Dotty Old Clint Eastwood Gave the Best Speech of the Week
Dirty Harry's pitch to independents and undecideds
I made my share of Clint Eastwood jokes last night. But I also watched his performance a second time, which is kind of amazing: How many convention speeches are worth watching twice? And of that tiny number, how many would you watch twice on the same night?
This is what I saw:
1. A comedy-improv debate with a chair may be the worst idea for a vaudeville act in showbiz history, but the crowd loved it. Or rather, they loved him. He's Clint Eastwood; almost everyone loves him. Even when he seemed like he might wander off into Rick Perry territory and choke completely, the audience in the hall was rooting for him. So, I suspect, was a lot of the audience at home.
2. Eastwood's criticisms of Barack Obama were the average American's criticisms of Barack Obama. If you want to hammer the president in a way that appeals to undecideds, you couldn't do much better than to complain about high unemployment and an endless war. That won't sound authentic coming from Romney, who has been tagged, fairly or not, as the guy who likes to fire people, and whose position on Afghanistan is 180 degrees away from Eastwood's. But coming from Clint Eastwood, that isn't a big problem…
3. …because Eastwood barely endorsed Mitt Romney last night. He was really endorsing Not Obama. The most substantial compliment he gave to the GOP's nominee was when he pointed out that Romney was a successful businessman -- and that came in the context of slamming the president for being a lawyer, Eastwood apparently forgetting that Mitt too is a graduate of Harvard Law School. "When somebody does not do the job, we've got to let them go," Eastwood said. That isn't an argument for any candidate in particular. It's a pitch for Despair and Change.
4. Eastwood didn't embrace the Republican Party, either. At the beginning of the address he seemed to be identifying himself with the "conservative people" in Hollywood, but then he rushed to expand the group to include "moderate people, Republicans, Democrats" as well. He had a similarly expansive vision of his audience: "Whether you are a Democrat or Republican or whether you're Libertarian or whatever, you are the best around."
5. Above all, those 12 minutes were interesting to watch. They were a great break from the heavily scripted, relentlessly on-message, and utterly boring infomercial that was the bulk of the convention.
In short: A widely beloved figure came onstage, offered a politically popular critique of the other party's candidate, put it in transpartisan terms that are more likely to appeal to undecided voters, and did it in a way that guaranteed we will remember it. He was human, eccentric, funny, weird, relatable. Maybe I would have preferred a performance of Eastwood's anti-government monologue from The Outlaw Josey Wales, but I'm not the target audience. I say the speech helps Romney.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The only criticism I have is that there should have been a blank Teleprompter in front of the chair.
Or just the teleprompter.
Ha, that would be even funnier for those of us in the know. But I don't think the majority of the audience would get it.
I'm pretty sure Clint actually thought Obama was there.
I'm pretty sure Joe Biden thinks blue is a flavor.
I'm pretty sure you're retarded.
See? Peak Retard? NOPE.
Yup, just when you think the test well is dry....gusher!
Must. . .publish. . .meme. . .as. . .instructed.
Yep, looks like the line of attack is as follows: The repubs are liars and Clint Eastwood is embarrassingly old.
Welcome back Mary Stack. Haven't seen you around here in a while!
Just what we need - another brain dead piece of shit griefer troll.
It's just Mary Stack in her latest incarnation. Meet the new griefer troll; same as the old griefer troll.
"Whether you are a Democrat or Republican or whether you're Libertarian or whatever, you are the best around."
If you liked his speech you shouldn't misquote it. He didn't capitalize libertarian in the actual speech.
He was listing political parties, so I think is appropriate.
Did you grow up near high voltage power lines?
"Did you grow up near high voltage power lines?"
I did. Why?
That's an interesting question, actually. There is no way to certainly know unless there is an official transcript published somewhere.
If there's a transcript the we could read what Clint "heard" Obama saying.
We already can.
I don't know, Jesse. A lot (A LOT) of other articles out there are telling me some pretty untoward things about this speech. Why should I believe you? The legacy media has made its decision!
I especially like how they're saying it was a bad move for the GOP because Eastwood "upstaged" Romney's speech. You know I'm voting for Mitt in November, but I have no illusions that having his boring speech upstaged by an anti-Obama voice is the best thing that could happen to him.
All that money and they didn't think to have an Obama hologram like Tupac at Coachella.
They totally should have had a Joe Biden hologram. God I would fly to Tampa right now to see that.
That would be a big fucking deal!
How about a Biden hologram in chains?
I would just pass out from the overload of awesome.
That would be considered an implied threat against the president's life, and they'd all be arrested.
That said, I can't wait for the debates between Ryan and Biden.
