Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Balancing the Budget

It's time to get serious about cutting government spending.

John Stossel | 8.4.2011 12:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The political class predicted "disaster" if Congress didn't raise its debt limit.

I think that was a scam to get more money. See, the poor politicians don't have enough, and they need to borrow more. We taxpayers are cheap. This year we'll give them only $2.2 trillion. They want to spend $3.8 trillion.

The president said if he didn't get more money, Social Security checks wouldn't go out. Why not?

With $2 trillion, they can pay Social Security, Medicare, the interest on the debt, and still have billions left. It's billions more than the government spent when President George W. Bush took office. What's the problem?

The problem is that Republicans and Democrats under Bush and President Obama doubled spending. Now, Obama wants more taxes.

Taxes shouldn't be the answer when spending is the problem.

Grover Norquist, who heads Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), leads the charge to keep the focus on spending. Norquist and ATR are famous for asking officeholders and candidates to sign a pledge not to raise taxes. Some say he is the reason the debt-ceiling debate was so drawn out.

"I think the reason there isn't a tax increase on the table," he told me, "is that 235 members of the House of Representatives signed a pledge never to raise taxes, a pledge to their voters, and 41 senators did. …

"Only if you take tax increases off the table do you even begin to … focus on spending, and that's what Obama wants to keep our focus off of. He wants us to talk about the deficit, not spending."

I pointed out that Obama might have scored points with the public because new revenues he sought—even though they wouldn't do much to shrink the deficit—would come from closing unpopular tax "loopholes."

 Norquist said he favors that—if tax rates are lowered at the same time.

"(We) want to simplify the code," he said. "(We) want to take a lot of the goodies that politicians have laced into that code … as long as you reduce tax rates and it's not a hidden tax increase."

Milton Friedman always said taxes don't tell the whole story. What counts is how much of our resources government spends, however it acquires them. The doubling of spending under Bush and Obama hasn't gotten enough attention.

"We need to ask what it is government should do," Norquist said. "But it's going to be knockdown, drag-out. All government overspending creates the constituency for its own perpetuation. … Weaning people off, that is very difficult."

He's right. When politicians make little cuts in the rate of spending growth, every interest group mobilizes to protect its little piece of the pie. That's why you must cut government like you take off a Band-Aid: quickly and all at once.

It's not hard to balance the budget. On my show, we made enough cuts to create a $237 billion surplus. I cut whole departments, like Education and Commerce. I cut two-thirds of the Defense Department (which still leaves it much bigger than China's). I indexed Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security to inflation, raised the retirement age, and took away benefits for rich people. But I don't have to run for office. Congressmen do, and they can't even manage to cut ridiculous tax breaks like those for ethanol.

Obama predicted disaster if the debt ceiling wasn't raised. Some predict disaster if the ratings agencies downgrade Treasury bonds. I'm dubious. In 1995, President Clinton and Republican Congress couldn't agree on a budget, so the government shut down twice, the second time for three weeks.

Did the economy grind to a halt? No. During the first shutdown, the stock market went up. During the second, it dropped then recovered.

The alarmists screamed that the fight over the debt ceiling would discourage lenders. Wrong. Ten-year Treasury bonds sold for a measly 3 percent interest (versus 15 percent in 1981).

I wasn't worried that Congress would fail to raise the debt ceiling. But I am worried that Congress will keep spending.

John Stossel is host of Stossel on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of Give Me a Break and of Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Medicare, Medicaid To Cost $1 Trillion In 2011

John Stossel is the host and creator of Stossel TV.

PoliticsPolicyEconomicsGovernment SpendingDebt
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (124)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    The U.S. Tax Code will never be simplified. Candidates need to be able to exchange tax credits for votes.

    1. Restoras   14 years ago

      Truer words have NEVER been spoken.

      1. Richard Head   14 years ago

        What he said about what he said.

        kill all exemptions except the personal one. if pols want to help their favorite group, they should have to appropriate the money in the budget, not be able to slip in a tax deduction.

