So that falls under case 1, not case 2.

              1. wareagle   13 years ago

                I think your #2 might be amended to say the administration doesn't give a shit if there is a coverup or if it just looks like there is.

            2. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

              To be fair, if I'm ever recovering from a serious injury in the hospital, pretty much the last person I want to see there is a congressman looking for a new political prop.

              1. R C Dean   13 years ago

                I dunno. If I was in the hospital because some scumbag politician hung me out to dry in fucking Libya, I think a little chat with a Congressman looking to make a federal case of it would be quite welcome.

              2. Randian   13 years ago

                Gosh, Stormy, any other government propaganda you want to spout today, or have you reached your quota?

                1. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

                  Ah yes, because obviously, it's because that evil Obama is hiding the survivors from Rep. Chaffetz. It couldn't possibly that they don't want to meet with him during their recovery, because I mean like who wouldn't jump at the opportunity to meet such a notoriously awesome guy as Rep. Chaffetz.

      3. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

        3) The Obama administration, like 80% of the country, doesn't care about Benghazi, even though the remaining 20% have somehow deluded themselves into thinking it's a major deal?

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          If they didn't care about it, why are they avoiding anyone testifying on it?

          1. wareagle   13 years ago

            The administration cares, all right, because it IS a big deal. However, it also knows that its media acolytes are unwilling to make The Obama look bad and the few bloggers and writers who do report on Benghazi can be portrayed as kooks and outliers.

            I predicted prior to the election this story would go away. If Obama won, anyone bringing it up would be painted as a sore loser. If Romney had won, his team would have wanted to start fresh and pursuit of this would have been tepid at best. Either way, four families are told to go to hell.

        2. Randian   13 years ago

          It is a major deal, and I am very sorry for people who don't think so.

          1. Drake   13 years ago

            Yes - they are expending a tremendous amount of energy to make it go away.

        3. Randian   13 years ago

          Such august bodies like the UN and the BBC are looking into Benghazi, so maybe that will stroke Stormy's Team Blue Boner.

        4. CE   13 years ago

          A US Ambassador was murdered. It's a big deal.

    4. bostonaod   13 years ago

      maybe she choked on a pretzel

  10. tarran   13 years ago

    Whenever I hear John Bolton's name, I am reminded of a running gag in Dave Barry's History of the United States, where he would present some embarrassing scandal or episode in Richard Nixon's political life and intone "This was widely seen as being the end of Richard Nixon's Career". Of course a couple of pages later, there would be Tricky Dick back again!

    John Bolton is one of the biggest fucking idiots in the pundit class, a man who appears so incompetent that he could screw up a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Yet people keep asking what he thinks, and not because they want a good laugh.

    1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

      I can only think he has mounds of dirt on every player in DC.

    2. DJF   13 years ago

      Remember, pundits get and keep their jobs because they say what the person paying them wants them to say and you are not the one paying.

    3. Ted S.   13 years ago

      At least what you're reminded of when you hear John Bolton's name is better than what I'm reminded of.

      1. Brett L   13 years ago

        That's worse than a Rickroll. Fuck you, Ted.

        1. Ted S.   13 years ago

          Is that a cry for help?

          I have my browser set up not to play embedded video automatically, so I only get a giant "play" button and can see what the video is supposed to be before clicking on it.

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            You won't get me twice.

    4. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

      Bolton's popularity is a result of one of the big problems with Team Red right now: being an asshole to Democrats is considered more important than actual competence when selecting candidates.

      1. MWG   13 years ago

        This.

      2. Don Mynack   13 years ago

        Except for Boehner, who can't wait to be best friends with them.

        I swear that guy must walk into a car dealership and immediately offer $1000 over list price.

        1. Jordan   13 years ago

          And then start crying. The orange pussy strikes again!

    5. SIV   13 years ago

      Bolton offered to serve in a hypothetical Ron Paul administration.

      I strongly suspect he would have got the job too. The supply of experienced diplomats who would relish disentangling the US from the UN and other foreign alliances is almost non-existent.

      1. wareagle   13 years ago

        this is why I don't totally get the "Bolton is a boob" meme. He seems the only guy saying that the UN is useless. Maybe it's the war boner he has re: Iran but hard to believe that anyone who talks about that genuinely believes it is a good idea.

        1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

          It's the war boner.

          1. nicole   13 years ago

            Yeah. But I did enjoy that Bush sent someone anti-UN to the UN like that.

            1. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

              This is what I'm talking about. What did Bolton actually accomplish at the UN? Is the US any less involved? Is the UN any weaker? All he did was make a convenient strawman for internationalist to point to.

              I'd rather have someone who was more interested in accomplishing the agenda of disentangling us from the UN than someone who was more interested in the posturing of being an asshole in the UN. If Bolton wants to do that, then go be a TV comedian.

        2. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

          I was at Leadership Program of the Rockies when he was a featured speaker...all the small Ls in the room (about 40%) were visibly ill having him there but as I have said before you can;t "fix" the republican party. He spent his whole time speaking of why it is so important to take preemptive action against Iran, nuclear if necessary. He is a fuck stick.

  11. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Amnesty and the U.S. Labor Market
    The Employment Picture for Less-Educated Workers
    http://cis.org/amnesty-and-the.....ed-workers

    Of the estimated 11 to 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States, seven to eight million are thought to be holding a job.1 Rather than enforce immigration laws and encourage them to return home, President Obama and some in Congress have promised to push legislation that would provide work authorization and legal status to illegal immigrants. Most research indicates that the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants have no more than a high school education.2 The president and his political allies seem to believe that the kinds of jobs done by such workers are plentiful. However, the findings of this report show that the employment picture is bleak for less-educated native-born Americans, who are the most likely to compete with illegal immigrants for jobs

    1. MWG   13 years ago

      Wait, they took our jobs?

