Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Taliban Spokesman Accidentally Unveils Email List, Says Nothing About it on Twitter

Matthew Feeney | 11.16.2012 2:59 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A Taliban spokesman, Qari Yousuf Ahmedi, has accidentally revealed the names of his subscribers by CC'ing everyone on his mailing list.

The list has over 400 recipients and includes a journalist based in Afghanistan who is now understandably a little concerned about his safety:

"Taliban have included all 4 of my email addresses on the leaked distribution list," tweeted journalist Mustafa Kazemi, a prolific Kabul-based tweeter with more than 9,500 followers. "Quite reassuring to my safety."

Others on the mailing list include activists, legislators, and academics.

If you're interested you can follow Ahmedi on twitter. At the time of writing he has yet to mention his mistake. 

Ahmedi is not the only fundamentalist Muslim using social media or email. A piece from the Washington Times highlighted two twitter accounts that might be of interest to those who like to keep up with news from the Taliban and Al Qaeda:@alemarahweb, a news source from the Taliban, and @Al_nukhba, an account that links to Al Qaeda messages from affiliated groups across the Middle East. For those who are interested in Somalia you can follow Al Qaeda allies al-Shabab. 

Quite how the accounts of Taliban fighters and spokepersons are even permitted considering how the Taliban interprets Shariah is unclear. Thanks to twitter any of us could ask. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Who Removed Reference to Terrorists From Talking Points on Benghazi?

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

PolicyScience & TechnologyWorldAfghanistanSocial MediaInternetFree SpeechTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (167)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

    Wait, these are the people that kept me in a state of heightened panic from September 2001 to around March 2002?!

    1. CE   13 years ago

      That's nothing. We were scared of the Soviets when I was a kid.

  2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    So easy, even a caveman can do it.

  3. Brett L   13 years ago

    Wile E. Coyote, Super Genius.

  4. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

    From his Twitter feed:

    LOL, the vampires in the Twilight movies represent bloodsucking Jews, but they're still cute #notgay

    So many infidels, so few scimitars to behead them with. #ThirdWorldProblems

    The entire opium crop in Afghanistan must be burned!

    1. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

      #OneOpiumPipeAtATime

    2. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

      ...if necessary, burn it one opium pipe at a time, LOL! #I'msostoned

  5. WWNGD?   13 years ago

    Allah's will.

    1. Shit-Eating Aardvark   13 years ago

      He has a will?

  6. Warty   13 years ago

    Is that Andrew Sullivan?

    1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

      Is that Andrew Sullivan

      Or his husband . . .

      Sullivan wrote a lengthy piece a couple years ago about beards, expressing a preference for full, thick ones (!) versus thin sparse ones. He really went into painstaking detail, so it's an obvious turn-on of his.

      1. Tonio   13 years ago

        Well, duh, Karl. Sullivan has written quite extensively about the Gay Bear community of which he is a highly visible member. We like beards and body hair.

        1. Episiarch   13 years ago

          "Can a twink be a top or is that reserved for bears?"

          1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

            "Can a twink be a top or is that reserved for bears?"

            Consulting Urban Dictionary now . . .

            Okay, that's fuckin nasty.

            1. Randian   13 years ago

              Nasty? Why?

              1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

                Nasty? Why?

                The image of large, hairy men getting it on with skinny, non-hairy boys . . . yep, nasty.

                But hey, I say they're free to do it to their hearts' content, even marrying if they so choose. That's what my libertarianism requires of me.

                1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

                  The image of large, hairy men getting it on with skinny, non-hairy boys . . . yep, nasty.

                  So basically, Afghanistan.

                  1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

                    So basically, Afghanistan.

                    That's gotta be the fastest way to get put to death in Afghanistan.

                    1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

                      You'd think, but the Taliban loves them some adolescent boy-fucking.

                    2. Randian   13 years ago

                      That's gotta be the fastest way to get put to death in Afghanistan

                      No. Blasphemy, adultery (with a woman), drug/alcohol use. These are all much faster.

