Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Join Us Tomorrow as Reason Staff Tweets the Second 2012 Presidential Debate!

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 10.15.2012 3:44 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It's coming. The second Obama/Romney face-off is almost here. Join the Reason staff here at Hit&Run tomorrow as we live tweet the foreign policy debate, starting at 9 p.m. There will, of course, be a drinking game.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Democrats Want Obama To Refocus on the Economy

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PoliticsPresidential Debates 2012Election 2012
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (64)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

    Join Us Tomorrow as Reason Staff Tweets the Second 2012 Presidential Debate!

    No.

    1. Lucy Steigerwald   13 years ago

      Alright.

      1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        LUCY!? I thought you perished in a tragic dirigible accident!

  2. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

    My drinking game: drink enough to pass out before it starts.

    1. Proprietist   13 years ago

      I was thinking, if we could just convince every American to join a drinking game where they take a shot each time Obama or Romney tell a lie or make a vague, unbelievable promise over the course of one debate, we'd probably generate enough sales to fuel a full economic recovery AND balance next year's budget.

      1. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

        You'd have to play the game on Jupiter to generate enough gravitational pull to be able to drink that quickly.

        1. Proprietist   13 years ago

          Since this game would surely be fatal if done in one sitting, we could space out the actual drinking part of the game over the course of, say, a year. But they still have to buy the alcohol tomorrow.

          1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

            STIMULUS!

      2. Rich   13 years ago

        if we could just convince mandate via penaltax every American to join a drinking game ....

        FTFY

  3. Episiarch   13 years ago

    While temping seeing as the last debate was a lulz factory, I still cannot stand watching politicians talk for more than a few seconds. I'll catch the highlights and play Borderlands instead.

    1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

      I bet Obama totally destroys his election chances by overdoing it and going total asshole.

      1. Episiarch   13 years ago

        That would be tremendously entertaining.

        1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          We can only hope. I wish I had an inside connection so I could egg him on. "Attack Mormonism! Call him a polygamist! Bring up the dog!"

        2. John   13 years ago

          And when he does that, the liberal excuse making about how American just can't handle an assertive black man because it is so racist will be even more entertaining.

          1. Rich   13 years ago

            "Obama Uppity In Polls"

          2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

            Exactly. Appeals to the base, and emasculates Romney by playing the ultimate race card!

      2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        Nope, he will go Full Metal Santa Obama and force Shit Flopney to expose his inner statist. They will simply try to out bid each other, going over be damned. You watch.

        1. Episiarch   13 years ago

          We'll see, doc. Anything can happen. Obama's staff have shown themselves to be tone-deaf retards, so their attempts to recover could be hilariously inept. Let's hope so.

          1. Tman   13 years ago

            I'm pretty sure that the campaign staff wasn't expecting a full-blown foreign policy disaster that turned in to cover-up a mere month before the debate that focuses on......foreign policy.

            How in the world Obama expects to spin the Benghazi debacle should be entertaining, at the very least.

            1. Tim   13 years ago

              Like a record baby, right round...

          2. $park?   13 years ago

            tone-deaf retards

            Excellent band name.

        2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          That usually works in debates, which are wonderfully situated to say things like, "Let's invest in empowering the children for the future" without anyone calling you out on it.

          The problem for Obama is that if he steers too much into bland platitudes, he'll lose votes right there. The big elephant in the room for him is explaining why his policies that aren't working magically will work if he gets reelected. Of course, it'll be extraordinarily difficult to effectively tell that lie with Romney waiting to call him out on it, so the chances are he'll try some other angle, like the angry president one.

          1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

            Actually, he has that whole "Republicans voting to cut spending for embassy security" gambit ready to go, no doubt. Nevermind that the Executive branch can bolster security at a given embassy at any time by rearranging deployments and assignments as needed.

            I don't think he will go Angy Prez without a teleprompter, and Flopney has the nice Mormon shtick going for him. As much as I despise The Flopster, I will give him credit that his feathers are hard to ruffle.

            1. John   13 years ago

              That is the biggest bunch of horseshit. They lowered overall spending. It is not like they told the DOS to cut security in Libya.

              1. Whahappan?   13 years ago

                If I'm not mistaken they were proposed cuts, that maybe passed the house, but didn't make it through the Senate, so the spending wasn't actually cut. And the proposed cuts wouldn't have come into effect until next year, anyway.

              2. VG Zaytsev   13 years ago

                It's even bigger bullshit than that John.

                The voted to cut future increases in spending and Hairy Reed kept it from even coming to a vote in the Senate so it was never enacted anyway.

        3. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

          That's why we need Bob Barker as a moderator.

          1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

            "Bob, I can run the government on $1 trillion/year."

            1. Tim   13 years ago

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A

    2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

      I was just trying to recall that last debate I watched. I think it was Reagan in 1984. I decided back then that I didn't think little debate "wins" and short policy statements were any basis for determining whether I was going to vote one way or the other, and I haven't looked back since.

