Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Dotty Old Clint Eastwood Gave the Best Speech of the Week

Dirty Harry's pitch to independents and undecideds

Jesse Walker | 8.31.2012 11:35 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

For their mystery guest, the Republicans went for the most obscure politician they could find -- some guy who was the mayor of a tiny California town in the '80s.
Associated Press

I made my share of Clint Eastwood jokes last night. But I also watched his performance a second time, which is kind of amazing: How many convention speeches are worth watching twice? And of that tiny number, how many would you watch twice on the same night?

This is what I saw:

1. A comedy-improv debate with a chair may be the worst idea for a vaudeville act in showbiz history, but the crowd loved it. Or rather, they loved him. He's Clint Eastwood; almost everyone loves him. Even when he seemed like he might wander off into Rick Perry territory and choke completely, the audience in the hall was rooting for him. So, I suspect, was a lot of the audience at home.

2. Eastwood's criticisms of Barack Obama were the average American's criticisms of Barack Obama. If you want to hammer the president in a way that appeals to undecideds, you couldn't do much better than to complain about high unemployment and an endless war. That won't sound authentic coming from Romney, who has been tagged, fairly or not, as the guy who likes to fire people, and whose position on Afghanistan is 180 degrees away from Eastwood's. But coming from Clint Eastwood, that isn't a big problem…

3. …because Eastwood barely endorsed Mitt Romney last night. He was really endorsing Not Obama. The most substantial compliment he gave to the GOP's nominee was when he pointed out that Romney was a successful businessman -- and that came in the context of slamming the president for being a lawyer, Eastwood apparently forgetting that Mitt too is a graduate of Harvard Law School. "When somebody does not do the job, we've got to let them go," Eastwood said. That isn't an argument for any candidate in particular. It's a pitch for Despair and Change.

It was the style at the time.
Twitter

4. Eastwood didn't embrace the Republican Party, either. At the beginning of the address he seemed to be identifying himself with the "conservative people" in Hollywood, but then he rushed to expand the group to include "moderate people, Republicans, Democrats" as well. He had a similarly expansive vision of his audience: "Whether you are a Democrat or Republican or whether you're Libertarian or whatever, you are the best around."

5. Above all, those 12 minutes were interesting to watch. They were a great break from the heavily scripted, relentlessly on-message, and utterly boring infomercial that was the bulk of the convention.

In short: A widely beloved figure came onstage, offered a politically popular critique of the other party's candidate, put it in transpartisan terms that are more likely to appeal to undecided voters, and did it in a way that guaranteed we will remember it. He was human, eccentric, funny, weird, relatable. Maybe I would have preferred a performance of Eastwood's anti-government monologue from The Outlaw Josey Wales, but I'm not the target audience. I say the speech helps Romney.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Earthquake Hits Manila, Tsunami Warning Issued

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

PoliticsCultureRepublican Convention 2012Election 2012Clint EastwoodMoviesCampaigns/Elections
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (69)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Cenotaph   13 years ago

    The only criticism I have is that there should have been a blank Teleprompter in front of the chair.

    1. RBS   13 years ago

      Or just the teleprompter.

      1. Cenotaph   13 years ago

        Ha, that would be even funnier for those of us in the know. But I don't think the majority of the audience would get it.

    2. Dan's brother Jeff   13 years ago

      I'm pretty sure Clint actually thought Obama was there.

      1. sage   13 years ago

        I'm pretty sure Joe Biden thinks blue is a flavor.

      2. Episiarch   13 years ago

        I'm pretty sure you're retarded.

        1. sage   13 years ago

          See? Peak Retard? NOPE.

          1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

            Yup, just when you think the test well is dry....gusher!

        2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          Must. . .publish. . .meme. . .as. . .instructed.

          1. sage   13 years ago

            Yep, looks like the line of attack is as follows: The repubs are liars and Clint Eastwood is embarrassingly old.

      3. Mike M.   13 years ago

        Welcome back Mary Stack. Haven't seen you around here in a while!

      4. Loki   13 years ago

        Just what we need - another brain dead piece of shit griefer troll.

