Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Richard M Kelly

Donate

Politics

Deliberative Polling Discovery: Taxes Create Great Weather

Tim Cavanaugh | 6.26.2011 2:52 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The other day I reported on the Deliberative Polling initiative that has been going on this weekend in the L.A. County town of Torrance.

Deliberative polling, a hybrid focus group, town hall and expert panel, was developed in the early 1990s by the Stanford communications professor Jim Fishkin.Randomly selected voters are brought together to be polled on their opinions, lectured by experts, interned in breakout sessions, then polled again to see how their opinions change. The goal is to get a sense of how voters would lean if they were, in the opinion of the pollsters, better educated. 

While I think the research structure of deliberative polling is fatally flawed by the presumption that the pollsters know what constitutes adequate knowledge of public affairs, the process itself is potentially interesting.

It would, for example, be interesting to see a random set of voters get browbeaten for two days not by good-government think tanks, politicians and apparatchiks but by a different set of experts whose default presumption is that holders of state power are no less self-interested than any other people.

That is clearly not the case with the Torrance event, where the above-the-line talent includes L.A. City Councilman Paul Krekorian and former Schwarzenegger cabinet member Sunne Wright McPeak, who now heads a non-profit devoted to closing the "digital divide." 

As this sampling of tweets from the white-hot center of the deliberiffic action shows, the participants in the What's Next, California? event have not, as initial reports suggested, risen so far above politics as usual that the city of Torrance is in imminent danger of escaping Earth's gravitational pull.

Tweets in reverse chronological order, just like life: 

Epic Quote: "I'll pay my high California taxes. I call it the 'weather tax.' I just want some accountability."

Fascinating discussion of taxes. 1 thing clear: Prop 13 as it stands is a big obstacle to raising revenue. 

"Ppl caught w joint shd be made to clean up streets, graffiti not in jails"

Actually, random sample was drawn from CA registered voters. Supposedly, it matches CA overall pop. pretty well.

I think a young man in this group has been writing a group manifesto - wonder what that's all about? 

participant: we're all gonna have to pay to get out of this mess. #prop13

What made this wknd great was how we discussed the structures of govt without regard to political opinion. 

Methodology claims to avoid groupthink b/c it doesn't require consensus, but this group is trying to get there anyway…

Some scary misconceptions here & there but yes:"@kathayccc:Amazing how smart #Nextca participant discussion is. I'd let them govern anyday!"

New group debating piecemail approach vs overhauling all of #prop13.

Sen Michael Rubio "We need performance measures to be accountable to our constituents."

Participant: we really need an org chart of CA government Wonderful! Should help.

Hero Manuel Pastor doubles down on Low's argument: economic inequity correlates to economic underperformance 

Prop 13 voters didn't realize…

real esprit de corps developing in some of the groups. Very cool to see -- civic engagement FTW!

This goes way beyond PowerPoint…

@GoldenStLiberty, maybe this convo too complex 4 Twitter (what?!?), but I don't understand your point…

participant thinks that California's college tuition is $0… 

Okay, the wheels really seemed to come off the car during the session. Issues too abstract? Not framed well? Not sure… 

biggest policy winner of #nextca so far: unicameral legislature with more reps.

Nazi comparisons?!? NorCal/SoCal divide?!? This convo is losing ppl, quick

participant pushing back: remember the people who designed this have an agenda, and if we don't like this, we need to tell them.

(Note a surprise appearance by frequent Hit & Run commenter and tireless blogger Golden State Liberty.)

Results of the deliberative poll will be released later this week by the Commonwealth Club. 

Meanwhile, back in California, Joe Vranich estimates that the rate at which businesses are departing the Golden State has increased five-fold in the last two years. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: How Libertarians Pushed Gay Marriage in New York Over the Top

Tim Cavanaugh
PoliticsEconomicsPolicyPollsLos AngelesVotingPropagandaCaliforniaTaxesGovernment Spending
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (94)

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 685 donors, we've reached $478,096 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

Virginia's New Blue Trifecta Puts Right-To-Work on the Line

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 12.6.2025 7:00 AM

Ayn Rand Denounced the FCC's 'Public Interest' Censorship More Than 60 Years Ago

Robby Soave | From the January 2026 issue

Review: Progressive Myths Rebuts the Left's Histrionic Takes

Jack Nicastro | From the January 2025 issue

French Study on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Finds a Drop in Severe COVID—and No Increase in Deaths

Ronald Bailey | 12.5.2025 4:25 PM

Warner Bros. Accepts Netflix's $83 Billion Bid, but Antitrust Threats Still Loom

Jack Nicastro | 12.5.2025 3:36 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks