Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Paul Krugman vs. Paul Ryan Redux

Matt Welch | 8.12.2010 12:46 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Weekly Standard's John McCormack rounds up the dispute to date. Unsurprisingly, the exchange is not covering Krugman in glory.

Peter Suderman wrote about the flim-flammery last week.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: On Health Care, It's Republican Stupidity vs. Democratic Deception

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PolicyEconomicsCultureNanny StateMediaEntitlementsFiscal policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (56)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

    I was at the doctor's office this morning, and I glanced at an issue of The New York Times Magazine. In a full page blow-up of a Kruglahoma! statement, he said something to the effect that there was no evidence that taking extreme measures to deal with global warming would hurt the economy. None!

    1. Episiarch   15 years ago

      He has a Nobel Prize, you Neanderthal. Everything he says about anything is automatically not just quote-worthy, but correct, and if it turns out to be wrong, it was all Bush's fault.

      1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

        I didn't vote for him.

        1. cynical   15 years ago

          You don't vote for Nobel Prize winners.

          1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

            What? How undemocratic can you get?

      2. John   15 years ago

        That is what I am talking about. You can't beat a Krugman fan for question begging and appeals to authority.

    2. Paul Krugman   15 years ago

      Back off, man. I'm a scientist.

      1. Ska   15 years ago

        Dr. Peter Venkman > Paul Krugman, DB

  2. Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman   15 years ago

    It ain't the way I wanted it! I can handle things! I'm smart! Not like everybody says... like dumb... I'm smart and I want respect!

    1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

      Paul, I'd like you to go fishing with Al. No, everything is okay.

      Have fun!

  3. Warty   15 years ago

    What a flimflam post.

    1. Steve Chaos   15 years ago

      Drizzled in flimflam sauce. Hey, I could write for the NYT too!

  4. SugarFree   15 years ago

    "Krugolicious" will soon replace "mendacious" in the dictionary.

    1. Warty   15 years ago

      Did you notice that his beard is so overgroomed that it barely deserves to be called a beard?

      1. SugarFree   15 years ago

        It's not that Krugman has grown a beard, it's that a beard has a Krugman growing out of it.

        1. Ska   15 years ago

          Do they have chemo for that yet?

        2. Ska   15 years ago

          Do they have chemo for that yet?

          1. SugarFree   15 years ago

            It's hard to give a beard IV drugs. They really require a topical antikrug conditioner. They say the Germans are on track to having one on the market in early 2013.

        3. DOS EQUIS   15 years ago

          HIS BEARD HAS EXPERIENCED MORE THAN A LESSER MAN'S ENTIRE BODY

          1. sage   15 years ago

            No need to yell.

      2. cynical   15 years ago

        I would call him a dwarf, but there's no way that's fair to dwarves (who are the libertarians of the fantasy universe anyway).

    2. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

      Krugpfeifengesicht.

      1. Ska   15 years ago

        Backrugmangesicht

  5. P Brooks   15 years ago

    The best part was the tax group Krugman cited put a piece in the Christian Science Monitor which specifically stated, "Ryan's plan is NOT flimflam."

    Earth to Krugabe: STOP DIGGING.

  6. Admiral Ackbar   15 years ago

    Hey, off topic, but from our friends at El Nuevo Times(I don't speak Spanish, sorry:

    Borrowers Refuse to Pay Billions in Home Equity Loans:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08.....tml?ref=us

    Essentially, the more debt you took on, the less likely it is that you will have to pay.

  7. P Brooks   15 years ago

    he said something to the effect that there was no evidence that taking extreme measures to deal with global warming would hurt the economy. None!

    We'll get it all back from the Multiplier.

    1. Warty   15 years ago

      Here's one that's right up your alley, John. Why Arabs Lose Wars

      1. John   15 years ago

        That is interesting. Top down systems never fight wars well. Our army is good because we have great junior officers and NCOs who take initiative.

        1. Warty   15 years ago

          I liked the bit about how too-successful officers are seen as coup risks. It's like the days of the empires never ended.

          1. John   15 years ago

            Also in Saudi Arabia at least there is a lot of tribalism. I went to an army class with some Saudi officers once. One of them was really bright and good. The other three were slugs. But the slugs were part of the right tribe and had the right connections. The good guy had no shot to go any farther than he was.

            1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

              A friend who fought in Gulf War I: ...A New Hope described the Saudi royal family and the ruling class as "vermin", or something along those lines.

              I've seen and heard nothing in 20 years to contradict that.

              1. Warty   15 years ago

                Of course they're scum. There's never yet been royalty that wasn't.

              2. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                That was a great war. These new wars have too many special effects and shitty plots. Plus the scripts are just hooey.

  8. John   15 years ago

    The Krugman defenders are one of my favorite species of liberal troll. They combine all of the smugness of the worst hipster, with a huge dose of economic ignorance and cover it all with a sauce of appeals to authority. Krugman won the Nobel Prize you know. They really are entertaining.

  9. R C Dean   15 years ago

    I thought we had a new nickname for the Krugster, but its slipping my mind.