  12. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Jim Sleeper: Gun Lovers, as 'Normal' Now as Segregationists Once Were
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....20026.html

    To understand what we're up against here, understand that many other gun enthusiasts think of themselves this way, too -- and that they see their critics as moralists addled by silly delusions about human nature. They alone uphold honor against depravity: Southern segregationists thought their way of life necessary to channel the violence at the bottom of all society toward a safer, more stable order, refined by codes of honor and masterful stewardship of Negroes wise enough to accept their place in it.

    Many white Americans outside the South accepted this reasoning's death-grip on the Congress, where long-serving Southern senators chaired many committees. They dismissed as regrettable but necessary, and, someday perhaps surmountable, the ranters and ravers at the fringes of White Citizens Councils and among unruly poor whites at the fringes of town or in the hollows beyond, and among egregious and sometimes-embarrassing Klansmen at night and sheriffs at noon.

    1. tarran   13 years ago

      You know, when you're derpsplaining to your base in a manner designed to piss off the people you have to convince to come over to your side, you ain't going to get very far.

      1. nicole   13 years ago

        Yeah, it's like when I saw some link to a story yesterday about how they know people won't just give up their guns, but maybe if they sell it as "giving up your guns for the collective good" they would. And I was like...I think it's actually the opposite, guys. Phrases like "collective sacrifice" are not going to sell the people you're trying to sell.

        But I guess I should just be relieved or something.

        1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

          individualism, how does it work?

          1. wareagle   13 years ago

            individualism, how does it work?

            in liberalville, if individualism was a good thing then govt would give it to you.

            1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

              in liberalville, if individualism was a good thing then govt would give it to you.

              Nice one!

        2. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

          i'm still laughing about that.

          1. nicole   13 years ago

            I am too. But I'm also crying...on the inside...or something. I don't know, I have this marvelous ability to always be staggered by collectivism, even though I've seen it over and over again. I guess it's the same thing that gives me the ability to re-watch or re-read Agatha Christie mysteries over and over again without remembering the reveal, but in this case much less cool.

        3. Restoras   13 years ago

          Shit like that make me want to buy more guns, not give them up.

    2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

      I can't believe Balko works for that fucking rag. And allowed them to take over his blog, for cryin out loud.

      1. tarran   13 years ago

        Well, one of two things is going to happen... he's going to expose them to a bunch of new ideas... or he will be leaving in a year or so to pursue "other interests".

        My money is on the later.

        1. generic Brand   13 years ago

          Or he starts to come around to their point of view... I really hope your predictions are correct.

          1. Ted S.   13 years ago

            Michael Totten left Instapundit, thankfully.

            1. SFC B   13 years ago

              When did Totten stop being a contributor in Instapundit? He was one of Reynolds' "replacements" when he took his last vacation, which was like November.

      2. RBS   13 years ago

        He still writes about whatever he wants, the comments are just a little more retarded. I have to admit I don't read it a frequently I a used to though.

        1. SIV   13 years ago

          the comments are just a little more retarded

          HuffPo comment threads make any random youtube video thread read like an old Firing Line transcript in comparison.

        2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

          The comments are unreadable, and that was about 50% of my enjoyment of The Agitator. That's not even taking into account the dog-awful design and layout and downright non-usability of PuffHo.

        3. Jerryskids   13 years ago

          I don't read it as much either. It just takes too much time to read anything on HuffPo. You know, because of the long hot shower you have to take immediately afterwards.

    3. Tim   13 years ago

      Samuel L Jackson is a racist? Wow.

    4. Don Mynack   13 years ago

      The same segregationists who did their best to keep guns out of their citizens' hands? Who is this jackass?

      1. Red Rocks Rockin   13 years ago

        Notice the tribalistic language at play here too--"To understand what we're up against here." In other words, gun owners are an enemy to be conquered, not one to be reasoned with.

  13. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

    A bill backed by Netflix that will make it easier to share film-viewing habits was passed by the House.

    What about tv-viewing habits? They're the new movies.

    1. bostonaod   13 years ago

      Way past that. In Soviet America, TV watches you

  14. Certified Public Asskicker   13 years ago

    Give a squeeze, for cancer prevention:

    http://www.foxnews.com/health/.....er-growth/

    1. Matrix   13 years ago

      damn you!

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   13 years ago

        I may have been first, but the story suggests we are both winners.

    2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

      Sending to The Squeeze as we speak...

    3. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      But, I don't have a wife!!!! If I am going to be checked, I want it to be fun!

      (pouts!)

      /envious of all you married and attached folks.

      1. generic Brand   13 years ago

        (pouts!)

        /envious of all you married and attached folks.

        Don't be. You are free to do whatever you want with whomever you want without someone trying to break into your phone to read text messages that have no relevancy to anything.

        1. Restoras   13 years ago

          ^^^^^^^^^ZOMG THIS!!!!!!!

          1. nicole   13 years ago

            PSA: If your SO is looking at your texts, you are Doing It Wrong

            1. SugarFree   13 years ago

              At least she's still into him enough to be jealous.

            2. Brett L   13 years ago

              Yeah. That's a firing offense for me.

              1. nicole   13 years ago

                I just finished reading This Is How You Lose Her this morning, which is basically completely about cheating and other ways to destroy relationships, and there's so much snooping. The last story is about a several-year relationship where the parties are engaged and the woman goes through all of the man's email and finds he's been cheating on her with like 50 different women (over a period of years). Of course, he was an ass, but fucking a, these people are in their 30s and still reading each other's email? I'm not going to say I have never violated a boyfriend's privacy, but I can truthfully say I haven't done it since I was a teenager.

                1. Brett L   13 years ago

                  I'm with you. If I think she's lying to me, I'll ask her. If I don't like her answers, I'll leave. But I will never, never, never snoop. Its a sure way to be miserable. Because the part no one admits is that even if snoopers don't find anything, they still don't trust you. Its relationship poison.

                  1. nicole   13 years ago

                    Exactly. Because if they trusted you, they wouldn't be snooping!

            3. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

              yeah...yikes. Snooping and jealousy are just stupid...grow some balls (or ovaries as the case may be) and accuse-await response OR get the fuck over it. This isnt rocket science.

        2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

          Jeepers creepers, dude! But then again, you picked her.

