Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Facebook, Russia, & Reagan

Nick Gillespie | 2.8.2011 9:35 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Ron Hart over at The Daily Caller notes Facebook's recent overseas stock offering:

With the proliferation of cumbersome and often ambiguous American financial regulatory laws, companies like Facebook choose to let people in other countries invest in their growth, not Americans. Such was the case with Facebook's most recent offering where, instead of filing all the complicated paperwork and risking our litigation/regulatory system, it sold $1.5 billion in shares to Russian and other overseas investors, giving them what will probably be a hefty profit. All the layers upon layers of rules and regulations Washington has heaped on an already-fragile financial system have hamstrung our competitiveness and sent jobs and investment money to friendlier shores.

Facebook's recent financing venture is a wakeup call. Russia, run by ex-KGB officers, is viewed as an easier and less intrusive regulatory environment than the U.S. The Russians will make a huge profit on an investment that, just a few years ago, U.S. investors could have reaped. That Russia, a country that once crumbled under the weight of its own immense bureaucracy, is now less regulated and more business-friendly than America speaks volumes

If Ronald Reagan had known that we would head toward socialism and our Cold War adversaries would go from communism to capitalism, he might have altered his famous line: "Mr. Gorbachev, reinforce this wall!"

More here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Keystone KGB and Russia's "Mafia State"

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PolicyEconomicsNanny StateRegulationFacebook
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (37)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Rob McMillin   14 years ago

    Or, the whole of the Facebook IPO is an enormous pump-and-dump stock fraud that even the elementary sort of disclosure the SEC requires would immediately lay bare.

    1. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

      So, you're hoping to short Facebook then?

      Is that right?

      1. Mo   14 years ago

        You can't short a private company. There's no way in hell Goldman would let anyone lend the shares to go short.

        1. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

          If Rob McMillin wants to risk his money on Facebook dropping below the closing price on the first day Facebook does go public?

          I'd like to hear that!

          Unless he's a hedge fund manager, he's obviously missed his calling.

          P.S. I have never and never would buy shares in Google at their multiples--but I sure as hell wouldn't short 'em either.

    2. Mo   14 years ago

      So we're supposed to feel bad that paying 25-50x revenue and 100 P/E without looking at the financials?

    3. Hmm   14 years ago

      90% of IPOs are pump and dump in the short run.

  2. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

    Oh, and somebody might notice too? Where the offerings happen, the jobs are likely to follow...

    There's no rule that says New York has to be the investment banking capital of the world.

    Those are high paying jobs we're talking about losing too! Why would we want those jobs to go somewhere else?!

    So the president can't shake his scary finger at Wall Street anymore?

    London may have already surpassed us as the financial center of the world anyway--and it wouldn't surprise me if Singapore continues to close the gap...

    That was one of the stupidest things the Obama Administration has done yet! Crippling Wall Street with international agreements?! Why in the world would our competition in France, the UK, Switzerland and elsewhere agree to do that?!

    ...could it be because they compete with us?! We may have had worse presidents than Obama since the end of the Cold War, but we haven't had any that were nearly as stupid.

  3. Wemi Zemi   14 years ago

    Wow, Ronald Reagon was just cool like that!

    anon-tools.tk

  4. SIV   14 years ago

    If Ronald Reagan had known that we would head toward socialism and our Cold War adversaries would go from communism to capitalism, he might have altered his famous line: "Mr. Gorbachev, reinforce this wall!"

    Nick, this is dumb even by your standards.

    1. SIV   14 years ago

      My sincerest apologies. This is actually typical Ron Hart.

    2. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

      The point is that we are slouching towards socialism even as what was the communist world continues to embrace capitalism.

      It's a fair point.

      How could we have forgotten so quickly what we used to know so well? Why are we working so hard to emulate the losers of the Cold War, even as the losers are struggling to become what we once were?

      1. Sovereign Immunity   14 years ago

        Hope and Change, baby! Fairness for all!

    3. LesMore   14 years ago

      SIV it is a joke that is thoughtful. They are heading toward capitalism and we are fleeing it.

      Hart is the best at making insightful jokes for the masses to ponder.

      1. SIV   14 years ago

        ^^^^Ron Hart's Sock Puppet^^^^

  5. chroma   14 years ago

    Here's a clue: if Goldman-Sachs thought this stock was worth a damn, they'd buy it all for themselves instead of pushing it on other people.

    1. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

      If Goldman Sachs weren't offering it to their customers, you'd accuse them of being greedy for doing that too!

      For cryin' out loud--do you guys think this is the first hot IPO ever?!

      Mergers, IPO's, that's the kind of thing investment banks do for a living--it's called "capitalism".

      ...and it's a wonderful thing.

      1. chroma   14 years ago

        Save your alternate world clairvoyance for Uri Geller.

        Capitalism is good, but not everything being sold is worth buying.

        1. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

          Maybe I read what you were saying wrong, but it sounded like sour grapes to me!

          We shouldn't give a crap about our opportunities to participate in capitalist enterprises going elsewhere because of our regulators--because investment banks wouldn't sell participation in IPOs if they were worth owning anyway?!

          If I had that wrong, I apologize. ...but that's the way it sounded to me.

      2. Really?   14 years ago

        Ken, Facebook is wildly overvalued - that much should be fairly obvious to someone with common sense and a modicum of business knowledge.

        Take a look at the few ads that they run: junk T-shirts, dating websites, and one or two mainstream companies. No way they're worth 50 billion.

