Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Could Obama's Pot Crackdown Cost Him Colorado?

Matt Welch | 7.19.2012 3:37 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

That's the question posed by this Salon article. Excerpt:

In Colorado alone, 40 dispensaries — all in compliance with state and local law — have already been shut down this year.

The surprising about-face has inspired former supporters in Colorado to try to legalize the drug outright. They managed to get a proposition to that effect on the ballot this November, and […] there are…warning signs that many of these same voters won't pull the lever for Obama in a crucial swing state.

"The element that nobody's really talking about is what I call the Gary Johnson effect," says Denver Democratic political consultant Rick Ridder.

Some testimony from spurned lovers:

"I volunteered for his campaign, primarily because he said he was going to respect state marijuana laws," says Josh Kappel, a Denver attorney who works at Sensible Colorado, a marijuana reform group at the forefront of the legalization effort. […]

Wanda James, a Democratic fundraiser who bundled $100,000 for Obama's 2008 campaign while serving on his national finance committee, runs an edible marijuana business in the state. She is so outraged at the White House that she "won't raise a dime" for his reelection.

"There's a number of major donors that have felt that way — people who've given over a million dollars," she told me. […]

Johnson registered at 7 percent support in a recent Public Policy Polling survey of the state.

I have been encouraging progressives to torture Democrats over the drug war for a while now.

Link via Gary Johnson's Twitter feed.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Non-Liberals Live Amongst Liberals, Deceptively Wearing Their Guises: Noted with Alarm

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsWar on DrugsBarack ObamaGary JohnsonMarijuanaElection 2012
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (80)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. John   13 years ago

    There and New Mexico. Obama has to lose those states because of people voting for Johnson. If Romney just beats him, the Democrats don't get the message.

    1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

      Vote for Johnson? John, haven't you heard - there are only TWO candidates for President (except for me) and only TWO political parties in the US. Team Red or Team Blue - those are your ONLY choices, John!

      Why don't you jump on the team and come on in for the big win?

    2. Aresen   13 years ago

      The ideal scenario is an extremely close outcome between Team Red Blue with about a 15% vote for Johnson*, which would demonstrate to both teams that they can't just give lip-service to Libertarian issues.

      *Ain't going to happen, BTW.

    3. Paul.   13 years ago

      As a former resident of New Mexico, I don't see Johnson pulling votes away from Obama. I read Johnson doing better in NM weakens Mittens, not Obama.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    She is so outraged at the White House that she "won't raise a dime" for his reelection.

    Outraged enough to pull for Johnson? If these are single issue voters, I don't know how they could do anything but.

    1. wareagle   13 years ago

      Outraged enough to pull for Johnson?

      that would be the last of her three options. The others are: vote for Obama anyway or stay home. Since this is a liberal, the smart money is on the former. Liberals tend to have no principle and will vote party over all else. Say what you will about the right, piss them off enough and conservatives will just stay home.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

        Obama will probably be better on the issue the second term, anyway. Right? RIGHT?

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          He will if we get rid of that pesky Republican minority in Congress.

        2. Bardas Phocas   13 years ago

          He promised he would.
          Well he had a back-room buttboy promise it to some reliable hack, which is just like a solid promise from the Obama.
          Is in it?

          1. fried wylie   13 years ago

            Is in it?

            Innit?

            1. Dovahkiin   13 years ago

              Is it in yet?

    2. Paul.   13 years ago

      "won't raise a dime for him"...

      But it doesn't say anything about how she'll vote.

  3. Aresen   13 years ago

    "The surprising about-face...

    After 42 months, only Salon and Obamaniacs could still be surprised.

  4. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

    She is so outraged at the White House that she "won't raise a dime" for his reelection.

    This does not mean she will not vote for the Obamessiah.

    1. wareagle   13 years ago

      she will support him. Ideology conquers all. Unlike conservatives who sat out in '08 because they knew McCain was not one of them, liberals have no principle and will not risk losing.

      1. Dunphy (the real one)   13 years ago

        do you really believe this crap? i feel like i'm at free republic. "liberals have no principle"

        1. fried wylie   13 years ago

          Dunphy The "youre not representing the entire spectrum of human view points" Concern Troll.

          For the portion of self-proclaimed liberals who take the time to espouse their "views", what wareagle said has been proven correct time and time again by the aforementioned espousing.

