French Defense Minister Expects U.N. Security Council to Authorize Mali Intervention
France's defense minister has said that the U.N. Security Council will pass a resolution before Christmas that will authorize a multinational African force to "stabilize" Mali. The resolution calls for an intervention force of 3,300 troops lead by ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States). An anonymous source spoke of another plan that involves sending 5,500 troops to help upgrade Mali's military. The announcement comes a little more than a week after the Ivorian president said that a military intervention was likely in early 2013 and Chad's president expressed "total confusion" over intervention.
In a separate operation, the E.U. is planning to send hundreds of European troops under French command to Mali to help "rebuild" Mali's army.
French drones have already been over the skies of the North African country, where Al Qaeda-linked militants have taken hold of the north and the south is under the control of an unstable and ineffective government.
The fear is that Mali could become a new base for Al Qaeda if militants are not displaced or defeated. The U.S. seems to share these fears. Almost two weeks ago, officials from the State and Defense departments told senators that they were working with ECOWAS and considering offering the force that enters Mali equipment, training, and advisers.
Quite what a successful intervention in Mali looks like is unclear. It is unrealistic to think that African troops, even with French and American support, will be able to effectively dislodge Al Qaeda-linked militants from a politically unstable country that is slightly larger than Italy, France, and the U.K. combined. Even were the militants defeated, they could move to one of Mali's neighbors. In addition, what influence foreign troops would have in an already politically unstable country is not obvious or predictable.
What is too often forgotten in many of the discussion regarding Mali is that it was foreign intervention in Libya that contributed to northern Mali falling into the hands of Tuareg fighters, who were then displaced by Al Qaeda-linked militants. No one has yet been able to give a convincing argument for why an intervention in Mali will be any less predictable.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The French are asking the UN for permission? The fuck?
Since when have the French condescended to "ask permission" to go dick with people in Africa?
Quite what a successful intervention in Mali looks like is unclear.
We'll let you know in fifteen years.
Quite what a successful intervention in Mali looks like is unclear.
From a distance it will probably look like a French government jobs program.
It looks like a lot of dead AQ members. That is the only way to prevent from just moving around.
France's own personal Afghanistan, hooray.
Oh, they'll throw it in our laps eventually, just like they did with Indochina.
Great, I love worthless colonies.
You mean Rhode Island?
DON'T TALK SHIT ABOUT THE PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
Awarded a "thread-time" achievement award for this and the previous comment.
The bit about Libya and Mali is...slightly misleading. The Libya intervention made things worse but Mali's crap army was already buckling to Tauregs even beforehand.
This intervention is very much a good thing. With any competency, it will be at least partially successful. It's really nice to watch the other countries getting in on the WAR without relying on America.
Are you having those AQ nightmares again?
Cyto makes his mom check under the bed for mooselimbs every night before he can go to sleep.
Ah this is the 'mock the person who presents evidence and points we can't counter' 'tactic'. And by 'tactic' I mean 'validation that I am right'.
Mali is.
It is unrealistic to think that African troops, even with French and American support,
Where did that come from?
Naturally, given his unshakeable punctilio on matters Constitutional, the President will ask for a declaration of war before committing acts of war in a foreign country.
Obama has a Nobel Peace Prize so it would not look good to declare war, so he will just bomb them.
Maybe the US drones & the French drones will get into some kind of cyber-pissing match in the skies over Mali.
And, there's a Star Wars joke in here somewhere but I can't find it.
A more likely scenario is that the French send in the FL and request drone support from Washington. Both side can claim there's no war since the FFL isn't, technically, the French army and drones don't have boots.
Wouldn't more predictable would make more sense here since the argument has to be made by those who somehow think it would be predictable?