Will Jerry Brown Allow Californians to Taste Beer?
File this under: Good news that it's happening. Bad news that it's stuff like this wot counts as a victory for freedom in 2011.
California's state senate has voted unanimously to reclassify breweries under the same regulatory apparatus that now applies to wineries with tasting rooms. This would allow brewers to open foodless tasting rooms and avoid restaurant-level regulation. Golden State Liberty hips us to this coverage by Michael Gardner in the San Diego Union-Tribune:
Current law bars breweries from opening a tasting room unless the facility meets all of the more-stringent health and safety codes that govern restaurants and food production facilities. Those include cleaning equipment, certain types of flooring, sinks, paint, plumbing and other measures.
If signed into law, the measure would change that so that craft beer makers are exempt as long as food is not served. That also will put breweries on an even keel with wineries, which have enjoyed an exemption from restaurant-style rules since 1985.
The legislation is awaiting the signature of Gov. Jerry Brown, who as Gardner reminds us "prefers pinot grigio over pale ale." I may read the bill and update later. My main curiosity is how this works with county and city health bureaucracies, which seem to do the real regulatin' in these matters. In any event, cheers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why do you dislike Obama? Because you're racist.
My new congresswoman, hooray!
I just got redistricted into her district. I'm considering moving; I don't know if I can handle the shame.
Is that why they didn't like ME?
I just saw this. Good lord. These folks are officially beyond parody.
Ah, no: this was when they officially went beyond parody.
Another progressive victory against dairy products!
Good thing CA is protecting its citizens from the dairy menace. The regulatory catch-22 is a nice, if unsurprising, bonus.
"I hope someone will say that what it appears to be is not in fact accurate," said Lee.
Please allow me. I hereby say, and you may quote me, "What it appears to be is not in fact accurate."
Sorry, no link, but I was annoyed to see in the paper today that Michael Gerson named about 4-5 people who had refused to sign the FAMiLY pledge and did not mention Paul or Johnson. What a douche!
Uh...
The sixth hurricane this year is going to be named "Friedchickeniesha"...what more does she want?
Why do you hate Tim's post so much that you threadjack it with the first comment?
Because FUCK Tim, that's why.
Or, alternatively, why do you have beer so much that you threadjack a beer-related post with the first comment?
We already knew you were a rapis...oh, that says racist. Honest mistake.
STEVE SMITH NOT RACIST, WILL RAPE ANY COLOR.
Frankly, I'm just stunned that the Legislature actually voted to lighten regulations on something.
As far as your concern about the local authorities, it's a fair point, but I'm not worried much. It seems to work smoothly in wine country (personal experience talking). Insofar as many of the counties in question would be dirt-poor without the tourism, the local authorities tend to welcome them.
Like the picture of Anchor. It has a tasting room, but I think it got around the regs because it wasn't open to the general public, but a part of the brewery tour.
The bill's amendment appears to be a pretty straightforward copy/paste/replace of the wine tasting section, so the bill itself doesn't tell you how it interacts with local laws. Presumably exactly the same way that wine tasting ones do.
Except that you can also serve pretzels (as well as crackers) at a beer-tasting place, while wine-tasting places are restricted to crackers. OMG BIAS!
I'm glad to know that I'm paying the salaries of people who are writing laws regarding exactly which palate-cleansers you can serve in your alcohol-tasting rooms. Jesus.
my palate cleanser is a ribeye steak. or maybe a porterhouse
It makes the bootlicking a little more palatable I guess?
If I'm going to drink at a brewery I'll need a train to take me there and back and this legislation doesn't deal with that. DOES IT Californian politicians!?!?!
This was my idea for where to start the high speed rail project.
Do not anger Google
"It is necessary to distinguish the Google search engine from the Google news service," the article said. "The news editors do not oppose having their content referenced by the Google search engine, they refuse on the other hand for their informational content to be included in Google News,"
Apparently they want to micromanage how Google works. They should start their own search company.
What a bunch of morons, Google linking to their website is a mutually beneficial relationship and Google doesn't need them.