    1. Greg   15 years ago

      People seemed to like "Paulie Krugnuts"

      1. R C Dean   15 years ago

        That's it.

    2. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

      Krugocrat? Krugunist? Krugisan? Krugshitter?

      1. Hank   15 years ago

        Fredo?

  10. x,y   15 years ago

    Don't listen to the haters Krugman, keep your chins up.

  11. Tman   15 years ago

    Let's not forget that we agreed to call him "Pauly Krugnuts" from now on.

  12. fresnodan   15 years ago

    1st - Krugman is simply dishonorable - his lies are especially pernacious because he tries to hard to craft them.

    THREADJACK!
    http://www.firstamendmentcoali.....stigation/

    I saw this this morning on CNN - but by noon it was gone. Astounding! Government warrants kept secret! This is a US citizen in the US!!!
    What is so disheartening is the attitude of business as usual, like getting a warrant from a judge, defending yourself in open court, etc., etc,.
    Its like we don't even want to have rights anymore.

  13. Old Mexican   15 years ago

    The Weekly Standard's John McCormack rounds up the dispute to date. Unsurprisingly, the exchange is not covering Krugman in glory.

    But he's so loved by the Left. He says all the beautiful things they want to hear, and changes them whenever expediency dictates - just like the the Left likes to hear!

  14. reason questionable.   15 years ago

    they're both fucking retards. simple as. let them buttfuck each other over a bottle of wild turkey while mangu ward fingers herself in the corner.

    who gives a toss about ryan or krugman. who even listens to them.

    reason needs to get off this paul ryan bandwagon. the guy is full of shit. you know it, we all know it.

    1. Spazmo   15 years ago

      As ill-put as that was, questionable has a point. Reason's been talking up some pretty thin gruel lately from Team Red. I know we're desperate for more libertarians in Congress, but jeez.

  15. Steve Chaos   15 years ago

    FLIMFLAM.

    SAUCE.

  16. SugarFree   15 years ago

    For anyone that missed it... Krugman now doesn't allow any comments on his blog longer than his penis.

    1. Ska   15 years ago

      Something tells me my comment won't be posted.

      1. Government of Wolves   15 years ago

        Kind of off-topic, but a great Winston Churchill story -

        Churchill walked into the House of Commons lavatory, where Clement Attlee (the Labour guy who created the NHS and nationalised British industry) was at the urinal. Churchill went to the urinal at the other end of the room.

        Attlee: "Feeling a bit standoffish today, are we, Winston?"

        Churchill: "That's right - Every time you see something big you want to nationalise it."

    2. Warty   15 years ago

      a lot of comment inches on every post are taken up by the same few ranters, who say the same thing every time; it kind of degrades the experience for everyone else.

      Most notably, it degrades Krugman's experience.

      Moose Williams
      Washington, DC
      July 29th, 2010
      11:18 am
      What about the Spam, Hayed, Friedman, and Spam. There's not much Spam in it.

      Get it? Mentioning Milton Friedman is spam LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!

  17. P Brooks   15 years ago

    It's hard to give a beard IV drugs. They really require a topical antikrug conditioner.

    There's only one way to be sure.

    It involves nukes, and space.

  18. Hobo Chang Ba   15 years ago

    You know, though, I've come to believe Krugman is something of a tactical genius. He advocates a stimulus far beyond the realm of political possibility - knowing that the economy is likely going to get worse, thus insulating himself from criticism for the failure of Keynesianism and making Obama look moderate by comparison. In the meantime, he promises the public "no pain, all gain" economics, which is exactly what we want to hear - that the government can protect us from down market cycles. Nobody who understands economics takes him very serious or see him as any more than the pawn "Nobel" economist partisan hack; fortunately for him and unfortunately for us not many people understand economics...

  19. cheap watches   15 years ago

    sharing this articles

  20. scarf   15 years ago

    You don't vote for Nobel Prize winners.

  21. lilly zhang   15 years ago

    http://www.burberryscarveshop.com/
    here are lots of nice quality burberry scarves at a discount price for you.

  22. burberry scarf   15 years ago

    our nice burberry scarves at a good discount are your best choice,great welcome everyone order from us,we will provide you with the best service.

    http://www.burberryscarveshop.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Federal Officials Won't Admit the Real Reason for Ditching the TSA's Shoe Rule

Jacob Sullum | 7.16.2025 12:01 AM

Barack Obama Wants Democrats To Be the YIMBY Party. That's Easier Said Than Done.

Christian Britschgi | 7.15.2025 3:30 PM

Why a Trump-Appointed Judge Is Torching His Own Court's Approach to Qualified Immunity

Billy Binion | 7.15.2025 3:08 PM

D.C. Finally Moves To Implement Ranked Choice Voting After 3–1 Voter Approval

Joe Lancaster | 7.15.2025 2:05 PM

OpenAI and Perplexity's New Browsers Make the Monopoly Claims About Google Look Foolish

Tosin Akintola | 7.15.2025 11:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!