      2. Certified Public Asskicker   13 years ago

        I haven't been able to play with mine, er, my wife's for awhile now. Damn breastfeeding 🙁

        1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

          yeah, that does suck. They were the forbidden zone for a too long.

          1. RBS   13 years ago

            One of nature's cruel tricks.

            1. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

              so true...so true.

      3. Ted S.   13 years ago

        Wait until you have to come home to that wife.

        1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          I look forward to it. I want to fall in love with my wife every day, even during the inevitable arguments and days of couch duty. Colour me a hopeless romantic.

          1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

            I look forward to it. I want to fall in love with my wife every day, even during the inevitable arguments and days of couch duty. Colour me a hopeless romantic.

            I imagine an American doctor living in the Ukraine has some serious street cred with the female population of his town. 🙂

          2. RBS   13 years ago

            Hahahahahaha, oh Doc. Hahahahahaa.

            1. generic Brand   13 years ago

              I laughed at that, too. I think he's just trying to impress IFH with his 1700's romanticism.

              1. nicole   13 years ago

                THIS IS WHY THERE ARE NO LIBERTARIAN WOMEN

              2. Randian   13 years ago

                It was pretty cute.

            2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

              I mean it with every fibre of my being. I don't even watch pr0n, so on with you!

              Besides, Saccharin Man has been married for 20 years, by his own admission. I imagine he's doing something right and perfectly true blue. And I will bet my left testicle he's a kick-ass husband, and the right one that Mrs. SugarFree is a looker.

              1. SugarFree   13 years ago

                Meh. I'm an OK husband, at best. She's much, much hotter than I am and makes far more money than I do.

                Mostly I'm just trying to hang on until her looks go in order to fuck over her second husband.

                1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                  She's much, much hotter than I am and makes far more money than I do.

                  I bet she has a PhD, too. Wait, MNG is a woman????

                  (DUCKS)

                2. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

                  you sir (@ SF) never cease to impress.

              2. RBS   13 years ago

                I don't doubt it Doc. Like Randian said below marriage has its own set of bullshit, like living with a woman and all of their double standards (especially when they are on the rag...) But overall it's pretty great. I will say, should you take the plunge, separate bathrooms are absolutely necessary to maintaining your sanity.

          3. edcoast   13 years ago

            Good fer you GM. I'm sure you'll be a good "catch" for someone.

      4. Randian   13 years ago

        Just as a counterpoint, marriage has its own set of bullshit, but I like it overall.

    4. Rich   13 years ago

      "Go ahead, squeeze the wheeze. Many people like to."

  15. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Starter home distillery
    http://kk.org/cooltools/archives/7959

    Then I stumbled upon a device called an Easystill. Basically, it is a water distillation unit that can also be used to distill alcohol as well. The idea of spirit distillation is simple. Alcohol boils at a temperature less than water, so if you get temperature above 78 ?C but below 100 ?C, the alcohol becomes vapor, leaving the water behind. A still captures the vapor, cools it enough to turn it back to liquid, allowing you to capture it.

    The EasyStill does all that in a 110-volt tabletop device that you can store in the closet or garage when you are finished. The still handles about a gallon of mash at a time, so if you make a small 5 gallon batch of fermented mash, you are running the thing at least 5 times to produce a liter of alcohol. The process is slow to start but does work. I've made drinkable moonshine. It's not for any serious distilling, but for cooking up a batch on occasion.

    1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

      I'm pretty sure that in the US you cannot legally own any distilling device without a federal license that gives the feds the power to search your premises at any time.

      1. generic Brand   13 years ago

        Because "Fuck you, that's why"

      2. Bardas Phocas   13 years ago

        I'm already committing 3-5 felonies a day as it is. Might as well try my hand at some whiskey or liquers.

        1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          I've thought about it and even looked into it a little. The problem is acquiring the metal without raising suspicion. Someone is guaranteed to ask you what you are planning to build, so you better be prepared with a good lie.

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            What? copper tubing and a 2 gallon pot. Buy them separately. Or ebay can be your friend.

            1. RBS   13 years ago

              Sure, hand delivered by the BATF.

              1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

                with a smile!

            2. robc   13 years ago

              Both of those are legitimate purchases for homebrewing.

              I bought copper tubing at Lowes for making a chiller.

              A 2 gallon pot is small for brewing, that easily passes the cooking test.

              1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                I was thinking of making a cap for my 9gal brewpot and sending it to a thumper and then the worm.

            3. thom   13 years ago

              If they come asking just pull out a wort chiller and show it to them.

              1. BakedPenguin   13 years ago

                I don't know if they would ship to the US, but home distillation is legal in NZ, and there are several still makers.

          2. Zeb   13 years ago

            Buy a bunch of copper tubing and fittings and say you are making a wort cooler.

            1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

              Well, yeah. The worm would be easy. It's the rest of it I'm talking about.

              1. Randian   13 years ago

                Is making ice wine legal?

                1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                  Is making ice wine legal?

                  I believe so, but it isn't wise.

                  Methanol is a natural byproduct of fermentation. When distilling, one is supposed to discard the head (first runnings) because that's the methanol which boils/evaporates at a slightly lower temperature than ethanol.

                  When you take a fermented product and freeze it to remove the water and increase the alcohol you leave all the methanol in there.

                  It's a great recipe for a nasty headache.

                  1. robc   13 years ago

                    Its how ice beer is made.

                    There are also some questionable legality about it. No homebrewer/home winemaker would ever get caught, but it might not technically be legal.

                    1. Randian   13 years ago

                      I am thinking that, given that making wine is legal, all you need is a bucket and freezer to get to applejack. At least, as far as my cursory investigation tells me.

                    2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                      all you need is a bucket and freezer to get to applejack.

                      You'll get a headache as well. Go ahead.

                      One of the purposes of distillation is it gives you an opportunity to discard the methyl alcohol and fusel oils. When they say double and triple distilled, they mean they've gone through the process a few times while discarding the head and tail, resulting in near pure ethanol.

