Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Canada Tosses Wheat Board with the Chaff

Baylen Linnekin | 11.29.2011 10:33 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Canadian Wheat Board's (CWB) 76-year state-mandated monopsony as the only buyer of farmers' wheat in much of Western Canada has come to an end. In killing the board's monopsony power--if not the board itself--Alberta agriculture minister Evan Berger had this bit of awesome to say:

"The ultimate property right is what you do with your production, whether it be intellectual or physical. I believe we are giving back a property right, a freedom of choice, to farmers who make large investments, who have the wherewithal to sell their grain to whomever, whenever, at what price they see fit," he said.

More here from the CBC.

The CWB apparently had quite the power in Western Canada, as federal agriculture minister Gerry Ritz, a leading opponent of the board, describes in a video that accompanies the CBC story (sorry, not embeddable). In the video, Ritz describes how the board's nefarious grip extended even to donations, such that some farmers who had crossed provincial lines were thrown in jail for more than two months "simply for taking a bag of wheat in their half-ton truck across the [provincial] line and donating it to a 4-H club."

Yet the CWB, which apparently employs hundreds in its behemoth offices in downtown Winnipeg, is painting its own demise as an effort to "steamroll western Canadian wheat farmers."

But Saskatchewan agriculture minister Bob Bjornerud said he expects the CWB's loss of authority instead to lead to "rural reinvigoration, including a new generation of young farmers." If I were an editorial cartoonist, I'd co-opt the Canadian Wheat Board's steamroller and be hard at work scribbling the word "Progress" on a steamroller and drawing the steamroller running over something with "CWB" on it--so that everyone could tell what the heck I meant.

Bonus Canadian-themed story: Why did Wayne Gretzky's daughter shutter her Twitter account?

Baylen Linnekin is the director of Keep Food Legal, a nonprofit dedicated to preserving and increasing "culinary freedom," the right of all Americans to grow, sell, prepare and eat foods of their own choosing. To join or learn more about the group's activities, go here. To follow Keep Food Legal on Twitter, go here; to follow Linnekin, go here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: U.N. Climate Change Breakthrough Decision Already Made: Where to Hold Next Year's Conference

Reason Foundation Senior Fellow Baylen Linnekin is a food lawyer, scholar, and adjunct law professor, as well as the author of Biting the Hands That Feed Us: How Fewer, Smarter Laws Would Make Our Food System More Sustainable (Island Press 2016).

PoliticsFarmingAgricultureDeregulationCanadaWorldScience & TechnologyPolicy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (116)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Stacy's Mom   13 years ago

    "The ultimate property right is what you do with your production...on Land taken by genocide."

    1. Barely Suppressed Rage   13 years ago

      Yer damn skippy. How the hell else would we get it?

      1. Old Soldier   13 years ago

        Fucking Normans took my land! (That I took from the Picts)

        1. Barely Suppressed Rage   13 years ago

          Well next time maybe you'll Pict on someone your own size.

    2. John Tagliaferro   13 years ago

      Surprised nobody mentioned the "monopsony" usage by Linnekin. The last time I saw that word used twice in the same post was on Ezra Klein's old blog when he was bitching about Walmart's buyers 'killing' Vlasic and other pet brands of his. His wolf-cry of Vlasic's demise was premature.

      In this case, the usage is appropriate.

      1. Live Free or Diet   13 years ago

        The last time I saw the word monopsony was in an econ text discussing Static Model controls.

        1. Aresen   13 years ago

          The CWB was a monopsony when facing the farmers, but it was also the only entity authorized to SELL wheat for most purposes, so it was also a monopoly.

    3. Avenge the Dorset   13 years ago

      I agree with stacy's mom. This is why I've been demanding a statement from Canada's Inuit that apologizes for the complete eradication of the Dorset peoples from the Canadian arctic.

  2. typical liberal   13 years ago

    Surely famine will follow.

    1. Famine always follows ag   13 years ago

      Civilized England and France both had regular famines for hundreds of years, and would have probably collapsed, save for the discovery of "virgin" soil of the Americas to exploit, and then Black Oil to fuel the so-called "Green" revolution, which is just the industry of turning oil into food.

      Think this anomaly in history will go on forever?

      Agriculture is like fiat money, the soil is like a bank. It's real fun, and seems so "productive," ? for a little while.

      1. Citizen Nothing   13 years ago

        Say "hello" to the Erie Nation for me, will ya, guy?

        1. Live Free or Diet   13 years ago

          If really put in the situation he advocates (no ag), he'd be saying hello to the Eerie Nation!

