Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Reason-Rupe: Public Uncertain of Amount, Impact of Current Health Care Regulation

Emily Ekins | 3.26.2012 11:45 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Despite the contentious debate over health care reform, the public is unclear on the present regulatory state of health care. When asked about the degree of regulation in the health care market, 23 percent of Americans believe the market is "very regulated" 41 percent believe it is "somewhat regulated" 18 percent believe it is not very regulated, and 11 percent believe it is "not at all regulated".

The public is also divided over whether the current degree of regulation is sufficient or excessive. 33 percent believe the market is overregulated, 39 percent believe it is under-regulated, and 18 percent believe it is regulated about the right amount.

Americans are also divided over how particular forms of regulation impact the health care market. For instance, when asked if Americans were allowed to buy health insurance from providers in any state, 43 percent believe premiums would decrease, 23 percent believe rates would stay the same and a quarter believe rates would increase.

Americans recognize some of the ostensible effects of regulation in the health care market. For instance, when asked how a provision in the new health care law requiring employers with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance would impact hiring and pay, 58 percent said it would cause employers to pay their employees less and 47 percent said it would cause employers to law off workers.  Yet, 39 percent said it would have no significant impact on hiring decisions and 30 percent said it would not have a significant impact on workers' pay.

On issues receiving a sizable amount of media attention and public discussion, majority consensus emerges. For instance, 54 percent of Americans believe that it is likely the new health care law will lead to government rationing of health care services, which means some forms of medical care would not longer be covered because it is too costly, not essential, or has too little chance of success. 33 percent believe it is unlikely.

Although the public recognizes the ostensible affects of particular forms of health care regulation, it is unclear to them how regulation as part of the new health care law may interact with innovation. 38 percent of Americans do not believe the new health care law will have a significant impact on  innovation in health care and medical research, while equal numbers (24 percent respectively) believe the law will increase and decrease innovation.

These results have important implications for economists and policymakers making their multifarious calls for health care reform. They would be wise to better articulate how provisions in the new health care law and other proposals for reform will impact competition, prices, choice, access, and innovation in the health care market.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted March 10th-20th of both mobile and landline phones, 1200 adults, margin of error +/- 3%. Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full methodology can be found here.

Full poll results found here.

Emily Ekins is the director of polling for Reason Foundation where she leads the Reason-Rupe public opinion research project, launched in 2011. Follow her on Twitter @emilyekins.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: You're Invited to Join Peter Schiff with Reason and FreedomWorks in DC on Thursday, 3/29 at 3 p.m.!

Emily Ekins is a research fellow and director of polling at the Cato Institute.

PoliticsReason-Rupe SurveysNanny StateCulturePolicyPollsCommunity RatingIndividual mandatePublic OpinionHealth insuranceSupreme CourtConstitutionHealth Care
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (3)

Latest

Trump's Case Against Birthright Citizenship Is a Constitutional Loser

Damon Root | 5.14.2025 2:35 PM

The Court-Ordered Takeover of Rikers Shows the Crisis in American Prisons and Jails

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.14.2025 1:55 PM

At 'Orgasmic Meditation' Trial, Feds Can't Find a Clitoris—or Evidence of Forced Labor

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.14.2025 12:45 PM

Trump Declares the 'Neocon' Era Over

Matthew Petti | 5.14.2025 11:30 AM

Trump's 'Deal' With China Leaves American Consumers and Exporters Facing Higher Tariffs Than Before

Eric Boehm | 5.14.2025 10:40 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!