                      Or you can remove frozen water crystals, concentrating the methyl alcohol and fusel oils, and have a crappy morning.

                    3. Randian   13 years ago

                      There isn't that much methanol or ethanol in wine to begin with.

                    4. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                      There isn't that much methanol or ethanol in wine to begin with.

                      Are you proud of your ignorance?

                    5. Randian   13 years ago

                      Are you proud of your ignorance?

                      Want me to bring up the chromatography sheets or are you just going to be a fucking retard about that too?

                    6. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                      Wine averages 15% ethanol, retard. Yes, retard, there isn't a lot of methanol in it, retard, but that doesn't negate the point that freeze stilling concentrates the methanol and fusel oils. Retard.

                      Like I said, retard, try it. See what happens, retard. I bet your retarded head will hurt like hell.

                    7. Randian   13 years ago

                      Yes, it still concentrates it. But concentrating very little of something into more very little of something still leaves very little of something.

                      Does that help any?

                    8. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                      Does that help any?

                      Sure Tulpa, whatever you say.

                    9. robc   13 years ago

                      2-3 ppm of methanol from fermentation.

                      If you take out 1/2 the water, that basically gets you to 4-6 ppm.

                      High pectin fruits will have more methanol, and looks like red wines produce more than whites, due to the skins.

                    10. Gray Ghost   13 years ago

                      Does botrytis bring anything to the party, re, increasing the amount of either methanol or fusil oils?

                      Some of the worst headaches from booze I've ever had have been when I've overindulged with Sauternes or other late-harvest dessert wines.

                    11. robc   13 years ago

                      The fusels are a much bigger issue. But, at least with beer, controlling your fermentation temp greatly reduces fusel production, so if the initial fermentation keeps fusels low, the ice distillation process wont have much to multiply.

                    12. Zeb   13 years ago

                      I made some applejack semi intentionally a few years ago (left an old jug of cider that had gone hard outside for a while. I thought it was pretty good. I let it sit for a while uncovered. Perhaps that got rid of some of the methanol. In any case, I didn't really have more than a few ounces, so I wasn't getting drunk on it or anything.

                    13. SugarFree   13 years ago

                      "Jacking" refers to the ice distillation method. But you are still left with menthanol and the nastiness it provides.

          3. EDG reppin' LBC   13 years ago

            The problem is acquiring the metal without raising suspicion.

            There are plenty of stills behind prison walls. Granted, they aren't making top shelf bourbon, but there is always a way to acquire materials, and assemble a still. Accumulate your parts over time, from a variety of sources, and pay in cash.

      3. Tim   13 years ago

        Assault boilers. No sporting use.

      4. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

        an addendum in the link:

        Making beer and wine at home in the US is perfectly legal. Owning a still (for water or making fuel) is legal. But making distilled spirits at home is currently illegal in all countries of the world except New Zealand.

        1. generic Brand   13 years ago

          I AM making fuel! My body runs on a constant intake of liquid courage, which just happens to taste a lot like moonshine.

        2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          Like lots of things, owning a still in the US is legal with a license.

      5. Brett L   13 years ago

        That's false. You can absolutely own a water distillation system. You cannot fortify alcohol without denaturing it immediately.

        1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          It is my understanding that you can own any distillation system that you want, provided you have a license. This way the feds have the power to inspect it whenever they want because you are at all times considered guilty until you prove your innocence my submitting to a search.

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            True, but you don't even have to have a license as long as you are doing water, denatured alcohol, or essential oils. Fortifying potable alcohol is the only thing you need a license for.

            1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

              I dunno. A while back I looked into getting a still designed for legal stuff for the purpose of doing illegal stuff, and I recall there being a requirement to fill out some paperwork and send it to the feds. The paperwork was a license to own the device for legal purposes while giving the feds the power to knock on my door at any time day or night to inspect the device and prove I'm not doing anything illegal.

              1. Brett L   13 years ago

                My experience is that you can purchase these things without a visit from the Feds. My friends' experience is that after 5-20 years of making the stuff, the only people who've had visits about it are the ones who try to sell it. If you aren't avoiding taxes on it, or making people blind, they don't have time for you.

              2. Zeb   13 years ago

                Looks like you can just buy them. Here for example: http://www.brewhaus.com/Moonsh.....C150.aspx.

                Maybe you still need a license, but the sellers don't seem to need you to have one.

            2. robc   13 years ago

              Even for denatured alcohol you need a license, IIRC. That way they can inspect your records to make sure you are denaturing.

              Its also the easiest way to run a still, just detour some of the product before denaturing. But you need to make the records line up.

          2. Zeb   13 years ago

            There seems to be plenty of distillation equipment available, and none of the sellers seem to require a license to sell them to you. One site I found even says that owning the still is legal, but using it to distill ethanol is not. So I suspect that there is a bit of a gray area. But it seems like you don't get in trouble unless actually caught distilling alcohol.

            1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

              Being the paranoid/cautious person that I am, there's no fucking way I'd purchase anything like that without using cash.

              1. Zeb   13 years ago

                Yeah, that's probably wise. Like if you buy grow lights (even for licit purposes).

                I wouldn't think it would be too hard to make one out of copper, though.

                1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                  I wouldn't think it would be too hard to make one out of copper, though.

                  As I said above, the hardest part is acquiring the sheet metal without raising suspicion.

                  1. Brett L   13 years ago

                    Look up "alcohol is a fuel" at Amazon. Nice little ebook. And no one is looking as long as your plan is in the 2-5 gallon range. If you're super paranoid, buy rings one place, sheet metal at another and copper at a 3rd.

            2. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

              it reminds me of the day - the 80s - when buying a switchblade assembled was illegal, but yet you could buy a kit to make your own switchblade. Wait, wut?

        2. Brett L   13 years ago

          Additionally, if I owned such a system, I might have hypothetically used it to make a backstrap molasses rum last weekend. Half of which might have been used as a cheap white rum that I would hypothetically water down and redistill next weekend. The other half, again, completely imaginary, got put in jars with the oak chips I used to age a batch of hypothetical whiskey and will hypothetically be aged dark rum in 6 months to a year.