      2. Aresen   13 years ago

        Actually, France had very few famines and was generally an exporter of grains.

        The English "Corn Laws" were intended to protect the upper-class land owners in England from competition from the French and allow them to charge the peasants more for the grain ('corn') produced in England.

        1. Michael Pack   13 years ago

          This is true during the middle age warm period,but,when the mini ice age struck,the French refused to plant potatoes instead or with grain,famine ensued.This and the utter corruption of the ancient regime lead to the French revolution

          1. Michael Pack   13 years ago

            of course any farming system that was reliant on one staple was doomed to famin sooner or later.[Irish potato famin?]A mix of grain,vegetable and meat seems to be the best cure.This became possible through modern farming

            1. Brett   13 years ago

              The other issue is lack of trade. Today droughts in grain producing regions and surplus production in other grain producing regions effect the market price and people can buy food grown halfway around the world. By contrast when France in the 17th and 18th centuries or Ireland in the 19th centuries suffered a massive crop failure markets in London hardly fluctuated.

      3. Shorter White Indian   13 years ago

        herp derp CITY STATIST derp

  3. anon   13 years ago

    If only it wasn't so cold in Alberta.

  4. Anarcho-lib Correction   13 years ago

    "The ultimate property right is what you do with your production, whether it be intellectual or physical."

    1. Nuclear weapons should be...   13 years ago

      ...private and widely used to settle differences with private defense corporations.

      1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

        If it makes a world as cool as Fallout, I'm all for it.

      2. tarran   13 years ago

        Yawn, economic ignoramus is ignorant.

        1. Tired   13 years ago

          Yawn. Blogwhore links to his own blog.

          1. tarran   13 years ago

            I recently had the occasion to read a debate I had with Dan T and M1EK back in the day. I was surprised that they actually put some effort into their trolling.

            The current crop of trolls are so pathetically lame.

            1. Episiarch   13 years ago

              Stalking a blog 24/7 takes some effort, tarran. Just not the kind of effort you're talking about.

            2. BakedPenguin   13 years ago

              Griefers, not trolls. Trolls just want to start an argument, either b/c they believe what they say or they just like fucking with people. Griefers like rectal / WI want to make a blog unreadable.

              But I know what you mean. The last time Underzog showed up, I told him how great it was to hear from him.

              1. Warty   13 years ago

                At this point, H&R is so degraded that it would be an improvement to hear from Dave W.

              2. SugarFree   13 years ago

                I guess the new check finally cleared.

                1. tarran   13 years ago

                  I was following the conversation up to this point. Check from who? To whom?

              3. John   13 years ago

                That is a really good distinction BP. Only Lonewacko ever crossed into Griefer territory before this. He would just post rants about immigration on every thread.

                1. ?   13 years ago

                  Whaaaah!

              4. John   13 years ago

                Underzog was never a troll. I always liked him. And Jersey McJones was okay. And then there was Gaius Marius and Thoreau. Gaius was a little crazy but always interesting.

                These people are just pathetic.

                1. ?   13 years ago

                  Somebody needs a hug.

                  1. John   13 years ago

                    Someone needs some Prozac.

                    1. Fascinating   13 years ago

                      John|11.29.11 @ 11:49AM
                      Someone needs some Prozac.

                      That's funny!
                      Will you be here all day?

                  2. Barely Suppressed Rage   13 years ago

                    Somebody needs a smack upside the head with a 2x4.

              5. robc   13 years ago

                Baked - offtopic, but have you bought my beer yet? (That was you, right?) Figured you would want to just go ahead and concede.

                1. BakedPenguin   13 years ago

                  robc - It's looking like you're right, but I'll wait until it's said and done. Remember, he has to win a playoff game.

                  Still, Bell's 2 Hearted, right?

                  1. robc   13 years ago

                    Yep.

                    The schedule isnt favorable either, you might get another year before having to pay off.

                    1. robc   13 years ago

                      I think I have a feel for NFL QBs. A few years back (draft day), I said that while he would be behind for a few years, that when they were all done, Cutler would have a better career than Leinert or Vince Young (all drafted that same day, Cutler drafted last).

                    2. Brett L   13 years ago

                      robc:

                      Who knew Leinart had a glass collarbone?

            3. Fascinating   13 years ago

              tarran|11.29.11 @ 11:16AM|#
              I recently had the occasion to read a debate I had with Dan T and M1EK

              Did you re-post it with revised footnotes and bonus commentary?

              1. John   13 years ago

                Boring troll is boring.