                    3. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

                      No. Blasphemy, adultery (with a woman), drug/alcohol use. These are all much faster.

                      Still, Sharia law has got to frown on that big time, right?

                    4. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

                      Frown on what, pederasty? According to most schools of fiqh, a boy isn't "male" until he has pubic hair. Also, since relations with "females" can begin at any age. (Thighing at any age, vaginal penetration starting at 9) Taliban style "boy play" is A-OK, Sharia-wise.

                    5. Tonio   13 years ago

                      That's totally disgusting, HM. And I know you're only the messenger, but I just threw up in my mouth a little.

                    6. Gojira   13 years ago

                      You do realize that the wiki link you provided states that most Mullahs consider it against sharia law but have a difficult time enforcing it, since the perpetrators are generally powerful warlords?

                2. Tonio   13 years ago

                  Karl, while I'm sure there are some bears who are totally into twinks (ewww...), bear-on-bear is more typical. UD is useful as a rough guide, but nothing more.

                  But thank you for overcoming your personal squeamishness. Srsly.

                  1. Randian   13 years ago

                    bear-on-bear is more typical.

                    That I did not know.

            2. Corning   13 years ago

              I always preferred the multi-player video game definition of twink.

              Which is a low level character with high level gear.

              1. Generic Stranger   13 years ago

                Where do you think the MMO people got the term from, Corning?

          2. Tonio   13 years ago

            I suppose they do...with other twinks. The twinkosphere is a mystery to me.

            1. Episiarch   13 years ago

              I'm sure there's a great deal of switching back and forth but I think more often then not bears are tops, unless they happen to be power bottoms.

              Work with me here, Tonio. Always Sunny.

              1. Randian   13 years ago

                One of the top (ha!) Columbus trivia teams is called The Power Bottoms.

                1. Tonio   13 years ago

                  (snicker)

                2. Episiarch   13 years ago

                  Actually, Randian, you've got it backwards. You see, the power bottom is actually generating the power by doing most of the work.

              2. Tonio   13 years ago

                Sorry, Epi. Bear is defined by appearance.

                The top/bottom/versatile breakdown in the bear community seems about the same as in the rest of the homosphere.

                Many bears are exclusively attracted to other bears, but not always.

                And then there are the bears from body- and facial-hair-challenged gene pools.

                1. Randian   13 years ago

                  And then there are the bears from body- and facial-hair-challenged gene pools.

                  Aww.

                  That seems like a life of heartbreak right there.

                2. Episiarch   13 years ago

                  God damn it, Tonio. Here.

              3. Brett L   13 years ago

                Eh. I know an uberbear who is a total bottom. He just happens to be a large, hairy dude that other gay men who are into bears find attractive.

                1. Tonio   13 years ago

                  Sorry, Epi, don't watch the show so didn't catch the ref. But on my viewing list. I can still hang with you and the other cool kids, right?

                  1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                    AS LONG AS IT'S ON YOUR VIEWING LIST.

                    Otherwise, get out!

                  2. $park?   13 years ago

                    I can still hang with you and the other cool kids, right?

                    If you think Epi is one of the cool kids, you've got a long way to go.

                    1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                      Hey, I'm the coolest monster since cool came to Cooltown!

                    2. Tonio   13 years ago

                      Ok, that explains a lot. Thanks, Sparky.

                    3. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                      If you think Epi is one of the cool kids, you've got a long way to go.

                      So sayeth he who whore-shipeth at the altar of Ke$ha, keep casting those stones, Sparkster. -)

                      Epi is admittedly one of my favourite posters, and the mental voice I have of his posts is John Cusack.

                    4. $park?   13 years ago

                      the mental voice I have of his posts is John Cusack

                      More like John Pinette.

                    5. Episiarch   13 years ago

                      What, are you a fucking limey now, doc? "Favourite"?

                      "I have great fear of tools. I once made a birdhouse in woodshop and the fair housing committee condemned it."