Seriously. They fucking sue Google for not paying them for linking to their stories, then get pissed off when Google blocks them? How does Google not pay and not block them? Goddamn mayonnaise-on-french-fry-eatin' assholes.
Try to focus, threadjacker.
Hey look, it's some passive aggression from a passive-aggressive little nothing. How about you go fuck yourself?
The Internet. Serious Business.
In other news, all the kiddies in CA schools need to be taught 'gay history.'
One tiny step forward, two giant leaps back. Its a loss for gays too, given that they won't learn anything about gay history anymore than they don't learn about rest of history. But at least they'll taste beer at a brewery when they 'graduate' and turn 21.
The upside is that they might emphasize Turing's work and Greek philosophy.
Oh, who am I kidding, it's going to be full of pseudo-scientific bullshit and revisionist history.
If history is any guide, er uh something.
Opinions on Taurus Judge for home defense?
.410/.45
Thanks
Pure silliness. Get a shotgun, get a revolver, don't get a shotgun that is a revolver.
I dunno, it's pretty cool just for the reason that it's a revolver that fires shotgun shells.
I mean, get one as a toy because it's awesome, but get something more useful for shooting burglars.
I did actually shoot one the other day and enjoyed it. Smooth and powerful like Sugarfree. Less cumbersome than a long barrel.
Smooth and powerful like Sugarfree
If you say so. Was is the Astroglide?
You shot a burglar the other day? Cool!
Perhaps a sword?
(unintentional comedy ensues)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hfLZozBVpM
That's not a sword... THIS is a sword.
The .410 fits in the .45 Colt cylinder because the shotshell walls are so wide. But it's still designed to be shot out of a barrel that's .410" in diameter. So there is a .02" gap between the wad and the walls of the barrel. Besides ruining any pattern, which admittedly doesn't matter much when you're shooting burglars, there has to be a lot of gas escaping through that gap, so you lose muzzle velocity. Which also doesn't matter. Still, it seems decidedly suboptimal.
This kind of thinking is what I am looking for here and to be honest why I brought it up with the only 18 libertarians in the world. I've never owned a gun myself so I'm sure there are plenty of things I would not think of when deciding what to get. But many of you have been down this road. before.
There is also this hilarious version.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/.....ge-magnum/
Be sure and browse the comments.
Yeah, don't get a Judge as a first gun. Don't get anything in .454 either. That caliber hurts to shoot.
If you like revolvers, get something like this as a first gun instead.
That looks like it means business.
An issue I had with the Judge was the grip. My pinky curled at the end of the grip due to my massive hands. Hands that I regularly use to strangle the weak and oppressed.
Also I was leaning towards the 3 inch cylinder version rather than the shorter (2.5?) one that initially came out. The difference seemed to be that you could get more punch into the shell.
The Judge is a gimmick. You're better off getting one of Taurus' super light .38+P revolvers for about $325. I'm a Kel-Tec fan, because they're so light for carrying (but they are not fun to shoot).
Go to a range where you can rent handguns and shoot a bunch. But something like the Judge is goofy, and don't forget that .45 Long Colt isn't cheap. If you want to shoot what you buy at the range for fun a lot, get a .38 or a 9mm.
I hadn't thought about being able to rent guns at a range.
It's a gimmick, but that doesn't mean I shouldn't get one. Gimmick guns are awesome, too.
He mentioned home defense, so I think the super-light pistols are a bad idea. Honestly, I'd just get a Mossberg 500 or equivalent.
My advice is to buy many guns, but, well, that's what I do so I'm biased. If you buy a semi-auto shotgun you can use it for home defense and to shoot skeet and trap (make sure it has variable chokes). If you buy a handgun, get something that is also fun at the range.
Or be like me and buy lots of guns that fit all situations: home defense, target shooting, skeet and trap, concealed carry, what have you.
Also, get a C&R license and fill your house with surplus firearms. If you do it right, you can build furniture out of stacked ammo cans.
a.k.a. female repellent.
