Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

McDonald's Jukes San Francisco's Toy Ban

Baylen Linnekin | 11.30.2011 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

San Francisco's ban on giving away a free toy with a child's meal containing a certain number of calories, salt, and other particulars is set to kick in tomorrow. McDonald's, the clear target of the ban, had a year to figure out a way to change its business practices. Seems like they used the time wisely, reports the SF Examiner.

The San Francisco ban on providing free toys to entice children to eat unhealthy foods goes into effect Thursday, but McDonald's plans to comply with the law by charging 10 cents a toy for their Happy Meals and donating the money to the nonprofit Ronald McDonald House.

(Catch that nice bit of editorializing about what's "unhealthy" there?)

SF Weekly parses the new McDonald's approach and reveals just how smart this move is on the part of the chain.

Now, in order to have the privilege of making a 10-cent charitable donation in exchange for the toy, you must buy the Happy Meal. Hilariously, it appears Mar et al., in their desire to keep McDonald's from selling grease and fat to kids with the lure of a toy have now actually incentivized the purchase of that grease and fat -- when, beforehand, a put-upon parent could get out cheaper and healthier with just the damn toy.

Who's Mar, you ask? He's Eric Mar, the San Francisco supervisor who championed the so-called "Happy Meal Ban." But you may know him better as a Reason.tv's October 2010 "Nanny of the Month" award winner.

Kudos to the SF Weekly for ending on this punny note:

In any event, it appears the fast food chain's sharpie lawyers have McTopped San Francisco's legislators. Count this city's lawmakers as the latest among the billions and billions served.

Lots of grimacing in the general direction of the ban that thankfully now appears to ban nothing from Reason here. Chase scene from Bullitt here.

Baylen Linnekin is the director of Keep Food Legal, a nonprofit dedicated to preserving and increasing "culinary freedom," the right of all Americans to grow, sell, prepare and eat foods of their own choosing. To join or learn more about the group's activities, go here. To follow Keep Food Legal on Twitter, go here; to follow Linnekin, go here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: RFK Jr., Green Energy Boondoggles, & Socialism for the Rich

Reason Foundation Senior Fellow Baylen Linnekin is a food lawyer, scholar, and adjunct law professor, as well as the author of Biting the Hands That Feed Us: How Fewer, Smarter Laws Would Make Our Food System More Sustainable (Island Press 2016).

PoliticsNanny StateSan FranciscoFood Freedom
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (156)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Suki   14 years ago

    My psychic vibe is telling me there will be "gaming the system" howls from the usual suspects soon.

    1. Southerner   14 years ago

      I am suddenly and inexplicably seized with the urge not to tell any more bad lawyer jokes.

      1. Comment Tater   14 years ago

        Speaking of nanny-statism: Boise city council passes new anti-smoking ordinance, comment thread oddly free of "fuck you"s.

        http://www.idahostatesman.com/.....qus_thread

        1. fish   14 years ago

          Idahos anti-nanny rep is vastly overstated. Pity.

          1. Comment Tater   14 years ago

            Yeah. Damn you, Mercatus! Now I'm stuck here!
            http://mercatus.org/freedom-50-states-2011/ID

          2. Rattlegoat   14 years ago

            The Nannies are in the southern part of the state where all the Ag stuff is, the north is a whole fuck of alot more fun, but that has been an influx of people from places like CA and other nanny-states, CDA has a ton of the nanny minded, but go up into the hills around it, and most of the people really don't care what the laws, they just do pretty much whatever they like.

  2. Restoras   14 years ago

    Awesome.

  3. Brett L   14 years ago

    I especially like the angle where when San Fran bans this, they will be punishing the sick kids and their families that RMcD house helps. Fuck you yuppie nannies, why do you hate terminally ill people?

    1. alittlesense   14 years ago

      Of course they do. Such people are unattractive.

    2. Bee Tagger   14 years ago

      What's a little bit of terminal illness when your soul is at steak?

      SF Weekly, are you hiring? I can pun and imply corporations only do evil, too.

      1. heller   14 years ago

        Mmmm, soul steak.