          1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

            I, for one, would like to - hypothetically speaking - sample some of this imaginary product.

            1. Brett L   13 years ago

              If you ever get down to north FL or southern GA, I'd hypothetically be happy to share.

              1. SIV   13 years ago

                They have moonshiners in Killearn?

                1. Brett L   13 years ago

                  I don't know any. The ones I know (me excepted) live in places outside of town like Quincy, Havana, Coon Bottom, and such. No reason they couldn't.

                  1. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

                    HYPOTHETICALLY

      6. aelhues   13 years ago

        You did notice that it's a water distiller....So it's illegal to own something to boil water and then collect the vapor into another container?

        1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          So it's illegal to own something to boil water and then collect the vapor into another container?

          It's perfectly legal, provided you have a federal license.

          They want to know where every still is so they can inspect them without notice.

    2. fried wylie   13 years ago

      that you can store in the closet or garage when you are finished

      So, just like....well, anything.

  16. Matrix   13 years ago

    Squeezing breasts could hinder cancer growth

    I'm sure some here would love to assist.

    1. Red Rocks Rockin   13 years ago

      I guess that explains why you don't hear about very many porn stars that develop breast cancer.

  17. Rich   13 years ago

    French psychiatrist sentenced after patient commits murder

    Another item for our forthcoming national conversation.

    1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      "If a psychiatrist lives in fear of being sentenced, it will have very real consequences and probably lead to harsher treatment of patients," said Canarelli's lawyer, Sylvain Pontier.

      The court said Canarelli should have requested Gaillard be placed in a specialized medical unit or referred him to another medical team, as one of her colleagues suggested. Her stubborn refusal had equated to a form of "blindness", the court president Fabrice Castoldi said.

      Gaillard had already been forcibly committed to a secure hospital on several occasions for a series of increasingly dangerous incidents.

      The victim's son, Michel Trabuc, said he hoped the case would set a legal precedent.

      "There's no such thing as zero risk, but I hope this will move psychiatry forward and, above all, that it will never happen again," he said.

      Oh no, no problems here..

      1. Zeb   13 years ago

        Yeah, no way that could discourage people who need help from seeing a psychiatrist.

        1. nicole   13 years ago

          No, Zeb, no one will be discouraged from seeing a psychiatrist by the fear that said psychiatrist might attempt to imprison them. They will be helped! How can you not see we're just trying to help?

      2. fried wylie   13 years ago

        Her stubborn refusal had equated to a form of "blindness"

        ADA, BITCHES!

    2. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

      I hope he goes to the same prison as those Eye-talian geologists.

    3. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

      If I were a practicing psych in France, I'd pull a Depardieu right about now.

  18. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Where are the fathers?
    http://www.israelhayom.com/sit.....hp?id=3071

    What I am suggesting, however, is that no amount of legislation is going to change what has gone wrong in the U.S. What is needed is a rebuilding of the cracked pillars on which a liberal society rests. But these pillars ? personal responsibility and the celebration of the difference between men and women ? have been on the chopping block for decades. This has been a boon to deadbeat dads. And unless it is rectified, the spate of senseless killings is bound to continue.

  19. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Cops get a bunch of new toys.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-guns.html

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   13 years ago

      Criminals willingly handing over their guns eh?

  20. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Video of eagle grabbing toddler. Real or fake?
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-park.html

    1. Zeb   13 years ago

      When are people going to do something about this eagle problem we are having?

      1. SugarFree   13 years ago

        "The luxurious seats are stuffed with eagle down and the dashboard inlaid with the beaks of a thousand eagles. Also, there are some eagles under the floorboards."

        1. tarran   13 years ago

          Is there a luxury edition with much more eagle I could look at? I don't want to miss out.

          1. Ted S.   13 years ago

            What was Corinthian leather made of, anyway?

            1. tarran   13 years ago

              Cowhide. They made gratuitously added the word "Corinthian" to make it sound mysteriously luxurious.

            2. EDG reppin' LBC   13 years ago

              Vinyl.

            3. CE   13 years ago

              Greek cows.

  21. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Trooper caught on camera conducting illegal cavity searches. Nothing else happens.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-tape.html

    1. Ted S.   13 years ago

      Why are cavities illegal, anyway?

      1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

        We Make Holes in Teeth!
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8Y_vEKbZhU

    2. SugarFree   13 years ago

      Nope. No double standard. It's not rape when a cop does it.

  22. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Ponnuru: Why Almost Everyone Is Wrong About Tax Reform
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/.....eform.html

    The more closely you look at the tax code, the less promising the idea of broadening the base becomes. That may be why Mitt Romney's campaign proposed imposing a cap on the total value of all deductions anyone can take (and why so many congressmen are now talking about the idea). It is more or less an admission that paring back the number and size of specific tax breaks is more political trouble than it is worth in revenue.

    The Bowles-Simpson model of tax reform -- broadening the base and lowering rates -- is the wrong one. Some tax breaks should be scaled back, to be sure. But the idea that the federal government can painlessly raise a lot of money from a base- broadening tax reform is a myth.

    1. fried wylie   13 years ago

      the idea that the federal government can painlessly raise a lot of any more money from a base- broadening tax reform is a myth.

  23. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Amanda Seyfried reveals how she created lifelike 'slurping noises' for Linda Lovelace biopic... with the help of a popsicle

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....iopic.html
    Lucky popsicle.

    1. generic Brand   13 years ago

      She told him: 'I have to go on record saying I've never done a live television show - after noon - without some kind of liquid courage. 'I'm pretty drunk. To be honest with you Dave, I've had about three. I'm a big fan of whiskey.'

      Niiiiiice.

    2. Ted S.   13 years ago

      It was done 35 years ago.

      1. kinnath   13 years ago

        I remember that

  24. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

    I wonder if I can get Chrome to play nice with reason today...I'm lost without reasonable.

    1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      I knew you othered me!

      /I keed. I keed.