        1. Mike M.   13 years ago

          It's just Mary Stack in her latest incarnation. Meet the new griefer troll; same as the old griefer troll.

  2. Cenotaph   13 years ago

    "Whether you are a Democrat or Republican or whether you're Libertarian or whatever, you are the best around."

    If you liked his speech you shouldn't misquote it. He didn't capitalize libertarian in the actual speech.

    1. CuriousGeorge   13 years ago

      He was listing political parties, so I think is appropriate.

      Did you grow up near high voltage power lines?

      1. Bam!   13 years ago

        "Did you grow up near high voltage power lines?"

        I did. Why?

    2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      That's an interesting question, actually. There is no way to certainly know unless there is an official transcript published somewhere.

      1. Dan's brother Jeff   13 years ago

        If there's a transcript the we could read what Clint "heard" Obama saying.

        1. darius404   13 years ago

          We already can.

  3. sage   13 years ago

    I don't know, Jesse. A lot (A LOT) of other articles out there are telling me some pretty untoward things about this speech. Why should I believe you? The legacy media has made its decision!

    1. Cenotaph   13 years ago

      I especially like how they're saying it was a bad move for the GOP because Eastwood "upstaged" Romney's speech. You know I'm voting for Mitt in November, but I have no illusions that having his boring speech upstaged by an anti-Obama voice is the best thing that could happen to him.

  4. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

    All that money and they didn't think to have an Obama hologram like Tupac at Coachella.

    1. sage   13 years ago

      They totally should have had a Joe Biden hologram. God I would fly to Tampa right now to see that.

      1. WTF   13 years ago

        That would be a big fucking deal!

        1. sage   13 years ago

          How about a Biden hologram in chains?

          1. WTF   13 years ago

            I would just pass out from the overload of awesome.

      2. ant1sthenes   13 years ago

        That would be considered an implied threat against the president's life, and they'd all be arrested.

        That said, I can't wait for the debates between Ryan and Biden.

  5. Paul.   13 years ago

    Did he talk for 12 minutes, punk, or did he talk 13?

  6. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    It's a hell of a thing, not endorsing a man. Take away all the votes he's got, and all he's ever gonna have.

    1. Warty   13 years ago

      I guess he had it coming, though.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

        None of them have it coming, kid.

        1. Episiarch   13 years ago

          "A man's got to do something for a living these days."

          "Campaign speechifying ain't much of a living, boy."

  7. edcoast   13 years ago

    "Hell of a thing killing a man"

    1. Brutus   13 years ago

      Well, he should armed himself.

  8. rts   13 years ago

    Clint Eastwood became huge star as a man of few words As a surprise guest on the Tampa stage he had too many words (I say as a friend)

    My dear, young man, don't take it too hard. Your work is ingenious. It's quality work. And there are simply too many notes, that's all. Cut a few and it will be perfect.

    1. Episiarch   13 years ago

      Which few did you have in mind, Majesty?

      1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

        If His Majesty says there are too many note, there are too many notes!

  9. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

    One thing about the speech is that it came across as sincere. Not carefully crafted by PR. And it wasn't about toeing the party line.

    1. Joe M   13 years ago

      Son, I am disappoint.

      1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

        Towing the Lannister lion?

  10. Warty   13 years ago

    Well, I'm all broken up over that man's rights!

  11. Dan's brother Jeff   13 years ago

    The Dems should get Busey

    1. NeonCat   13 years ago

      Only if he promises to pull out somebody's endocrine system on stage.

      1. sage   13 years ago

        Why drag Sugarfree into this?

    2. Loki   13 years ago

      Isn't Busey already V.P.? Has anyone ever actually seen Joe Biden and Gary Busey in the same place at the same time?

  12. Dan's brother Jeff   13 years ago

    "They did not think he would get up there and erode in front of the whole world like he did. And it was embarrassing," the Rev. Al Sharpton said. "I mean you almost wanted to go out there and get him."

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/s.....z258ryBJ65

    1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      So basically, something creative happens at the RNC. The Liberal media punditoracy has no pre-formulated answer.