                1. King Troll   13 years ago

                  You know you've made it when the Goon Squad shows up and makes a special effort to tell you how boring and uninteresting you are.

                  1. John   13 years ago

                    I guess someone is a little sad and angry about being left out. Sorry but sometimes it is just really hard to be the retarded kid.

                    1. Citizen Nothing   13 years ago

                      John's troll seems to have the same "joke" writer as MNG. Hmmm.

                2. ?   13 years ago

                  John, you're a born comic. Ever do any standup?
                  Will you be here all day?

    2. Colonel_Angus   13 years ago

      Actually, I can control my intellectual production. I don't have to let anyone else learn my ideas, or create anything.

  5. rather   13 years ago

    The good news about your National Enquirer bonus story is that I no longer have to go to TMZ to get the latest

  6. The Feds   13 years ago

    Wait...they're gutting a major government agency? How is that even possible?

    1. rts   13 years ago

      Not just the Wheat Board, but the Conservative government is also scrapping the long-gun registry (and salting the earth so it can't easily come back).

      If only they'd scrap the handgun registry as well.

      1. Shmenge   13 years ago

        There's also a good chance Canada is pulling out of the Kyoto protocol.

        1. Torontonian   13 years ago

          And suddenly Canada's the western world's new libertarian paradise...

          ...that is, until you see the income tax rates.

          46.41% combined marginal tax rate on income over $128,800. (This varies by province.)

          1. The Gamboler   13 years ago

            And the retarded militarism.

        2. Brett   13 years ago

          Kyoto's expired.

  7. P Brooks   13 years ago

    The Canadian government is volutarily shutting down a State price-fixing scheme?

    Maybe the Mayans were right.

    1. PS   13 years ago

      I think there's something to the fact that much smaller countries (population-wise, don't freak out you fucking cheeseheads) are better able to self-regulate when reality inevitably catches up. Another reason to doubt the US will be able to turn the Titanic from the iceberg.

      1. Aresen   13 years ago

        Actually, it is more to do with it being a majority government in Parliament.

        A majority government is effectively a one-party dictatorship until it is voted out.

        The budget cuts in the 1990s would not have been possible if the Liberals under Jean Chretien (aka "Dishonest Jean") had not had a majority government, even though they were absolutely necessary to save Canada from what is now happening in Europe.

        1. PS   13 years ago

          Well, regardless of the means I don't think it's a coincidence that smaller countries dominated the index of economic freedom. And I think the effect is only going to get larger over time.

          The advantages of being a large country seem to be disappearing as trade restrictions and such things become less important.

      2. Restoras   13 years ago

        Perhaps, but in the meantime Rhode Island is taking on water, fast.

        1. JW   13 years ago

          Did they build too much on top of it? It's just a matter of time before it sinks, you know.

          1. Barely Suppressed Rage   13 years ago

            Maybe it will flip over, like Guam. It is an island, after all - it has "island" right in the name.

          2. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA)   13 years ago

            OMG it could TIP OVER!!!!1111111

  8. Real Merikan   13 years ago

    Real Merikans won't buy tainted Candadian wheat. If God had meant for wheat to be grown in Canada, he would have made it warmer there.

  9. rts   13 years ago

    "The ultimate property right is what you do with your production... except for the nearly 40% we take in taxes".

    (As a Canadian, I only wish I were exaggerating).

  10. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    If I were an editorial cartoonist, I'd co-opt the Canadian Wheat Board's steamroller and be hard at work scribbling the word "Progress" on a steamroller and drawing the steamroller running over something with "CWB" on it--so that everyone could tell what the heck I meant.

    Not enough labels.

    1. Cow Bell   13 years ago

      Or me.

    2. Dagny T.   13 years ago

      Ideally there would be some labels identifying what the labels represented, such as "METAPHOR" and "SYNECDOCHE" and so on. Then it might be up to Friday Funnies standards.

      1. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

        It's a shame you have to be a fantastically talented artist to do political cartoons, or we could clean up in this racket.

        1. King Troll   13 years ago

          Happily there's no such criterion for professional chat-room punditry.

  11. Roscoe Filburn   13 years ago

    Well fuckin' A.

    1. Baylen Linnekin   13 years ago

      +1

  12. P Brooks   13 years ago

    steamroller running over something with "CWB" on it

    Don't forget to put a top hat on the driver of the steamroller.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    That Wayne Gretzky was involved in the closing of the Twitter account is strengthened by this tweet shortly before it disappeared: "Having a nice sit down dinner with my dad about social media..haha #SIKEEE."