    2. Ted S.   13 years ago

      I think your problem is using Google's (motto: Let's be evil!) browser.

  25. SugarFree   13 years ago

    Guy with barely working penis and an attraction to lesbians gives out dating advice.

    "I'm a 7. He's a 4. How could he cheat on me?" Over the phone, Betsy sounded as confused as she was angry. Her boyfriend of two years had just confessed to an ongoing affair, and was now begging for forgiveness. In addition to being unsure whether the relationship was worth trying to salvage, my friend was mystified. For Betsy to call herself an "7" on the attractiveness scale would come across to most as grotesque false modesty. A gorgeous 36 year-old advertising executive, she'd been cheated on by Will, 38, whose resemblance to Paul Giamatti (at his schlumpiest) was striking.

    "I assumed he'd never cheat on me," she said. Leery of inordinately handsome men (the sort that most would say were her aesthetic equal), Betsy had been relieved to find herself drawn to the funny, talented, but in the eyes of most, decidedly unsexy Will. "My calculus did involve his not being super-attractive," she admitted; "at least partly because of how he looked, I took his fidelity for granted." With the sexes reversed, dating Will was her way of following Jimmy Soul's famous advice to the effect that "if you want to be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife."

    Maybe he cheated on you because of your insecurities, Betsy.

    1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      This is why I will never marry an American woman.

      1. Randian   13 years ago

        Where do you get this shit?

        1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          You really need to see UKR wimminz. Though admittedly, they are refreshingly honest and quite blunt...

          And you can go stuff it, Frog Worshiper! -P

          1. Randian   13 years ago

            Blunt and honest sounds like code for "will bring a borscht pan down on top of your head in the middle of dinner"

            1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

              No "code". Is everything a dog-whistle with you? -D

              I simply mean, if they like you, they say so upfront. If they don't, you know it. If they think you are cute, they say so. If you are ugly, expect to hear that, too. No games or other such nonsense, and a thick skin is recommended. But the payoff is Slavic women are notably loyal, unlike women in the USA. There's a reason why all the good ones are already taken, TAO.

              Just don't piss off a UKR wimminz. I have seen one fight b'twixt two gals already, and they hit with closed fists.

              1. Zeb   13 years ago

                Sounds ideal to me. I hate fucking games with women (well, that kind of games).

                1. Zeb   13 years ago

                  "Fucking" in the intensifying sense above, of course.

      2. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

        I married a furriner AND she tukurjerbs all your "programmers". Anyway, GM, I couldn't agree more. Most (not all, but every one i dated) American women are absolutely crazy. Not saying the woman I married isn't woman like (they all cra cra) but to a much lesser extent and is very upfront about how dumb I ma so it makes it easy for me. "I need you to buy this particular thing for me for x-mas. Take a picture with your phone right now so you get the right kind." Hell, it is like heaven.

        and yes, I miss a lot of signals, so she quit trying to send them and now sends e-mails.

    2. nicole   13 years ago

      I hate him for quoting Jimmy Soul more than for anything else now, all thanks to you SF.

    3. Spoonman.   13 years ago

      "I thought I could treat him like dirt because I don't find him attractive. How could he do this to me?"

      1. RBS   13 years ago

        That's what I got from the story.

      2. wareagle   13 years ago

        yup...even the ugly dog expects to be scratched now and again.

      3. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

        That sounds exactly like what she was saying. She hasn't figured out that even ugly dudes can get tail if they have that je ne sais quoi? THe Squeeze looks like George The Animal Steele, but I'm pretty certain he's had more than most men's share of ass in his life.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          You're dating a guy who looks like The Animal? I mean, like back fur and all?

          I have to meet you, Kristen. You sound like a scream.

          1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

            He has a little back hair, but not a forest. It's more the bald head and Quasimodo face that resembles The Animal.*

            *this is said with all affection - I think he's sexy as hell.

            1. Red Rocks Rockin   13 years ago

              Does he have a stuffed toy he calls "Mine"?

              1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                Turnbuckles must not be safe in the Kaptious Household either.

    4. generic Brand   13 years ago

      Maybe he cheated on you because you falsely claim to be a "7". The Hardy-Weinberg scale of rating women is subjective, people. Some people's 7's could be another man's 3; not even fuckable!

    5. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

      "My calculus did involve his not being super-attractive,"

      Good lord do women suck at math.

      1. Rich   13 years ago

        "Penises are HARD!"

        1. nicole   13 years ago

          I LOLed.

    6. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      if you want to be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife

      I think the real key would be to find a wife who thinks you are more attractive than she is (and hopefully is actually more attractive than you without realizing it).

      1. Jerryskids   13 years ago

        I think the real key would be to find a wife who thinks you are more attractive than she is (and hopefully is actually more attractive than you without realizing it).

        You mean a happy marriage is like a mutually beneficial transaction where each party thinks they are getting the better end of the deal? I suppose next you'll be telling me this is how the free market works to maximize happiness. How can you know what will make you happy without the government telling you so?

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          You mean a happy marriage is like a mutually beneficial transaction where each party thinks they are getting the better end of the deal?

          I haven't been married, but I'm extending the principle from my successful relationships. My current girlfriend is way hotter than I am, but for some bizarre reason finds me irresistible.

          How can you know what will make you happy without the government telling you so?

          Mostly I kept trying stuff till I found something that made me feel happy, then I kept doing her.

    7. Ptah-Hotep   13 years ago

      "My calculus did involve his not being super-attractive," she admitted; "at least partly because of how he looked, I took his fidelity for granted."

      So I saw no need to fulfill his sexual needs. And then he cheated, why????

      Stupid bitch got what she deserved.

    8. Randian   13 years ago

      He may have cheated because, you know, you implicitly thought he was unattractive and he was looking for someone who would make him feel attractive.

      I have a very hard time believing that someone who leads with a "uggo boyfriend has no business cheating on me!" didn't let that attitude permeate the relationship.

      1. Tim   13 years ago

        There are some women who feel the best way to diss a woman rival is to seduce her husband.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          That too. And then women reinforce it by being more mad at the other woman.