      1. VG Zaytsev   13 years ago

        They're pissed because it was an epic takedown of their God Obama and they know that the dems are too stupid and wooden to do anything half as good at their convention.

    2. Cenotaph   13 years ago

      Al Sharpton criticized a Republican Convention speech? You don't say.

    3. sage   13 years ago

      Al Sharpton calling someone embarrassing is like the pot calling...uh, never mind.

    4. sage   13 years ago

      "I mean you almost wanted to go out there and get him."

      ELIMUNASHUNIST RHETORIC!!!

    5. Count Anacreon   13 years ago

      What a pud.

  13. kinnath   13 years ago

    It's like progressives have never had to deal with old people that still had brains sharp as a tack, but struggle to speak smoothly and clearly because they're old. I'm sure Client would clean their clocks in any business transaction.

    1. kinnath   13 years ago

      Please fix your fucking preview button so that I can actually use it.

  14. Bardas Phocas   13 years ago

    GOLDSTEIN!!!

    at least today's Goldstein.
    Who will it be tomorrow?

  15. highnumber   13 years ago

    I didn't watch it but the reaction I've seen and heard on FB and around the office was that it was embarrassing for Clint. "Stupid" was one succinct review.

    1. VG Zaytsev   13 years ago

      Here it is.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....._embedded#!

      It's definitely worth watching.

    2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

      I thought it was okay. Not brilliant oratory, but effective enough. The rambling really helped make it a little more credible.

      That said, I don't really give a crap about what Clint said. Or what any of the rest of them said (his speech is the only thing I've watched in the whole thing). Still voting Johnson.

      1. highnumber   13 years ago

        LBJ? Bold move.

        1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          I like his willingness to make staff members attend him while he's taking a crap. With the door open. It's a strong management technique.

  16. highnumber   13 years ago

    I didn't mean to imply that I couldn't find a link to it but thank you. I'll queue it up right behind all those tv shows that people keep telling me I should watch.

  17. Loki   13 years ago

    Eastwood barely endorsed Mitt Romney last night

    I almost have to wonder if, with the Afghanistan/ anti-war stuff, he was making a kind of stealth Ron Paul "endorsement". Or perhaps a stealth Gary Johnson endorsement? Obviously he couldn't come right out and say it, given his audience. They probably would have had security escort him off the stage if he had, but I kind of have to wonder what was up with that. Surely he's not politically tone deaf enough to think Romney's an anti-war candidate.

    1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

      If he did that, I'm going to put a framed photo of him on my wall.

      1. James Anderson Merritt   13 years ago

        So we're thinking he pulled a "Marc Antony"?

  18. Proprietist   13 years ago

    So once again "The Simpsons Already Did It" is true.

    1. Jesse Walker   13 years ago

      Alas, it's a Photoshop. In the original he's yelling at a cloud.

  19. James Anderson Merritt   13 years ago

    I'm sure that, ultimately, Eastwood's speech will help Romney. But, assuming he actually feels as he indicated in his speech, or in previously published interviews and quotes, why should Clint Eastwood help Romney at all? Maybe, as you say it's all about not-Obama. But in that case, why didn't Eastwood offer more support to Ron Paul when he could have helped? Why didn't Eastwood enlist himself as "secret guest" and key endorser of, say, Gary Johnson? Why hitch Romney to his star?

  20. T. Durden   13 years ago

    The fact that we are talking more about Eastwood than Romney means it hurt. If the best thing or most memorable thing coming out of a convention is not the nominee then he failed.

    1. josh   13 years ago

      i think that's a major mistake people are making. they'll remember the case eastwood made, but that only aids romney. and mitt got to give his speech without people dissecting it for days since people were "distracted". it's not like clint eastwood died and all anyone can think about is how good unforgiven was. when they talk about clint, good or bad, it gets put into the context of not electing obama.

      the whole idea that overshadowing the candidate is a bad thing misses the point. as long as they're making your point for you, you remain the only name on the ballot, so who cares?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!