Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Conservatives ? Big Government Too

Shikha Dalmia | 4.29.2012 10:12 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It has been clear for a while that the liberal-tarian alliance isn't going anywhere fast even though fantasies that some day, one day, it'll be fully consummated simply won't die down. But now Frank Luntz, the conservative pollster, has a piece in the Washington Post that suggests that the conserva-tarian alliance might be on its way to an annulment too. Luntz lists five myths about conservative voters, the top one being that they no longer – if they ever did -- give a bird's do-do about small government. He notes:

They may have rallied around President Ronald Reagan's call for smaller government three decades ago — but it's not the 1980s anymore. Today, conservatives don't want a reduced government so much as one that works better and wastes less.

In a poll we completed among self-identified conservatives just before the 2010 elections, "efficient" and "effective" government clearly beat "less" and "smaller" government. For conservatives, this debate is less about size than about results, along with a demand that elected officials demonstrate accountability and respect for the taxpayer, regardless of whether they're spending $1 million or $1 trillion. They are rallying behind the budget proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) not simply because it cuts the size of government, but because it cultivates accountability.

It used to be that conservatives supported smaller government on theoretical grounds: The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen; government should only do for people what they truly cannot do for themselves; government isn't the solution, it is the problem. You've heard such comments from conservatives, and they're the mantra of the tea party movement. They're still part of conservative orthodoxy — which is why Republican candidates invoke them — but the underlying conservative belief system is shifting.

In keeping with this sentiment, conservative voters don't want Big Government entitlements such as Medicare and Social Security dismantled. Writers Luntz:

Take Florida, a key swing state full of conservative seniors. According to an AARP poll there last year, 70 percent of them oppose cuts to Medicare. They want the program strengthened, not dismantled. They know Medicare needs reform, but they want changes to be effective and reasonable.

But if a decade of ruinous wars, kleptocratic bailouts, and profligate and useless economic stimulus packages by Big Government won't shake conservative faith in Big Government, then what will?

Maybe libertarians are just falling down on the job and can't find a way to effectively communicate the failures of Big Government. Or Americans have just become too fond of their EITC and Social Security checks to be seriously moved by cute Remy videos. In short, a la Greece, there are too many of us on the government dole and too few left to question it.

If there is a silver lining to Luntz' findings, it is that even though conservatives don't distrust Big Government, they still trust themselves more. Hence, when it comes to Medicare – the greatest entitlement program on the planet, they want patient-centric solutions to extend its solvency. He notes:

Conservatives believe in such simple principles as personal choice and greater competition, and they are more confident than liberals in people's ability to make the right decisions. For example, 78 percent agree with the statement: "Increasing patient choice in Medicare will help save Medicare from bankruptcy. When patients can shop for better care .?.?. it will force insurance companies to compete against each other, which lowers costs and increases care.

This is consistent with the finding of the recent Reason-Rupe poll that Americans want more control over their own health care dollars with 65% of them saying that Medicare should hand them the money that it currently spends on their behalf so that they can purchase their own private health plan, compared to 24 percent who don't.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The White House Press Correspondents' Dinner Is About as Bad as You Think, Only a Little Bit Worse and a Little Bit More Fun

Shikha Dalmia was a senior analyst at Reason Foundation.

PoliticsPolicyNanny StateLiberalismMedicareBig GovernmentConservatism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (54)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ryan   13 years ago

    You mean there's a large group of people which say one thing yet mean another?

    /shocked

    1. Ryan   13 years ago

      /says

      1. Ryan   13 years ago

        /means

        1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

          There's a lot of 'em, Ryan. Some of them are called "Freepers".

        2. juris imprudent   13 years ago

          "I know this book. Your conclusions were all wrong Ryan."

  2. JW   13 years ago

    She's a plant, right? A very, very stupid plant.

    1. Apatheist ?_??   13 years ago

      I would hope no one is that stupid but the hands off my medicare types tend to be so.

    2. Anacreon   13 years ago

      Agent Provocateur, no doubt.

      1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

        Could be a false flag... maybe an Occutard?

  3. Brutus   13 years ago

    You mean Frank Luntz?