        2. wareagle   13 years ago

          dunphy,
          are you new here? Look around. When Obama evolved on gay marriage, the questions was would blacks not support him, not whether they would support someone who shares their viewpoint. Same thing with this pot story. The pissed off woman is still going to vote for him. Party dogma trumps all.

  5. Ken Shultz   13 years ago

    I have been encouraging progressives to torture Democrats over the drug war for a while now.

    Getting progressives to vote against the Democrats over the drug war, isn't that a bit like trying to get feminists to vote against the Democrats for being pro-choice?

    From what I can tell, there isn't anything about the drug war that's unappealing to progressives. In fact, it looks to me like applying drug war tactics to a host of other issues is what being a progressive is all about!

    I can see how liberals might get upset about the drug war, but progressives? They'd have the police treat homeschooling and selling cheeseburgers like selling crack if they could.

    1. Nyarlathotep   13 years ago

      "I have been encouraging progressives to torture Democrats over the drug war for a while now"

      Welch needs a reason? Democrats should be tortured on general principle.

      1. Ken Shultz   13 years ago

        Progressives certainly need to be tortured over what they do.

        No excuse needed.

        But I don't think it bothers them, the damage they do. ...not even if it's poor people or minorities they're hurting.

        They're the ones the old saying "if you're want to make an omelet, you're gonna have to break some eggs" was coined for. They take the pain and suffering they cause as an indication that somebody's finally doing something to fix the problem.

        That's yet another reason why progressives are America's most horrible people.

  6. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

    I'd like to think some of these people will defect to Johnson, but 99% of them won't. They may be mad as hell about Obama's drug policy, but that crazy libertarian guy just wants their grandmothers eating cat food until they die in a gutter. Come November, they'll be pulling a lever for Obama.

    1. Brandybuck   13 years ago

      They may hate Obama's guts, but they will vote for Obama anyway just because Obama told them to.

  7. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

    Of course, Coloradans and others could just vote for The Turtle Man.

    A TRUE American Hero?.

    "LIIIIIIIIVE ACTION!"

    1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

      Apparently, I SF'ed that link. Huh...

      http://www.google.com/search?q.....66bih=616

      1. The Derider   13 years ago

        The episode where they fly him to North Carolina is hilarious. When he sees the escalator in the airport "uhh... what's that?"

    2. Libertarius   13 years ago

      Turtle Man 2016

      THE TURTLE MAN CAN

  8. CampingInYourPark   13 years ago

    Anyone thinking the gov't should be telling us how to talk, eat, drive, heat our homes, etc. isn't going to suddenly think they shouldn't doing the same with any other thing. Even IF they flip on cannabis they reserve the right to choose something else to beat the masses into submission with.

  9. Loki   13 years ago

    Could Obama's Pot Crackdown Cost Him Colorado?

    I doubt it. I think there's enough progreso-tards in Boulder and Denver county who may bitch about this shit, but when push comes to shove they'll vote for him anyway. Not voting or voting for a 3rd party won't even cross their minds. "I don't like Obama anymore, but Romney's worse" will carry the day.

  10. Dunphy (the real one)   13 years ago

    i certainly hope it costs him colorado, but i have no idea if it will

    his relentless drug war pimping is disgusting, and completely contrary to what he said when he ran for president.

    attacking medical mj clinics is way worse than attacking just plain MJ (growers etc.)

    many of these people are legitimately sick, and mj is a valid therapeutic modality

    granted, libs in my state have passed draconian laws making it difficult for chronic pain patients to get opioid (iow effective meds) too.

    people's suffering and personal choices don't mean shit to statists

    1. wareagle   13 years ago

      you have thus answered the question you posed upthread regarding liberals and principle. Until and unless there is video of him snatching a joint out of some elderly terminal cancer patient's hand and stamp it out, these people will support him. And even then, most of them still will.

  11. Old Mexican   13 years ago

    "I volunteered for his campaign, primarily because he said he was going to respect state marijuana laws," says Josh Kappel

    And on whom should the blame rest, Josh? On him for saying an obvious lie, or on you for being so gullible?

  12. JimDee   13 years ago

    Obama only got elected because so many people thought he was going to decrim or legalize. I almost voted for him for that reason until I got over it and remembered he was probably full of crap as all Hangers-On-Of-The-Regime are. I'm glad my instincts are still good.