      However, if Obama slugs Romney, I'll watch the tape.

  4. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

    In the interest of all this hubbub about the West eschewing speech these days, in light of that awful Cage/Revolta movie, I hear-by move that the terms "face-off" should now be deemed offensive speech, never to be seen again and forever more stricken from the lexicon of daily discourse.

    1. Proprietist   13 years ago

      "F*c*-Off" was a great episode of Breaking Bad, however.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    LITHE BLOG!

  6. SugarFree   13 years ago

    Prediction: At least one of them will have a very obvious erection.

    1. Warty   13 years ago

      Do warboners count?

      1. SugarFree   13 years ago

        Of course they count. It's the only non-chemically induced boners either ever have.

        1. Warty   13 years ago

          Then your prediction is amazing in its timidity, isn't it?

          1. SugarFree   13 years ago

            What's the point of making a prediction that won't come true?

            1. Episiarch   13 years ago

              What's the point of making an erection that won't turn blue?

              Wait, what?

      2. Tim   13 years ago

        Only your doctor can tell you if Warboner is right for you.

        1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          Yes. Either of them can take Warboner, since it massively increases your chance for a stroke.

        2. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

          See a doctor immediately if your warboner lasts more than eleven years, as this may be an indication of a seriously flawed government.

          1. Episiarch   13 years ago

            Do not take Warboner if you have trouble with killing foreigners indiscriminately or you have heart problems.

          2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

            Does the government have a DNR and a DPOA in place, by chance?

            1. SugarFree   13 years ago

              No, but I damn well bet they have a deadman's switch.

    2. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

      You mean Crowley?

      1. SugarFree   13 years ago

        You know you want to cockstab that neck wattle.

        1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          That's a terrible thing to say about Monica... Oh, you meant Candy. Nevermind.

      2. Rich   13 years ago

        Win!

  7. Tim   13 years ago

    Can Obama man up? Will he man up too much? He's under a lot of pressure compared to Romney.

    1. Rich   13 years ago

      (As aides roll in portable backboard.)

      "HORSE right now, Biotch! Just you and me!"

  8. Warty   13 years ago

    English Bob: [discussing the assassination of President Garfield] Well there's a dignity to royalty. A majesty that precludes the likelihood of assassination. If you were to point a pistol at a king or a queen your hands would shakes as though palsied.
    Barber: Oh, I wouldn't point no pistol at nobody, sir.
    English Bob: Well that's a wise policy, a wise policy. But if you did, I can assure you, if you did, that the sight of royalty would cause you to dismiss all thoughts of bloodshed and you would stand...how shall I put it? In awe. Now, a president...well, I mean, [chuckles]...why not shoot a president?

    Fuck all these fake little TV "debates".

    1. Zeb   13 years ago

      They put them on TV now?

  9. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

    Don't let their identical DNA fool you. They differ on some key issues.

    1. Episiarch   13 years ago

      "The sheer drama of this election has driven voter turnout to its highest level in centuries: six percent."

      1. Warty   13 years ago

        "It's time for someone who has the courage to stand up and say, 'I'm against those things that everybody hates!'"

  10. John   13 years ago

    In all seriousness what is Obama going to do? He can't defend his record. He can't claim Romney is some kind of scary libertarian out to kill grandma. I don't see how he performs any differently than he did the first time.

    1. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

      He can come out dressed as Big Bird.

      1. Tim   13 years ago

        You do realize, Mr. President, that "Big Bird" isn't real?

    2. SugarFree   13 years ago

      This one won't be about undecided voters, but rather shoring up the base. Expect him to be aggressive and derisive.

      1. John   13 years ago

        Then he is done. He might as well concede the election. The undecideds and independents all want politicians to appear reasonable and to get along. If he just appeals to his base, he will lose.

      2. Episiarch   13 years ago

        Oh, I really, really hope so. If we're really lucky we get some trash talk.

        1. John   13 years ago

          Maybe he can break out the accent he used in the 2007 video the Daily Caller broke.

          1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

            Ah, yes. The patois. His secret folksy, local colour rhetorical weapon. Just the thing for a Town Hall "debate".

          2. Warty   13 years ago

            If we're really lucky, he'll try to imitate Cleveland's favorite bus driver. "I bring my granddaughter and she whup yo ass!"

            1. Episiarch   13 years ago

              We're not that lucky. Nobody is. Not even a leprechaun.

            2. Tim   13 years ago

              "Romney you white motherfucker"

          3. Rich   13 years ago

            Yes! It'd be even better if he custom-mimicked each questioner's accent individually.

            "Gracias, Rosita. Si, jou are right to bring up Meheeco."

  11. Mike M.   13 years ago

    Watch some slimy politicians when I can watch Justin Verlander utterly humiliate the Yankees and bring them to the brink of elimination? Not just no, but HELL no!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!