        1. Spencer   14 years ago

          It's a little fatty actually.

          1. wylie   14 years ago

            you can gnaw on soul-grizzle indefinitely, it never loses flavor.

    3. WTF   14 years ago

      Nanny bureaucrats out-maneuvered by smart corporate lawyers? Who would have ever guessed?

      1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

        If people hate attorneys so much, they should stop providing them with opportunities to be weasels like this.

        1. DEM   14 years ago

          Weasling out of things is important for a boy to learn. It's what separates us fromthe animals. Except the weasel.

          1. Barney Gumbel   14 years ago

            "I dont know where you magic pixies came from, but I like your pixie drink!"

  4. Scooby Doo's snicker   14 years ago

    Politicians should run our lives because they are smarter than the rest of us.

  5. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

    What a stupid thing to ban. It's not like the kids are buying the product--it's their parents. We have to have ordinances to keep parents from buying stuff because their kids whine about it? Sweet Jesus.

    1. Bodhi   14 years ago

      The parents were the only causal factor not mentioned in the video.

  6. R C Dean   14 years ago

    Respect, Mickey D. Well played.

    1. WTF   14 years ago

      Yes, McD's response is awesome. I may have to get a Big Mac for lunch just out of respect.

      1. Beloved Rev. Blue Moon   14 years ago

        I just had my first Big Mac a week ago (a quarter-century into life) and now I am hooked. Why was I denied this sublime pleasure?

        1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

          The dressing makes the Big Mac. Its the main thing that I taste, anyway, and I buy it when I'm cravin that flavor. And the McRib for the rib-o'flavin.

          1. dunphy   14 years ago

            it's the combination ... iow, the whole package is greater than the sum of the parts.

            i , for example, admit to being a total cheese snob. i go to PFI and even at wholesale prices probably eat about at least $100 of cheese a month.

            however, the faux cheez in the big mac WORKS with the other ingredients. just like how the sauce, the shredded iceberg (god forbid), the bun, etc. etc. just all work together

            that's why it's been a big seller for decades and continues to be

            it's timeless near perfection

            i love andy bourdain and he can rail about MCD's all he wants (like many hipster snobs) but McD's knows what it is doing. the big mac is awesome

            and fwiw, even in food-o-phile france, McD's is VERY successful

            1. mems   14 years ago

              two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun

        2. Heroic Mulatto   14 years ago

          The hell....?

          Why would anyone eat a Big Mac when Five Guys exists in this world?

          1. robc   14 years ago

            There isnt one within 2 feet of my home in every direction?

          2. DesigNate   14 years ago

            I just recently discovered Five Guys and have been ruined for life. No other burger joint comes close.

            1. Clich? Bandit   14 years ago

              Steak and Shake...end of discussion.

              1. Rick Gozinia   14 years ago

                I have a McDs, 5 Guys, and Steak & Shake on the same block in walking distance from my house. Indiana, ftw!

                1. wareagle   14 years ago

                  ^^^^^answers the question of whether Nirvana exists.

                2. wylie   14 years ago

                  "walking distance", sure, if I wasn't so full of burgers.

                3. Evan from Evansville   14 years ago

                  From my handle, you know where I roam.

                  Kinda sounds like the east side Lloyd.

                  And for the record, to all you non-Evansvillians, the Evansville metro area is, indeed, the fattest in the country.

                  1. Evan from Evansville   14 years ago

                    Damn squirrels! This above comment is lookin' right at Rick.

                4. EDG reppin' LBC   14 years ago

                  Hey Rick,
                  Rockville road on the Westside of Indy? That is the first Five Guys I ate at. I have been hooked ever since. One just opened up in my stretch of the woods here in Long Beach.

              2. Anonymous Coward   14 years ago

                Steak and Shake...end of discussion.

                I love a good Steak n' Shake milkshake, but Mein Gott, they serve the most pathetic hamburgers (excuse me, STEAKBURGERS) known to man. Even McDonald's doesn't serve you a hamburger that thin.

            2. Brandon   14 years ago

              Five Guys is overrated, but maybe that's because I live in Denver, home of the Cherry Cricket.