        1. tom beebe   14 years ago

          Try this, for equity, for simplicity, for feaseability:

          1. All persons residing in the U.S. shall come together in "tax units". Members need not be related, need not reside together, and a tax unit may consist of as few as one person.
          2. Each year congress shall set a "minimum wage" and a "tax rate".
          3. The following shall not be subject to taxation:
          ? An amount equal to a year's earnings (2000 hours) at the minimum wage, for each adult (age 20-65), decreasing 10% per year to 50% at age 15, and increasing 10% per year to 150% at age 70.
          ? All payments for necessary health care including medical care, pharmaceuticals prescribed by a health care professional, vision and hearing aids, and fees for health-enhancing entities such as gyms. Health care insurance premiums may be deducted but not health care expense paid for by such insurance.
          ? All educational expenses including day care for children or legally incompetent persons, the portion of state and local taxes used for education, and tuition, fees and educational materials for private school education, including that portion of parochial school tuition and other expenses going for non-sectarian education.
          ? All income saved into an account for investments; withdrawals from this account for the benefit of any member of the tax unit shall be reported as income.
          4. The "tax rate" shall be applied to any income greater than the deductions listed above, regardless of amount.
          5. Any municipality having greater than 100,000 inhabitants or any state may impose on their citizens a surtax which shall be applied the same as the Federal tax.
          6. Tax units whose deductions exceed income, shall be paid a sum equal to the tax rate multiplied by the shortfall in income.
          7. There shall be no federal tax on corporations or other business entities.
          8. The Office of Management and Budget shall compute revenues to be expected using the newly set tax rate and minimum wage, applied to the previous year's reported incomes. No expenses in excess of that amount may be made without approval by 75% of each house of Congress. This tax shall be the only source of revenue for the federal government.

          1. Justin   14 years ago

            I agree with #7 since companies just pass on that expense - which is about 20% of the price - to consumers in the form of higher prices.

            Rather than focusing on one's income, we have a sales tax, which would be a lot less invasive of one's privacy.

            That is the basic premise of the FAIR TAX.

    2. MNG   14 years ago

      True, but it's more than that. People for a long time have thought the tax code could be used to promote certain activity while inhibiting others, and not always in a rent-seeking way...

      1. Paul   14 years ago

        People for a long time have thought the tax code could be used to promote certain activity while inhibiting others, and not always in a rent-seeking way...

        But always in a government-overreach kind of way.

      2. skr   14 years ago

        fuck those people

  2. Rachel Maddow   14 years ago

    The $2 trillion in cuts is already hurting our economy. Just look at the Dow!

    1. Jeff   14 years ago

      It's also making our women(?) uglier. Just look at the Maddow!

      1. PantsFan   14 years ago

        that's a woman?

        1. Bingo   14 years ago

          Tony's going to be soo disappointed when he finds out. All that wasted seed...

        2. Drax the Destroyer   14 years ago

          Depends on your definition of 'that's'.

  3. SugarFree   14 years ago

    How can the federal government be expected to micromanage everyone's lives with only a paltry $22,000 per second?

    1. Paul   14 years ago

      By hiring more managers, silly.

  4. Clone from Mission Viejo   14 years ago

    They should try entering in promo code: Rome at the check-out

  5. Almanian   14 years ago

    I think that was a scam to get more money.

    *stares at Stossel over eyeglasses*

    Really? Seriously? John - buddy - please tell me something I DON'T know once in awhile.
    This is today's "Cop Shoots Dog" story, right?

    1. Joe M   14 years ago

      Yeah, while I like Stossel, he's not very deep in tone.

      1. Tman   14 years ago

        People always say this about Stossel, but if he gets the libertarian message out to an audience who normally could care less about politics and economics than I have no problem with him lowering the intellectual intensity of the presentations.

        1. Neu Mejican   14 years ago

          People always say this about Stossel, but if he gets the libertarian message out to an audience who normally could care less about politics and economics than {sic} I have no problem with him lowering the intellectual intensity of the presentations.

          Yeah, but he tends to lower it into below silence into negative territory.

          1. Tman   14 years ago

            Thanks for not correcting my spelling NM. Awful kind.

            he tends to lower it into below silence into negative territory.

            I blame the intrinsically paternalistic nature of it all, personally.

            1. k2000k   14 years ago

              I think it is the nature of the biz frankly. Look at any of the so called reporters who claim to be 'hard hitting' and they are similar to stossel in tone of voice. At least his show has political views I can stomach to listen too.

          2. Blankenship   14 years ago

            I've been very disappointed by Stossel's articles. I come to Reason for creative and fresh discussions; Stossel's "libertarianism 101" is just boring and banal. Maybe they thought a celebrity would increase their readership?

        2. Joe M   14 years ago

          Could be. Perhaps it's just so obvious to me that I find the simplification frustrating.

        3. R C Dean   14 years ago

          Can we call this the Standard Stossel Disclaimer?

