FDA to Investigate Breathable Caffeine Shots
At the urging of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-New York), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will review the safety of Aero Shots, a new breathable caffeine product. The product allows users to ingest about 100mg of caffeine—roughly the amount of caffeine in an average large cup of coffee—in a powdered "shot" from a lipstick-shaped container.
"FDA will review information brought to the agency's attention about this product" in order to see "whether regulatory action is warranted," the agency reportedly said in a statement released to the press. It's not clear what actual information, if any, was brought to the FDA's attention, unless Sen. Schumer's latest round of ban-happy grandstanding counts. Schumer has focused his attention on worries that club-goers might rely on the boost provided by the caffeine shots to party longer into the night, which sounds like fun for those who enjoy clubbing, but not a matter that should concern the FDA.
Schumer doesn't really have any evidence that the product is harmful, but that is exactly what seems to concern him. He warns that the product's "effects have never been examined by independent regulators to determine their impact on the human body and in combination with alcohol, especially for adolescents." Of course, adolescents are already free to consume caffeine in soft drinks and coffee, often in far larger doses than come from an Aero Shot. Those who frequent Starbucks, for example, have the opportunity to purchase single cups of coffee with an average of 330mg of caffeine, more than three times the amount in one of the shots.
An ABC News report on the FDA decision quotes University of Florida professor Dr. Bruce Goldberger expressing similar concerns about youth access and the possibility that "you could mix it with alcohol in a social setting." Given the recent hysteria over the caffienated alocoholic beverage Four Loko, this is sadly not surprising. But the ongoing freakout over the possibility that someone might mix caffeine and alcohol will surely vex America's many whiskey-and-Coke drinkers.
No matter what, it's telling that the primary worry about breathable caffeine does not seem to be that the product itself might be harmful but the fear that someone might somehow hurt themselves by mixing it with an entirely separate product.
Here's Reason.tv on why the feds, encouraged by legislators like Sen. Schumer, banned Four Loko:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Boy Chuck just has his finger right on the pulse of every hot new fad doesn't he?
You libertarians just don't get it. Schumer wants to ban breathable caffein because that is what the vast majority of American voters want. They want to be protectd by any tyrant that points out something scary to them. America is not the land of the free and home of the brave. Those generations have died off. Present-day Americans are domesticated and want to escape from freedom.
Yes! Breathable caffeine is so much worse than drinkable caffeine because...because...I'm sure there's a good reason if the government is concerned.
Your lame. Shut up.
I might be lame, but at least I know the difference between 'your' and 'you're'
Because fuck you, that's why!
http://www.drunktiki.com/2011/.....ats-why-2/
Aero Shots' biggest mistake is not offering a cut of their profits to the government. That's what this all comes down to.
Shut up, fuckhead!
It seems that the good Senator has forgotten that caffine is readily available in pill form...perhaps he wants to ban that too. Check out my blog http://www.decisionday2012.com
Caffeine is available in many forms, and in far stronger doses than this breathable option. Knee-jerk reactions like this are always emotional, and never rational.
If you dont shut up, Im gonnna kick yer ass! Try me.
yummy!
knee jerk reactions are what define liberals, in particular, and all statists, in general.
You know, I tried the Aero Shot before because they were giving it away for free and it's pretty good at giving you a boost. I was going to buy it, but then I was like, I paying $3 for 500 mg of caffeine, when I could just get it in pill form and it only cost 6 cents for a 200 mg table of caffeine. Same effect, same ease of use, only cheaper. Granted though, a pill isn't as cool/hipster as breathing in your caffeine, but for the price, I'll take the pills
Offtopic but,
There's an ad drumming up support for government subsidized birth control in the sidebar.
Are you sure. All I see is one for Sherrod Brown and Overturn Citizens United.
It's served up based on your net history. I've got one for an MBA program and a kid with a harelip. I must be giving google fits.
i've got one for Axe deodorant and a device called "The Anal Intruder" weird.
I saw the Sherrod Brown one earlier. Let's not forget the pro-Santorum ads. Wonder why they're wasting their money.
I've got none, because I use Ad Blocker Plus.
What R said.
They're advertising kids with harelips?
I don't see any ads.
http://adblockplus.org/en/
I don't see any ads.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....r_embedded
+1
As long as the taxpayers aren't paying for the ad, good for reason and whichever organization provides the ads that they waste the PAC's money.
I'm going to mix my dinner with alcohol tonight. After that, I'm going to mix my guitar playing with alcohol. Later, I will make sweet love to my wife, while under the influence of alcohol. Should I get some sort of clearance from the FDA? Or do I need Sen. Schumer to sign off on my evening plans?
No, as long as you skip the after-dinner coffee, he should be chill with that.
do I need Sen. Schumer to sign off on my evening plans?
----------------------------
I suspect if you tape the event and shoot him a copy, that'll be fine.
fap fap fap fap
...for any of the political stances he takes, but that's never stopped him. He's all the proof you need to know that New York is a turd of a state.
When the fuck are we going to ban bourbon and Coke???
