ObamaCare Continues to Make Consultants Richer
Here's what the public thinks of ObamaCare (via Pollster.com):
See that blue line? It's not going up. No, despite promise after promise that public opinion is just about to turn on the president's health care overhaul, the opposite appears to be true. Individual polls obviously vary, but the overall trend since last fall is clear: Fewer and fewer people favor the law, while outright opposition continues to hold steady.
The law's backers have long argued that the law would become popular just as soon as the public started to see its benefits. But more than a year after its passage, they're still struggling to convincingly explain just what those benefits are.
There is, however, one class of people to whom they probably don't have to explain anything. It's one of the few classes that's already doing quite well off of the law's existence: health policy consultants and lawyers—especially those advising state governments on how exactly to implement the law. Via Sarah Kliff at Politico:
More than $300 million in exchange grants has already flowed into the states since the Affordable Care Act passed. That number will grow exponentially in the coming months, as states move from the initial steps of passing exchange legislation to the more lucrative task of setting them up.
For health consultants and information technology vendors, it's already shaping up to be a gold mine.
State health exchange planning documents obtained by POLITICO read like a who's who of top health consulting firms, with contracts awarded to health vendors large and small. Between Indiana and Washington state — two of the three states that have received grants to establish exchanges so far — Deloitte Consulting, Mathematica Policy Research, Wakely Consulting Group and Milliman all have received exchange-related federal dollars.
Thanks to the law's regulations, in other words, outside advisers are raking in public cash and contracts. Democrats passed it. Now consultants are swooping in to find out what's in it—and on the taxpayer dime.
Nor are the exchanges the only part of the law that's turned out to be lucrative for the consultant class. In April, The Washington Post reported that ObamaCare's new rules for accountable care organization were proving to be a boon for "lawyers, lobbyists, and consultants," with some outfits charging health providers $25,000 for day-long consulting sessions and as much as a million dollars for full-fledged strategic implementation.
Given that state governments and health care providers—the professionals who ought to be most knowledgable about the law—are spending big bucks on outside experts who claim to be able to explain how the law works, maybe it isn't a surprise that ObamaCare's supporters still haven't figured out how to sell the law's benefits to the public. Meanwhile, the nation's consultant class seems to have done a rather good job figuring out how to sell explanations of the law's complexities to the state-level bureaucrats and health care administrators stuck implementing the law's bevy of new rules and regulations.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's one of the few classes that's already doing quite well off of the law's existence: health policy consultants and lawyers.
Woot! Represent!
Expect a court date, RC. You just slandered our highly-dignified profession.
Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Otherwise, lawyers would be even richer.
He did slander and as such RC is guilty, and owes the liberal lawyer recompense for his reputation in the sum of $1.
My client feels that liberal lawyer's reputation has been overvalued...
Feature, not a bug.
That's exactly right. Insanely complex legislation with internal inconsistencies absolutely benefits certain classes of people.
PPACA, aka the keep Health Actuaries Full Employment Act of 2010
Dollars to donuts that Obambi uses this as an example of his successful job creation efforts during the campaign.
They will need to up the budget to provide consultants to explain it to the public. Perhaps in some sort of camp, where they can concentrate on studying the benefits of the law, and be allowed to leave only after they give the correct answer to the poll question.
Meanwhile, the nation's consultant class seems to have done a rather good job figuring out how to sell explanations of the law's complexities to the state-level bureaucrats and health care administrators stuck implementing the law's bevy of new rules and regulations.
Well, sure. They can pretty much say anything they want, and nobody is sure enough of the details to question them closely on it.
"ObamaCare's supporters still haven't figured out how to sell the law's benefits to the public."
Maybe that's because there aren't any. Or at least no one's yet found any in that stinking pile.
The vendors of the shit sandwich are in the same position.
If we take in our hand any legislation; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion and surely only benefits consultants, lawyers, and/or accountants.
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the legal code to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of legislation, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The legal professions, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated law will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the deadly light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.