          3. RyanXXX   13 years ago

            God damn it, Episiarch, we must have the same taste in everything. GOT, Sunny, Futurama, Archer, Boardwalk Empire....

            You watch Curb?

            1. Episiarch   13 years ago

              I recognize the comedy that is Larry David, but I cannot handle the abject humiliation and embarrassment he subjects himself to. It's like the British The Office; absolutely brilliant, yet extremely painful to watch. So no, I do not regularly watch CYE.

              1. Warty   13 years ago

                The word is Fremdschaden. And I can't bear it either.

              2. RyanXXX   13 years ago

                Yea, it can sometimes make me cringe as well. Parks and Rec is the same way, but I love that show. How about Breaking Bad?

        2. grrizzly   13 years ago

          We like beards and body hair.
          That explains it. We don't.

          1. Tonio   13 years ago

            Who is "we" in the context of your post?

            1. grrizzly   13 years ago

              The kind of guys I've ever been attracted to. My partner claims that no one with a beard can be even remotely attractive. I at least can occasionally look beyond the beard, though it's always a flaw, he cannot.

              1. Tonio   13 years ago

                Then your handle is quite ironic, FTW.

        3. Randian   13 years ago

          Just because Sullivan considers himself a bear does not mean he is attracted to other bears, though.

          1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

            Just because Sullivan considers himself a bear does not mean he is attracted to other bears, though.

            Here I was thinking that pitcher and catcher just about covered it. But now we're into twinks and bears, too . . .

            1. Tonio   13 years ago

              Nope, way more complex than that, Karl.

              1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                Wait a second, Tonio, are you saying that homos are individual human beings with a full range of human desires and tastes?!?

                1. The Immaculate Trouser   13 years ago

                  That can't be right.

                  1. Tonio   13 years ago

                    What can't be right, Trouser?

                    1. The Immaculate Trouser   13 years ago

                      The "homos are human beings" thingee.

                      Just doesn't make any kind of sense.

                    2. Tonio   13 years ago

                      Oh, we're not human, Trouser, we're spawn of satan. And for every three humans I corrupt I get a toaster, five for a toaster oven, etc. I haven't had to buy a gift in centuries.

                      But srsly, there are some evangelicals who really, really believe that all homos are possessed or are devils and all kinds of other crazy bullshit.

                2. Loki   13 years ago

                  "They fight just like real people."

            2. Randian   13 years ago

              Oh hell no. You know that old joke "ask 12 libertarians about something and you'll get 13 different points of view"?

              There are more gay subcultures than there are gays.

            3. Shit-Eating Aardvark   13 years ago

              Don't forget the Queens and the Butches.

            4. Corning   13 years ago

              What do you call women who are attracted to men with hair?

          2. Tonio   13 years ago

            True, but in his case he is (based on reputation and his husband).

  7. Rich   13 years ago

    Quite how the accounts ... are even permitted considering how the Taliban interprets Shariah is unclear.

    Why is this? Do they use an image of The Prophet as an avatar, or something?

    1. Loki   13 years ago

      I'm guessing in addition to the rest of their batshit insanity, they're also luddites. But I'm not really sure.

      1. Rich   13 years ago

        They use machine-made firearms, don't they? So, it's got to be something else.

        1. Redmanfms   13 years ago

          That's for killing the infidel. Anything is excusable to confound and destroy the kaffir. Seriously. They can even false convert so as to "blend in" as long as the secretly stay true to Allah.

          It's a religion that one could easily think has pernicious deceit and murder as its core values

    2. Tonio   13 years ago

      Do they use an image of The Prophet...

      Good one, Rich.

      1. Tonio   13 years ago

        They take the injunction against "idolatry" very seriously. That's why lots of art from the muslim world is non-representational - geometric patterns, calligraphy. Depictions of the prophet are most particularly verboten.

        1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

          Really want to piss 'em off - send that picture of the dogs playing poker - DOGS, UNCLEAN! GAMBLING! RRRRARGH!

          1. Tonio   13 years ago

            You're a genius, Col.