              1. JB   14 years ago

                Five Guys is probably the best chain (I ate at the original before they expanded too).

                Other one-off places have it beat though.

              2. dunkel   14 years ago

                Frings!

          3. Red Rocks Rockin   14 years ago

            Five Guys has good burgers, but their fries leave a lot to be desired. I've noticed In N'Out has the same problem.

            1. robc   14 years ago

              They make it up in volume.

              Seriously, 5 guys, I dont need 100 cubic feet of fries.

              1. Auric Demonocles   14 years ago

                I don't need 100 cubic feet of fries.

                Often I want to order half of their smallest order of fries.

            2. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

              I've had five guys (nohomo). I was not highly impressed. In N Out is some shit I wish I have access to. I'm not that in to fries anyway, I think "fries well done" might be a solution to the problem you describe.

              (I have spent some time studying the In N Out menu and I know exactly what I will order)

              1. goober1223   14 years ago

                4 by 4. Animal style fries.

              2. Jay   14 years ago

                Ever heard Lonely Island's "No Homo" song? Hilarious

            3. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

              5 guys is also pretty pricey for what they are.

              1. Auric Demonocles   14 years ago

                That's true, I end up spending over $10 on a bacon cheese burger and fries.

            4. JW   14 years ago

              To each his own. I like 5 Guys' fries.

              I swear the burgers are laced with crack.

            5. Jim Treacher   14 years ago

              The first time I have Five Guys was in Indianapolis, and the fries were great. But the ones in DC suck.

              1. dunphy   14 years ago

                imo, carl's jr is pretty good amongst fast food burgers.

                in and out is very good, but they don't have them round my parts

                1. Bones   14 years ago

                  Anyone ever have a Whataburger? It's not good food but damn it's wonderful.

                  1. Scott   14 years ago

                    Well-deserving of its position as a Texas Treasure.

                  2. Sy   14 years ago

                    Yes. whataburger is the shit.

          4. Grummun   14 years ago

            Had Five Guys for the first time the other night. The burger was okay, but dinner for two was damn near $20.

            There used to be a place in Columbus called Backyard Burgers. They had a blackened burger avec cole slaw that darn tasty.

            1. John-David   14 years ago

              Swenson's in Akron. Nothing beats a Galley Boy.

              1. Timon19   14 years ago

                You better fuckin' believe it, fellow Akronite.

                The Galley Boy makes the Big Mac look like amateur hour.

    2. Evan from Evansville   14 years ago

      Word.

      I've been literally laughing to myself all day at the beauty of it all. What a lovely example of the shit our government does/creates.

      I will remember this and share it as often as possible.

      Straight the fuck up McDs. I just ate two breakfast burritos. On the dollar menu. Boom.

      I heart thee.

      1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

        I recently made a last minute addition of the burrito to an order of a steak biscuit and the burrito was quite flame.

        1. Evan from Evansville   14 years ago

          "Flame?"

          I am unfamiliar with your new-found slang, but if this term indicates "Fucking magical," then we are in complete agreeance.

          FOR THE RECORD: This site doesn't think that 'agreeance' is a word. I am deeply troubled by this.

          1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

            Dope, fly,... rad? Its like we're just not jivin that well here. You did type "word" up there.

            1. Evan from Evansville   14 years ago

              Word. Rad is an acceptable answer.

              But I'm not groovin' with that 'jivin' sans apostrophe. Ya feel me?

              1. mike   14 years ago

                I love when those of the "get off my lawn" set use the slang but try to church it up with proper punctuation. There's no place to put an apostrophe in "yinz" such that it would be considered the king's English. The same applies to its plural, "yunz."

                1. Evan from Evansville   14 years ago

                  I'm 24.

                  I don't always insist upon grammarial rules, but when I do, I prefer to follow my own.

                2. FlyoverCountry   14 years ago

                  What, or who, is "yinz"? I know Iowa is always 5 years behind in trends, but can someone fill me in anyway?

                  1. T   14 years ago

                    Some shit they say in Pennsylvania to make them sound more like uncouth knucledraggers.