      2. CE   13 years ago

        Yeah, someone thinks I'M a 4, I'm stepping out for sure.

    9. SFC B   13 years ago

      I am not a very attractive man. The only times in my life when women have actively pursued me have been when I was in a relationship. I am fairly certain that being a man in a serious relationship ups your "attractiveness" by like 2. Other women see you are in a relationship and they think "well, there has to be something about him she likes. I would like to find out what."

      I am probably wrong.

    10. dunlap   13 years ago

      Interesting Jezebel article.

      I don't think there is a simple answer as to why that guy cheated. But the story does prove that there is at least one wrong way to "ensure" your guy doesn't cheat.

      Personally, I think most people cheat because they're shallow, selfish weasels. You have to rise above your weasel-ish tendencies to stay committed to someone. It's hard to do.

  26. waaminn   13 years ago

    Dude seesm to be talking a whole lotta smack lol

    http://www.PrivacyUSA.tk

  27. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    It seems the girlfriend of MMA fighter Ray Elbe got a little overexcited during sex and, how shall I put this, "misjudged her landing."
    http://www.tmz.com/2012/12/17/.....-malaysia/

    1. db   13 years ago

      Yeah, that's nothing to laugh at. When you hear a "POP!" it's time to stop.

    2. SugarFree   13 years ago

      Elbe says he expects to make a full recovery -- and was ordered to take "anti-erection pills" for two weeks.

      They make Lindy West pills?

    3. Rich   13 years ago

      IIRC, Dr. Drew once something like this addressed on Love Line. The caller, a kid, had ostensibly slipped out and rammed into the bedpost.

      1. Rich   13 years ago

        Niiice cut and paste, Yoda.

      2. SugarFree   13 years ago

        I remember this all too well. Unless there were two of them, the one I heard was they are having sex and she came down on it. When he called in, only the lower half of his penis would become erect. Dr. Drew told him to seek immediate medical attention, and the kid replied that it happened six months ago. Dr. Drew told him there probably wasn't much a doctor could do for him at that point.

        1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          See below, Saccharin Man.

    4. generic Brand   13 years ago

      Elbe told the whole story -- in painfully graphic detail -- on an MMA website ... explaining how he was having sex with his GF, who was "on top" ... when she bounced a little too high, and crunched Ray's erect penis.

      According to Ray, his penis "fractured" ... and "blood was everywhere." Ray says he immediately passed out from the pain.

      Feel his pain (and now mine) through the power of synesthesia!

      1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

        I don't even have one of those things, and I'm slightly dizzy reading that.

        1. nicole   13 years ago

          Seriously

        2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          Then I will spare you the details of how, in the ER, priapism, via The Little Blue pill, is not relieved when an erections lasts for more than four hours. -D

          Let's just say, it's not pretty...

          1. tarran   13 years ago

            Bloodletting?

            1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

              Yep. Think 10 gauge needle, an incision, and a Penrose drain.

              Other methods involve a large syringe, depending on the size of the member and how veiny it is.

              1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

                The amount I am ooged out by that description is entirely dependent on how much and what kind of anesthesia is given.

                1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                  None really, unfortunately. When you have Sildenafil or Ta-DA!-lafil in your system, I can only give a local, like lidocaine (WITHOUT EPINEPHRINE, or the penis blood flow will totally constrict and your pecker rots off), because an opiate with contribute to further decrease in BP. And the local is not super effective, as the patient can still feel the pressure and sensation of what I am doing.

                  Fun Medical Fact: The Little Blue Pill's discovery was the accidental side effect of research for anti-hypertensive drugs. It's initial indication was for TX of high blood pressure.

                  1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

                    Yeah, now I'm ready to pass out.

                    1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                      Compared to what I normally do in my job, this is child's play. -D

                      But I have no doubt you can out-program circles around me and design all sorts of tech that would take me days to figure out.

                      DIVISION OF LABOUR!

                    2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

                      Don't let a software or hardware developer hear you call what I do "programming"! I do front-end web development. That's the "Basket-Weaving Major" of the web development world.

                    3. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

                      Soooo, we had a boobie thread earlier, what happened to that?

    5. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      "Yes, Ray, you can FX your penis!"

      During an erection, the penis is engorged with blood. If the penis is bent suddenly or forcefully while it's engorged, the trauma may rupture the lining of one of the two cylinders in the penis (corpus cavernosum) responsible for erections ? resulting in a penis fracture. The trauma is usually related to aggressive or acrobatic sexual intercourse or, in some cases, aggressive masturbation.

      A penis fracture is a painful injury that's often accompanied by an audible cracking sound, followed immediately by dark bruising of the penis due to blood escaping the cylinder. In some cases the tube that drains urine from the body (urethra) may be damaged as well, and blood may be visible at the urinary opening of the penis.

      A penis fracture requires urgent medical attention. A penis fracture can usually be diagnosed with a physical exam, and prompt surgical repair is typically recommended. Left untreated, a penis fracture may result in deformity of the penis or the inability to have or maintain an erection (erectile dysfunction).

      1. SugarFree   13 years ago

        "Tell them it looks like a battered highway cone!"

      2. Matrix   13 years ago

        I nearly passed out reading this...

        1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          Wimp.

      3. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

        escaping the cylinder

        the engine of industry needs repair.

  28. kinnath   13 years ago

    I grew up in the South with guns everywhere and we never shot anyone. This [shooting] is about people who aren't taught the value of life."

    I am impressed with Mr. Jackson.

    1. Rich   13 years ago

      "The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. lessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper"

    2. wareagle   13 years ago

      Sam is leaving the plantation on this one.

      That's not racist, is it?

  29. The Other Kevin   13 years ago

    Sorry to break this to you guys, but I think we are going to see some form of gun control pass. All they have to do is name it the "Sandy Hook Prevention of Child Murder Act", and they can paint anyone who opposes it as a heartless monster. Of course, the Repubs can write their own bill, but we all know how likely that will be.

    1. Rich   13 years ago

      "SHPCMA"?

