45 Percent of Americans Say Abolish and Consolidate HUD, 46 Percent Say Keep It As Is
In a memorable Republican presidential debate moment last month, Texas Gov. Rick Perry couldn't remember the third government agency he'd eliminate if elected president. Another candidate, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), says if he's elected he'll get rid of five federal agencies: Commerce, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, and Interior.
Which federal agencies are the American people most willing to eliminate or consolidate? The Reason-Rupe poll finds 45 percent of Americans are ready to eliminate the Department of Housing and Urban Development and 41 percent would eliminate the Department of Energy.
Those who would abolish or keep the departments of Housing and Urban Development and Interior are within the margin of error, revealing that Americans are evenly divided over whether to abolish and consolidate these departments or keep them as is.
The Department of Education was on both Paul's and Perry's lists to cut, but 61 percent of Americans want to keep it, while just 34 percent say eliminate it. Americans also seem to favor a federal role in transportation, with 59 percent opposed to abolishing the Department of Transportation. Sixty percent also oppose abolishing the Department of Homeland Security, with 34 percent in favor of abolishing and consolidating it.
Nevertheless, the fact that 30-45 percent of the population wants to consolidate the federal bureaucracy is nothing to scoff at. These results suggest that proposing to abolish and consolidate federal departments is not a fringe view.
Some have proposed abolishing or consolidating certain federal agencies and departments to reduce the deficit. I'm going to read you a list of federal agencies and departments. Please let me know if you would favor abolishing and consolidating its functions, or prefer to keep it as is. The first one is, the Department of…
Find full Reason-Rupe Q4 2011 poll results, question wording, and methodology here.
The Reason-Rupe Q4 2011 poll collected a nationally representative sample of 1200 respondents, aged 18 and older from all 50 states and the District of Columbia using live telephone interviews from December 1-13. Interviews were conducted on both landline and mobile phones. The margin of sampling error for this poll is +/- 3 percent.
Follow Emily Ekins on Twitter @emilyekins
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, there is no a single agency that a majority want to close.
We are so fucked.
The EPA is seperate? I thought it was inside one of the agencies, like Energy
Abolishing the Dept. of Education is a no brainer. I mean, you just hand back control of education to the states and wash your hands of a few hundred federal employees.
Energy hasn't done anything productive or useful since inception.
I'm not sure what the hell the Dept of the Interior does and why Paul's against it.
I'd keep HUD long enough to wind down Fannie and Freddie (who would both be rolled into it) and then put in a sunset clause.
I really have no opinion on commerce.
Everything in education that the Federal Government has a legitimate interest in could be handled by five clerks at the Library of Congress.