    Mario Lemieux let Cindy tweet away during that ten-month bout with concussive PMS.

    (Go Pens.)

    1. John   13 years ago

      The Great One's daughter apparently has quite a twitter account.

  14. Warty   13 years ago

    If I were an editorial cartoonist, I'd co-opt the Canadian Wheat Board's steamroller and be hard at work scribbling the word "Progress" on a steamroller and drawing the steamroller running over something with "CWB" on it--so that everyone could tell what the heck I meant.

    No crying Statue of Liberty in the background?

    1. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

      The steamroller would be labelled "Progress" in scare quotes, and would be driven by a top-hatted and bemonocled Evan Berger. He would be driving it over a field with a trail of flat wheat behind and a man being pulled under the front labelled "hard-working Canadian wheat farmers." And it wouldn't be the Statue of Liberty, you ignorant pig. It would be a crying moose.

      1. Dagny T.   13 years ago

        A weeping beaver has slightly different connotations, so I'll allow the deviation from the classic Canadian animal. Can we work something in about the vast gluten conspiracy? I think that would be nice.

        1. T   13 years ago

          How do you pictorially represent the vast gluten consipracy? Shadowed background figures with GLUTEN written on them?

        2. John   13 years ago

          I think a weeping beaver is better. What about the vast lactate conspiracy? Maybe you could borrow the Chick Fila cows.

          1. Sparky   13 years ago

            I tend to stay away from my wife when she has a weeping beaver. I don't know why anyone would want to see that in any kind of cartoon.

            1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

              Coward.

        3. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

          Also, the Weeping Beavers would be a good name for a rock band.

          1. Aresen   13 years ago

            They could book for the next Michelle Bachmann rally.

          2. John   13 years ago

            It would only work for an all girl punk band.

            1. Lame Troll   13 years ago

              That's funny!
              Will you be here all day?

              1. Gimlet   13 years ago

                No one wants you here.

    2. EDG reppin' LBC   13 years ago

      The steamroller should have outrageously oversized ears, and tiny little black dots for eyes, too.

  15. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

    Wheat. . .lots of wheat. Fields of wheat. A tremendous amount of wheat.

  16. bell ringer   13 years ago

    Speaking of foreign news, Breivik has been declared insane.

    What will it mean? Breivik is clearly being declared insane simply because he dissents from the political assumptions of the ruling class and carried out assassinations based on his dissent. He will be put in a psych ward because he disagrees with what he perceives as the cultural betrayal of Norway's political leaders and his belief that those who disagree with government policies regarding immigration and "multiculturalism" are not able to acquire a meaningful political voice.

    Is Breivik alone in his views? Is there any public support in Norway for his views, if not his actions? Will he one day be viewed as a hero? With the public be outraged that Breivik is not being held criminally accountable for his murderous rampage?

    1. Aresen   13 years ago

      Murdering children is not "assassination", no matter how much one "dissents from the political assumptions of the ruling class".

      Get a grip.

      1. tarran   13 years ago

        It's a knotty problem:

        On the one hand, Breivik wants a trial so that he can use it as a platform to spread his ideas as Hitler and Castro did.

        On the other hand, the guy is mentally capable of assisting in his own defense and did know that what he was doing was wrong & illegal.

        I'm surprised that the court ruled he was not sane enough to stand trial. If they did it to prevent him from using the trial as a soap-box, it would be a terrible mistake.

        1. John   13 years ago

          I bet that was what they were thinking.

        2. Aresen   13 years ago

          Some who slaughters children to make a political statement is not just insane, he is mad-dog-insane.

          Despite my opposition to the death penalty, I would have no qualms about pulling the lever on Breivik. I'd view it as a public health measure.

          1. tarran   13 years ago

            Oh, I agree that he is insane in the general sense.

            Legal insanity is much narrower in scope; a person cannot be responsible for their actions or capable of assisting in their defense at trial.

            Ted Bundy, for example, was clearly insane. But the planning he conducted, the efforts at concealment, his intelligence etc all meant that he was responsible for his actions, was capable of assisting his defense, and so it would be inappropriate to say he was legally insane.

            Contrast this to someone with dementia who thinks he is back in WWII and strangles his roommate thinking that the roommate is a Nip infiltrator. A trial here would be pointless because the guy clearly wasn't responsible for his actions.

            Breivik is far closer to Ted Bundy than the senile vet.

          2. Ted S.   13 years ago

            Some who slaughters children to make a political statement is not just insane, he is mad-dog-insane.

            Or he could just be garden-variety evil.