        4. JMW   14 years ago

          Stossel: Libertarianism for Beginners.

          Reason: Libertarianism for the Criminally Clueless.

          1. Mr. FIFY   14 years ago

            DU is over ------------> thataway, JMW.

            1. JMW   14 years ago

              DU is what?

              1. Mr. FIFY   14 years ago

                DemocraticUnderground, you stupid pigfucker.

                IOW... go home.

    2. Trident   14 years ago

      Stossel always talks like he's trying to educate a 5-year-old about how something works.

      Which in the case of most people is probably justified.

      1. squishua   14 years ago

        He has a psychology degree. It shows.

  6. Neu Mejican   14 years ago

    The doubling of spending under Bush and Obama hasn't gotten enough attention.

    ???? How much more attention could it have gotten????? I guess TMZ didn't do any stories on it (I am only guessing here, of course).

    1. skr   14 years ago

      its the doubling part to which he is referring, i believe.

  7. Moog   14 years ago

    Tony??

    Goddammit get in here.

    They're starting all over again.

    1. coma44   14 years ago

      He had to take the trash out before mom got mad.

      1. jacob   14 years ago

        Still asleep in the basement, in his spider man PJ's. Bong in one hand, I am not 'sayin' whats in the other.

        Mom is upstairs screaming

        1. Rob   14 years ago

          "...I am not 'sayin' whats in the other."

          I'll say it: KARL MARX NUTSACK!

          1. Tony   14 years ago

            Karl Marx is he the one with the horn?

  8. Anonymous Coward   14 years ago

    Seriously?
    This article deserves to be deleted from the internet immediately.

    1. Trident   14 years ago

      Obama has not yet proposed an internet tribunal.

      That's scheduled for his second term.

      1. tom beebe   14 years ago

        Internet Czar is on the way.

    2. Neu Mejican   14 years ago

      This article author deserves to be deleted from the internet immediately.

      FIFY?

      1. Drax the Destroyer   14 years ago

        We're talking about Krugabe right?

  9. A Serious Man   14 years ago

    Well, now that we have a firm grasp of the obvious.

  10. sddsf   14 years ago

    welcome to our website:

    ------- http://www.ifancyshop.com --------

    if you like to order anything you like.

    More details,

    please just browse our website Quality is our Dignity;

    Service is our Lift.

    enjoy yourself.

    thank you!!

    ------- http://www.ifancyshop.com -----

  11. dfgfd   14 years ago

    welcome to our website:

    ------- h t t p :/ / w w w . i f a n c y s h o p . c o m --------

    if you like to order anything you like.

    More details,

    please just browse our website Quality is our Dignity;

    Service is our Lift.

    enjoy yourself.

    thank you!!

    h t t p : / / w w w . i f a n c y s h o p . c o m -----

  12. NoTalentAssclown   14 years ago

    Maybe instead of complaining about how this information is obvious and written for a 5th grader... why not share it with the simpletons who have the reading capabilities of 5th graders?

    Stossel has experience in addressing the masses, and he speaks and writes at that level. The commenters and regulars at Reason.ccom are not his target audience...

    1. Arcaster   14 years ago

      Exactly.

  13. Drake   14 years ago

    You have to remember that liberals always say the opposite:

    "Obama predicted disaster if the debt ceiling wasn't raised."

    The Dow is down 650 so far this week...

    1. Paul   14 years ago

      It's because the stimulus was too small. Paul Krugman told me on NPR.

      1. k2000k   14 years ago

        We also should remember that the dow doesn't mean shit about how the economy is actually doing.

        1. Easy Peasy   14 years ago

          It will if it gets low enough.

        2. Drake   14 years ago

          Unemployment, inflation, housing... None are getting better.

        3. Paul   14 years ago

          We also should remember that the dow doesn't mean shit about how the economy is actually doing.

          We do, which is why we ignore Shrike screaming about how great Obama is because the S&P is up over 90%

  14. rac   14 years ago

    there are at least three categories of readers on this subject. 1. those who know it already; 2. those who know it, but don't care (or actually like the current state of afairs [e.g. Tony, China, etc.]; and 3. those who don't know it. I presume he's writing for the third category. But do they read Reason? I doubt it.

  15. k2000k   14 years ago

    They don't but maybe he thinks another online publication will link to his article.

  16. Masturbatin' Pete   14 years ago

    I indexed Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security to inflation, raised the retirement age, and took away benefits for rich people.