                    The proper word is "y'all".

                    1. Mensan   14 years ago

                      Yes, "y'all" is correct. "Yinz" is just nonsense jibberish.

                      And how about a little love for Red Robin.

  7. free2booze   14 years ago

    The next item for the San Fran legislature, a proposal to ban donations to private charities. Problem solved.

    1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

      I wish they would actually float this around. Just to watch them destroy themselves.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Totally McQueen.

  9. Almanian, Poet Lori Ate   14 years ago

    That Grimace McQueen toy is exquisite and I want one.

  10. Sheriff Bart   14 years ago

    I would have gone with the candygram, but I am impressed, nonetheless, Mickey D's!

  11. heller   14 years ago

    Pwned!

  12. Jeff P   14 years ago

    Grimace used to have four arms, man. The McDonald regime's genetics and eugenics programs put an end to that. The Mayor and police chief are both burgers, but Hamburgler still roams free.
    When will we liberate this land?

    1. wylie   14 years ago

      The Mayor and police chief are both burgers, but Hamburgler still roams free.

      baptists & bootleggers.

      1. wylie   14 years ago

        *burgerleggers?

  13. Kunty Krazy Kristen   14 years ago

    I think I have a McFlurry just because of this bit of stickin' it to the Top. Men.

    And also McFlurries are delicious.

  14. ChrisO   14 years ago

    Can we divert the Mexican border fence to surround SF and Marin County? It would probably do more good there.

    1. Eduard van Haalen   14 years ago

      Why stop there? Give SF back to Mexico, assuming Mexico is dumb enough to take it.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   14 years ago

        Then Nancy Pelosi can bother the Mexican Congress, not the U.S. one.

        1. Aresen   14 years ago

          We couldn't do that!

          She might be kidnapped by one of the drug barons.

          1. Aresen   14 years ago

            I mean: Have you no pity for the drug barons?

            1. WTF   14 years ago

              We could make them pay us to take her back. Deficit solved.

              1. wylie   14 years ago

                eliminate the deficit AND bankrupt the cartel, two birds with one stone.

    2. wareagle   14 years ago

      shouldn't the fence around San Fran be to keep the loons IN?

      1. ChrisO   14 years ago

        That's the idea. But you also have to fence in the wealthier loons in Marin County, or you haven't really solved the problem. Okay, probably Alameda County, too. Jeez, that fence keeps getting bigger and bigger...

        1. wylie   14 years ago

          What we really need are some sort of camps. I haven't worked out all the final details yet.

          1. JEP   14 years ago

            http://xkcd.com/984/

  15. Apple   14 years ago

    Hmm, I'm starting to think prohibition might not always work.

  16. Tim   14 years ago

    "McDonald's, the clear target of the ban, had a year to figure out a way to change its business practices. Seems like they used the time wisely,"

    They were TOYING with them all along!

    1. Sevo   14 years ago

      Winna!

  17. P Brooks   14 years ago

    "It'll work, I tell you; we just need to do a little fine tuning."

  18. romulus augustus   14 years ago

    Don't the toys move in interstate commerce? How can SF get away with this regulation?

    1. wylie   14 years ago

      "get away" with it? I figured that would be the justification.

      1. dunphy   14 years ago

        iirc, the commerce clause doesn't prevent local govt.'s from affecting interstate commerce.

        it allows the federal govt. to get involved in stuff that affects interstate commerce.

        lots of things state govt. regulates (rightly or wrongly) also affect interstate commerce.

  19. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

    I don't see how kids meal toys can be considered free in the first place. Kids meals aren't particularly cheap, the industry doesn't refer to the toy as a "premium" for no reason. It factors in to the price.

    1. Aresen   14 years ago

      TANSTAAFL is a basic libertarian premise. It always was a pitch to get the kids to drag their parents to Mickey Dee's.

      Caveat emptor and all that.

      1. Robert   14 years ago

        No, it's not that. It's to keep the kid quiet while the rest of the family eats.

        1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

          What the fuck are you smokin? Kids make some damn noise when they playin with those friggin toys.