Consultants have guessed at the awesome grandeur of the legal cycle wherein our polity and the human race form transient incidents. They have hinted at strange codices in terms which would freeze the blood if not masked by a bland optimism. But it is not from them that there came the single glimpse of forbidden aeons which chills me when I think of it and maddens me when I dream of it. That glimpse, like all dread glimpses of truth, flashed out from an accidental piecing together of separated things?in this case an old newspaper item and the notes of a dead accountant. I hope that no one else will accomplish this piecing out; certainly, if I live, I shall never knowingly supply a link in so hideous a chain. I think that the accountant, too, intended to keep silent regarding the part he knew, and that he would have destroyed his notes had not sudden death seized him.
Hume and Lovecraft, together again!
consultants are swooping in to find out what's in it?and on the taxpayer dime.
the private sector is probably spending even more having to do the same. a giant cash burn.
Consultants are part of the private sector.
You might have missed this part:
Meanwhile, the nation's consultant class seems to have done a rather good job figuring out how to sell explanations of the law's complexities to the state-level bureaucrats and health care administrators stuck implementing the law's bevy of new rules and regulations.
Who is ultimately paying their salaries? The taxpayer.
Kind of like tax law. I fully expect titles to crop up like CPHA (Certified Public Health Advisor)
Broken Windows Incorporated
Sweet blogname.
So what stocks can I invest in to take advantage of the boom?
And all this money will have gone to waste if the Kochtopean teabaggers succeed in convincing the activist Roberts court to ahistorically overturn affordable health care.
You guys are real friends of the taxpayer. Not.
I'm convinced Hobie is a clever joke. I can't be the only one.
What do you mean by "clever"?
overturn affordable health care
The price of health care has gone up since Obamacare was passed.
In fact it has gone up faster then the rate it was rising before it was passed.
In other words it did not lower the cost of health care, it did not keep the cost steady it did not keep the rate of rise lower then what it was before, it did not keep the rate of rise steady....it in fact accelerated the rise of healthcare costs.
How the fuck is that in anyway, shape or form affordable healthcare?
The other day John Stewart was making fun of Cain for saying he would not sign a bill longer than 3 pages. The media is focusing on the joke that black people can't read or something like that, but Stewart would have made the same joke even if Cain were White. The real issue that has got lost in the media haze is that long bills are complex, raise compliance costs, and make lawyers rich.
Also, the prosecutors don't have to prove that his motives were 100% political. Only that they were in part political. Again, that won't be hard to do.
I refuse to believe that he could have gotten anyone to spend almost a million dollars to cover up his affair for him if they weren't supporting his campaign.
Dammit. Belongs in the Edwards thread.
why the sum of $1 😉
That's what a lawyer's reputation is worth? Just a step above a politician's reputational value until he does the inevitable and enters politics, whereupon is zeros out.
WTF, all the movies you guys claim to watch -I am perpetually crestfallen
This guy is still doing the Ted Kennedy Shuffle...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srfcx5B8ktI
Edwards just couldn't dance around the law like this guy (doing the Kennedy Shuffle)...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srfcx5B8ktI
See that blue line?
I am more concerned about the red dots...and how after that middle hump are mostly found above the red line.
If the line is some sort of average wouldn't you expect to have an equal number of red dots above it as you would find below it?
Pollster.com doesn't use simple averages. It's what's called a "trend estimate."
http://www.pollster.com/faq/map_faq.php
Ah, sorry -- correct link here: http://www.pollster.com/pollster-faq/#2
Ah, sorry -- correct link here: http://www.pollster.com/pollster-faq/#2
One thing about Reason's internet squirrels is that they are the most cruel to reason employees.
Anyway about the red dots...on 2nd look they do appear to be even....I think when I first looked I neglected to look at the red dots below the blue line.
You think support is dropping now... wait until people actually are affected by it.
I'm disappointed MNG and Tony didn't show up to defend this job creation programme.