    1. Brutus   13 years ago

      That's better

  4. Killazontherun   13 years ago

    Incredible how these poll numbers are in accord with the Rovian BigGovBush!Bush! political philosophy Luntz espouses isn't it?

    1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

      This face right here? *points*
      This is my "Shocked Face"

    2. Drake   13 years ago

      So some supposedly conservative people took a multiple choice poll. They chose efficient and effective government over less and smaller government - either because they want efficient big government, or they simply don't believe that the government will ever shrink.

      This, in turn, means that conservatives and libertarians can never get along?

  5. PantsFan   13 years ago

    HAHAH That's so true.

  6. shrike   13 years ago

    Since when was Reagan for smaller government? He was just for lower taxes.

    Bill Clinton was the Small Gov president (meaning he actually cut federal spending).

    1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

      "he actually cut the growth in automatic spending increases", you mean.

      Clinton = Reagan = Bush = the other Bush = Obama. They ALL suck.

      But you claim you only voted LP up until 2000, at which point you also claim you started voting Democrat.

      IF that's true, at that point you sided with The Other Enemy of Freedom... Team Blue. You went from one frying pan to the other frying pan.

      Fuck you.

      1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

        And since when is your friend Obama for smaller government?

        1. PantsFan   13 years ago

          To be fair, by "smaller goverment" they mean fewer people per civil servant, duh.

          1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

            Good call, Friend of Trousers.

      2. shrike   13 years ago

        I voted anti-fascist in 2004. I didn't like Kerry a bit and thought him a worthless sump who would just arrest the Neo-Nazi movement forming on the right.

        In retrospect I am glad Kerry lost.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          A vote is an expression of who you want FOR President, shrike. You have voted for Democrats for political power since 2000 - that's all we needed to know.

        2. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

          But if you stopped voting LP, you really didn't vote anti-fascist.

          Why did you hate Kerry? You're on his page, philosophically...

          1. Randian   13 years ago

            He hated him so much, he voted for him for President! makes total sense!

          2. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

            I predict he'll start spewing the "wasted vote" BS any moment now.

            1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

              *I* hated Kerry AND Bush so much, I voted for Michael Badnarik.

              1. Randian   13 years ago

                Last I checked, my ballot didn't have a "tick here for Anti-Fascist Vote" section. Although now that I think of it, it probably should...

                1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

                  The only way to vote against fascism, is to not vote Team Red/Team Blue.

                  1. shrike   13 years ago

                    There is an element of truth to that, I admit. I do it begrudgingly - not because of the truth in it but because of the rancid source.

                    1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

                      Fuck off, Bitch Puddin'.

              2. SIV   13 years ago

                I hated Kerry AND Bush AND Badnarik so much I didn't vote in the 2004 general election.

                1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

                  Wow... that's severe. I could see not voting for, say, Bob Barr, but Badnarik was at least a Team Libertarian.

        3. Enyap   13 years ago

          Did you also vote for the censor music and games ticket of Gore/Lieberman? How are secular moralist any better than christfag moralist?

          1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

            They're both bad, and evil.

  7. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

    There is a fucking problem with your server/anti-bot bot, Reason. Next year I'll designate my donation to buying some uprated software or hardware or something that - you know - WORKS or something.

    Fuck you.

    Good night.

    1. SIV   13 years ago

      Everything is threaded comments' fault.

  8. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Yeah, I have no respect for anybody who votes the "anybody but _________" ticket. Fuck them in the asshole with a cat-o-nine-tails.

    If everybody in America voted for the candidate they wanted, we would probably have a half dozen national political parties, countless regional parties and a system much more representative of localities than the national parties. People like shrike (on either side of the aisle) perpetuate the flawed two-party system the rest of us are saddled with. He, and the rest of the sheep who vote according to party affiliation rather than for an individual are cunts that deserve nothing but derision. They are cowards.

    1. PantsFan   13 years ago

      But even with a dozen parties, eventually you have to get down to 2 for President. So after the 2nd round, half the people are voting for the 2nd choice.

      1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

        That's a great idea, sloop. Fuck those who bitch about "balkanization"... that's EXACTLY what we need.

