Mitt Romney Declines to Set His Hair on Fire in Order to Get Voter Support
Mitt Romney knows that's it's "very easy to excite the base with incendiary comments," and while some of his GOP rivals—not that anyone in particular comes to mind—might be willing to "say really outrageous things" in order to pander to the base, Romney isn't that kind of candidate. He has standards. "I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support," he said in Michigan this morning. Via the cable-news capturers at TPM:
If he won't set his hair on fair, then what will he do? Well, he'll declare his intention to pursue large federal spending cuts, but won't say which programs he'll slash to meet his goals. He'll say he plans to reduce tax rates by cutting loopholes from the tax codes, but won't say which ones. He'll use military procurement process as an example of government's inherent waste and inefficient spending, and then argue that we should set a minimum floor on defense spending as percentage of the total economy. He'll describe Medicare as a burden on the budget that's on the path to bankruptcy, and then vow to reverse Obama's Medicare cuts. So it's true enough, I suppose. Romney doesn't pander to the base by saying really outrageous things. He panders to the base more straightforwardly, by telling them exactly what they want to hear.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That's bullshit. The American people deserve leadership willing to set its hair on fire.
When we elect by reality show, this dream will finally be realized.
When we elect by reality show, President Situation will have to deal with the middle east situation and the domestic spending situation, while finding out first hand that the president situation isn't as nice a situation to be in as President Situation thought at first.
And then of course there's Secretary of State Snooki...
But Romney's hair is one thing about him that's tolerable.
He's got to be a werewolf.
I'd like to meet his tailor.
The people deserve leadership that will commit ritual suicide when they fuck things up as badly as things are right now.
I bet that was in an earlier draft of the Constitution.
I bet Newt would set his hair on fire to win the nomination.
I know he'd happily set someone else's hair on fire.
I saw Man...or Astroman? at the Metro in Chicago around '97 or '98 and at one point the lead guitarist ran around the stage wearing a helmet that was on fire. It was one of the best shows I've ever seen. Shouldn't the leader of the Western World at least be able to live up to the standards of an indie space/surf rock band?
after watching politicians make a shambles of things, what harm could come of giving a businessguy a shot.
Earth, Ross Perot, 1992.
Just curious, but do you live in an alternate reality where Ross Perot won the 1992 election?
No. but "after watching politicians make a shambles of things, what harm could come of giving a businessguy a shot" is pretty much the argument that a lot of Ross Perot fans were using back then. The "Earth, Ross Perot, 1992" line was a paraphraseing of a line from Star Trek 6.
I'd have thought people on a libertarian website would get that reference.
But to answer your question, yes, a butthurt Romulan traveled back in time and changed the past. I invented a device that allows me to communicate across alternate realities, but only through H&R's blog.
SHUT UP!!!
How is Romney not a politician? Just because he's lost so many of the elections he's run in?
Romney's not a politician and Newt's a Washington outsider.
I'd have to say Romney is the most politician-y politician there is. His business experience is nice, but I'm not sure it matters that much when, as a candidate, he's vagueness incarnated.
If there's a list of things to admire about Rick Santorum, it's
1) He does answer the question that's asked.
...that is all.
If he won't set his hair on fire, then what will he do?
He'll set your hair on fire
August 2012, Tampa
-H&R Headquarters
Libertarians complain about Romney, promise not to vote, succeed in remaining irrelevant for another four years.
What would you have me do with my one vote? Since it is statistically irrelevant, I'll cast it for Gary Johnson so, at least, I don't feel like a hypocrit.
Irrelevancy it is!
If the only way to be relevant is to vote for someone I don't want elected, then I will stay irrelevant, thank you very much.
And the fact that the two major parties are relevant in politics does not mean that their voters are. Pretty much all voters are irrelevant as individuals.
Sorry Romney: You just lost my vote to the Micheal Jackson/Richard Pryor ticket.
Being rich is in and of itself unethical.
Having success is well and good, but living a life of largesse is immoral while others still have need.
But then who will support those who make their livelihood from my largesse?
I'm amazed that with that much product, it doesn't simply burst into flame every time he even steps near a fire. The fumes from that thing must make you dizzy if you stand next to him.
Also, if he isn't willing to set his hair on fire for my amusement...elitist!
Warning, do not attempt to operate Romneybot near open flame.
Romneybot's hair catches on fire. Awkward... I AM ROMNEYBOT.
I would hope the hair section is detachable on this build of the Romneybot. Simply pop the eject button if it catches fire and attach a replacement section of Romneyhair.
Nope. The hair is actually a carnivorous symbiote that has to be fed on the blood of infants twice a day. It was so expensive that they had to leave out the enthusiasm module due to budgetary constraints.
Maybe we can find his evil twin robot leading a wayward band of Borg and convince him to give our RomneyBot the emotion chip.
Great. Now I'm going to spend all day trying to photoshop an evil-Spock beard onto a Romney picture. Now I have to know. (Yes, I know, I'm mixing TOS w/ TNG plot-lines.)
Thank god you put in that last sentence, because I was already cracking my knuckles getting ready to type a scathing response.
Little-known fact: it was Romeny's hair that caused that huge fire at Daytona last night, not jet fuel.
I finally got around to reading the FATCA morning link.
Maybe Mittens could explain why this sort of WORLD POLICE!! totalitarianism is a bad idea.
Of course, that would require him to actually believe it to be a bad idea...
Mittens
Hahaha! Even better than Krugnuts!
Tulpa, is that you?
Every time I hear our sitting President speak, I wonder why he doesn't simply burst into flames.
If RomneyBot begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
When not in use, RomneyBot should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration. Failure to do so relieves the makers of RomneyBot, Wacky Mormon Products Incorporated, and its parent company, Global LDS Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.
Not to worry, they have multiple Romneybot copies in cold storage in an undisclosed location near Salt Lake City. Looks like this one might be going loopy; better unfreeze the next one.
Do not taunt Happy Fun RomneyBot
Insulting the hardcore voters of one's own party is an interesting campaign strategy, to say the least.
He's crazy like a fox!
I'd rather see them both fight with flame throwers instead of blame throwers.
I don't want to set my hair on fire
I just want to start a flame from a fart
"Mitt will begin by reversing Obama-era defense cuts and return to the budget baseline established by Secretary Robert Gates in 2010, with the goal of setting core defense spending ? meaning funds devoted to the fundamental military components of personnel, operations and maintenance, procurement, and research and development ? at a floor of 4 percent of GDP."
And a ceiling of 120%?
As to NFL jerseys broad authorize and run an online business, it is alone actual beneath money bare compared to artery shops, these bargain and replica nfl jerseys awash are mostly of acceptable superior and can even exhausted the originals in agreement of attractiveness.Wholesale NFL jerseys are aswell the same.We look at the example of Colonel Richard Grace, wholesale nfl jerseys for the success and happiness in the history of others. ncaa jerseys wholesale He was on the 20th in Athlone Buried in June 1691, and sits on their shirts TOMB.
spending cuts, but won't say which programs he'll slash to meet his goals. He'll say he plans to reduce tax rates by cutting loopholes from the tax codes, but won't say which ones. He'll use military procurement process as an example of government's http://www.lunettesporto.com/l.....c-3_4.html inherent waste and inefficient spending, and then argue that we should set a minimum floor on defense spending as percentage of the tota
fair, then what will he do? Well, he'll declare his intention to
I saw Man...or Astroman? at the Metro in Chicago around '97 or '98 and at one point the lead guitarist ran around the stage wearing a helmet that was on fire. It was one of the best shows I've ever seen.
Voter ID
Election commission of India