            And I'm a bit uncomfortable with your use of the word "children", since (according to Wikipedia) the median age of the murder victimes at Utoya was 18. 17 of those murder victims were 17, whom we wouldn't think of as children if they were having sex with each other.

            Also, Breivik didn't just kill "children" indiscriminately; he picked a political youth camp for his murders.

            I'd say not insane at all, and agree with "Isaac Bartram's" comments.

          3. bell ringer   13 years ago

            Some who slaughters children to make a political statement is not just insane

            He wasn't just making a statement. He was trying to eliminate future leaders whom he was convinced would betray his country. Even if he were just butchering people to make a statement, it does not mean he was insane. All indications are that he knew exactly what he was doing and meticulously planned it, hardly the actions of a madman. More like the actions of an extremist willing to perpetrate horrible acts to try to force a political change.

            Words like "mad" and "insane" get thrown around far too cavalierly. They are used to describe pretty much every ambitious despot. It is more accurate to recognize the differences in motivations and morality of the despot or terrorist or mass murderer than to dismiss them as "insane".

        3. Isaac Bartram   13 years ago

          I would not be at all surprised if he was declared insane so that he can be locked up for life instead of the 20yr+/- maximum that they could give him if he was convicted in a criminal trial.

          I also would not be surprised if there is a lot more sympathy for his opinions on race and ethnicity among the general public than the Norwegian political establishment would like to admit.

      2. bell ringer   13 years ago

        Murdering children is not "assassination"

        His intention was to slaughter the next generation of what he thought were traitorous politicians. Killing political leaders is assassination. He didn't murder random youths.

    2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      This is a spoof, right?

      1. Isaac Bartram   13 years ago

        I think the questions asked in the last para indicate that this is not one of our Stormfront vistors.

        Asking questions about the State's motives or those of Breivik do not show that the questioner is necessarily sympathetic to one or hostile to the other.

  17. Warty   13 years ago

    If we're going to be talking about wheat, here's a song about beer.

  18. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

    Serious question though: If the CWB doesn't buy the farmers' wheat, won't it just rot in the silos?

    1. Aresen   13 years ago

      Actually, the meme promoted by the CWB is that the farmers will become helpless pawns of Cargill and Monsato, etc without the government to protect them.

    2. R C Dean   13 years ago

      Pish. The wheat won't even make to the silos; it will just rot in the fields.

      Without a government agency, you see, the farmers will just sit in their kitchens, staring vacantly into space.

      1. Aresen   13 years ago

        I see you have met a few farmers. 😉

        1. R C Dean   13 years ago

          Indeed I have.

          The planning, preparation, and just plain hard work they put into their crop insurance frauds is an inspiration to us all.

      2. The Farmers   13 years ago

        We're lazy as hell! Lawyers do ten times the work.

    3. aix42   13 years ago

      The wheat board can still exist, just not as a monopoly.

    4. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

      The tribbles will eat it first.

    5. Paul   13 years ago

      Serious question though: If the CWB doesn't buy the farmers' wheat, won't it just rot in the silos?

      There's this obesity crisis on, so any wheat that doesn't make it to market represents pounds lost in the population. Win-win.

  19. P Brooks   13 years ago

    If the CWB doesn't buy the farmers' wheat, won't it just rot in the silos?

    The farmers will be compelled to migrate to the cities and take jobs at Tim Hortons.

    The great plains of Canada will become a pheasant hunter's paradise.

  20. Res Publica Americana   13 years ago

    Meanwhile, the federal government of the United States maintains its policy of illegally assassinating Americans, executing illegal and costly wars of unjustifiable intervention, and not one state is man enough to actually tell the feds to eat shit and fuck off with regards to ObamaCare.

    God forgive us for what we've done to our inheritance.

    1. New West Republic   13 years ago

      I don't think our federal gov't has quite got to the point of assassinating Canadians yet, but we've wasted a fair bit of blood and treasure in Afghanistan and helped bomb the shit out of Libya. And not one province is man enough to tell the feds to fuck off with regards to the intrusion of the Canada Health Act into their exclusive constitutional jurisdiction over the regulation of health care.

  21. Paul   13 years ago

    Yet the CWB, which apparently employs hundreds in its behemoth offices in downtown Winnipeg, is painting its own demise as an effort to "steamroll western Canadian wheat farmers."

    The oppressor always warns that his demise will be the end those he oppressed.

  22. John   13 years ago

    I wish Pennsylvania would do this with their stupid liquor control board.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Andor Is a Star Wars Show About the Brutality of Bureaucracy

Peter Suderman | 5.16.2025 10:10 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!