      2. sloopyinca   13 years ago

        No you don't, Pants Fan. Ross Perot almost proved that. If he'd have been a more likable and/or personable guy, and if Stockdale hadn't have gotten fucked over in the debate, we may well have found out what a third option could have done.

        I am just a firm believer in voting for who you want (or not voting out of principle), and damn everybody else. I really believe it's what the founders would have done.*

        *And on that, if we had a winner gets the Presidency and runner-up gets the VP slot, I think we'd have many more options than what we have now. And better ones at that.

  9. PantsFan   13 years ago

    1st world problems

  10. Zuul mothafucka Zuul   13 years ago

    Every time I hear about Frank Luntz and polling I think about Penn's sage advice.
    "Fuck You Frank!"

  11. SIV   13 years ago

    Shikha Dalmia loves big government. Does that make her a conservative or a liberal?

  12. PapayaSF   13 years ago

    "Strengthening" Medicare and Social Security by turning them into private accounts for younger people with (perhaps) some federal insurance for extreme cases could turn them in a more libertarian direction without freaking out the current beneficiaries or giving too much fodder for the statist scaremongers.

  13. JeremyR   13 years ago

    Well, duh, because otherwise there really wouldn't be a need for the Libertarian party, then.

    But still, which is better, those that know they should stop spending so much damn money but can't (or won't), or those that think they should spend more money (and do)?

  14. np   13 years ago

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/.....ot-america
    turns out we're in worse shape than Greece, with health care playing a major part of course

    (but Greece can't print Euros, ha)

    cybersecurity bills:

    "Four bills coming out of the House with strong majorities," Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Tex.) said Friday. "I really think the burden is on the Senate to do something. They can do big bills, small bills, it really doesn't matter. Just do something."

    small effective government, bi-partisan style => leaner, meaner, more nimble Leviathan to respond at will

  15. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

    Wow... this is surprising:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....?ref=media

    ...surprising that Obama's handlers would want insane blowhard Ed Schultz anywhere near their campaign ads.

    I wonder if Schultz threatened to torch the fuckin' place, like he did a while back.

  16. chingtuna   13 years ago

    But you claim you only voted LP up until 2000, at which point you also claim you started voting Democrat.

    IF that's true, at that point you sided with The Other Enemy of Freedom... Team Blue. web design canada
    You went from one frying pan to the other frying pan website designers canada .

    1. Proprietist   13 years ago

      Come on, at least TiggyFoo contributes something new to the discussion instead of simply plagiarizing someone else's comment.

  17. WWNGD?   13 years ago

    Frank Luntz, the conservative pollster, has a piece in the Washington Post

    Can we have a link to the article, the original link is a link to this page!

  18. KevinP   13 years ago

    Is this photograph actually true? Was it actually taken with a conservative holding it? Or is it another Reason "fake but accurate" gimmick graphic?

    1. Isaac Bartram   13 years ago

      Googling "keep your hands off my medicare" produces immages and stories on several variants on this.

      If I had to speculate I'd say that some of them come from genuinely not knowing that "medicare" is a government program - possibly even confusing it with "healthcare" - while others are versions of the old "my social program is social justice, yours is government waste/socialism/etc.

      Whatever it is, I'm afraid my final conclusion is that, for this generation at least, the battle against big government is lost.

      1. Isaac Bartram   13 years ago

        As to the actual picture in this thread the signholder appears to be too young to be on Medicare.

        But the fact that it refers to "stealing from Medicare to support..." indicates that she knows Medicare is a govenment program. Why she thinks it, too, is not "socialized medicine" is anyone's guess.

    2. Eric   13 years ago

      Looking at the people behind her may help. My screen's kind of small but the guy on her left kind of looks like Trotsky. Also, no doughy middle-agers, or gaudy patriotic crap anywhere that I can see. I'm guessing this one is in your "fake but accurate" category.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota

Christian Britschgi | 5.23.2025 5:00 PM

Texas Bans Delta-8 THC, Which Is Only Popular Because of Prohibition

Joe Lancaster | 5.23.2025 3:45 PM

The Executive Power Case That Unites Donald Trump and Franklin Roosevelt

Damon Root | 5.23.2025 2:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!