    Okay, a question about means-testing: how do we solve the grasshopper/ants moral hazard problem? In other words, how do you get people to save for retirement if their savings reduce the amount of Social Security to which they will be entitled?

    1. Easy Peasy   14 years ago

      Simple. No body is allowed to save for retirement and everyone is taxed at 75 percent, but no one is allowed to charge anyone over 75 for anything they purchase.

      1. Drake   14 years ago

        75 what?

        1. Easy Peasy   14 years ago

          75 years old.

        2. ?   14 years ago

          ...years old, I'm guessing.

          1. ?   14 years ago

            Hey, I was right.

      2. skr   14 years ago

        does all the stuff the old farts freely acquired (excluding consumables) after 75 get returned to the stores or whatnot after their deaths?

        1. ?   14 years ago

          To the government, probably.

          1. NeonCat   14 years ago

            Department of Estate Sales

        2. db   14 years ago

          Yeah but the family has to pay to have the old-person smell washed out first.

  17. Esteban   14 years ago

    Good article from Stossel but it's just not going to happen until the system crashes. If there's no emergency no one will pay attention. Unfortunately the pain from the crash will hurt a lot. Hopefully the feds pull their heads out of their asses soon, but if America reelects the same jokers then we'll have over 5 more years of entrenched spending. It's a house of cards now folks. Good luck.

    1. jacob   14 years ago

      The dow is down 400 - this this the first step to the great 'thump'?

      1. ?   14 years ago

        Fortunately they raised the debt limit so this won't happen.

  18. terry   14 years ago

    Basically, the government's behavior won't stop until people simply quit paying taxes. I'm not sure what other remedy there is.

    1. roystgnr   14 years ago

      People already won't pay enough taxes to fund the government's behavior. That's why they had to sell tens of trillions of dollars in bonds. Now people won't even lend them that much money, so they have to sell bonds to the federal reserve.

  19. jacob   14 years ago

    THEM: USA Credit. This is Peggy. How may I help you?
    ME: I've maxed out my credit card, and would like you to increase my limit.
    THEM: Why?
    ME: Well, I've maxed out ALL of my credit cards, I'm only earning $60k per year, but I'm spending $100k per year.
    THEM:
    ME: It's for a good cause, really!
    THEM: What cause would that be?
    ME: Well, I promised my mom that I would pay for all her medical bills, and for her food and housing, too.
    THEM: She can't live with you?
    ME: But then she wouldn't be independent.
    THEM:
    ME: And I promised my good-for-nothing cousin that I would pay for all HIS medical bills, food, and housing.
    THEM: He can't work?
    ME: Well, he CAN, but doesn't want to take a job that is beneath him.
    THEM:
    ME: And if you don't raise my credit limit, I won't be able to do that AND pay you what I already owe you.
    THEM:
    ME: I'll default on all those obligations to my mom and my cousin.
    THEM:
    ME: Hello?
    THEM:
    ME: Are you there? Hello?
    THEM: ...

    The Dow is DOWN 400+. Obviously the stimulus was not large enough, right Toni?

    1. MrGuy   14 years ago

      You've earned three fantastics.

    2. Except   14 years ago

      Except the credit card company is entirely fine with paying. It's the account holders who couldn't decide whether to keep paying the bills or not.

      Republicans should have forced what they wanted when they were writing the budget, not when it came time to pay the piper. This is all just political theater.

    3. db   14 years ago

      This is excellent.

    4. H man   14 years ago

      Would have added paying the bodyguard for the neighbor down the street but other than that nit pick, excellent.

  20. serb   14 years ago

    Bla bla bla bla...... Like in nature, shitroller bug keeps rolling bigger and bigger shit. He stands up finally, when the shit (his food) is 3 times bigger then him, and proudly...... bla bla bla bla This is the economic-politics bases. There is nothing to be done, shitroller bug dropped in hole

  21. Rotm   14 years ago

    The plunge team must have had marching orders to take the day off. I doubt the investors actually get it about this phony deal being a fix.

  22. ranting ranter   14 years ago

    Do people really rip their bandaids off like that? I keep hearing this cliche.

    seriously I remove them very slowly and carefully. Not making an argument about the budget here.

  23. Thomas   14 years ago

    This article says it all perfectly.

  24. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    What can America do in traffic to thin the herd?

  25. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Our fever is about to crash.

  26. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    The government needed a ride to the airport.

  27. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Kazman! Didn't they do a squiggly lined cartoon of this guy?

  28. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Using less gas isn't good for Big Oil.