          2. Shit-Eating Aardvark   13 years ago

            I never got this whole dogs are unclean thing. Mine have all been housebroken and don't eat their own shit.

            1. Tonio   13 years ago

              Dogs as a species are held to be particularly "unclean" in traditional muslim and jewish cultures. Yes, it's the feces-eating (their own or that of other animals) that drive this.

              But the list of "clean" animals that may be eaten (according to Leviticus) is pretty narrow - clean land animals must divideth the hoof and cheweth the cud.

              1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                Don't forget that pesky shellfish, bottom feeder, and lack of scales prohibitions. -)

                1. Tonio   13 years ago

                  That, too, although I was focused on land animals not aquatic life ("fishes").

                  And there's another set of rules for birds. Chickens, A-OK; buzzards, right out.

              2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

                That's not entirely true. There is nothing in the Jewish religion that defines dogs as ritually impure; however, for many religious European Jews there is a cultural aversion to dogs as they have inherited memories from their grand-parents and great-grand parents of vicious dogs being sicced on them during pogroms and such.

                1. Tonio   13 years ago

                  And thanks for the link, HM. As with everything in jewish law it's insanely complicated, ie:

                  Actually, I'm presently learning in seminary in Israel and we were discussing neutering/spaying a dog or cat and one of the rabbis said that the way around this is to go to a non-Jewish veterinarian and sell him your pet before he spays/neuters and then buy your pet back after the deed is done. Easy squeezy!!!

                  ("Easy," yeah, right.)

                  1. GozWa   13 years ago

                    But a dog has personality

    3. Flatulent Monkey   13 years ago

      Its fine, but one cannot follow any user name other than @TheRealz_Allah.

      User names like @JusttheJesus, @JumpinJehovah, @Buddatastic, or @HolyBrahma shall not be followed.

  8. HazelMeade   13 years ago

    In the future, this will be a new method of information warfare. Assination by fake accidental CCing.

    1. $park?   13 years ago

      In America we call it SWATting. In Afghanistan they call it DRONEing.

      1. Episiarch   13 years ago

        I thought we called your posts droning. On and on.

        1. $park?   13 years ago

          Is that the best you've got? I expected something more ... creative. Maybe you'll get some of your energy back after you snort another line off Jim's dick. Or is he still coring out your ass?

          1. Episiarch   13 years ago

            We're done with the coring, we've moved on to spooning at this point.

            1. nicole just can't even!   13 years ago

              Little spoons in the spoon drawer! What does the first spoon say?

              1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                "I'm glad you didn't kill..."

                Reno 911, nicole? And I thought you were cool.

                (shakes head)

                1. nicole just can't even!   13 years ago

                  Well that was awfully silly of you wasn't it.

                  1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                    I was trying to be optimistic. But when you revealed your love of Twilight I should have revised my opinion down.

          2. Randian   13 years ago

            Although blue humor is enjoyable, I wish you would be a touch less on-the-nose.

            1. $park?   13 years ago

              Lighten up, Francis.

              1. Randian   13 years ago

                You're like the male version of Lindy West.

                1. $park?   13 years ago

                  Oh yeah? Well I had sex with your wife!

                  1. Randian   13 years ago

                    Much better.

                    1. $park?   13 years ago

                      *facepalm* It's the end of the day and it's Friday. Maybe you could track down Tulpa and have a serious discussion in another thread.

    2. Tonio   13 years ago

      I'm all for assination. LOL.

      1. $park?   13 years ago

        If you hurry you can get in on Epi and Gojira's action.

        1. nicole just can't even!   13 years ago

          Oh, I don't think he has to hurry.

          1. $park?   13 years ago

            You're probably right. Once the two of them get all coked up it's like a brown tornado.

          2. Episiarch   13 years ago

            Everyone's welcome to join in! Except ProL. He's too messy.

            1. Gojira   13 years ago

              Too messy after being compared to a brown tornado? That's messy indeed!

              And I am very careful to wash my insides out on a regular basis to avoid infection from the various sharp impliments Epi seems to favor.