      Nah, it'll be "Charlotte, Daniel, Rachel, Olivia, ...'s Law".

    2. Randian   13 years ago

      Count me skeptical.

    3. Drake   13 years ago

      I will bet against it. The House and Senate are half-full of Republicans who think they are going to be President. A Republican who votes for gun control is dead as a Presidential candidate.

      1. Somalian Road Corporation   13 years ago

        Romney was a gun control supporter.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          In one iteration of the ROMNIAC program.

        2. Drake   13 years ago

          In a vague, deniable Massachusetts way - and it still hurt him.

          A straight up and down vote in the U.S. Congress is far worse.

    4. Matrix   13 years ago

      "Sandy Hook Imitation Thwarting" Act.

      1. Ted S.   13 years ago

        🙂

        Yesterday I mentioned that I have an instinctive opposition to proposed legislation of the "[insert name of photogenic victim here]'s Law" type. I also instictively oppose legislation where the naming is a feel-good acronym.

    5. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

      I'm curious at to what the NRA is going to say on Friday

      1. nicole   13 years ago

        I do not have a good feeling about it at all.

        1. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

          same. they've gone dark. a colleague represents an ammo manufacturer and he's not getting his calls returned from NRA HQ

          1. SIV   13 years ago

            The NRA isn't going to compromise and sell out in a news conference.The danger is they do it during the legislative process behind closed doors.

          2. nicole   13 years ago

            They have some kind of statement about how they're going to make a statement on Friday, and it says (PDF) that "The NRA is prepared to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never
            happens again."

            1. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

              saw that. just they have to realize that the gun control side is not interested in working with them.

              1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                NoVA, you will find this quite interesting.

                1. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

                  Thanks -- I completely forgot that was in there.

            2. SIV   13 years ago

              The left is going to howl over those "meaningful contributions". The NRA represents its members.They are not the Republican Party nor are they a trade group for the firearms industry.The NRA is a civil rights organization. They will not propose ANY rollback in gun rights in a news conference/public statement.

      2. wareagle   13 years ago

        why does the NRA have to say anything? No one expects the beer and liquor industries to say anything when people get drunk and cause car wrecks. No one is holding Big Drunk responsible for the Cowboys' player who crashed a car and killed a teammate.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          Because soccer moms are retards.

          1. EDG reppin' LBC   13 years ago

            Behold the face of Evil!

          2. Libertymike   13 years ago

            Including the hot, MILFY ones?

            1. T   13 years ago

              Based on my experience in suburbia, yes indeed.

              I expect a different kind of moron when we move back into the city.

        2. robc   13 years ago

          As pointed out yesterday, no one is holding Big Gay responsible for Penn St. Rightly so.

          1. Libertymike   13 years ago

            They are holding a dead man responsible.

      3. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

        The NRA is about to put the spotlight on the fact that they hate the idea of average citizens having guns. This is why I did a little digging and found the National Association for Gun Rights.

        1. Matrix   13 years ago

          JPFO is my choice.

        2. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

          GOA is good too.

          see my above hatred of the NRA

          1. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

            below...FUCK THREADED COMMENTS!

            1. BakedPenguin   13 years ago

              I'd prefer SAF. GOA had some shit about that jackhole sheriff in Phoenix being a "protector of the Constitution". I read that and knew they should not be taken seriously.

      4. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

        The NRA actually authored the Brady Bill. I will never give them a dime. You want a gun rights lobby go with GOA.

        1. CE   13 years ago

          Or just learn to make your own bullets.

    6. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

      if any legislation is passed, it - of course - won't actually tackle the "problem", but will instead by a feel good measure.

      1. Randian   13 years ago

        Prohibition: This Time It Will Work! I Swear!

    7. AZ   13 years ago

      They're putting Biden in charge of it.

      If it were a winner, Obama would take the lead himself. Perhaps this is also clearing Hillary's path as thanks for the timely concussion?

    8. Gray Ghost   13 years ago

      Any GC actions by this Administration will be done via Executive Order, implementing existing legislation. Who's going to say "No"? The GOP, who stood by while W expanded the powers of the office?

  30. Randian   13 years ago

    By the by, this Google Images this is bullllllshit.

    1. Randian   13 years ago

      s/b "Google Images 'thing'"

  31. Don Mynack   13 years ago

    Prison guards use these to stop riots. Should be enough to put down psychotic pipsqueaks like the Lanzas of the world, while the cops take their sweet time, and liberals cower.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeUid2gt-XU

  32. Enough About Palin   13 years ago

    Georgia supervisor, coworkers and four others cashed 1,300 U.S. Treasury checks before authorities caught them. More than 171 Postal workers arrested in 2012

    The former supervisor at an Atlanta mail distribution facility, a coworker and four others pled guilty this month to stealing $3 million in U.S. Treasury checks, including veterans benefits, tax refunds and Social Security checks. By the time authorities figured out the scheme, the small theft ring had stolen or cashed 1,300 federal checks, officials said.

    http://www.washingtonguardian......dto-prison

    1. Matrix   13 years ago

      And they would've gotten away with it too if it wasn't for those meddling kids.

  33. Patriot   13 years ago

    Would you support my Patriotic Eugenics Plan?
    1. We need to keep abortion legal and make it free to all who want it. Those who get pregnant, and then decide they don't want to have children, are not the genetic stock we want in our nation.
    2. Free birth control to all who want it. The fact is that we have a large population of undesirable stock who either can't afford birth control, or are too stupid to buy it. Either way they reproduce, and we pay for it. This needs to stop.
    3. End the welfare system for parents. If they can't take care of their children, they will be taken away and raised either by competent parents or the state. It would save money and discourage reproduction among these people.
    4. Pay women 2,500$ each to get sterilized, 250$ a year to go on long term birth control. Men get 500$ to get sterilized. Sterilization reversals will not be covered. Prisoners who get or have gotten sterilized will receive special treatment in prison.
    5. Give tax breaks to middle and upper class Americans to reproduce more and improve the gene pool.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!