Taxes

Tax the Rich?

|

In efforts to make a populist appeal, President Obama declared this afternoon: "I reject the idea that asking the hedge-fund manager to pay the same tax rate as a plumber or teacher is class warfare. I just do." The president announced plans to raise taxes on the wealthy and for a new minimum tax rate on millionaires to ensure that the wealthy whose income may largely derive from capital gains and dividends will have incomes impacted not only by corporate income taxes, but by higher capital gains taxes as well.

Results from the Reason-Rupe poll actually demonstrate a willingness by a majority of Americans to increase taxes on the "wealthy." However these preferences depend greatly on how one defines wealthy. The poll asked the standard question "Do you think the federal government should increase taxes on the wealthy," with 69 percent in favor and 28 percent opposed. However, respondents in favor were then asked what household income they would use to define someone who is wealthy and should therefore pay higher taxes. Respondents consistently listed incomes that were above their own, even high-income respondents, suggesting that people may want to raise taxes, but just not on themselves.

For instance, the interquartile range among those making less than $25,000 a year ranged from $100,000 to $500,000 a year. Yet, those making $100,000-$199,000 defined wealthy as $250,000 to $5000,000. Those making over $200,000 defined wealthy from $300,000 to $1,000,000. The graphic below compares each income group to that groups' preferred definition of the term "wealthy." Each group typically wants to tax those who make more than they do.

 

Click here for full survey results.

Survey Methods

The Reason-Rupe Q3 2011 poll collected a nationally representative sample of 1200 respondents, aged 18 and older from all 50 states and the District of Columbia using live telephone interviews from August 9th-18th 2011. The margin of sampling error for this poll is ± 3 percent. The margin of error for the GOP presidential race numbers is ± 4.79%. Interviews were conducted with respondents using both landline (790) and mobile phones (410). Landline respondents were randomly selected within households based on the adult who had the most recent birthday. Sample was weighted by gender, age, ethnicity, and Census region, based on the most recent US Census data. The sampling frame included landline and mobile phone numbers generated using Random Digit Dialing (RDD) methods and randomly selected numbers from a directory-listed sample. Clickhere for full methodological details. NSON Opinion Strategy conducted the poll's fieldwork. View full methodology.

NEXT: Tax the Rich?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. 1M, 0.9, 0.8… down to you and me.

    Join the Tea Party and be heard. Otherwise its just company A or company B owning America.

  2. How many people were polled in this study?

    How were respondents selected?

    This study isn’t valid unless these are reported.

  3. If you actually read the article there is a line that says ‘Full results can be found here.’ With a nice link to the results of the survey and the questions of how many people, how they were selected and so on is found there.

  4. I’m curious: what happens if you regress each respondent’s “this-is-wealthy” figure on their household income, with a bevy of controlling factors of course? Will it continue to appear that people’s definition of wealth is always significantly above wherever they are? Or is it an artifact of something else?

  5. I wonder how people would respond if it was postulated that people who pay higher taxes should get additional votes on election day.

  6. Issue is relevant in the context as rich people must pay high taxes but it is really needed to define that who is Rich people . What is the criteria and still some questions are pending to answer. So a good analysation is needed by US government. Thanxxx for updating.

  7. “Respondents consistently listed incomes that were above their own, even high-income respondents, suggesting that people may want to raise taxes, but just not on themselves.”

    In other news, scientists report that the sun rises in the east, and that water flows downhill.

  8. that luck is a perceptual view based on a belief that something circumstancial, be it a trinket of some sort, a lucky charm, or a mystical belief based on supersticious ideas can cause situations to work out for your right time and the right place has some merit in regards to this; however, I think that to be successful requires greatly detailed thought processes which evaluate a purpose and identify the steps needed to create the desired successful outcome. Once this type of integrated thought is realized the work begins. To take what is written down as the plan of success and implement it through determined effort towards the accomplishment of the success plan is what makes it happen. Thought is the genorater initially as you must research what is needed to make your plan a success. It’s like that old saying, “I think and therefore I am.” – ????? ??????
    ????? ???????

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.