          Some of the toys even talk and beep and shit.

          1. wareagle   14 years ago

            toys that shit cannot be good.

  20. Ska   14 years ago

    Good for McD's, with the added bonus of setting up a solid preemptive "why does SF's local government want sick children to get less charitable funding" defense on future attempts at re-legislation.

    1. Aresen   14 years ago

      Given the mindset of the SF city government, I can see them banning the practice then adding a 10 cent tax per burger to be paid to the "Official SF Government Children's Fund."

  21. Aresen   14 years ago

    Even though I hate Mickey Dee's crap food, I may make a point of taking a kid for a Happy Meal next time I'm in SF.

    Mickey Dee's pwns SF.

    1. wylie   14 years ago

      just gotta borrow a kid...

      1. Jerry Sandusky   14 years ago

        I have a few I can spare!

  22. WWNGD?   14 years ago

    In the picture, is that a maple leaf under the McDonald's logo? If so that would be a McDonalds-Canada happy meal toy and not affected by the San Fran ban.

    1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

      Is it a law in Canada that normal American things have to be branded with canadian markings? Wendy's has that shit, too. I don't see tiny American flags that often on things that say Made In U.S.A.

      1. Aresen   14 years ago

        Nah. It's just a common corporate ploy to remind us we are basically a subsidiary, formerly majority British, presently majority American, but with the Chinese and Indian shareholding moving up fast.

      2. wylie   14 years ago

        i think maple leaves just look cool. hmmm, maybe I'm secretly part cannuk, *shudder*. dammit, where's my zesty mordants.

        1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

          Japanese maple leaves certainly look cool.

          1. WWNGD?   14 years ago

            Almost like some other plant but not as green.

          2. Ryan Frederick   14 years ago

            I thought so, too. Fuck me.

  23. |   14 years ago

    This is one occasion where the Daily Show actually gets this right:

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/wa.....y-meal-ban

    1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

      The Daily Show has been getting a few things right, lately.

    2. Fatty Bolger   14 years ago

      OK, that was pretty awesome.

    3. Auric Demonocles   14 years ago

      Great bit.

  24. Joe M   14 years ago

    So brilliantly excellent. I salute you, you magnificent bastards.

  25. marco73   14 years ago

    And just look at all the free press that McDonald's is getting out of this.
    Please, please nannies, don't throw us in the briar patch!

  26. Fluffy Got Demoted   14 years ago

    I salute you, mighty lords of McDonald's.

    This victory was not without cost, though. A few weeks ago I bought my kid a Happy Meal at the drive-thru, and when we got home we discovered that they had taken out the standard small fries and replaced it with a micro-fries. Standing in for the missing fries were some cellophane-wrapped apple slices.

    Now, my kid eats a fresh apple just about every day. The last thing he needs is some apple that has been sitting around SLICED for weeks or months, whether it's wrapped in cellophane or not. In addition, my kid is smart enough to know when he has been screwed.

    "Why did they do this? Why would they do this?" he kept asking, over and over.

    "Because the First Lady is a no-good bitch," I told him, since my wife was not around to object. "The government scared McDonald's into wrecking the Happy Meal. Because they're all no-good bitches."

    "Why? Why would they do that? Why, Daddy, why?"

    Apparently you can only get a real Happy Meal now by specifying up front that you don't want the Lady Obama version but want the Classic version.

    1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

      The problem with "let's put "healthy" things in the children's meal" is, the kids just won't eat the portions that they don't like that much. My fries often went unfully eaten. Shitty assed carrots damn sure won't be touched, and the kid will still get the toy.

      1. wylie   14 years ago

        McDonalds is clearly in the pocket of BigCarrot and ConglomeratedApple.

        1. Evan from Evansville   14 years ago

          Conglomerated Apple.

          Humor. I recognize that.

          1. Tony   14 years ago

            I prefer "Big Fruit"

            1. Sevo   14 years ago

              I knew you would.

        2. squirt   14 years ago

          BigCarrot = rhinoplasty for Frosty

    2. Fatty Bolger   14 years ago

      "Because the First Lady is a no-good bitch," I told him, since my wife was not around to object. "The government scared McDonald's into wrecking the Happy Meal. Because they're all no-good bitches."