  29. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    I can increase the MPG on cars right now. Replace your catalytic converters with straight pipes.

    1. Justin   14 years ago

      Also get these spark plugs, which on the plus side will reduce the emissions enough so you probably could take off the catalytic converters.
      http://tiny.tw/8oI

  30. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Dead kids gets applause.

  31. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    CAFE rules should force people to stay home.

  32. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    It's always a "tragic moment" for the Chevy.

  33. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Deans is getting kickbacks for every Chevy Malibu sold.

  34. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Detroit: City on the grow!

  35. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Szoka, writer of what? Txts?

  36. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Plus, texting people will start driving their cars underground.

  37. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Wait, you mean I can speak my text into the phone, and be able to hear the text coming to me? In my day, we called that a phone call.

  38. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    MOST OF THESE PEOPLE WERE AT A STOP.

  39. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Speeders in the audience slow to clap.

  40. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Szoka wants to censor Chuck Shumer's right to complain about things you're doing.

  41. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    BALKO!

  42. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Balko suggests instead of blowing over the limit you should blow the cop.

  43. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    "Beefy cop."

  44. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    I never laughed at the guy stumbling drunk out of the bar. I rolled him.

  45. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Stossel and his pliable in studio fans.

  46. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    "Just place it in your mouth for instant results!"

    Things the ladies love to hear.

  47. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Adrian Moore of the Reason Foundation? Why haven't we gotten any Morning Links from Moore yet?

  48. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Yeah, like I want to drive underground (see my earlier comment!) through tunnels built by Communist China-men.

  49. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    "Get to work on time."

    Every Reason contributor should be required to work a BTO line in their Fox appearances.

  50. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    It doesn't look like the Myashi pillow can double as a marital aid.

  51. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Illogical morons get the government they deserve.

  52. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Speed limits were for insurance companies. They wanted higher premiums.

  53. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Don't give the mic to the punk. Give him a haircut.

  54. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    I hated my Chevy Blazer ZR2.

  55. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    I'm hitting the sack. Some of us have to get to work by nine.

    1. serb   14 years ago

      Damne, You replied so much that looked like U`r on work allready.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

        Team Stossel Liveblog, baby. Get onboard the bullet train to Awesomeville.

  56. serb   14 years ago

    1st of all You all guys have to get serious. U`r gonna get us all around the globe down nowhere. All national treasuries are filled with US bonds (Ours has about 4 billion, and we are seize like Main), and simply DOW is crashing down now. We (outside USA) got the picture clearly - Your Budget is with spending and this Rep-Demo debate one chat in a lounge of the Nut Dome. You simply do not have any earnings no more. Solution with War Weappons Economic is at the end. Now, earnings in totall are just Microsoft and on the ground of Microsoft achievement - Porn on-line industry, some mobile GSM spending industry and Food. You simply, used to have a very nice FEDERAL Country, but You gave a shit to think smart about the future, and gave it all for fraud Bank loans and credits. Tea Party farts have bought U all for small money and once again they are gonna do it.

    1. Justin   14 years ago

      " You simply do not have any earnings no more."

      What is amazing is that this seems to be a general perception, yet even last year, U.S. revenue was higher than any year before the Bush tax cuts were implemented.

    2. ranting ranter   14 years ago

      no the aging baby boomers that are destroying the US budget and soon enough the currency are not the reason for the problems in europe. Europe has their own entitlement-dependent aging populations they made promises they can't keep to.

      Though it's true the same bad socialist ideas are responsible.

  57. Justin   14 years ago

    An argument that we needs to be promoted is how RACIST the current social security tax scheme is.

    For those born in 1970, black men on average die before they can even claim any retirement benefits (60.0 years), while white females live to 75.6 years.

    http://www.census.gov/compendi.....1s0102.pdf

  58. James Anderson Merritt   14 years ago

    Didn't I read that the reason the debt ceiling had to be raised RIGHT NOW was because the government had already taken out the sovereign State's equivalent of payday loans, which were somehow classed as "not borrowing" through accounting tricks, and had to repay them immediately? I'm sure I read something to that effect, recently.

  59. mr.vb   14 years ago

    thank u

    thank u

  60. mr.vb   14 years ago

    thank u
    thank u
    thank u

  61. ??? ???? ???   14 years ago

    much delivers

  62. ??? ???? ???   14 years ago

    much delivers

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Road Hard

Charles Oliver | 6.4.2025 4:00 AM

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!