Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

FTC Will Fine Google $22.5 Million, the Largest Fine in Agency History, According to WSJ Report

Peter Suderman | 7.10.2012 2:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

When Google engineers discovered that the mobile version of Apple's Internet browser, Safari, blocked certain features within Google's social network, Google+, they devised a workaround to circumvent the browser's built in privacy protections. The browser trick also gave Google the ability to track online user behavior that would have otherwise been blocked by those same privacy features.

Google disabled the tracking technology after it was discovered by Stanford security researcher Jonathan Mayer and reported by The Wall Street Journal. But that didn't stop the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) from pursuing action against the search giant for running the tracking scheme in the first place.

Now the FTC is set to fine Google to the tune of $22.5 million, the largest fine ever levied by the agency, according to unnamed officials cited in a report by the Journal. 

The fine won't substantially impact Google's bottom line (the company brings in that much cash in a few hours), but it does send a signal: The FTC is gunning for big players in the tech sector—with Google at the top of its list.

Indeed, Google has more or less officially been on the agency's shit list for a while. Last year, Bloomberg noted that the agency was weighing a probe of Google, and had hired Tim Wu, the mastermind behind the Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality policy, to consult with the agency on how to regulate large Internet companies like Google. The FTC also recently decided to subject Google and Facebook to special oversight, as Forbes' Kashmir Hill explains:

After Google's Buzz debacle — a privacy violation that was far from obscure — the Federal Trade Commission essentially sentenced the tech company to a 20-year probation, during which it has to undergo biannual privacy audits and not do crazy privacy-invading stuff. The FTC has issued similar sentences forFacebook, Twitter, and MySpace, essentially giving itself more power to regulate and levy fines on these companies than it ordinarily would have. As I have argued before, it's how the FTC is hacking U.S.'s fairly weak privacy lawsto make them stronger.

For the next two decades, the two companies that come up most often in the discussion of privacy — Facebook and Google — have a probation officer. (Only Apple needs to be added to the mix.) Privacy missteps by these companies may now lead to multimillion dollar fines (which get sent over to the U.S. Treasury).

Meanwhile, as the FTC works so hard to protect us from the threat of more useful search results and advertising designed to offer products we might actually want, mobile phone carriers reported earlier this week that in 2011 government law enforcement agencies made more than 1.3 million demands for private information about subscribers, including requests for massive "tower dumps" that can return the names and call records for thousands of individuals after a single request. The mobile carriers have resisted a handful of the most dubious requests, and even reported a few to the FBI. The government authorities collecting this data, much of which is not connected to anyone actually involved with a crime, have no uniform standards or protocols for storage or retention, meaning that communications records for entirely innocent individuals may be being kept indefinitely. Thank goodness we have vigilant government watchdogs looking out for our privacy. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Your Terrible Anti-Marijuana Editorial of the Day is Somehow in Favor of Decriminalization

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

PolicyScience & TechnologyNanny StateInternetPrivacyTelecommunications Policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (35)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Aresen   13 years ago

    So, how much is that in Internet Quadroons?

    1. Mo' $parky   13 years ago

      Eleventy gazillion, give or take a jillion.

    2. mr simple   13 years ago

      Definition of QUADROON

      : a person of one-quarter black ancestry

      -- M-W online

      1. SugarFree   13 years ago

        Definition of JOKE FROM ANOTHER THREAD

        : a joke referencing something from another thread

        -- S-F online

        1. mr simple   13 years ago

          What, no link?

          1. SugarFree   13 years ago

            It's like I have to do everything around here.

            1. mr simple   13 years ago

              Damn my work getting in the way of constantly reading and posting.

  2. SugarFree   13 years ago

    I use Safari on my iPad. I assume the FTC will be cutting me a check. Right? RIGHT?!?

    1. Episiarch   13 years ago

      For being a dumbass, you get NOTHING.

      1. Mo' $parky   13 years ago

        GOOD DAY SIR!

    2. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

      I use it on my iPad and iPhone. I fully expect I will get exactly twice as much money as you do.

      1. Dagny T.   13 years ago

        You should get a better iPhone browser. I like iCabMobile in terms of ability to customize and to view HR comments.

        1. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

          It's a whip if it can't be the default browser, but I'll give it a look.

    3. Paul.   13 years ago

      You should have bought a guyPad.

      1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

        Or a SuperflyPad.

        1. Paul.   13 years ago

          I prefer the more stylish dolemitePad.

          1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

            Or the Galaxy Shaft. It's a bad--

            1. Dagny T.   13 years ago

              Wow, I can't believe it took this long:

              ...mutha, shut yo mouth.

    4. mr simple   13 years ago

      The FCC doesn't share.

  3. Paul.   13 years ago

    mobile phone carriers reported earlier this week that in 2011 government law enforcement agencies made more than 1.3 million demands for private information about subscribers, including requests for massive "tower dumps" that can return the names and call records for thousands of individuals after a single request

    so once again, our government which has the power to jail us continues to spy on us with little oversight, while we get unhinged that Williams-Sonoma tracked my waffle-iron purchases.

    1. Bi-Curious George   13 years ago

      waffle-iron purchases? How many waffle irons do you need?

      1. Paul.   13 years ago

        It's none of the FTCs business, that's for sure.

      2. fried wylie   13 years ago

        How many waffle irons do you need?

        You try competing with IHOP with only one waffle iron. Noob.

  4. ant1sthenes   13 years ago

    Isn't Wu the civil liberties wunderkind who suggested that if you used machines to produce your speech, it shouldn't be constitutionally protected? Fuck that little shit.

    1. Paul.   13 years ago

      Last year, Bloomberg noted that the agency was weighing a probe of Google, and had hired Tim Wu, the mastermind behind the Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality policy

      That's all you need to know about Wu. He wants to see all your packets... to protect you.

    2. Ska   13 years ago

      COCKSUCKA!!

  5. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

    OT:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwWqKJKTGK0

    1. heller   13 years ago

      But have you heard the original?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO9tOwVmulo

  6. Paul.   13 years ago

    sentences forFacebook, Twitter, and MySpace

    I like that. Where's Friendster? AOL? What about Prodigy?

  7. mr simple   13 years ago

    So you're telling me that when my AVG Do Not Track feature says it's blocking Google Analytics, it's lying?

  8. heller   13 years ago

    Slightly OT: http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-p.....tions-770/

    The headline is a bit sensationalist, but this still sucks.

  9. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

    Google shouldn't spy on its customers. The government hates competition.

  10. fried wylie   13 years ago

    Google has more or less officially been on the agency's shit list for a while.

    With little to no effect on google. But hey, thanks, FTC, for wasting my tax dollars in serving absolutely no purpose whatsoever.

    1. Mo' $parky   13 years ago

      Would you actually feel better if they had accomplished something knowing what their goals are?

  11. Suki   13 years ago

    Google diabled the tracking technology

    I think you mean diabolicaled there.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

By Trump's Logic, Biden Deserves Credit for a Dramatic Drop in Overdose Deaths

Jacob Sullum | 5.21.2025 12:01 AM

Subaru Is the Latest Carmaker To Hike Prices in Response to Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.20.2025 4:50 PM

What Kristi Noem Gets Wrong About Habeas Corpus

Billy Binion | 5.20.2025 4:33 PM

Will Trump's Order To Lift U.S. Sanctions on Syria Be Followed?

Matthew Petti | 5.20.2025 4:00 PM

Judge Rules in Favor of New Hampshire Bakery in Fight Over Donut Mural

Emma Camp | 5.20.2025 3:20 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!