              His Chinese dick-trap even had spikes in it. Totally goth.

              1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                I am what I do. Which I guess means I'm you?

                1. Gojira   13 years ago

                  That sounds like Neil Diamond lyrics.

                  1. $park?   13 years ago

                    Neil Diamond had a song about a Chinese dick-trap?

                  2. Episiarch   13 years ago

                    Then I have succeeded beyond my wildest aspirations.

                  3. Tonio   13 years ago

                    Neil Diamond? That's going too far, Jimbo, even by the tolerant standards of HnR.

              2. nicole just can't even!   13 years ago

                So Jim, I see you are a follower of Maurica?

                (NSFW)

                1. Gojira   13 years ago

                  Well unfortunately since I am at work, that'll have to wait until I get home.

                  Actually it'll wait until tomorrow b/c my friends are really really wanting have a round of L5R roleplaying tonight, so I'm going to send the wifey on a nice girls-night-out so I can gay out and pretend to be a fantasy samurai.

                  Complete with the buggery.

                  1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                    JJ, remember that it's your turn to bring the Astroglide. I've got the beer and amyl nitrate, and NutraSweet will bring the nameless horror from beyond space.

                    1. Gojira   13 years ago

                      ...the nameless horror from beyond space.

                      Is that what he's calling it these days?

                      Last month he just referred to it as "my little sugar-cube".

  9. Episiarch   13 years ago

    "Frylock, order the intelligence helmet immediately."

    1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

      "Frylock, order the intelligence helmet immediately."

      Speaking of intelligence, did you get a chance to watch the Gilbert Gottfried video?

      1. Episiarch   13 years ago

        No, I don't even have time to watch my DVD of Aqua Unit Patrol Squad #1, let alone that. Plus, I forgot.

    2. Gojira   13 years ago

      So anyway, about the one-party state that is Connecticut...

      I keed I keed!

  10. Loki   13 years ago

    Quite how the accounts of Taliban fighters and spokepersons are even permitted considering how the Taliban interprets Shariah is unclear.

    I'm guessing it's "tweets for me and not for thee."

  11. HazelMeade   13 years ago

    Another thing we could do is set up fake twitter feeds that purport to be from legitimate Taliban and Al Qaeda news sources, and see who subscribes to them.

    1. Tonio   13 years ago

      You'd undoubtedly pick up some journalists who report on but don't support their cause.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

        Locking up inquisitive journalists...a feature, not a bug.

  12. kinnath   13 years ago

    ALT-TEXT: "Siri, please out all of my friends."

  13. Bernieyeball   13 years ago

    How is anyone suprised at this? After all Homer Simpson runs a Nuke Power Plant!

    1. jb4479   13 years ago

      A friend of a friend works in a nuke power plant and it's scary how close "The Simpsons" comes to the real truth.

      1. Redmanfms   13 years ago

        I was a Navy nuke, and there was a long held myth that Groening was a Navy nuclear vet because of the perverse accuracy of his portrayals of nuke world.

        Most people in the nuclear industry are dorks. People who are very smart and well-educated and can perform very complex reactivity calculations on the fly who are dumb-founded by simple shit. The twidgets (nuke ETs) were the worst offenders in this regard. Meanwhile MMs like me saw any problem as solvable by repeated and vigorous, but inappropriate, application of pipe wrenches until either the item began working again or was broken enough that the Bubbas (civilian shipyard guys) had to fix it.

        /sea story

  14. ant1sthenes   13 years ago

    So, does that mean we can sign them all up for gay porn spam now?

    1. $park?   13 years ago

      If you can find something they aren't already subscribed to.

  15. 0x90   13 years ago

    alt-text: "What the... I thought I searched for goats."

    1. $park?   13 years ago

      I lol'd

    2. Loki   13 years ago

      Thread Winner. Assuming you're referencing what I think you're referencing.

      1. Tonio   13 years ago

        Ewww...

        1. 0x90   13 years ago

          In this context, you have to spell that ewe.

