Next Steps in the ObamaCare Legal Challenges
The Cato Institute's Ilya Shapiro has a handy primer/predictor for what's coming next in the various legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, including the most important question: When will the Supreme Court hear arguments? Here's part of his answer:
The earliest the Supreme Court could grant cert — on the existing petition out of the Sixth Circuit — is the moment after this blogpost goes live…. More realistically, it would be the week before the term opens for argument in October, right after the so-called long conference, when the justices review and rule on all the petitions that have come in over the summer. But they'll likely wait to get the Eleventh Circuit case because they'd probably rather hear from the 26 states (and their counsel, former solicitor general Paul Clement) than any other plaintiffs.
Read the rest here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I would be shocked if the supreme court took on a PPACA case before the myriad cases wound their way through the various circuits. IANAL, but wouldn't it be prudent to hear all objections concurrently? This is especially true if the first ruling upholds the legality but only specifically in the area where it is challenged?
IA (also) NAL, but:
"No stay of the Eleventh Circuit's ruling is needed because the individual mandate doesn't go into effect until 2014 and that's the only provision that's been struck down."
Since there's a non-severability clause, doesn't this mean the entire act is out absent a stay?
OK wow, those guys are making a LOt of sense dude.
http://www.real-anon.at.tc
3 comments, and one from the anon-bot?!?!? I stayed just sober enough to type for that?????
If only White Indian cared about ObamaCare.
If only White Indian cared about ObamaCare.
Hunter-Gatherers stay healthy by Play. They don't need healthcare.
The beauty of these blogging engines and CMS platforms is the lack of limitations and ease of manipulation that allows developers to implement rich content and 'skin' the site in such a way that with very little effort one would never notice what it is making the site tick all without limiting content and effectiveness.
This is the perfect blog for anyone who wants to know about this topic. You know so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really would want...HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!