      From one Dad to another, let me compliment you on your parenting skills.

      1. Brett L   14 years ago

        Can't wait for the report from parent-teacher conference day.

      2. Fluffy Got Demoted   14 years ago

        He also loves Matchbox cars and the Need for Speed game series.

        We have already had many talks about how if the left wing and the environmentalists get their way, there won't be any fun cars around to drive by the time he grows up and the Matchbox car company will go out of business.

        He's only 5 so I'm not sure he gets it, but I figure if you start early on these basic concepts you can fill in the detail later.

        1. wylie   14 years ago

          "EPA drafting new regulations for non-ambulatory toy vehicles."

          Getting a whole pile of Matchbox cars emissions-tested is gonna be a bitch.

        2. Tonio   14 years ago

          I'm sure the Greenies would be happy with toy buses, bicycles or recognizable hybrids.

    3. Tonio   14 years ago

      Brilliant, Fluffy, just brilliant. I suggest that we all start publicly using the term "Lady Obama Version" publicly as much as possible, as in "I want the classic version, not the Lady Obama version."

      1. The Monster   14 years ago

        Lady Obama... tells us what to eat.
        Indoctrinates our kids on Sesame Street.

  27. califronian   14 years ago

    This seriously made my day. Now I love McDonald's corporation whereas before I was just indifferent.

  28. mr lizard   14 years ago

    I too despise any non-breakfast Mac D 's food. However today I'm going to walk past 6 Hipster run healthy-ish places to suck down a happy meal. But I might get the fruit cup substitution for added irony....

  29. NAL   14 years ago

    I'm going to have a Quarter Pounder today after work to support McD's for their spiteful brilliance.

    I've posted this before, but Happy Meals actually gave me a great opportunity to teach my kids the value of money. You see, almost all of the toys are just plain junk and the kids realize that about 2 minutes after getting it. So I always give my kids an option, you can have the happy meal, or just get the equivalent food and I'll give you a dollar (that's about the difference in price). They take the dollar every time now.

    1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

      Premium quality has gone way, way down since the meals of my yoot.

  30. Alan Vanneman   14 years ago

    Who's that in the car? Mr. Turd?

    1. Carrot Top   14 years ago

      That's funny, dude. Can I steal that?

      1. Anal Vanneman   14 years ago

        Everything reminds me of turds.

      2. Carlos Mencia   14 years ago

        Too late, man. I already did.

  31. Auric Demonocles   14 years ago

    Keep up the quality alt-text Baylen.

  32. squirt   14 years ago

    Every SF politician should be forced to watch Penn and Teller's episode of Bullshit! dealing with fast food. The take home point: high priced restaurant food typically has more fat, grease and calories than fast food. The war on fast food is largely snobbery.

    There is a particularly delicious segment in which a research takes a meal from KFC, puts it on china and give the items fancy names and serves it to test subjects. He then asks the test subjects to rate the food as he did other groups of test subjects served the same food in the original KFC packaging. He found that the china and fancy names substantially improved the perception of the food quality in the minds of the diners.

    The human mind is a fascinating thing.

    And SF is run by insane people.

    1. Sevo   14 years ago

      "The war on fast food is largely snobbery."

      And the high-priestess of naming each tomato is on record:
      "But, above all, Ms. Waters was unable to bring home the point that it's not that food prices at Chez Panisse are too high, it's that food prices at the restaurants that feed most Americans are way too low."
      Yep, those darn proles shouldn't have cheap food!
      http://www.petmd.com/blogs/ful....._expensive

      1. jjh2   14 years ago

        Sevo,

        Except that Alice Waters didn't say that... That's the point that the article writer says she was "unable to bring home."

        1. Sevo   14 years ago

          OK, she meant it. Try this:

          "HEMISPHERES: What is the one thing that we don't understand about food?