          1. Tonio   13 years ago

            Nanny!

  16. Archduke Pantsfan   13 years ago

    OT: Had to reinstall Chrome, and reasonable won't install.
    ERROR from Chrome Store:

    Package is invalid.
    details: 'illegal path (absolute or relative with '..'): '/img/icon_16.png"

  17. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

    Check the box if you'd like to receive bombing updates, special offers, or promotions from the Taliban and occasional promotions from our trusted partners, such as al Qaeda, Inc.

    1. CE   13 years ago

      Or FBI training and funding for your next attack.

  18. np   13 years ago

    Alt-Text: "Finally, something not controlled by teh jooz. Thank Allah this thing is made in China."

    1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

      Uighur made, to be Shaira complaint!

    2. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

      "Oh Shiite."

      1. Episiarch   13 years ago

        You really are the worst. And I mean that. The worst!

  19. 0x90   13 years ago

    The funny thing, to me, about that picture, is that if you broke out your time machine and sent the device he's holding back to the US or USSR in the '60s, the country you chose would have won the cold war within the span of a couple of years.

    And yet, this guy uses it to REPLY ALL his contact list to everybody.

    And yet further, neither the US nor the USSR have been able to subdue that region.

    1. CE   13 years ago

      Have you seen Iron Sky? The moon Nazis couldn't attack Earth because they didn't have enough computing power to run their space battleship. Until they captured an astronaut's iPhone. But then the battery died on them.

      1. Corning   13 years ago

        They can survive on the moon generate power using Hydrogen 3 and build a space battleship but they can't figure out how to connect a copper wire to a hole on an iPhone.

        I hate Space Nazis.

      2. Corning   13 years ago

        Another thing:

        Everyone always complains about Independence Day where they wrote a virus to take out the mother ship.

        Why is this implausible yet somehow an iPhone, without any programing let alone reverse engineering, is suddenly running a friggin space battleship.

        Hell in Independence Day they even spent 5 min of the movie explaining how they figured out how to turn off the shields....in Iron Sky they just plug it in and it works....preposterous!!!

      3. JW   13 years ago

        SPOILERS!

    2. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Defeating an army - Easy
      Conquoring a people - Hard

      1. Corning   13 years ago

        Defeating an army - Easy
        Conquoring a people - Hard

        You need to read "The Gallic Wars" and Xenophon's Anabasis.

        It is not hard to conquer a people...you just need to be willing to kill lots and lots of innocents.

        1. Redmanfms   13 years ago

          It is not hard to conquer a people...you just need to be willing to kill lots and lots of innocents.

          Pretty much.

          One can find far more recent references than that:

          Germany and Japan.

          South Vietnam.

    3. Corning   13 years ago

      if you broke out your time machine and sent the device he's holding back to the US or USSR in the '60s, the country you chose would have won the cold war within the span of a couple of years.

      Bullshit.

      Neither country would even the technology to properly study an iPhone let alone duplicate it.

      The best they could do is have one really really fast compact low power supercomputer...that is if they ever figured out how to program it.

      1. 0x90   13 years ago

        A couple of years is hyperbolic, but I think you underestimate the power that comes with knowing, concretely, that an idea is feasible.

        1. Corning   13 years ago

          I also think there would a problem with an iPhone being in the hands of Government.

          I would imagine the thing being studied in a top secret government facility...not studied in the open.

          The knowledge that makes up the technology of an iPhone is spread out among literally 100s of corporations with 1000s of researchers....I really do not think a handful of government bureaucrats with top secret clearance could get anything out of it....they would probably "brick" the thing in under 2 months.

          Your scenario could work if say some researchers experimented with the device then went into the private sector and implemented some of the ideas they saw.

          Sort of like how Apple and a whole host of other companies got a ton of ideas from seeing demonstrations of Xerox GUI technology way back in the day.

          Of course the Soviet Union of the 1960s would never be allow this.

          1. Redmanfms   13 years ago

            This.