        1. sevo   14 years ago

          "Take a look at the few ads that they run: junk T-shirts, dating websites, and one or two mainstream companies. No way they're worth 50 billion."
          They are to the greater fool.

        2. sevo   14 years ago

          "Take a look at the few ads that they run: junk T-shirts, dating websites, and one or two mainstream companies. No way they're worth 50 billion."
          Or, hey, let's wait for our whacko day-trader shriek to scream his analysis!

        3. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

          "Ken, Facebook is wildly overvalued - that much should be fairly obvious to someone with common sense and a modicum of business knowledge."

          The stock, like any other, is worth what people are willing to pay for it.

          I wouldn't buy their stock and hold it at the valuations I've seen--no way.

          I said the same thing about Starbucks and Google too. When Google went public? Its PE ratio was about 120!

          There isn't anything about Ken Shultz that makes him want to invest in a stock trading at that valuation--but other people bought it and held on to it! And they all have one thing in common...

          They're glad they did.

          The point here is that just like everything from gay marriage to taking drugs, just because it's something I don't necessarily want to do doesn't mean no one else should be allowed to do it...

          And if anybody here is suggesting that I should be okay with Barack Obama's army of asshole regulators circumscribing my opportunities because, oh well, no one should want to make that investment anyway--then they got another thing comin'!

          There isn't anybody here who's anywhere near smart enough to make decisions on my behalf--about what opportunities are in my best interest. You want to make decisions for other people?

          Have kids or get a dog--and leave me out of it!

          1. Really?   14 years ago

            Ken, you are overstating the case here. Everyone agrees with you on freedom. What I disagree with is the notion that Facebook did what they did because of regulation (given that Ron Hart offered no proof) rather than for the reasons provided by Mo, Rob McMillan, and me.

            1. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

              I've been following this since they first started shopping the Facebook deal around. Here's a random snippet, but you can find others elsewhere...

              "Consider the recent Facebook fiasco. Goldman Sachs stated that it wouldn't offer Facebook shares to U.S. customers because "the level of media attention might not be consistent with the proper completion of a U.S. private placement under U.S. law"...

              http://online.wsj.com/article/.....67856.html

              Russian investors are thrilled though, I'm sure.

    2. johnl   14 years ago

      Bingo. But for anyone who thinks private investments overseas are a good deal I could use some help liberating some funds from a bank in Nigeria.

      1. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

        Am I supposed to assume that you think it's a bad idea for Russians to invest in Facebook because Facebook is based in the U.S? Or am I to understand you think it's a bad idea for Americans to invest in Facebook because you think Facebook is based in Russia?

  6. Really?   14 years ago

    Not surprising to anyone, Ron Hart offers absolutely zero evidence that Facebook's private shares sales had anything to do with regulation. As stated above, it could have everything to do with scamming less sophisticated investors into buying overvalued stock.

    There is embarrassing, and then there is linking to this garbage piece approvingly. This is "Humvee/Prius-level" bad.

    1. Ken Shultz   14 years ago

      Can you see the other side of this at all?

      Just out of curiosity, do you have any inkling whatsoever why someone might think being part of the private placement ahead of a Facebook IPO might be a good idea?!

  7. Hmm   14 years ago

    Looks like Jim Rogers might need to amend his "move to China and learn Chinese" comment to include include Russian.

  8. Kenny Rogers?   14 years ago

    SHUT UP DANNY DEVITO

    1. KENNY ROGERS   14 years ago

      I WAS RAISED ON THE DAIRY, BITCH!

  9. C-Dog   14 years ago

    Wow, investors are missing out on the deal of a lifetime...

    The firm would levy a 4% placement fee on clients, plus a .5% "expense reserve" fee. It would also require investors to surrender 5% of any profits, known as "carried interest," according to a Goldman Sachs document.

    Oh, it also contains a backstab clause where Goldman is allowed to short your dumb ass without telling you. The whole thing is a joke.

  10. Amakudari   14 years ago

    Russia, run by ex-KGB officers, is viewed as an easier and less intrusive regulatory environment than the U.S. The Russians will make a huge profit on an investment that, just a few years ago, U.S. investors could have reaped. That Russia, a country that once crumbled under the weight of its own immense bureaucracy, is now less regulated and more business-friendly than America speaks volumes.

    This is so dumb and untrue. Come on, the country murders people who expose corrupt business practices. In Russia, it's not about regulation, it's about ability to support the oligarchy, by at least not making waves. Regardless of the reasons for Facebook's private placement overseas, it's not because Russia is more business-friendly.

    1. Amakudari   14 years ago

      Also, FWIW, I do think the SEC is far too aggressive on private placements, and it's that way because it's defending itself: what could be worse than a successful business deal in which informed investors accept less disclosure and forgo the SEC's stamp of approval? If you raise the cost of being publicly traded, the only way for the SEC to prevent such a scenario is to increase the costs of being privately traded.

      But I really take issue with the idea that a shithole like Russia is, generally speaking, more "business-friendly." This is just one particular area where they play nice. And there's a reason Facebook started in the US: we have the best venture capital funding in the world, bar none.

    2. KarenBeach   14 years ago

      Amakudari, Putin is an ex KGB guy. The country is lousy with them, Hart is dead right and freaking funny as hell.

      1. Amakudari   14 years ago

        What did I post that gave you the impression I thought Russia wasn't a mafia state? Did you just read one sentence or something?

  11. WillieWonk   14 years ago

    Hart writes like P.J. O'Rourke and has a very smart way about his humor. He is in our paper, the Orange County Register, which leans libertarian.

    Let's not eat our young.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!