    Obama will lose a lot of his 2008 constituency because of this single issue.

    1. DesigNate   13 years ago

      One can only hope.

      1. JimDee   13 years ago

        Centrifiers have finally succeeded in making "hope" a dirty word. It only took them a few centuries.

        I do believe we're going to see a lot of abstentions on the Presidential ballot this year.

    2. SIV   13 years ago

      Obama only got elected because so many people thought he was going to decrim or legalize.

      He made it absolutely clear in the campaign he would NOT do this. He weaseled/waffled/lied on backing off the med mj raids but repeatedly ridiculed those who called for legalization.

      1. JimDee   13 years ago

        Not to be pedantic, but what he said and what people thought are two different things.

  13. The Derider   13 years ago

    On the war on drugs:

    Johnson Obama Romney

    If you're a democrat, a vote for Johnson is a vote for Romney. Game theory indicates they will vote for Obama, since we all agree that Johnson cannot win.

    Or, if you're too stupid to understand game theory, they're EEEEVIL.

    1. The Derider   13 years ago

      There were supposed to be "greater than" characters between the three candidates.

      1. Libertarius   13 years ago

        You're a dumbass, and a vain one at that. You refuse to face the reality that Obozo IS an in-over-his-head, flailing hack who doesn't know what he's doing--just like any libtard when they leave the ivory tower.

        1. The Derider   13 years ago

          Do you think that Romney will be better than Obama on the Drug war?

          Do you think Johnson will win?

          If your answer to both of those questions is NO, Obama's the only rational choice.

          1. JimDee   13 years ago

            You're choosing someone that claims his that the powers of his office entitle him to kill you, like any warlord.

            There's exactly no rationality in choosing anyone for that office. The only rational decision is to abolish that office. As this is a nation of irrational fools, whoever wins in November will be the worst choice of the two non-choices offered.

            1. The Derider   13 years ago

              The powers of his office do allow him to kill me in some situations, but, unlike any warlord, those powers are granted to him by the constitution and not his personal army.

              I'm not sure that anarchy is the only rational option.

              1. JimDee   13 years ago

                Anarchy would be a better option that the increasing chaos practiced by Statists.

                1. The Derider   13 years ago

                  Is there any non-country I could look at to compare the outcomes of anarchy to statism?

                  1. JimDee   13 years ago

                    That was my point. Anarchy isn't attainable but the chaos of Statism is all around us.

                    1. The Derider   13 years ago

                      I think your point was about the advantages of anarchy over statism.

                      If anarchy is impossible, how can you know?

                    2. JimDee   13 years ago

                      Statists always miss the point.

                      The point is that there's no difference between Obama and Romney and anyone voting for either of them is a fool.

                    3. The Derider   13 years ago

                      I'd take Romney or Obama over anarchy. Anyone who thinks that's a better outcome is a fool.

                    4. JimDee   13 years ago

                      Cluephone: I'm not an anarchist. I'm also not a statist. My uncomplimentary comparison of the two should have tipped you off.

                      As I said, Statists always miss the point.

          2. Paul.   13 years ago

            Do you think Johnson will win?

            If your answer to both of those questions is NO, Obama's the only rational choice.

            A vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Gary Johnson!

            1. The Derider   13 years ago

              Right, and if Gary Johnson can't win, a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for nothing.

              1. MSimon   13 years ago

                We don't have national elections for President. We have State elections.

          3. Emmerson Biggins   13 years ago

            If your answer to both of those questions is NO, Obama's the only rational choice

            False

        2. The Derider   13 years ago

          Do you think that Romney will be better than Obama on the Drug war?

          Do you think Johnson will win?

          If your answer to both of those questions is NO, Obama's the only rational choice.

    2. Aresen   13 years ago

      Unless and until Team Blue and Team Red understand that they cannot simply give lip service to Libertarian issues then ignore them after the first Tuesday in November, there is absolutely no reason to prefer either of them.

      1. The Derider   13 years ago

        This assumes that Romney and Obama have identical positions on the drug war, which they don't. Any difference is a reason to prefer one over the other.

        1. Paul.   13 years ago

          I believe one wants to crack down harder on illegal drugs, the other wants to crack down slightly harder-er. So yes, differences abound.

          1. Aresen   13 years ago

            I believe the "difference" he refers to is that Obama wants to put you in a prison run by the California Prison Guard Union and Romney wants to put you in a prison run by Jails-R-Us.

            Obviously, the former is much preferable.

          2. The Derider   13 years ago

            I realize this is sarcasm, but what you're writing is literally true. Even if Obama is 1% better than Romney on the drug war, it's a reason to vote for him. Unless you think Johnson has a chance, which I don't, it's a binary choice.

            1. JimDee   13 years ago

              It sounds like it's getting desperate down at Obama HQ.

              1. The Derider   13 years ago

                When logic fails, snark to the rescue!

                1. JimDee   13 years ago

                  Those that preach voting for Obamney deserve snark+1. It's like a hooker preaching abstinence.

        2. Aresen   13 years ago

          You are assuming that the WoD is the only libertarian issue.

          Neither team has any cred in the WoD.

          Team Blue wants to put me in jail for selling soda pop and tax me to spend money on dentures for teens or some other piece of 'social justice.'

          Team Red wants to put me in jail for looking at pr0n and tax me to spend money on the USS Dick Cheney and bigger prisons.

          F**k them both.

          1. The Derider   13 years ago

            Its a thread about the war on drugs?

            1. Aresen   13 years ago

              Although I cannot vote in your election, I don't see anyone on this thread who believes that the WoD is the sole issue in the 2012 campaign.

              The main reason I want Obama to win in 2012 is that the economy is going nowhere over the next few years, no matter who is in office, and I want to see Team Blue wear it. (I know there isn't really a great deal the POTUS can do about the economy, but the fact is that voters tend to blame the President's party anyways.)

              1. Aresen   13 years ago

                Also, I find a certain amusement in the ongoing "Blame Bush" thing that Obama and the Blues keep pushing.

                I am wondering if they will keep it up all the way to 2016.

              2. The Derider   13 years ago

                GO TEAM RED ROOT ROOT RAH!

                1. JW   13 years ago

                  Hey joe, whadya know?

                  Did you gain a lot of weight recently? I can barely recognize you.

  14. TindWeee   13 years ago

    lol, Obama is an idiot, plain and simple.

    http://www.New-Anon.tk

    1. Paul.   13 years ago

      Anon bot is learning. Skynet can't be far away.

      1. Aresen   13 years ago

        One might think so, but then anon-bot will make a comment dissing Lobster Girl.

  15. Warty   13 years ago

    joe-like typing detected.

    1. JW   13 years ago

      It must return to the creator to correct the error.

      1. Warty   13 years ago

        Run away, dude! joe's back, and this time, he's heard of game theory!

  16. teapartydoc   13 years ago

    The only way to definitively end the drug war is to eliminate physician licensing by the government. Think about it.

    1. SIV   13 years ago

      No shit. I've always thought the best way to frame the big picture on drug prohibition was to ask people if they thought it right to have to take off work and pay $20 -200 out of pocket to get a fucking refill on a non-psychoactive prescription of a relatively benign drug they'd taken countless times before.Focusing on "get you high" drugs alone alienates most of those who don't use them and would generally prefer other people don't.

      Ending government prfessional licensure and the gateway would dramatically cut "health care" costs as well. They always focus on cutting edge treatments and heroic end-of-life measures when the bulk of medical costs involve simple tests, answering a few questions and waiting for the quack to whip out his magic pad and pen. You could produce good primary care providers who knew exactly when to "kick it upstairs" with some vo-tech training and an apprenticeship.

  17. Robert Chase   13 years ago

    Sixty dispensaries have already been closed, and more Federal threats are going out soon. Obama has already forfeited my support, but I will vote socialist -- not for Gary Johnson! While Wanda James may have made significant contributions to Obama's election, I just canvassed for him. The majority of people who use cannabis in Colorado are politically ignorant and disengaged -- most who do vote are probably susceptible to the "lesser of two evils" argument, and will end up voting for Obama despite his failure to end Prohibition or even fulfill his pledges to medical cannabis states.

  18. SIV   13 years ago

    The majority of people who use cannabis in Colorado are politically ignorant and disengaged

    Sad but true. One of my best friends is always eager to get off work or finish any other serious responsibilities of the day so he can (in his words) "smoke myself retarded".

  19. Sir Humphrey Appleby   13 years ago

    test

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!