One Way to Help Reduce Dependence on Foreign Oil? A Recession
Here's one way to reduce the nation's dependence on foreign oil: Let the economy dive into the deepest recession in decades. Remember that next time you hear a Democrat brag that, thanks to President Obama "America's dependence on foreign oil is the lowest in two decades," as Advanced Energy Economy Co-Founder Tom Steyer said at tonight's Democratic National Convention.
Steyer presents this factoid as part of a case for Obama, saying that at the GOP convention last week, "you didn't hear any plans that would create jobs or a long-term plan for energy security."
It's true, as Obama's campaign has advertised, that the nation's dependence on foreign oil is below 50 percent. But U.S. government energy figures show that it's been declining since before Obama took office, and, as Politifact notes, the biggest drop happened in 2009 as the recession was at its worst. The economy isn't the whole story, reports the Energy Information Administration; efficiency improvements and changes in consumer behavior also played a role in the shift in demand. But according to the EIA, the decline does partially reflect "the downturn in the underlying economy after the financial crisis of 2008." There's a correlation, in other words, between dependence on foreign oil and a struggling economy.
Still, expect President Obama to follow up on this line of argument when he speaks tomorrow night. Campaign aides have said that energy will be a focus of his Thursday night speech, and he's long been obsessed with the idea of juicing the economy by subsidizing alternative energy schemes, even when his own senior economic advisers have told him those schemes aren't likely to pay off.
Not for most of us anyway. But they might pay off for a few clever profiteers — like Tom Steyer. As he made sure to remind us, he's not an environmentalist. He's a businessman who has made the bet that "advanced energy is America's future." Which is another way of saying that he's bet that publicly funded subsidies for unproven energy schemes are in his future.
Democrats, of course, aren't the only ones immune to populist fantasies about dramatically reducing dependence on foreign energy. At the Republican convention last week, Mitt Romney made the utterly implausible promise to achieve North American energy independence by 2020.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Another way to "reduce dependence on foreign oil" as defined by percentage of oil that is foreign? Higher oil prices.
American produced oil tends to be more expensive than Saudi oil, which is the cheapest to extract in the world. When oil prices are lower, it's not economically worth it to extract US oil, and only the cheapest oil in the world to extract, mostly Saudi, makes it to the market. When oil prices are very high, it becomes worth it to use alternative sources, and the American percentage goes up.
Here's one way to reduce the nation's dependence on foreign oil: Let the economy dive into the deepest recession in decades.
Bullshit.
Almost! The show is Bullshit! and I don't think they did an episode about this. Peter should submit this to their producer and see how it goes.
On a side note the recession has reduced our nation's dependance on foreign bananas, foreign French wine, and foreign kangaroo pelts.
What's bullshit about it? A slower economy has less energy needs than one growing at a more rapid pace. The Chinese aren't interested in pipelines so the proles can gas up their cars.
We may be importing less oil, but it has nothing to do with anything that Obama has done.
We are consuming more nat gas, and that has shit to do with Obama.
I fucking hate the hero worship BS in politics.