Did he talk for 12 minutes, punk, or did he talk 13?
It's a hell of a thing, not endorsing a man. Take away all the votes he's got, and all he's ever gonna have.
I guess he had it coming, though.
None of them have it coming, kid.
"A man's got to do something for a living these days."
"Campaign speechifying ain't much of a living, boy."
"Hell of a thing killing a man"
Well, he should armed himself.
Clint Eastwood became huge star as a man of few words As a surprise guest on the Tampa stage he had too many words (I say as a friend)
My dear, young man, don't take it too hard. Your work is ingenious. It's quality work. And there are simply too many notes, that's all. Cut a few and it will be perfect.
Which few did you have in mind, Majesty?
If His Majesty says there are too many note, there are too many notes!
One thing about the speech is that it came across as sincere. Not carefully crafted by PR. And it wasn't about toeing the party line.
Son, I am disappoint.
Towing the Lannister lion?
Well, I'm all broken up over that man's rights!
The Dems should get Busey
Only if he promises to pull out somebody's endocrine system on stage.
Why drag Sugarfree into this?
Isn't Busey already V.P.? Has anyone ever actually seen Joe Biden and Gary Busey in the same place at the same time?
"They did not think he would get up there and erode in front of the whole world like he did. And it was embarrassing," the Rev. Al Sharpton said. "I mean you almost wanted to go out there and get him."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/s.....z258ryBJ65
So basically, something creative happens at the RNC. The Liberal media punditoracy has no pre-formulated answer.
They're pissed because it was an epic takedown of their God Obama and they know that the dems are too stupid and wooden to do anything half as good at their convention.
Al Sharpton criticized a Republican Convention speech? You don't say.
Al Sharpton calling someone embarrassing is like the pot calling...uh, never mind.
"I mean you almost wanted to go out there and get him."
ELIMUNASHUNIST RHETORIC!!!
What a pud.
It's like progressives have never had to deal with old people that still had brains sharp as a tack, but struggle to speak smoothly and clearly because they're old. I'm sure Client would clean their clocks in any business transaction.
Please fix your fucking preview button so that I can actually use it.
GOLDSTEIN!!!
at least today's Goldstein.
Who will it be tomorrow?
I didn't watch it but the reaction I've seen and heard on FB and around the office was that it was embarrassing for Clint. "Stupid" was one succinct review.
Here it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....._embedded#!
It's definitely worth watching.
I thought it was okay. Not brilliant oratory, but effective enough. The rambling really helped make it a little more credible.
That said, I don't really give a crap about what Clint said. Or what any of the rest of them said (his speech is the only thing I've watched in the whole thing). Still voting Johnson.
LBJ? Bold move.
I like his willingness to make staff members attend him while he's taking a crap. With the door open. It's a strong management technique.
I didn't mean to imply that I couldn't find a link to it but thank you. I'll queue it up right behind all those tv shows that people keep telling me I should watch.
Eastwood barely endorsed Mitt Romney last night
I almost have to wonder if, with the Afghanistan/ anti-war stuff, he was making a kind of stealth Ron Paul "endorsement". Or perhaps a stealth Gary Johnson endorsement? Obviously he couldn't come right out and say it, given his audience. They probably would have had security escort him off the stage if he had, but I kind of have to wonder what was up with that. Surely he's not politically tone deaf enough to think Romney's an anti-war candidate.
If he did that, I'm going to put a framed photo of him on my wall.
So we're thinking he pulled a "Marc Antony"?
So once again "The Simpsons Already Did It" is true.
Alas, it's a Photoshop. In the original he's yelling at a cloud.
I'm sure that, ultimately, Eastwood's speech will help Romney. But, assuming he actually feels as he indicated in his speech, or in previously published interviews and quotes, why should Clint Eastwood help Romney at all? Maybe, as you say it's all about not-Obama. But in that case, why didn't Eastwood offer more support to Ron Paul when he could have helped? Why didn't Eastwood enlist himself as "secret guest" and key endorser of, say, Gary Johnson? Why hitch Romney to his star?
The fact that we are talking more about Eastwood than Romney means it hurt. If the best thing or most memorable thing coming out of a convention is not the nominee then he failed.
i think that's a major mistake people are making. they'll remember the case eastwood made, but that only aids romney. and mitt got to give his speech without people dissecting it for days since people were "distracted". it's not like clint eastwood died and all anyone can think about is how good unforgiven was. when they talk about clint, good or bad, it gets put into the context of not electing obama.
the whole idea that overshadowing the candidate is a bad thing misses the point. as long as they're making your point for you, you remain the only name on the ballot, so who cares?