          WATERS: That it's precious. We need to pay for it. We need to pay for the food and pay the people who produce it. That's profound and terribly important. We still think we can get it for free. And you know, it's that idea that we have been indoctrinated to believe, that food should be fast, cheap and easy. And it's really that kind of thinking that is destroying the world."
          http://www.hemispheresmagazine.....ce-waters/

    2. zeroentitlement   14 years ago

      Yes, +1,000.

      The same San Francisco fags who get their lube-saturated thongs in a wad over fast-food chains are the first ones to breathlessly praise local greasebombs served at their many delightful Mexican, Chinese, and Italian local joints. Oh, but the local joints are cool, despite being just as likely to kill you, so they're OK.

      If some taco truck in the Mission District were to hand out free toys with a carne asada burrito that's smothered in cheese, guacamole, lard-refried beans, and lard-fried tortilla chips, there'd be a cute little human interest story in the Examiner showing smug hipster parents taking their kids to pick up a slab of aforementioned salted lard, and smugly murmuring to the besotted fag reporter about "how important it is to expose our kids to multicultural dining experiences."

      I love the Examiner's objectivity here:

      The San Francisco ban on providing free toys to entice children to eat unhealthy foods

      Yeah, that was McD's big plan, all right. To force all of America's children to be unhealthy and nearly immobilized by their own fat, BWAAAhahahaha! *eyeroll*

      1. squirt   14 years ago

        mmm ... Bay Area Chinese (and other oriental) food. I love mees some oriental food and the SF has the best and best variety that I know of. Still prefer some good TexMex to real Mex, though.

  33. dunphy   14 years ago

    personally, i have done the same sort of protest. i eat more mcdonalds since this SF thing came about. i am using the power of my dollar to vote FOR McD's and fight agaisnt this kind of nannyism.

    McD's doesn't claim to BE health food, and fwiw many of its food choice are quite healthy AND of course health comes down to a healthy diet OVERALL. iow, eating an occasional big mac won't harm you AT ALL. and people like them. it makes them happy. for a small price. that's a good thing.

    it IS all about snobbery, because there are plenty of items i could order at a fancy restaurant that are at least as bad if not worse.

    i recently went to dinner at a very nice italian place and i had creme brulee for dinner, and my friend had a chocolate panacotta (sp?). do we really need to check the ingredient list? iirc, creme brulee is sugar, heavy cream and egg yolks iirc. oh, and a bit of vanilla.

    i fucking HATE food nannies. and i say this as somebody who pays a lot of attention to my diet, and routinely has to make weight for contests, which means bodyfat at 12% or less

  34. Ken   14 years ago

    The way the oafish statists on SF Weekly are losing their shit over this is giving me a Schadenboner.

  35. Scott   14 years ago

    I'm confused.

    Is it part of the law that McDonald's can't let people buy the toy without the meal?

  36. Big Mac Rudy   14 years ago

    It will cost alot more than a 10 cent donation to pay for my neighborhood kids going to the Ronald McDonald House for cardiac issues. Save the kids, Save the resources, Save our Medical system & Save the human race. Whoever calls this a "Culinary" acheivement needs help. Compare this to tobacco please.

    1. WWNGD?   14 years ago

      "alot" is not a word, teach the children that.

  37. Socrates   14 years ago

    I LOVE that you included a link to the Bullitt chase scene. From now on, every post tangentially related to San Francisco should. And btw, the only way McQueen could get any cooler is if he was the one driving the Charger.

    (You know it's true.)

    1. James Solbakken   14 years ago

      My step-brother had a 1970 Plymouth GTX back in the day, and boy, was I jealous, but of course if it had been my car, I'd be dead or still in jail I'm sure, seeing all the trouble I caused with my chevy.

  38. laurie   14 years ago

    I'm a San Franciscan, and I think this story is honestly the most delightful thing I've heard all year! The icing on the cake? Even NPR dubbed McDonald's "McSmarter" in their Marketplace story. Awesome.

  39. Mr SmartyPants   13 years ago

    It's all for the children!

    http://tinyurl.com/SanFranToyBan

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Trump Cut Funds From Wasteful Projects To Spend on Wasteful Statue Garden

Joe Lancaster | 6.3.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!