RTFA, I guess.
When the fuck are we going to ban bourbon and Coke???
You mean, in a social setting? Pretty fucking soon!
He warns that the product's "effects have never been examined by independent regulators to determine their impact on the human body and in combination with alcohol, especially for adolescents."
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
http://www.gop.com/
*barf*
vote anarchy
http://www.youtube.com/fpsrussia
Always picturing a black guy with the contraband in question, no?
the primary worry about breathable caffeine does not seem to be that the product itself might be harmful but the fear that someone might somehow hurt themselves by mixing it with an entirely separate product.
Or, God forbid, have fun in a state-disapproved way.
In Schumer's case, the main concern is that he hasn't been on TV protecting the children in a couple of weeks. I'm not sure if he's Sandusky to Reid's Paterno, but both of them need to be shitcanned as soon as possible.
He's been a congresscritter out of New York for more than 30 years now, half his life. He ain't going anywhere until he dies.
That would be a shame. Support Breast Cancer.
Someone needs to set up a few plainly visible bear traps in front of a few camera's on tripods in front of chuckie's office. 10 to 1 he'd jump right in without looking, with his manboobs flopping wildly in the breeze.
Back in my day, we didn't have this new-fangled caffeine powder; I had to resort to chocolate-covered espresso beans. Yeah, sometimes they all melted together, but that's the way we liked it. And if some woman had to lick the chocolate off your hand, that was fine, too.
These are in fact the beans used to revive mortally wounded Super Sayans.
If the FDA is going to review "whether regulatory action is warranted" you can bet that regulatory action is coming. Enjoy these while you can.
Considering that the FDA thinks regulatory action is warranted on everything, I have to agree with you.
Good thing they haven;t found the dihydrogen monoxide website yet.
Yeah, but they're already looking into hydrolic acid.
I prefer hydrogen hydroxide.
Dude, that's not even funny. My cousin smoked some dihydrogen monoxide, or as he called it, "hydro's" and totally blew his mind. That kid was going to Stanford on scholarship and would have started as a tight end last year. Now, he just sits in my Aunt's basement trying to score more "hydro's". Next time you want to make a joke about dangerous drugs, you should ask yourself how it could effect your family.
Here is a website where you can educate yourself.
That shit will get you addicted for life, man! Don't do it!
I'm curious. In the last 30 years, have they ever reviewed something that they decided not to regulate? I mean, I realize your point is that they always do, but it may just be that they have every single time.
Yep, that's what I mean. Their mind is already made up.
have they ever reviewed something that they decided not to regulate?
Depends upon what you mean. If you mean, have they ever approved something for unrestricted sales...yes, look at your local pharmacy for over the counter drugs. If you mean, have the decided that any food or drug is outside of their regulatory scope...well that's another question. My guess would be,yes, but that would be more work to demonstrate than my lazy ass is willing to do.
Vote Democrat.
http://wwww.democrats.org/
*barf*
That's just as bad as voting Republican, shrike.
And you call yourself a capitalist. *hmph*
fffffffffffffffffffffffppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppprrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
In a country like the one the Founders envisioned, we'd be questioning the very existence of the FDA and other such federal agencies; after all, there's really no constitutional rationale for them. Instead, we're arguing over whether or not some silly caffeine product is harmful, and whether or not it should be banned as such. I guess this is what we've been reduced to.
Chuck you suck shut the fuck up.
Make me, you bitch.
I'd be happy to make you my bitch. Your first task will be to iron my shit.
I'll fuck your shit up with an iron. Close enough, fuckstain?
Whatever happened to trash talking among Democrats? Why back at the '68 convention I shouted "Fuck you, you Jew son of a bitch! You lousy motherfucker! Go, home!" at Senator Abraham Ribicoff when he questioned why the police were beating up protestors outside. You can do better Chuck.
Go eat a thousand dicks, you dead, bogtrotting son of a whore.
If you're out of the womb and ain't an infant, caffeine is one of the safest drugs ever found.
regulatory action is warranted on everything
To nitpick: allowing for sales with no restrictions is a regulatory action. Heck, providing active support for more consumption is regulatory action. The FDA looking at a product is not really an issue. But if they decide this should be banned or restricted, I'll be first in line to call it dumb.
Why would anyone need this product? You can already get caffeine in a pill or chewing gum form and of course the standard liquid coffee format and energy drinks. Why would you need to inhale caffeine?
Indeed, it has no utility. Right, Francis?
This is not "breathable". It's a powder that sticks in your mouth and is absorbed in your mouth and gut. And in that sense, it's exactly the same as coffee. So he health effects are pretty well known.
I noticed that as well. I could see the (theoretical) concern if it were actually an aerosol product, but a powder shouldn't be that worrying. And even if it were an aerosol, no way it could be more dangerous than inhaling nicotine in any form.
Smokers are worse than Hitler!
Dude makes a lot of sense man. Wow.
http://www.Privacy-Wares.tk
If only I had a dime for every bad story that began this way.
Chuck Fucking Schumer should fucking die in a fucking fire.