            The Soviets failed because of who/what they represent. Their policies caused their collapse and it was inevitable. The fact that they were so woefully behind technologically is indicative of their neo-luddism. With the return of The State to Russia they are even given to wistful re-imaginings of how things went. Hell, some of these idiots actually claim they were ahead technologically and their is a widely believed myth among Russians that Intel's Pentium chip was developed using theories created by and named after some Russian mathematician named Pentius. That is some next-level denialism that would shame even our most logically-challenged progs.

            They would have had no fucking clue what to do with an iPhone if it had been presented to them in even the '80s.

            1. Redmanfms   13 years ago

              Correction, went and looked, some dude named Vladimir Pentovski.

  20. Tim   13 years ago

    Wait, is he on the shitter?

    1. Loki   13 years ago

      He does look a tad constipated.

  21. GILMORE   13 years ago

    A Taliban spokesman...accidentally revealed the names of his subscribers by CC'ing everyone on his mailing list.

    Ouch! That's such an Internet 1.0 Faux-pas. He must be *sooo* embarrassed. I bet he had to totally like email all his friends and be like 'dude, I didn't mean to'

    It so reminds me of that time i accidentally issued a Fatwa against my mom.

  22. Death Rock and Skull   13 years ago

    MOTHAFUCKIN HOSTESS IS IN TROUBLE!
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/.....EN20121116

    We need to make sure that the products will live on.

    All you health cunts who are itching to disparage Twinkies, shove it up your ass.

    1. $park?   13 years ago

      WHAT?!?! HOSTESS IS CLOSING??!?! Why are we just hearing about this now?????

      1. Death Rock and Skull   13 years ago

        Hostess can close all it wants as long as my breakfast favorites such as Mini Muffins and Brownie Bites will be produced with the same formula by another manufacturer.

        WHY COULDN'T IT BE LITTLE DEBBIE? THEIR MUFFINS SUCK ASS.

        Otis's are alright.

        1. SIV   13 years ago

          Little Debbie rules them all.

    2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      Yet another venerable American institution ruined by Unionism.

      1. Corning   13 years ago

        I am actually happy.

        It always brings a smile to my heart when union shops fail.

    3. A Serious Man   13 years ago

      I linked to this story in yesterday's PM links, it included a few interview quotes with the striking workers.

      One of them, I shit you not, said that he was okay with losing his job since he figured he would get more money from unemployment anyway. Another guy lamented the greed of the company despite the fact that he made $17.50 an hour mixing water and sugar together in a factory.

      1. Death Rock and Skull   13 years ago

        What the fuck? I did practically the same job at Clorox, makers of Hidden Valley, and made just above minimum wage. And that's all it was worth.

      2. Death Rock and Skull   13 years ago

        Damn, even entry level for a skilled, college educated profession is only worth about $12.

  23. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

    Feeney, look at all the alt-text options the commentariat has come up with, and they aren't even professionals! You sicken me.

    1. Corning   13 years ago

      When alt-texts can write themselves like the one above it is best just to leave it blank.

      I am no Feeney fan, especially when he writes about the Eurocrisis, but in this I think he made the correct choice.

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        I've never seen anything as wrong as your comment.

  24. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

    Going for 72 virgins 140 characters at a time.

  25. Archduke Pantsfan   13 years ago

    Wasn't this the plot of Skyfall?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Science Needs Dissent: NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya on COVID, Autism, and Climate Change

Matthew Rozsa | 8.2.2025 7:00 AM

Chris Arnade on China, Wall Street, and Walking Around the World

Tyler Cowen | From the August/September 2025 issue

Trump Is Openly Using the Presidency To Enrich the Trump Brand

Matt Welch | 8.1.2025 5:00 PM

A Cop Lied, Fabricated a Sex-Trafficking Case, and Jailed a Teen on False Charges—and Still Can't Be Sued

Billy Binion | 8.1.2025 4:49 PM

Shattering Norms: Federal Immigration Agents Aren't Afraid to Smash Your Car Window

Autumn Billings | 8.1.2025 4:01 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!