Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

FTC Will Fine Google $22.5 Million, the Largest Fine in Agency History, According to WSJ Report

Peter Suderman | 7.10.2012 2:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

When Google engineers discovered that the mobile version of Apple's Internet browser, Safari, blocked certain features within Google's social network, Google+, they devised a workaround to circumvent the browser's built in privacy protections. The browser trick also gave Google the ability to track online user behavior that would have otherwise been blocked by those same privacy features.

Google disabled the tracking technology after it was discovered by Stanford security researcher Jonathan Mayer and reported by The Wall Street Journal. But that didn't stop the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) from pursuing action against the search giant for running the tracking scheme in the first place.

Now the FTC is set to fine Google to the tune of $22.5 million, the largest fine ever levied by the agency, according to unnamed officials cited in a report by the Journal. 

The fine won't substantially impact Google's bottom line (the company brings in that much cash in a few hours), but it does send a signal: The FTC is gunning for big players in the tech sector—with Google at the top of its list.

Indeed, Google has more or less officially been on the agency's shit list for a while. Last year, Bloomberg noted that the agency was weighing a probe of Google, and had hired Tim Wu, the mastermind behind the Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality policy, to consult with the agency on how to regulate large Internet companies like Google. The FTC also recently decided to subject Google and Facebook to special oversight, as Forbes' Kashmir Hill explains:

After Google's Buzz debacle — a privacy violation that was far from obscure — the Federal Trade Commission essentially sentenced the tech company to a 20-year probation, during which it has to undergo biannual privacy audits and not do crazy privacy-invading stuff. The FTC has issued similar sentences forFacebook, Twitter, and MySpace, essentially giving itself more power to regulate and levy fines on these companies than it ordinarily would have. As I have argued before, it's how the FTC is hacking U.S.'s fairly weak privacy lawsto make them stronger.

For the next two decades, the two companies that come up most often in the discussion of privacy — Facebook and Google — have a probation officer. (Only Apple needs to be added to the mix.) Privacy missteps by these companies may now lead to multimillion dollar fines (which get sent over to the U.S. Treasury).

Meanwhile, as the FTC works so hard to protect us from the threat of more useful search results and advertising designed to offer products we might actually want, mobile phone carriers reported earlier this week that in 2011 government law enforcement agencies made more than 1.3 million demands for private information about subscribers, including requests for massive "tower dumps" that can return the names and call records for thousands of individuals after a single request. The mobile carriers have resisted a handful of the most dubious requests, and even reported a few to the FBI. The government authorities collecting this data, much of which is not connected to anyone actually involved with a crime, have no uniform standards or protocols for storage or retention, meaning that communications records for entirely innocent individuals may be being kept indefinitely. Thank goodness we have vigilant government watchdogs looking out for our privacy. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Your Terrible Anti-Marijuana Editorial of the Day is Somehow in Favor of Decriminalization

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

PolicyScience & TechnologyNanny StateInternetPrivacyTelecommunications Policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (35)

Latest

At 'Orgasmic Meditation' Trial, Feds Can't Find a Clitoris—or Evidence of Forced Labor

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.14.2025 12:45 PM

Trump Declares the 'Neocon' Era Over

Matthew Petti | 5.14.2025 11:30 AM

Trump's 'Deal' With China Leaves American Consumers and Exporters Facing Higher Tariffs Than Before

Eric Boehm | 5.14.2025 10:40 AM

Reason Nominated for 17 Southern California Journalism Awards

Billy Binion | 5.14.2025 9:57 AM

Normalizing Relations

Liz Wolfe | 5.14.2025 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!