This is why we have 1% of the vote.
What the hell is a C&R license? Is that some stupid Ohio thing, you derivative buttmuncher?
Curio & Relic.
Basically war trophies from World War Dos.
You half-educated buffoon. You're probably a Pixies fan, aren't you?
You're probably a Pixies fan, aren't you?
You're really going below the belt now, aren't you, you blithering fartknocker schmuck?
I have no interest in C&R weapons, other than my SKS. I am a handgun and shotgun guy, really.
When my toting license cleared I really wanted to get a C&R just so I could buy (and trade and sell)old guns out of state and mail order.I've held off because I don't need the extra steady cash outflow.I'll never get a nice Greek military Mannlicher-Schoenauer rifle w/o one though.
The Mossberg looks good. And more towards what I originally had in mind. A scatter gun that I could put bird shot in for the first round or two then the business rounds since the burglar will likely be interrupting business time with the wife. I'm in a apartment so I don't want to kill my neighbors kid.
I had mentioned my desire for a shotgun to my father in law who is a collector and avid user of guns. He happened across the Judge and got a deal on it.
Also what is a C&R license?
I see the C&R post now. Thanks.
Pump shotguns suck balls for sport shooting. You want an auto or a side by side or over-under. They can still be used for home defense, but also work for sport. I have a pump (Winchester 1300) in my closet for home defense, and a side-by-side and a Weatherby semi-auto for skeet and trap. And when we sell our startup for a zillion dollars, I will buy a Citori.
be interrupting business time with the wife.
Lol, is that what you call doing the dishes?
When you grow up you will see why they call them business socks.
Anything that will get adequate penetration to kill, stop the bad guy, will also march right through apartment walls. If it won't go through walls, it won't penetrate deep enough on the intruder. Unfortunately.
Are you planning on getting a CHL for the handgun? If not, get something you'll enjoy shooting at the range too. The S&W 686 looks great for that.
Make a mental note: next time I tell epi to get my coffee say Get my fucking coffee please
http://www.theagitator.com/201...../#comments
Yep, the government of Rankin county can no longer be tolerated. Start handing out the weapons to the citizens and spill some blood.
#16 Dig for Fire
Not a terrible song, but I prefer Pixies being Pixies over Pixies being Talking Heads.
Well I promised to post 100 songs, so I'm going to have to reach into the covers obviously.
Or you could just give up and stop that crap.
the pathetic thing is that without knowing a damn thing about this issue, i can guarantee you the biggest opposition to this law, and the little bit of freedom it would provide, is coming from the wineries.... they don't want the comeptition. As always in anticapitalist america, the favorite way of avoiding competition and denying free markets is buying legislation that outlaws, or otherwise greatly hinders, one's competition. The breweries should fight back and accuse the wineries of being filthy, unclean, roach-infested pits of slime that are exempt from all health inspector visits. Doesn't matter if it's true... slander is the only way to fight anticompetitive antitrust violations.
The good news is that, after rolling over and playing dead about the wars, the dispensary raids, the indefinite detentions, the drone attacks, and all that, there is still an issue liberals will withdraw support for Obama over.
The bad news? Read for yourself.
The irony is that reform (or CUTS of some sort) is the only way to continue the entitlement programs. Means testing and all the such.
You would think that progressives would support reforming the system to give to those that need it the most...
Dude, you missed the best part:
I don't think that these people quite understand how to threaten politicians. There is a way to do it, and it is through votes.
These must be the dildos who paid Obama $5,000 each to sing to him. I'm going to love calling the Obama supporters "war mongers" and watch them flail.
Also, looking at the comments: JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!!! You do not "pay in" to Social Security or Medicare. You directly transfer your current dollars to current beneficiaries. Furthermore, the US Supreme Court has ruled that the government has no contractual obligation with regard to those programs.
WHY THE FUCK IS THIS SO GODDAMN HARD TO UNDERSTAND?
Fuck Sheila.
OK wow that makes a LOT of sense dude.
http://www.complete-privacy.us.tc